Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Women's prisons and the Gender Recognition Act (2015)

1235710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Ah now again Jack you're just making stuff up here. In contradiction to historical fact. And you know that because you replied to @plodder's post about John Howard, and even brought in Elizabeth Fry. Both those people were clear that women in prison were vulnerable to abuse from male prisoners.

    So unless there's evidence that transidentifying male prisoners are different from other male prisoners in that they are not a threat to women, people who think they should ever be put in with female prisoners are increasing that risk for purely ideological reasons.

    And the argument that "Ah sure rape has always existed so what harm if there's another rape or two" is a terrible argument. I've said this to you before.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭baxterooneydoody


    So why not put women and men in the same prison at that rate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Should some of those violent women potentially be sent to the male estate?

    If not, why is it ever ok to send trans women prisoners? What's the logic there?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,868 ✭✭✭plodder


    For the record, the term "trans-identifying" is considered a transphobic slur.

    Why is that so, when the paragraph below on a current gov.ie page isn't?

    Young people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex or belong to other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTI+), often experience worse health and life outcomes

    I suspect it's very much based on the person saying it …

    Disappointing that such rampant transphobia and use of transphobic slurs is still being tolerated on Boards, considering it is against the charter.

    How very 2018 of you. Being compelled to use certain forms of language and generally what we are allowed and not allowed to say is at the centre of this whole issue.

    https://www.gov.ie/ga/an-roinn-leana%C3%AD-m%C3%ADchumais-agus-comhionannais/preaseisiuinti/minister-ogorman-launches-lgbti-youth-in-ireland-and-across-europe-a-two-phased-landscape-and-research-gap-analysis/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,868 ✭✭✭plodder


    I'll take your clarification that you don't identify as progressive, but the rest of it is whataboutery.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,896 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    We are not undoing anyone's rights. We just want to live our authentic lives. Not our fault we were born with the wrong body parts that do not match how we are.

    Thank you.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,919 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Thats up the the IPS, id imagine it has more nuances then protecting women though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,919 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I don't know what the logic is, perhaps Limerick prison has better segregated areas. I'm aware of a number of prisoners Serving their sentence in Limerick prison, separated from others, for many different reasons.

    Serving and former members of AGS, traditionally served their time in Arbour Hill prison. Did not make them sexual offenders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Did you reply to the wrong post here? That's not an answer to what I asked.

    For clarity: in your opinion (not the IPS's) why do you think it may be appropriate to send some TW to a male prison due to their violent behaviour, but never (I presume) appropriate to send an aggressive lesbian to a male prison due to her violent behaviour?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,565 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The women's prisons are more overcrowded then the males.

    Again there is no trans person being housed in a women's prison.

    The Governor of each prison is ultimately responsible for the inmates, they know what they are doing.

    Far more actual issues to be addressed in the prison system, this bigoted strawmen isn't one of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,896 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    No Trans Women are Women and Trans Men are men. What's so hard about that to understand?

    Also biology is a lot more complicated than you think. I would post it here but you would probably not understand it. Too complicated for your simple mind.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    right so if you don’t entirely agree with everything a trans person says or believes you’re a bigot?

    Intelligent and worthwhile conversation, I’m at the edge of my seat awaiting your next cute attempt at personal attacks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    The women's prisons are more overcrowded then the males.

    Then why were any trans women sent to a female section at all then? There were three at the same time in the women's estate in Limerick Jail, which is the most overcrowded in country.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Does that mean you think that Barbie Kardashian, being a woman in your opinion, should never have been sent to a male prison?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,565 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    No. But if you come out with hateful ignorance like below. You probably are.

    women fought for ions to have the rights they have today & it’s all been undone by a few lads wearing a dress.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,565 ✭✭✭✭Boggles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I was quoting you LOL - spelling mistake and all.

    (I've added the quote box now to make that clear)

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,896 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Not one I ever heard of. I think that maybe its just some Trans Women maybe realising this generation might not be the generation that can have a baby and maybe a little jealous. I see it all as perfectly natural. Trans Women will someday be able to give birth too. though. Maybe not in my lifetime but I hope it is. Not for me though :( .

    I will be too old by then.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    So if you've never heard an trans person wanting this, why did the HSE at one point remove all references to the word "woman" from their cervical cancer information sheet (while not removing the word "man" from the prostate cancer one)?

    Were they doing it off their own bat, out of an excess of zeal? (I think that's quite possible by the way). But can you see how that makes women feel that the trans agenda is about erasing the very concept of women?

    In case anyone thinks this isn't true:

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Ah now again Jack you're just making stuff up here. In contradiction to historical fact. And you know that because you replied to @plodder's post about John Howard, and even brought in Elizabeth Fry. Both those people were clear that women in prison were vulnerable to abuse from male prisoners.

    So unless there's evidence that transidentifying male prisoners are different from other male prisoners in that they are not a threat to women, people who think they should ever be put in with female prisoners are increasing that risk for purely ideological reasons.

    Ah now I'm not making stuff up here. Segregation based on sex has not reduced the opportunities men who are of a mind to do so, have to abuse women. As far as historical facts go, well again that's a question of whose facts are they? Much as I like to indulge in a bit of historical revisionism as the next person, the reason the early prison reformers sought reform was because of the conditions of both men and women who were incarcerated, and what they perceived to be the moral decline of the individual in circumstances where men and women were getting up to no good amongst themselves (they were having sex, basically, cos what else were they going to do when they had nothing to do?). That's the reason they were in favour of the Act, and why in reality, the Act failed miserably in it's aims, because of the lack of inspectors.

    And because of the way our system of justice functions, what with everyone being afforded the right to the presumption of innocence, the onus is on the person making the claim that men are a threat to women, to provide evidence for their claim, before anyone would even contemplate whether male prisoners are a threat to female prisoners. Their assumption, which can only be based upon an ideological position, isn't supported by evidence either, where the greatest threat to female prisoners, are other female prisoners -

    The rate of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization [PDF] is at least 3 times higher for females (13.7%) than males (4.2%). This has been attributed to the fact that a majority of prison officials do not view female-on-female sexual assault as “true rape,” making them less likely to reprimand inmates. Furthermore, as the female prison population has grown at a dramatic rate, states have been unable to keep up. Therefore, female prison facilities tend to be overcrowded and poorly designed, making them difficult to police.

    And the argument that "Ah sure rape has always existed so what harm if there's another rape or two" is a terrible argument. I've said this to you before.

    I'm certain I've never made that argument, so while I'm perfectly willing to take your word for it that you've said it to me before, it's unlikely to have been in response to an argument I did make.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,565 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    It is the definition of hate.

    At least own it.

    You are not fooling anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,919 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I already stated in my post, that perhaps Limerick prison has better and more separated areas?

    I think whatever reason the IPS have is perfectly ok. Like I said serving and former members of AGS traditionally did their time in Arbour Hill.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    can’t even answer the question 🥱

    ignoring you now.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well I'm sorry for accusing you of something you didn't do. In my defence, the argument has been made so many times before on here that I can't possibly remember who all has tried it. Suffice it to say that it's been tried before so it's not new and it's still a terrible argument.

    And if segregation never reduces the risk, then let's get rid of single sex spaces altogether, right? Why make an exception for just one group of males?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭baxterooneydoody


    You'd have been an advocate for baby and mothers homes back in the day I'd say, the machinations of state cannot make mistakes, putting dangerous and threatening men into female prisons is another leaf taken off the tree of equality for women



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    But I wasn't asking you to justify what the IPS did - and especially not to justify it by speculating that they must have had good reasons!

    I was asking whether you think that maybe violent female criminals should sometimes be held in the male estate because of the risk they pose to other women (you gave that example yourself) and if not, why do you think that violent transwomen should sometimes be sent there?

    But it's fine. Your inability to answer the question tells us what you really think about transwomen. I have my answer.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,919 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Would l? My mother was a single pregnant woman with me in the 1970s, so maybe watch what you're saying about other people?

    There are no men in women's prisons



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I've already explained this.

    Saying someone identifies as trans as per the example given, is not the same as saying "trans-identifying male/female".

    The difference is someone who uses the term "trans-identifying male/female" is using it for the purpose of invalidating the transgender person's identity, to show disrespect for how they identify, and their disapproval of their identity.

    It's simply another way to misgender a transgender person. Dressed up in fancy language!

    "Trans-identifying male/female" is a transphobic term used by TERFs and transphobes.

    *edited for error in grammer.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    there’s some really interesting mental gymnastics going on to twist that into a transphobic thing I can’t lie.



Advertisement