Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1906907909911912

Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I didn't post any assumptions about your views - I said "Too large a proportion of the electorate are alright Jack"

    We can agree to disagree.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It would depend on any Housing Party being milquetoast enough on all other issues that they could attract voters from across the spectrum

    I think this is key. A credible, single issue housing party would have to be genuinely agnostic on any issue that did not directly affect housing with no party line on anything else.

    Hence it would be important that anybody involved was motivated by a genuine ambition to try and fix the problems at hand, without any overriding ideological bent. If somebody's proposed solutions are either extreme left - eg tax rich developers and landlords into oblivion - or extreme right - eg ban all immigration and deport foreigners - then they would be no use to a credible party.

    You would need to start from the position that there are essentially two problems that need to be solved:

    a) not enough supply on the market to buy or rent and b) taxpayers burden from housing is too high

    Important to recognise that solutions to (b) are not practical if it means making (a) worse. Solving (a) is the priority.

    And every proposal or policy would need to be evaluated solely on the grounds of whether or not it would have a realistic and beneficial impact on the above, with no political or ideological considerations.

    The biggest barrier to establishing such a party is finance and fundraising, as there are very strict rules on political fundraising designed entirely to favour existing parties - public funds are given to parties in order to ensure less reliance on, and thus influence from, private donors. Good idea in theory but in order to qualify for public funds you need to be an established party and have contested elections, so it is a bit of a catch 22. I guess crowd funding could be able to help with this.

    I think in the first instance you'd need 6 to 8 people to form a party executive and get some sort of coherent strategy in place on policy, communication, candidate selection etc. T

    These people would have to have no overwhelmingly strong ideology, a genuine interest and ambition to fix housing, and a willingness to enter politics without being too political.

    Sounds like a tall order but if anybody reading this thinks this sounds like an interesting idea, PM me and at the very least we can discuss the pros and cons further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭Eclectic Econometrics


    Which is the apartments one? It is not apparent from the titles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    https://open.spotify.com/episode/1fTnhlvDMroiSVXA8ylrkg?si=7yZJy2VoT6qjBo2aq7mFqQ



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭Eclectic Econometrics




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    More headwind for gov revenue/fdi/employment

    20250512_080643.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 862 ✭✭✭2lazytogetup


    is property now overpriced? would you be buying now or will there be some soft landing or crash in next few years. im looking to buy but thinking ive waited this long, i may as well wait for prices to come down. tks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Property and rents are extremely expensive, but that does not nesecarilly mean they will drop in the short/medium term. Government policy continually increases price.

    The risks associated with property increases, these risks feed through into the economy, jobs investment etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,610 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Prices wont be coming down in the near future if at all. We have too much demand which with our emigration policy is going to get worse and we are not even building enough year on year to support our yearly population growth so the back log from the last 5/6 years is still to be dealt with as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Nobody can tell you and anybody claiming they can is wrong. What you can be told is the risk you are taking and possible outcome. If property price continue to rise you may not have enough income or mortgages available for you to buy at the higher prices for what you need. You may also simply age out of getting a mortgage if you wait too long as after 40 getting a 30 mortgage is harder so you may need a 25 year or 20 year mortgage depending on your current age and when you go to buy. Prices could drop while you wait and you get a cheaper mortgage but you still need a place to live so whatever costs are associated with that should be added to the cost of waiting and getting a property. So if rent is 2k a month and you wait 2 years that is 48k.

    If you buy now with what you can afford and prices crash at sometime in the near future you could end up in negative equity where your property is worth less than your mortgage. This will tie you to that property and if you sell while prices are down you will lose money. If you continue to pay your mortgage you will eventually come out of negative equity whether prices increase or decrease. Now when the crash happened in 2000s a lot of people had negative equity but not the majority of those who bought but the people that bought in the last 0-4 years from the peak were. It only then effected those who had to sell but he people that held onto to them came out and were years along on their mortgage payments not having lost any money.

    Now a lot of people as prices were rising said they would buy after the crash and clean up had a bit of an issue. The banks wouldn't lend mortgages so they couldn't buy along with many losing jobs so couldn't get mortgages either. The house prices were unstable so many didn't buy there were also a lot less properties for sale. Rents did drop so it was cheaper to wait then it would be now but it still had a cost many ignore. The thing is the combined wait before the peak and then the time waiting for prices to be stable could easily been a 8-10 wait. So at 30 if one person waited at 40 they get a 25 year mortgage with the cost of renting for 10 years but another person buying at 30 has 10 years paid off their mortgage and 20 years left if they went for a 30 year mortgage (cheaper than rent) or 15 if they went 25. So one person finished their mortgage at 55 and the other at 65. 10 years you can add money with favorable tax is a lot of money to add to a pension.

    The last crash had many factors in play and is not an inevitability based on price. There are a lot more mortgage restrictions and a similar crash is highly unlikely even with Trump. Work from home has changed a lot in terms of price distribution. Prices could still crash but we are so massively under supplying housing as opposed to an over supply we had at the crash.

    Basically it comes down to personal circumstances more so than the market. Just make sure you can pay the mortgage but even then it is hard to be made give up a private home if you are paying some of it back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The last crash had many factors in play and is not an inevitability based on price. There are a lot more mortgage restrictions and a similar crash is highly unlikely even with Trump

    The single biggest contributer to the last crash was people loosing their jobs.

    Trump wants our jobs back in the US

    He also wants the corporation tax back. This is currently used to pump property prices in Ireland placing Ireland in the worst possible situation should we experience a recession/crash



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I don't agree prices crashed way before the job losses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    There won't be a "crash" per se; houses €1m+ could drop significantly as the younger generations struggle to get a foothold on the ladder until later in life, let alone accrue enough equity to be able to upsize to €1m+ houses. Similarly, first-time buyers are the ones being given the extra leverage with the various schemes which has turned €350-400k houses into €500-600k houses over the course of the last few years. These could lose 20% of their value which isn't really a "crash" since they would only revert to where they were within the last 5 years.

    Long story short, with the government no longer able to plant magic money trees on the demand side for property purchasing, this increases the potential for small haircuts (20% in some of the more juiced segments).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I don't know where you are getting 350k going up to 600k in the last few years or why you are talking about 1mil housing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    3 bed semi-d's in the Belcamp estate by Balgriffin were selling new in Nov 2021 for €385k, they are now valued at over 550k. That's some increase in less than 3 and a half years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    https://www.thejournal.ie/investment-fund-belcamp-manor-dublin-6267289-Jan2024/

    Might be a huge contributing factor in this one estate. It isn't the norm by any stretch. What you are really talking about here is 8 houses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    That's the new phase of the development.

    The one's for private sale (majority back in 2021) sold for €385k semi-d end terrace, they're valued at 550k+, over 100 houses so no not 8 houses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    To give an example, Glenheron is a housing estate in Greystones finished around 2017-2018. The houses fit into the help-to-buy scheme at the time. If you search "Glenheron" in Wicklow county on the PPR you can see the price jumps in the last few years in the region of 50% from €350-450k to €500-650k. The thing is; given the help-to-buy rules, these places that came on market around 2018-2020 can only be recently sold without having to pay back some of the tax rebate so the data is slow to pick-up.

    6 Glenheron View - PPR 2018 €392k

    6 Glenheron View - PPR 2024 €617k

    This is just government fluff which has lead to such staggering, lightning quick price increases in the first-time buyer segment (sub-€500k) resulting in these houses getting an extra €50-100k in value (ca. 20-30%) that I could see disappearing in a reasonable outcome where the State belt needs to be tightened and, for instance, help-to-buy is not further extended to help FTBs also purchase these second hand homes or else councils and charities no longer have the financial resources to pay €3-4k pm rent for these places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,888 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    its not far off 10% per year, i dont keep that close an eye but isnt that around the yearly property price inflation in Dublin the last while?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Oh I know that it is, doesn't mean it's not still madness. I used this example as the other poster was countering the idea that houses went from 350 to 600, and while not exactly the same increase, it's not as ridiculous as they were making out it out to be.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,081 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭DataDude


    As per Awec you’ve forgotten VAT. But also

    Back in 2017, these houses received government subsidies. In 2025 they no longer receive government subsidies…this should be deflationary…but the prices are still way up.

    This makes the opposite point to the one you’re trying to make. It’s actually one I’ve made a few times on here…people wonder what would happen if the HTB was removed…we already know, look at north Wicklow where the HTB was effectively removed (due to the price limit not indexing) back in 2021…absolutely nothing. Prices kept (and continue to) fly up without any government supports at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    It is still not the norm. Are you saying the majority of housing has gone up by such amounts? It is not even the majority of Dublin prices. Your overall claim is FTB are protected from a crash to the market by subsidies from the government. Not all FTBs bought new properties with HTB. Back in the late 90s and early 00s house prices were rising everywhere at a very fast rate which I would say is much faster than now

    It is way off the point I was making about the benefits of waiting for prices to drop to buy versus just jumping in. Nobody can be sure there will or won't be a crash but using prices as the gauge is problematic but we certainly aren't in the same situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,610 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I find it funny people just look at the the cost price of a house that has gone through the roof in the last 8 to 10 years but forget that all the inputs for building a house has also shot up in that time and in order for a builder to be profitable new house prices have to reflect this.

    For example

    Labour - there are lads who wont get up out of bed in the morning in the trade unless there is a huge amount dangled in front of them. (thats brickies, roofers, tilers, sparks, plumbers the lot are ridiculously high in costs here )

    Land - Price gone up through the roof

    Building materials - Also gone through the roof

    This is before we get into what additional cost the likes of adding electricity connection, water and other utilities or the fact that most houses now have ridiculously high ratings and building reqs to adhere too which adds in cost.

    Then of course you have inflation and the fact that prices nearly halved in the period from 2007 to 2012 so there was always going to be some kind of realignment along with that inflation.

    Ultimately if our demand out weighs supply none of the above costs are coming down any time soon ergo our prices are not going anywhere while we are importing a huge population into the country year on year and trying to house every bleeding heart that looks for accommodation. Our government is effectively prioritizing both social housing and Vultures to take the majority of housing coming on stream and leaving anyone trying to do things the right way in this country as in working/saving and trying to get on the ladder in the dirt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,347 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    I would easily say houses in major towns have doubled in price since 2018 for instances in local town 3 bed semi town subarbs nice estate could be easily bought for 135-145k now they are asking 260-265k ,i checked ppr and in '22 200k was the going price.

    They will probably double in price again within the next 8 years ,

    Normally it was said land was a mighty investment as it usually doubled in price in a decade ,well it now looks like house investment is putting land investment to shame albet the crash screwed house prices for 6-7 years but that is well and truely behind us



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Google Ai generated response to

    "Job losses and house price falls during Ireland's property crash 08"

    • Overall Employment:Employment fell by 8.3% between 2007 and 2009, and unemployment rates rose significantly, reaching 11.4% in May 2009 and 14.3% by September 2011. The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) estimated that unemployment could reach around 17%

    .................

    There was an over reliance on property sales related taxes in the noughties.

    On the other hand podcast recently, Jim Power stated that corporation tax revenue exceeded income tax revenue over a 12 month period for the first time ever (caveat includes Apple judgement)

    Think about that! The over reliance on one sector and using the proceeds to make everything more expensive, destroying competitiveness for other sectors



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    So the job losses happened after the crash of 2007 like I said



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Property prices from 06 to 2012

    2006 +14.9%

    2007 +7.5%

    2008 -6.9%

    2009 -19.2%

    2010 -13.5%

    2011 -16.2%

    2012 -13.8%

    Source: Permanent TSB/ESRI house price index

    house-prices-06-12.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,988 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Go look the number of sales during this time. The property crash happened in 2007 and the financial crash happen in 2008. The property agreed to be sold in 2007 get shown up in 2008. Property sales dropped in 2007 and people started losing their jobs afterwards due to the 2008 worldwide financial crash. They were separate things



Advertisement