Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1186187189191192198

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    These constant objections are the sort of woke crap that got Trump elected, the do-gooders go too far and eventually and people just get fed up and vote for an extremist government because they are sick of the tail wagging the dog. Maybe we need a trump for a few years to get these projects and polices through.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You keep going on about green objectors and other nonsense and it is poop! The reasons you give are not the reason why the road was not built despite your bluster. There is only one reason why it has not been built and that is that it was and still is an incredibly bad design (for Galway) with flaws that are guaranteed to fall foul of our laws.

    You, however, cannot say a bad word against the design team who have submitted these plans - all you can do is hurl stupid insults at people who have submitted observations on the plans. You blissfully ignore the fact that the groups organising this development have publicly acknowledged that it will make Galway's traffic worse. It is not the solution you and others claim because the evidence from the councils shows that what you claim cannot be truthful. You already know this but keep up the pretence that the green numpties who complain that the plan is harmful to galway are the ones spoiling your party.

    The green senator, etc can plan to submit observations to any development that they want. That doesn't mean that the observation will be accepted and go any further. Maybe thisnisnwhy other Irish towns and cities have managed to have infrastructure planned, built and opened in the same space of time that Galway has wasted on this project.

    However, while I've typed these facts out, I know you'll continue to ignore the truth and peddle your nonsense

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Here's another one now - I'm reminded of the image of Dougal confusing dreams and reality 🙄

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 839 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    IMHO deliberate f^*kwittery is worse than incompetence

    If this project is a murder case;

    there is a party who might be guilty of manslaughter but there is a second party who are guilty of first degree premeditated murder



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Wpuld you go away? You're just trying to waste our time with this guff

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,788 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    he is a serial rereg who wastes everyones time. I would just ignore



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,315 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Hard to see how this won't be coming up in a JR, with the government on track to massively miss the emissions targets from the Climate Action Plan. The question will be how do we permit a project that will add to transport emissions more, particularly as sales of EV cars have dropped significantly.

    I wonder have they updated the docs to included the fact that EV sales have reduced, so emissions from transport on this might be worse than thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There is not a single country in Europe going to be paying any such fines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭_Puma_


    While true for most European governments, their leaders will be working hard in the background sorting out derogations as these limits were intended as just another way to shake down states to fund the commission.

    You may be underestimating how far down the Idealogy rabbit hole our lads have gone.

    The need to be seen as the best boy in class is instantiable and best boy Simon Harris is up there in the WEF as the worst.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭gilly1910


    But how is it such a bad design, and let's be honest the majority of objectors to such projects, are dyed in the wool serial objectors, who will always oppose any sort of progress. There were major objections to the upgrade of the N11, the Carrickmines stretch of the M50, the Kildare bypass was held up for years over a snail, the M3 through Tara, there are major objections to the M20 Cork - Limerick road, with the usual reasons of the environment, wildlife etc., been dragged out by these people. However with the exception of the M20 which has yet to be hopefully built, all of these roads were built, nobody died, the environment and wildlife survived, farmers got richer, and we all got to our destinations a lot quicker. The problem with this country, is that unlike the UK and most major European nations, they all built their motorways in the 60s and 70s, while we were very late coming to the party, with all of our motorways built in the 2000s. Added to the fact that we have an extremely unpredictable and slow planning system which allows serial objectors to thrive, hence why our infrastructure in this country is so far behind a lot of our European neighbours. I like most people have given up on a ring road ever been built around Galway, and that in itself is a shocking indictment of successive governments, Galway City Council, our planning process, and of course those who will care least, the serial objectors. At the end of the day we need to reduce the likelihood of judicial reviews of all proposed projects, by having a new planning and regulatory environment that can deliver faster decisions and a higher thresholds for rejection of major plans. Sadly it probably won't happen, and Galway will continue to suffer for decades with almost total gridlock, and a completely inadequate public transport system.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Leaving aside your lack of understanding of the previous projects you refer to, I'll answer your question about bad design (which has been mentioned hundreds of times in this thread but you either failed to read or understand): it is a bad design because it's purpose is to be with a distributor road and also a bypass. In addition, it's primary goal was to reduce traffic congestion but the councils proposing it gave confirmed that it will make traffic worse. Would you not call that bad design and, if not, why not?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭gilly1910


    My lack of understanding of previous projects, do you always maintain such a condescending, pompous attitude, and that you are far more knowledgeable than us mere mortals, bowing to your vastly superior knowledge on such projects. I don't for one second claim to be an expert on any road building project,but I'm still thankful that most of them were built, and let's be honest had the Galway ring road been built 20 or 30 years ago, there wouldn't be a word about it today. The M50 is a prime example of how not to build a major road, poorly designed, poor junctions, built in a piecemeal fashion, but lets be honest thank f**k it was still built, otherwise bad and all as Dublin traffic can be, it would be carnage if the M50 didn't exist. The Galway ring road should have been built a long time ago, and still should be built, end of!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    You aren't addressing that the designers say in their design document it will make traffic worse!

    I have no doubt it would have been built 30 years ago, because the existing road that tries to have its cake and eat it by being both a bypass and a distributor, and about which there are a great deal of complaints, was built in a similar planning context

    The only difference between building the ring road 30 years ago and now is which road you would be complaining about the terrible traffic on and calling for a new one to fix.

    As you say, serial objectors will always exist, we can't really change the actual framework, because often there are legitimate issues that shouldn't be ignored. Making that system more efficient is absolutely critical.

    None of this changes the facts that all the other schemes you mentioned got built, delayed as they might have been by objections, because those objections proved to be invalid or were mitigated.

    The key difference is that the GCRR has glaring deficiencies in that it can't prove its own need and says it will make things worse so if/when it goes to JR, it won't take a few years delay and then be good to go, it will take a few years and then be rejected wholesale by the judge for being a crap design that has glaring holes.

    That rejection won't be the fault of those bringing a JR

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    OK.

    Whatabout.

    Would you call it a bad design and, if not, why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,574 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    https://connachttribune.ie/government-report-concludes-ring-road-wont-solve-citys-traffic-587/


    A new Government report has concluded that the proposed city ring road would not solve Galway’s traffic woes – leading to calls to ‘move on’ from the €1 billion project.

    The Department of Transport has published a report on ‘The Economic Cost of Congestion in Regional Cities’ and has determined that car traffic currently costs the city more than €35 million per annum and predicts that this will rise to €107 million by 2040 – when the ring road is operational.


    something, something, something, DA GREENZZZZZ!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    It doesn't matter if God above designed the road, the objectors would still say it's flawed. We have tolerated too many of these objectors most of whom are blow ins who wanted to close the door behind them when they moved to Galway. We tolerate way too much crap in this country and the legal profession are huge benefactors and a large part of the problem.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    As we're discussing the GCRR, what "blow-ins" submitted an observation (I'm assuming you know that the planning process does not support "objections") that delayed the project? Can you name one of the blow-ins that took it to a JR?

    How exactly did the legal profession add to the problems of where we are now?

    Any delays to then project were down to forseen issues which went ignored (and continue to be ignored) by those behind the project!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,574 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Xenophobia and fear of green boogeymen seem to be the only reason to build this road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭gilly1910


    I would also take that with a massive pinch of salt, as I cannot understand how one of the most gridlocked towns/cities in Ireland would not benefit from a ring road. Galway is choked with traffic, and removing a large part of that traffic from the city could only be a good thing. I don't think anyone doubts that ring road also needs to be built in conjunction with vastly improved public transport, so new cycle lanes, a better bus service, and dare I say it a LUAS. However all we ever do in this country, and particularly in the west of Ireland, is talk about it, bring out reports and more reports, yet nothing ever gets done.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    OK.

    Would you call it a bad design and, if not, why not?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    It is the councils pushing for the road who are telling us that it will increase traffic and emissions. They submitted this with their planning application. It is that much of a farce!

    As for the other modes of transport you mention, those same councils are not really facilitating anything new until the road is built.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭gilly1910


    Well what do you suggest, do what they have done for the last 30 years which is absolutely nothing, and watch while the traffic in Galway gets worse and worse if that's even possible. Too many people on here banging on about what a poor design the proposed ring road is, so what do you all suggest then instead. The City Council have done nothing for decades to alleviate Galway's chronic traffic problems, and yeah even if it is a bad design, I am so sick of the traffic in Galway and it's rubbish public transport, that I would be of the opinion to just build the bloody thing!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,574 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    I think your doubts are all answered in the very short article I linked to. We'll get a temporary reprieve and then things will get way worse. Which is exactly what most people have been saying here.

    I think this highlights the exact issue your complaining about. People come up with solutions that they think are going to fix things but analysis show it won't. It's basic engineering. Humans aren't as good at logical thinking as we like to think we are and then fall back on emotional attachments while telling ourselves we're being logical. Multi billion euro projects that remove people from their homes, forever alter our landscape and lock us into a path that will make things worse for generations should undergo a lot of scrutiny. We're literally being told by the experts that this is going to make things worse but we still have loads of people here insisting it won't based on nothing more than their feelings. That's the real problem.

    This design should have been scrapped years ago and a new plan devised that'll actually help.

    P.S. I was in favor of this too until I looked into it more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭TnxM17


    Well, over the last 30 years GCC have had a few attempts at submitting plans for the Ring Road, so its not fair to say they have done nothing. When they first submitted plans I was all in favour - because way back then we were of the understanding that the way to ease traffic congestion was by building more roads. We now know that does not work - the unfortunate part is that GCC persisted with roughly the same plan, and now are in the position where their own data shows it will make things worse in the long term.

    As for suggestions - plan the transport needs of the city around people (not private cars) and then build roads where there is a need. Those roads will mainly be distributor roads well outside the city that would move traffic to it that does not need to be near the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    I've stayed out of this thread because I feel it's such a waste of energy but I have to comment here because I literally do not understand your logic.

    You're tired of how bad traffic is in Galway. You feel the problem is getting worse but you still want the authorities to spend potentially a vast amount of money on a road that will definitely make things worse (according to their own figures) just for the sake of building something. How is that in any way sensible?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Well what do you suggest, do what they have done for the last 30 years

    It is the lads desperately defending the GCRR who want to continue to do what we have done for the last 30 years! Others want an integrated approach which is more likely to be delivered.

    I have to laugh at this strategy of presenting the last 30 years as some sort of alternative approach which has failed so now it's time to build the road. In reality, we have spent the last 30 years trying only to build a road, maybe we could try a slightly different approach and broaden our gaze somewhat (which I think would still involve a new bridge across the Corrib, less the "degrowth" nonsense gets rolled out again)?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    My lack of understanding of previous projects, do you always maintain such a condescending, pompous attitude, and that you are far more knowledgeable than us mere mortals, bowing to your vastly superior knowledge on such projects.

    I wasn't really trying to be condescending but when the point that the proposed road is a bad design needs to be explained several times per page, it gets tiring having to repeat oneself to someone who couldn't be arsed reading up on rhe basics!

    I don't for one second claim to be an expert on any road building project

    I've not made such a claim myself either. I have however read what the council have told us which is that the planned road will make traffic around Galway worse. This isn't a conspiracy theory or anything- the council were quite clear in telling us this info.

    ,but I'm still thankful that most of them were built, and let's be honest had the Galway ring road been built 20 or 30 years ago, there wouldn't be a word about it today.

    ...and what? There have been loads of things built in the past that never should have - are you saying that we should just accept those design approaches now?

    The M50 is a prime example of how not to build a major road, poorly designed, poor junctions, built in a piecemeal fashion, but lets be honest thank f**k it was still built, otherwise bad and all as Dublin traffic can be, it would be carnage if the M50 didn't exist.

    The planned GCRR is quite similar to the M50 in that but is supposed to be both a bypass and a distributor road (but kinda fails at both). However, since the M50 opened (along with other factors) traffic around the capital has become much worse. Are you saying that was a good thing?

    The Galway ring road should have been built a long time ago, and still should be built, end of!!

    So whilst traffic will definitley get worse because of it, we need it to get built because traffic congestion is already bad?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    Lets just stick our heads in the sand and wait for the next generation to sort it and look back at the idiots who delayed it and held the city and county to ransom over bog cotton and bullshit.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,539 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You see, there you go again hurling insults at those who point out the negatives of the proposal using information freely available within the proposal docs and again you ignore those ultimately responsible for it being a failure and you've the neck to accuse those critics of having their head in the sand?

    So Peter, why exactly do you want Galways traffic congestion to get worse?

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



Advertisement
Advertisement