Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Last of Us - HBO *Spoilers* See warning in post #1

15860626364

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,699 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Great episode. Lovely way to fill in the blanks on the time jump we got at the start of the season and build on Joel and Ellie's relationship. It shows how much money HBO are spending and the reputation the showrunners have established for the show when the likes of Joe Pantoliano are taking a bit part like that (it was even smaller than Nick Offerman's role in Season 1!).

    I haven't played the game but I assume the cold open was not only a nice insight into Joel's parenting but also to set up Tommy stepping into the void he's left a bit more…

    I was a bit surprised at Joel confirming that the fireflies could have found a cure if he'd let them cut open Ellie's brain. The poor science (and conditions of the lab) shown last season had me beleiving he knew they were clasping at straws and that her death would have served no purpose.

    I really hope Neil Druckman does more television or films. That really was excellently scripted and directed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 664 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red


    Never played the game so this is all new to me.

    The birthday focused flashbacks were nicely done, it was a clever device to move along the missing 5 years.

    The movement from the innocence of adolescence with the dinosaur/spaceship into adulthood with the tattooist/dope smoking played out well.

    The revelation on the porch with the knowledge of what's to come is emotional but raises the question of whether Joel actually deserved it for what he did. Although painted sympathetically he is an anti-hero of sorts & probably got his just deserts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,576 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    What an episode.

    That final scene was absolutely immense. Incredible acting from both Pascal and Ramsey. Pascal is so good that, as multiple posters have mentioned above, it really stands out as a shame that this is his last appearance in the show.

    Great to see Joe Pantoliano make an appearance too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Didn't realise this was the last appearance of Pascal- I guess they could slip in another flashback next season however unlikely. It does show how the writers were so good at writing good emotional scenes involving Joel and Ellie, something they have failed to do for the Ellie and Dinah this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭MfMan


    Dunno, just not getting the point of this second series. Is it an action piece or a human soap drama? Episode 2 was excellent, everything I had hoped for, but practically every episode since has been mainly exposition and explaining things about how people feel about each other etc. Episodes 3 & 4 dealing with the aftermath of Joel's death and the burgeoning of Ellie's / Dina's relationship. 5 speeded things up a bit and gave us a slightly wider insight into the WLF / Scars conflict plus the airborne-spores infection that will surely be developed later. 6 back again into more explanation of Joel's / Ellie's rift plus Eugene's backstory. With much better pacing, writing and editing at least 3 of the episodes could have been condensed into one.

    I thought the main narrative of this program was about a zombie-apocalypse, which definitely has become secondary in this series. Since episode 2 the raison d'etre seems to be avengeance for Joel, which is moving far too slowly for me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    The zombie apocalypse stuff was always secondary. Even in the first season, the story was about Joel and Ellie's relationship; Joel finding something/someone worth living for rather than just surviving in the world, and Ellie exploring the world with someone she grew to care for after spending her life growing up in quarantine with no family and a real bad case of survivor's guilt.

    The actual character stories have to be central, otherwise you don't care what happens to the characters when they're in danger. The zombie apocalypse is just the backdrop to the characters' story arcs.

    I'm not saying they've done a great job with the Ellie & Dinah side of things this season, but if it was constantly just fights against infected, little to no character development, and human survivor groups who are just plain evil with no moral ambiguity whatsoever, well then the show just becomes The Walking Dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭head82


    That was a standout episode. I only wish every episode could deliver a similar emotional impact. Not wanting to sound overly harsh in my criticism of the show but it's such a short season.. 7 episodes.. and such a long wait between seasons that I really want each episode to fully deliver. There's been more than a couple of episodes this season (last season too!) that I personally found to be a missed/wasted opportunity. Purely because the source material was so good.

    If each season contained more episodes, 12~14.. the odd downtime episode would be more forgivable.

    Anyway, I'm probably being greedy. Roll on the finale.. I fully expect it to deliver!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,576 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    "Is it an action piece of human soap opera?" is such a weird question. It's a HBO series, not a Jason Statham movie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭MfMan


    Yes, but if you were to categorise it to a single description, what would it be? In series one, the zombie infection was practically ever-present and provided a guiderail to each episode. In this series, I feel it's more in the background with it's influence more fitful; this series to my mind has been much more about human dynamics and relationships. If you knew nothing about this program and standalone watched episodes 2, 3 (to some extent, excluding the subway action) or 6, you would have trouble grasping the whole apocalypse aspect of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,899 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    Not sure you're remembering correctly. There were some set pieces with the infected of course (Kansas City for example), but the story was clearly about Joel and Ellie.

    The story isn't and never was about the infected. It's indisputably about the people, their relationships and their nature, and how it's shaped by living in a post apocalyptic world.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,576 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    "But if you were to categorise it to a single description, which would it be?" is another bizarre question. Why would I do that? It's much more complex than that.

    The Last of Us is not about a zombie apololypse. The apocolypse is the setting for a story about people, their relationships and front-and-centre is a complicated relationship between Joel, who lost his daughter and Ellie, who lost her parents and how complicated and fraught a relationship like this can be.

    If you think this is just a zombie actioner then I can see why you are disappointed. But that's not the show's fault. It's yours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I think that comes down to two main factors. In the first season, you have to have a strong focus on the infected and the effects of the virus because you have to set up the rules and bounds of the world the show takes place in. Whereas in the second season, you then know all that and bar some evolution or modifications we already know how and what the infected can do.

    Secondly, Joel & Ellie in season 1 were travelling alone across the length of the country with little-to-no supplies or equipment, and Ellie was very inexperienced. In Season 2, the first few episodes were set in the (mostly) protected town of Jackson, and then Ellie & Dinah have travelled to Seattle but both are fairly experienced due to their time doing patrols and all their training in Jackson. So again, the infected are still a danger, but somewhat less so.

    Now there's more of a focus on the two warring factions in Seattle that Ellie & Dinah have found themselves in the middle of in their hunt for Abby. Again though, the infected are merely a backdrop in that.

    But I would also say, if you knew nothing about the program and standalone watched one of the earlier episodes this season, yeah, you'd have trouble grasping the apocalypse side of things. But not every episode should focus on that, because you have to set up the character stories and personal stakes for the audience to care about what happens to the characters in times of danger. And if someone jumps into a show 12 or 13 episodes in and doesn't understand what's happening… that's their own problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭jj880


    A dram-pocalypse? Like rom-com 😵‍💫

    Not sure I see the value in saying the series should be in 1 genre. For more zombie action maybe watch The Walking Dead. I tried but lost interest because I didn't care much about the characters. The Last Of Us hits different. It gets you in the heart. Thats always been its appeal for me anyway.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭MfMan


    There were, but I think pretty much everything that happened in series one was motivated by or as a reaction to the infected world the characters found themselves in. How to protect themselves against it and survive. The main plot driver was getting an immune Ellie safely to the midwest. Joel and Ellie's relationship evolved and grew organically along the way.

    Unlike One, series two seems to be too much looking back (and inwards), explaining character's interactions and not progressing the current narrative with enough pace. Maybe to synopsise crudely, flashbacks in One were about the apocalypse, in Two about relationships moreso. Last night's episode is getting (perhaps merited) praise, explaining why Joel and Ellie drifted apart, but it wasted a whole episode doing that I felt. It is interrupting and breaking the flow of 'present day' actions; the story of why the Seraphites and WLF came into being and the origins of their conflict are much more interesting to me.

    ""But if you were to categorise it to a single description, which would it be?" is another bizarre question. Why would I do that? It's much more complex than that."

    All TV series get categorised into something; Dallas was a soap opera, Kojak a cop drama, Fraser a sit-com etc. TLOU series one was a zombie-apocalypse for sure, series two seems to be straying from that IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Great to have had 2 prestige tv series airing at the same time and for me, barring an incredibly strong last episode, Andor just about pips TLOU.

    Not sure what I’m going to watch after next Monday. Everything is going to feel like a big step down I fear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,745 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    That porch scene was stunning. Was emotional watching it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    To be honest, I kinda think you're misremembering a lot of Season 1. It was only 9 episodes, but in that you had the episode with Bill & Frank (which was entirely relationship-based, think the only infected was in the shop Joel and Ellie are scavenging at the start), Joel & Ellie arriving in Jackson (think the only action in that was against humans at the end where Joel gets injured), the flashback episode with Ellie and Riley in the Mall (relationship-based, a little action towards the end), and the David episode while Joel was injured (very little infected if any, action more against humans).

    It's the kind of thing where, again to draw comparisons to The Walking Dead, the more you have characters fighting the infected and surviving, the less you view the infected as a threat. In The Walking Dead they kept having to use huge groups of zombies to represent a threat, and even then they usually found a way to take out that large group. The infected in TLOU should be used somewhat sparingly. In the game, you fight them constantly, but if they replicated that in the show then Joel/Ellie/Dinah would all basically be superheroes. It's why we saw the whole town struggle against a large group, but we've also seen Ellie getting bit twice so far this season while fighting a few of them.

    It's part of why Joel wouldn't let Eugene come back to Jackson to say goodbye to his wife, because if he turned at the wrong moment he could kill someone. Every infected needs to be treated as an absolute danger.

    If the characters were fighting the infected every episode without harm, they stop being seen as dangerous (to the audience in particular).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,313 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Loved last night's episode.

    Totally engrossing and explained so much .( In fact I think it might have been better placed earlier on the season for that reason ? )

    Beautiful acting by both Ramsay and Pascal . Really good .

    We were in tears watching it at the end .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭Bluewolf


    what’s the other one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,364 ✭✭✭appledrop


    An amazing episode, but I'm kinda annoyed they left it to episode 6 to tie things up, the last few episodes were absolutely crap, I could have done with this one earlier!

    They have made a huge mistake killing Joel, I don't care what happens in game they could have changed it! The strength of this programme for me has always been about yhe relationship. That whole episode in season 1 about the two gay partners was one of the best things I have ever seen, and this one was up there aswell.

    The bring out the best of each other, Bella acting was amazing in this episode alongside Joel. I just don't buy her and Dinah together too immature.

    Well roll on last episode, I'll either love it or hate it!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,899 ✭✭✭EagererBeaver


    There is simply no way they couldn't not kill Joel. When you're adapting a story from its source medium there are creative choices you can make so that it's more suitable on TV. You can't fundamentally change the whole plot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,750 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Joel has to die. It's an integral part of the second game and therefore the whole story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Toranaga


    I think the season only being 7 episodes means that they had to give a bit more time to the will they won't they and lovey dovey thing rather than Ellie's single minded quest for revenge taking as central a role. The stuff with Norah was good but was in contrast to what we had seen. I suppose now following the Joel episode they should be able to get the audience into her head a bit more but I'm unsure Bella is quite pulling off the anger. Excellent otherwise mind you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Agreed. And they have been making changes from the game along the way to both improve some bits that weren't great in the game, or to use the fact it's TV to show additional things, other characters conversations not involving the playable character etc, which is harder to do in the game.

    But Joel's death is the singular event that the entire second game centers around. Everything depends on it happening. If Joel didn't die and instead it was Tommy or Dinah, absolutely everything changes. As we saw in this latest episode, Ellie isn't just devastated by Joel's death just because he was essentially her father at this stage, it was because they were on the outs with each other for a while but had just had this breakthrough that could be the start of rebuilding their relationship… and then Joel was killed before it happened. He died before they could make up. That's a powerful motivator for Ellie beyond just "Revenge for death of someone they know".

    Plus of course Abby's whole motivation is to kill Joel because he killed her father, and the rest of her group go along with her not just because of that, but also knowing he killed a bunch of their Firefly friends, ended the chance at a cure etc. If instead they killed someone else instead of Joel, then they just become cartoonish psychopathic villains.

    Killing off Joel is absolutely a big loss to the show, just like it was to the game (a lot of gamers got waaaaayyyyy too attached to Joel and directed huge abuse at the voice actress who played Abby in the game, including death threats directed towards her newborn son). But it's the entire crux of the story going forward. Not a chance they could have changed it without just coming up with an entirely new story instead of adapting the second game.



  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,357 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    I enjoyed the episode, final scene was very good. Timeline wise, was that the night before he was killed?

    Eugene's death was a tough one. Joel swore he wouldn't execute him (well, he swore something), but when they were walking Eugene was talking about how cold he was getting. Shivering. He was getting the shakes the people get before they turn, so I guess he did what he thought was needed.

    Hey Joel, maybe I could talk to my wife on that nice radio you have there? Nah, saving the battery.

    Joel: Your husband died peacefully, thinking only of you.

    Ellie: Na uh, he died screaming when Joel shot him in the face!

    Ellie was such a dick there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah, it was the night before the attack on Jackson and Joel's death (the last bit of episode 1 is that night when people are walking past the exposed pipe and we see the strands of the fungus moving, which then leads to the horde attack on Jackson the next day), so Joel & Ellie had only just had the conversation where they could start mending their relationship, but then never got the chance to.

    As for Eugene, I don't think Joel had any intention of letting Eugene get back to Jackson, which is why he sent Ellie off to get the horses. I think particularly when Eugene seemed unsure which path led back to Jackson (you'd think he'd be familiar with the way considering he was a former Firefly, he was on patrol etc), Joel knew he had to put him down, and Joel knew it'd be too big a risk both moving Eugene back to Jackson and once he got there. Not to mention they'd still have to kill Eugene probably right in front of his wife which could be even more traumatic.

    I don't think Ellie was completely in the wrong in telling the woman what happened in that Ellie probably felt she deserved to know the truth, though she likely couldn't be sure that Eugene definitely would have made it back and been able to talk to her before he died.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,576 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Agreed on Ellie.

    I get the impression that Joel wasn't lying to save himself, he was lying so that he could save the wife's feelings. Allowing her to believe that he didn't suffer, wasn't afraid and was brave.

    Ellie was pretty selfish here and was a bit of a d*ck 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭jj880


    I took it that Ellie realised that Joel had blatantly lied to her for a 2nd time with the "I promise" line and same facial expression. Felt sorry for Gail but I think Ellie had reached her fill of Joel's BS (in that moment not knowing Joels full reasons for lying to her at the end of Season 1) regarding important events in other people's lives. I thought it was well done and added a bit more build up to the dance hall and porch scene when

    Joel finally poured his heart out on why he did what he did and lied.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,604 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    That porch scene was incredible….. When Pedro left the show, we lost ALOT.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,750 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Absolutely. But the same can be said of the game too.

    'The Last of Us' game was genuinely one of the best games I've ever played (I literally bought a PS3 just to play it) and I've been playing games since the 80's. It made you actually give a damn about the characters on the screen, even if I disliked the the character jumps, as it were. But in the sequel when Joel is killed, it stole so much that that game became irredeemable for me, despite the fact that it's an integral part of the whole story. It became a point of no return, which I think a lot of viewers of the show are now experiencing.



Advertisement