Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New TB proposals to be announced today.

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    Anytime I had a reactor I would always follow up with the department to check for lesions.

    My understanding is that lesions are a sign of a bad infection so if they are present then you have a serious problem.

    I do agree the idea that the purchaser of an animal that is over 6 months since its last test is the one that had to do the test is a bit ridiculous. If it was a case that any animal over say 48 months sold to another farm had to have a test within the last two months it would make more sense.

    Seen a dairy sale recently and all the cows were tested last August it definitely affected prices as farmers didn't really want them known they would have to test the cows when they got them home.

    Post edited by Anto_Meath on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,463 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    I always understood too that lesions not showing up in the factory, didn't mean the animal didn't have TB. Only advanced cases showed up with lesions.

    "Why did my reactors not have lesions at
    slaughter?

    The tests for bTB in cattle are very effective at
    detecting infected animals; yet when these cattle
    are sent for slaughter as reactors, only a minority
    will have visible lesions of bTB. This can cause some
    herd owners to wonder if the animals really had
    bTB at all.
    It actually means that the disease has not yet
    developed to the stage where the damage caused
    by bTB is so large that it can be seen by the naked
    eye during post-mortem inspection.
    "

    Teagasc - Leaflet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    Neighbour lost 60 animals on a test what did the department do only cull the vaccinated badger sett on the farm straight away, and blamed his zero grazing in the back end. Nothing about the 80 deer that was culled off his and surrounding land by two hunters and when deer were examined by the trained hunters for lesions up to 30% we’re showing and the department wouldn’t take any samples to the lab due to not been shot by there hunters. TB is an industry and the ones paying the price are farmers and everyone else involved is making the money and the farm organisation sit back quietly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    @Sheep breeder you are definitely right about it been an industry with many benefactors and the farmer carrying all the stress & loss.

    The numbers going down in some herds is frightening. Zero grazing does seem to be a contributing factor as I know of farms were cows are in all year round that have had issues. But it's because they are picking up infection from the grass that is contaminated by deers & badgers. I would guess deers are an even bigger spreader than badgers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭V6400


    Its not jumping to conclusions, there is no need for a farmer to contact the department, I followed up on mine regularly and was told that procedure is I would be contacted if anything was found and that if I was not contacted to be told she showed up lesions or a positive in the cultures then she did not have it. I also rang regularly to find out what would be the plan for testing, the impact on neighbours etc. because the single bit of contact I got in the post doesnt tell anything other than youre locked up and you better do what they tell you or youll be in trouble. They couldnt give me a definite answer on any question I asked. It really just sounded as if it was being made up as they were going along. It also took almost a month and I dont even know how many phone calls to get the reactor taken, if they were really serious about it she would be gone in a few days max as if she actually had TB she was just hanging around for another month to spread it to more animals and wildlife.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭893bet


    how long does compensation take to be paid affer you have done what you need to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭older by the day




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭893bet


    No and too late now as cattle were rehoused after it immediately as no choice. All paperwork submitted 6-8 weeks ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    The process I had was, 4 animals down, on a Friday.

    Phone calls and registered letters received Monday & Tuesday to tell me I was restricted.

    Phone call on Wednesday to appoint a valuer.

    He landed on Saturday valued the animals. I sign a form to say I agreed the value and he told me to drop other forms that came in the pack back to the DVO which I did on the Monday morning.

    Phone call Monday evening to say animals would be be picked up on Tuesday morning.

    Small cheque back from the factory on the Friday.

    I emailed that to the DVO office & got a phone call to say they want the original & the original receipt for the purchase of disinfectant.

    Dropped all into the DVO the following Monday and I was paid my compensation by the Friday. So 3 weeks from the animals went down until I was paid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,422 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    You could still have an inspector out to inspect the washing. If you can show some way that it was carried out.

    The paperwork wasn't submitted by the inspector that looked at the washing and it was months before I was paid. Each inspector doesn't know what the other are doing or have done. I'd say you may chase up on that tomorrow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭V6400


    Did you submit a form to defer the washing date?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,132 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    It should come in the tb pack sent out, word of warning they don't like you not doing the disinfectant process



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭V6400


    If he submitted the form to defer the washing he should get paid nearly straight away after submitting the factory docket, if not no payment until the washing is done and declaration sent in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭893bet


    I did the washing and sent in the forms. Now had to rehouse the cattle after.

    Got a call and they are coming to inspect. Explained they are no long clean as we are 6 weeks later so I had to rehouse the cattle for a few weeks after cleaning. Hopefully that is accepted. I did take a tonne of pictures anyway so have evidence of cleaning.

    Worst case I will have to clean again I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭V6400


    If you have pictures and a receipt for the disinfectant it would be very bad form if they don't pay out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭Neddyusa


    So this TB "eradication" scheme is going on for 75 years now, the disease is more prevalent than ever and apart from being a nice gravy train for those paid from the big TB purse, who else has benefited?

    What would happen if we decided to do away with the TB industry and just treat the disease like any other, such as viral pneumonia? Allow farmers to treat sick animals or vaccinate in high risk herds and areas? Maybe it's a stupid question, but surely it couldn't be as costly an approach as the current sh*tshow?

    Post edited by Neddyusa on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭older by the day


    You should have just let them come out after washing. The inspector would have a fair idea whether it was washed or not and you could have shown him the pictures in the yard.

    A lot of those lads have thrust issues from chancers sending in the forms and nothing done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭893bet


    I didn’t stop them coming out then. First contact I have with regards any inspection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭QA1


    you will be fine you washed sheds have receipts and pictures have the date on them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭TPF2012


    I had 1st reactors ever here on farm in March, Inconclusives.

    Just wondering how your vet does the test. Had 2 young vets do the test that went down in, they had the caliper out for every animal, measuring mm and comparing to 2nd day. No obvious lumps but a few millimeters seem to be enough for an Inconclusive result.

    Retest I had older male vet, no measuring and quick visual for lumps. In the future if I see the calipers appearing can I insist on changing vet?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    @TPF2012 your post is a perfect example of the frustration farmers have with the TB testing program. Sometimes it depends on the vet or mood of the vet on the day you are reading. In fairness to the crew I use the rule seems to be calipers in the pocket & rub the hand along the neck, measure anything they feel needs it.

    I remember a department vet one time & she had a little tool box with her with the brass tags and red buttons ready to go.. she definitely only had one thing on her mind.... she didn't last long in our area thankfully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,132 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Theirs going to be major flare-ups on farms if the department stop paying out on cows kept after an initial tb outbreak that later go down in a subsequent test, with the value of decent cull cows now 1700 plus as a start point, expecting farmers to take 200-300 of the factory and take the hit won't wash



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    @jaymla627 there would be murder. As it is a TB outbreak is a significant finical loss.. if the department cut the competition it would be a disaster. It's one of the reasons I wouldn't chance buying in stock when restricted because if a bought in animal goes down in a restricted herd there is no compensation for that animal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭older by the day


    I'm sorry, we all know that vetinary firms send out their trainees to roll over farmers. I should know because I was one long enough.

    I believe vets give a great service to farmers, 365 day cover, wind, wet, dry, they will always come out.

    The only problem is that if you're with vets which have a fairly big throughput of young vets, then you could get stuck with a trainee.

    I had a call during the spring and I ended up doing the procedure with the young vet watching. I still got the full bill.

    I won't let a trainee vet tb test for me. I tell them out straight the vets that can test, here.

    When they leave college, they have minimal experience and should be accompanied by an experienced vet if right was right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,189 ✭✭✭148multi


    There have been a number of different vets from different practices around barred from testing for not using their calpiers for reading a test, by the department. Department officials hiding in hedges and recording vids and also timing vets. More and more young vets have no connection to agriculture or experience of it before training to be a vet. Dr. Paddy wall said he brought a class of first year vets out to a dairy farmer one Friday, when they arrived the farmer was assisting the cow with a jack, four of the student vets wanted to report the farmer to the department for cruelty, Dr. Wall explained that what the farmer was doing was in no way cruel or abusive, but on Monday morning the four students raised the issue again expressing their wishes to report the farmer to the department for cruelty.

    II find the best way is let time thin out the vets that have picked this profession for the wrong reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,463 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    I passed my TB test, but on the first day the vet asked did I inject them for Blackleg. He had spotted the lumps. Something I wouldn't have thought of, at the time when injecting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,617 ✭✭✭cjpm


    I normally give the blackleg vaccine under the skin over the ribs precisely for that reason.

    Whether or not it’s the correct site I don’t know…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭tabby aspreme


    https://www.thejournal.ie/badger-culling-ireland-6709659-May2025/.

    This came out today, I don't know why the dept are not as concerned with TB in deer, as with Badgers, there's a lot of TB in my locality and the deer population has increased massively



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭older by the day


    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/new-tb-plan-point-of-sale-risk-info-for-females-over-18-months/

    The first reactor retests will be carried out 60 days after the removal of the reactor animals off the holding, as is currently in place. Reactor retest will be carried out at 60-day intervals until there is a clear reactor retest.

    "It is only following a clear reactor retest that the clock starts on the four-month period. This revision means there will be an overall increase in time restricted, even if there are no reactors after the first 60-day retest"

    So that's 3 clear tests, so that's at best six months after the reactor leaves the farm.

    "The sale of cull cows from restricted herds at special mart sales will be expanded to include the sale of dairy cull cows, with no animals allowed return home from such sales"

    "However, the department is additionally proposing to develop a support package to facilitate the fencing-off of badger setts"

    I suppose we should bring them in home and make them supper



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 389 ✭✭Gman1987


    Its amazing how the media can spin thing, if you were a non farmer reading that heading you would be asking why are the Department being so cruel culling so many badgers. How about a heading like "20% of all badgers test confirmed TB positive" . If 20% of all cattle in herds were going down with TB it would be a epidemic



Advertisement