Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Women's prisons and the Gender Recognition Act (2015)

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It's not that unusual for people to be confused:

    A third of Britons don’t know that transgender women were born male

    Anyway, there is a trans prisoner in Cloverhill,

    So not just one then, as you said earlier? At least two. Unless the trans prisoner at Cloverhill is a transidentifying female? (I think that's very unlikely, though, don't you?)

    and mens prisons are also overcrowded.

    So you already said, and I already explained that I don't see how that is a justification for making women prisoners' living conditions worse.

    Even if the women's estate in Limerick were not already the most overcrowded in the country, that would still not be a good reason to expect women to be the ones to put up with even worse conditions to preserve conditions in the men's prisons

    In the article I posted in the OP:

    Limerick women’s prison is the smallest prison institution in Ireland, with a bed capacity of just twenty-eight. It is also the country’s most overcrowded, with forty-six prisoners in custody. This means its bed capacity is currently at 164 per cent. 

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,701 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    And it seems to me that that refusal to care about women's wellbeing is typical of Ireland. It's sad that so many women are so socialised into always putting males first that they think it's perfectly ok to use women as support animals for unhappy men. Without even getting the women's consent.

    For a minute there I thought you might be referring to prostitution. But there’s a very simple reason the issue of the welfare of women in prison doesn’t rate all that highly on anyone’s priority list - because they have committed criminal offences. People are understandably given to caring more about the welfare of the perpetrators victims, than any consideration given to the perpetrators of criminal offences.

    That’s not to say that women who commit criminal acts aren’t given any consideration at all, they are, but another reason people simply aren’t interested in having that conversation is because as you quite rightly point out - it’s a really, really uncomfortable one, and it’s not just an Irish thing at all -

    https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/female-sex-offenders-more-common-gender-bias-statistics-rape-abuse-a7839361.html

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/truth-female-sex-offenders/

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/29/young-women-mens-prisons-affairs/

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglen2n8jk7o.amp

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn9jjrjzelvo.amp


    People would simply rather that boat wasn’t rocked, which is a far more reasonable explanation than expecting anyone should have to care about people who are behind bars because they have been convicted of criminal offences. It’s a gender bias in the criminal justice system which operates in women’s favour. Were I a woman who was aware of that fact, I’d be keeping shtum about it too, not out of any notions that I’d been socialised to put males first, or that I imagine it’s ok to use women as support animals for unhappy men (that still sounds like you’re describing prostitution!), but simply as a matter of self-preservation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I disagree strongly that it's only because women in prisons are convicted criminals that society dismisses their well being. Women in psychiatric hospitals, and to a lesser extent ordinary hospitals, have been faced with similar problems - rapes and assaults in psychiatric wards (not only by trans women, BTW, but sexual assault by male "carers" is another, albeit equally important, problem) and being refused care in other hospitals if they ask for female-only carers.

    And anyway, if you were right that the lack of concern was only because they were convicted criminals, then why would anyone want to put transidentifying males in the prisons that they request either? They're criminals too, after all. Unless of course, the wishes of males, even those convicted of crimes, takes priority over those of women.

    QED

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    trans prisoners should be in the prison of their gender. That is their actual one not their preferred.
    If they do not like that the simple solution is do not end up in prison. That is quite simple for I’d say the majority and especially in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,900 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    It must be different there. Here in Ireland it's a lot slower. Believe Me I know.

    As for where the person goes to prision be they a cis man, a trans man,cis Woman or a Trans Woman. Well that's up to the authorities and the law to decide. If you commit a crime you don't get to choose where you go.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,701 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I disagree strongly that it's only because women in prisons are convicted criminals that society dismisses their well being. Women in psychiatric hospitals, and to a lesser extent ordinary hospitals, have been faced with similar problems - rapes and assaults in psychiatric wards (not only by trans women, BTW, but sexual assault by male "carers" is another, albeit equally important, problem) and being refused care in other hospitals if they ask for female-only carers.


    I wouldn’t suggest it was only for that reason either, I’m saying that’s a lot of the reason, in regards to why people generally aren’t interested in the welfare of women in prison. And I’d agree with you too about the examples of the welfare of women in psychiatric facilities and hospitals, but where you suggest ‘not only by trans women’, I’m certain it’s not intentional but I’d be pointing out the fact that the vast, vast majority of perpetrators are men, men who have never claimed to be women, as opposed to the idea that men who claim to be women are doing so to gain access to women when they represent a minuscule percentage of men who commit rape and sexual assault. Being refused care in hospitals because they ask for a female-only carer is often times more a question of resources than it is an outright refusal to provide treatment. It’s not right, but again it would be unusual to suggest that in the majority of cases like that, the treating physician is transgender. More often it’s simply because the treating physician is a man. You absolutely don’t need me to point out gender bias in the medical profession.

    And anyway, if you were right that the lack of concern was only because they were convicted criminals, then why would anyone want to put transidentifying males in the prisons that they request either? They're criminals too, after all. Unless of course, the wishes of males, even those convicted of crimes, takes priority over those of women.

    QED


    I don’t know that the vast majority of people involved in the Irish prison system want to put transgender prisoners anywhere, let alone in prison where they have the unenviable task of having to deal with them, and with other prisoners who object to their presence, which is why they’ve been calling for a policy to deal with the issue for years now, and there still isn’t one. In any case, nobody is put in a prison that they request, prisoners are accommodated in the prison system in accordance with a number of factors which are taken into consideration. Having to accommodate transgender prisoners is a relatively new phenomenon that didn’t have to be dealt with previously, even the rise in the number of women prisoners is a phenomenon that didn’t have to be dealt with previously, and even with the expansion of the women’s prison in Limerick, they’re still having to deal with the issues caused by significant overcrowding due to the lack of funding and piss poor planning -

    The women’s wing of Limerick Prison is currently operating at twice its capacity.

    That’s according to the Irish Prison Service’s latest figures, which show that the women’s wing is housing 91 inmates, despite having a maximum capacity of just 56 beds.

    The women’s wing of Limerick Prison has consistently been the most overcrowded facility in the system.

    When the Prison Visiting Committee first inspected the wing in 2022, they reported that overcrowding —  at the time reaching 157% of capacity —  was an urgent issue.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41583310.html


    Feckall has actually improved in 3 years -

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41008808.html

    It’s not that the wishes of males, even those convicted of crimes takes priority over women, it’s simply that it’s just not as high up on people’s priority lists as it is on some people’s priority lists is all. If it actually was the case that the wishes of males convicted of criminal offences where their victims are women and children were prioritised over women, it’s unlikely they would choose to be in prison where their access to women is a lot more limited and restricted than if they weren’t in prison, and many more of them simply aren’t ever convicted in the first place -

    https://www.nbcnews.com/specials/sex-assault-convictions/

    But that’s a whole other can of worms which… even I ain’t touching with a forty foot barge pole!

    https://archive.ph/px5Fi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,871 ✭✭✭plodder


    For a minute there I thought you might be referring to prostitution. But there’s a very simple reason the issue of the welfare of women in prison doesn’t rate all that highly on anyone’s priority list - because they have committed criminal offences. People are understandably given to caring more about the welfare of the perpetrators victims, than any consideration given to the perpetrators of criminal offences.

    I know I've mentioned this before, but for someone so "progressive", it's surprising to see you write the above, which has a real whiff of pre 1820's about it (or modern day California maybe).

    One of the most interesting recent anniversaries that was (not) commemorated by liberal Ireland was the 200th anniversary of the UK Gaol Act, which established sex segregated prisons throughout the British Empire, the motiviation for which included …

    John Howard FRS, for whom the Howard League for Penal Reform is named, was a key penal reformer of the 18th century. In 1785 he and Jeremiah Fitzpatrick observed the sexual degradation of women and girls in Wicklow Gaol

    I only heard about it through an article in the UK edition of the Times which didn't even mention the link with Ireland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaols_Act_1823

    The current "case by case" policy might have a chance of identifying potentially predatory males who could be a serious danger to women prisoners, but it does not help in the slightest with preventing non-predatory but still entirely inappropriate relationships arising in prison. People who keep hens don't tend to judge foxes on a case by case basis. They just try to keep them all out.

    Google (ex RTE) Paddy O'Gorman's podcast (Paddy's Podcast) and the "Transgender Special" where he interviews women who were in prison and homeless hostels. The first woman he spoke to was an ex prisoner who was "punished" for disrespecting a male prisoner on the same wing of Limerick prison, by calling them "a man".

    Post edited by plodder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I said there was one transwoman in custody in a male prison. The prisoner in Cloverhill is referred to as transgender.

    I don't think there would be too many disagreeing that we need more prison space. Maybe it's time to build a new prison or two. I don't see any issue with dealing with trans prisoners on a case by case basis, in fact, I think it's probably better then a one for all policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Building more prisons sounds like a very Tory solution to the question!

    It may well be necessary anyway but I presume it’s like building more roads to solve traffic jams, ie demand for places will increase accordingly and at best we’ll go from 164% capacity to 130% (or whatever - numbers picked out of the proverbial, but you get my point).

    The idea that we can build our way out of this to the extent that there will be so many spaces that cells can be set aside for transidentifying men without adversely affecting women’s living conditions.

    @plodder’s post explains why male and female prisoners were separated in the first place - should we just get rid of that segregation now and judge men on a case by case basis? Most men are not rapists after all.

    The link in my OP shows that over 51% of transidentifying male prisoners in US federal prisons are inside for sex offences - which is FAR higher than for the male prisoners in general.

    So men identifying as trans (who may or may not be “genuinely” trans) are statistically a far greater risk to female prisoners than the average male criminal. So why would you give them the benefit of the doubt, and not all male prisoners?

    Why do you think that’s “better” than a policy for all male prisoners, regardless of how they identify? Better for whom? Not better for the women anyway!

    Until your utopia comes where we have excess spaces in the women’s estate, putting any TW in a female section is prioritising a few males over the well being of ALL the female prisoners. Why do you think that’s a good idea?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭baxterooneydoody


    They should be put in a place where they get adequate mental health help with their condition, no amount of self proclamation will deny the biological fact they're born male or female, let them behave as they like as free men or women but in a state run facility, ie hospital, prison etc they should be treated according to their assigned gender at birth as having either a penis or vagina.

    The like of Barbie kardashian should be put in a male prison or a mental hospital and let him

    his own canoe. He is a danger to women and should be treated as such.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    The transgender prisoners in Ireland are tested on a case by case basis and are separated from the general population of whichever prison they are in. No risk.

    Of course we need new prisons, there are massive overcrowding issues, and will we fill those spaces? Absolutely. Because they are needed. No increase in prison spaces despite a jump in population over the last 20 years or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭baxterooneydoody


    Again, boards sh1tty website won't let me edit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Right but none of that explains WHY transidentifying males should be put in the female estate in the first place. And based on what “tests” to make sure they’re genuine?

    Because until your utopia comes where we have excess spaces in the women’s estate, (ie never) putting any TW in a female section is prioritising a few males over the wellbeing of ALL the female prisoners. Why do you think that’s a good idea?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I have never stated anything about where they should be placed. I feel the the IPS are the correct people to decide that, which they currently do on a case by case basis.

    ( Oh and the law in this country says nothing about 'tests' so that's irrelevant)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Normally in the top RH corner you should have either three dots or a “settings” type symbol. If you open that you should be able to edit.

    Like this (I clicked on the 3 spots and the middle band Edit/Flag appeared)

    IMG_3846.jpeg

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    LOL I’m asking whether the law is fit for purpose, given what’s coming out in countries where they have a media that does its job at least occasionally.

    So “that’s what the law says” misses the point by a country mile!

    Should the IPS take the same case by case approach to all males? If not, why not? Most of them aren’t rapists either.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    You're asking if which law is fit for purpose, the gender recognition act? It appears to have been working just fine, I don't believe there have been any issues with it.

    Why would they take a case by case basis on male prisoners? Male prisoners go to a male prison, female prisoners go to a female prison. Transgender prisoners (transmen or transwomen) are treated on a case by case basis. Seems to be working fine.

    What does the fact that most men are not rapists have to do with it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭baxterooneydoody


    It stopped working on monlbile a while back, when I go to edit no text box appears



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well except it hasn't been working fine. Our spineless media have mostly been ignoring it, which is a different thing. As @plodder says, former RTE journalist Paddy O'Gorman interviewed several women including former inmates of Limerick women’s prison about what it’s like for female prisoners when males are imprisoned with them. 

    They said that women were "punished" if they "disrespected" trans identified males: Lianne Casey said that when women expressed feelings of unsafety due to the presence of the men, they get locked back up in their cell because "you’re disrespecting them and you’re not treating them as women."  These are women who have often been abused by men, and who may feel very uncomfortable in the enforced presence of men in a space where the women have no freedom to just go somewhere else - and they are risking getting extra time put on their sentence of they say anything. Well no wonder most of them don't complain then.

    She also complained that two or three of the male prisoners, even when locked up, used to be "roaring out the doors, disgusting and vulgar talk," for which they didn't get punished, though the women got punished just for saying that the person was a man.

    If you're actually in the wellbeing of the women, and not just the TIMs, you really should listen to his podcast.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I will listen to it later definitely, but the Trans prisoners are not part of the general prison population, therefore they are not a risk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It's not consistent or reliable: I can usually edit on my phone, but I get other issues like sometimes the formatting won't work, and I have no idea why. Definitely more glitchy on phones than on PCs. (And bad enough there too!)

    Anyway, I did think you probably knew that, but it was worth a try.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


     the Trans prisoners are not part of the general prison population, therefore they are not a risk.

    I don't understand what you mean? Barbie Kardashian was not a risk?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    For the record, the term "trans-identifying" is considered a transphobic slur.

    Disappointing that such rampant transphobia and use of transphobic slurs is still being tolerated on Boards, considering it is against the charter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    You see you're proving the problem. Because you've got it wrong: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/trans-identified_male

    trans-identified male (not comparable)

    1. (derogatoryoffensiveTransgender female.
    2. (uncommonTransgender male

    How could a transidentifying male be a biological female? You either prove my point, or you're deliberately trying to muddy the waters and make it unclear to all but a few activists. And then, going by history, the activists will change the "acceptable" terms and everyone else will be wrongfooted again. It's a tactic.

    Anyway, considered a slur by whom? I consider "cis woman" to be a slur to women. We are not a subcategory of ourselves. So does that mean nobody can use that expression?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I don't engage in discussion with TERFs and transphobes. They're not worth my time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    You obviously don't engage much with dictionaries either:

    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/trans-identified_male

    trans-identified male (not comparable)

    1. (derogatoryoffensiveTransgender female.
    2. (uncommonTransgender male

    You've got it exactly the wrong way around, which was my point in the first place. Because you're determined to rewrite language to ignore reality, which leads you to all sorts of nonsensical places.

    A biological male remains biologically male, even if they wish to live (identify) as a woman. Hence, transidentifying (or transidentified in the US, same thing) male is a trans woman.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,701 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I know I've mentioned this before, but for someone so "progressive", it's surprising to see you write the above, which has a real whiff of pre 1820's about it (or modern day California maybe).

    One of the most interesting recent anniversaries that was (not) commemorated by liberal Ireland was the 200th anniversary of the UK Gaol Act, which established sex segregated prisons throughout the British Empire, the motiviation for which included …

    John Howard FRS, for whom the Howard League for Penal Reform is named, was a key penal reformer of the 18th century. In 1785 he and Jeremiah Fitzpatrick observed the sexual degradation of women and girls in Wicklow Gaol

    I only heard about it through an article in the UK edition of the Times which didn't even mention the link with Ireland.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaols_Act_1823

    I think the only reason it's surprising is because you see me as someone so "progressive". I don't, but that aside, there wouldn't be any reason for 'liberal Ireland' to commemorate what never amounted to much anyway in terms of prison reform because the Act was ineffective in its aims given the failure to employ inspectors of prisoners conditions at the time. Far more influential in terms of prison reform for women was the work of Elizabeth Fry, though it's of no surprise whatsoever that she rarely gets a mention in the history books.

    The current "case by case" policy might have a chance of identifying potentially predatory males who could be a serious danger to women prisoners, but it does not help in the slightest with preventing non-predatory but still entirely inappropriate relationships arising in prison. People who keep hens don't tend to judge foxes on a case by case basis. They just try to keep them all out.

    The current 'case by case' policy doesn't have a hope of identifying potentially predatory males who could be a serious danger to women prisoners, as that's simply not it's purpose, nor is it's purpose to help in preventing non-predatory but still entirely inappropriate relationships arising in prison. If I may use your analogy, it's rather a case of foxes keeping hens who will determine the fate of the hens, and the foxes aren't too bothered about the hen's welfare -

    Males are the perpetrators in 98 percent of staff-on-inmate sexual assault (PDF] of female inmates. Forty-one percent of guards in the average state female correctional center are male, a job that entitles them to perform strip searches and have access to prisoners in their most vulnerable states. Therefore, although women comprise only 7 percent of the state prison population, they comprise 46 percent of sexual abuse victims. Male prison officials not only use force and violence to commit sexual assault against female prisoners but also use their positions to coerce, threaten and intimidate inmates into sexual activity. Thousands of documented accounts exist of prison staff demanding sex in exchange for drugs, favors and access to educational programs. Similarly, prison officials often use threats of going to the parole board with false reports of bad behavior, planting drugs on prisoners or withholding basic necessities such as feminine hygiene products or visitation with children if inmates do not perform sexual acts. While these acts are repugnant, prison officials are not the only perpetrators of sexual assault against female inmates.

    The rate of inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization [PDF] is at least 3 times higher for females (13.7%) than males (4.2%). This has been attributed to the fact that a majority of prison officials do not view female-on-female sexual assault as “true rape,” making them less likely to reprimand inmates. Furthermore, as the female prison population has grown at a dramatic rate, states have been unable to keep up. Therefore, female prison facilities tend to be overcrowded and poorly designed, making them difficult to police.

    In addition to cross-gender supervision and poorly designed facilities, prison sexual assault against females is prevalent because little punishment exists to deter perpetrators. Victims are often blocked from bringing charges against prison staff who were either complacent or the culprits in their attacks by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). The PLRA requires prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies before they are allowed to file suit in federal court to challenge prison abuses. For victims this means that they must report their abuse to the very people committing or facilitating that abuse. Thus, inmates who complained of staff sexual misconduct were punished 46.3 percent of the time.

    The source is from the US, but it's a repeated pattern in many countries, including the UK and Ireland.

    Google (ex RTE) Paddy O'Gorman's podcast (Paddy's Podcast) and the "Transgender Special" where he interviews women who were in prison and homeless hostels. The first woman he spoke to was an ex prisoner who was "punished" for disrespecting a male prisoner on the same wing of Limerick prison, by calling them "a man".

    I remembered him from that godawful series "Paddy's People" which used be on RTE years ago, he was the poor man's Joe Duffy then, but because I wanted to be fair to you, I did listen to the podcast there about an hour ago, and he hasn't changed a bit - still looking to exploit people to serve his own peculiar interests. I learned nothing from the podcast that I wasn't aware of before, just that I wouldn't choose to attempt to frame it in the same terms as he on several occasions throughout a 20-minute podcast, attempts to do. If I wanted to pretend like I gave a damn about women prisoners, I'd focus on, funnily enough, the welfare of women in prison, which I could do, but that doesn't seem to be what this discussions about; instead yet again it appears to be zoning in on the idea of men in women's prisons, and a very particular kind of man in women's prisons - the transgender sex offender. Given there are only three of them in the whole of the Irish prison system, I'd suggest it was a bit like missing the wood for the trees, in much the same fashion as the recent protester who imagined her campaign would be a PR crisis for Government. I don't have it in me to point out that there are currently thousands of young women in Ireland are starving, homeless and destitute, it hasn't caused a PR crisis for Government yet, nor do I expect the general public to care much for the welfare of women in prison when the claim is that they are at risk from 3 prisoners who very few people are actually all that bothered in where or how they are accomodated, because that's the responsibility of the IPS, not something which is of any concern to the general public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    The use of the term "trans-identifying" in any sense is meant to invalidate how a person identifies and show disagreement or disapproval of their IDENTITY.

    It is derogatory TERF language and transphobic behaviour.

    But at least it makes the TERFs and transphobes easy to identify. No pun intended.

    /end.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    Jesus this transgender thing is getting so confusing I don’t know what is or isn’t ok anymore



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Oh yay! Another trans-bashing thread on boards. Just what we needed.



Advertisement