Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1178179181183184190

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You are splitting hairs on the definition of what is proposed for Galway, but let's be honest here Galway badly needs something.

    I think everyone agrees on this.

    As I wrote in my previous post Galway is been left behind by the likes of Limerick and Cork as it has never been given anything in the form of a bypass or a ring road.

    To be correct, Galway was not left behind - the council are currently holding it back by holding all other possibilities to ransom until after the road is constructed

    At the end of the day we all know that any form of a LUAS in Galway, or proper bus corridors will take decades to come to fruition, so just build what is proposed before Galway chokes to death on it's own traffic.

    But building the road will, according to the council, make traffic worse (and make the people of Galway even more car dependent) and when it is built you will have no viable travel alternatives in place. Why are you and so many others so eager for that scenario?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Can I ask where people have seen it being discussed in terms of unlocking development potential? I thought they were originally saying it definitely wouldn't be used for that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Here's Galway Chamber, page 5:

    https://galwaychamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/14122018-GCRR-Chamber-Submission-2.pdf

    The Galway City N6 Ring Road is included as one of the strategic road improvement projects to be delivered within the next decade, necessary to unlock development opportunities

    Their formal submission on the project consultation was similar.

    I read some articles quoting local politicians saying the same thing at around the time of the previous submission to ABP also.=



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm not splitting hairs though: they're proposing a design that they KNOW won't solve any problems, and they're proposing it over and over. I think Galway needs both a bypass and a distributor. It already has what is a "ring road" double-jobbing bypass-distributor mess, it doesn't need a second one! London orbital is in absolutely no way a distributor, it's a bypass starting way outside the city and ending way outside the city. It's used for traffic to get past the city. Absolutely nobody I know gets on the M25 to get from one part of the city to another. In Galway, 95% of people will get on this "ring road" to access another part of the city, according to the numbers. That's similar to N40 and M50 in Ireland, these are bypasses swamped by commuters to the point of "forced or breakdown flow" according to the NTA.

    I won't even discuss the idea of the Dublin outer orbital, that's for a different thread, suffice to say there's a good reason that was shot down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭gilly1910


    I would still rather that these bypasses or ring roads are swamped by commuters rather than the internal narrow streets of Galway. In an ideal world cities should always be bypassed, and maybe as you build your public transport you can then start preventing cars from coming into the city, in the form of a congestion charge. While it's a different topic, surely with congestion charges and the Ultra Low Emission Charges in London, if you're not using the brilliant London Underground to get from A to Z, you would never drive across the city, as it would be too expensive, so you would have to use the M25?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    No you're paying your ULEZ and congestion charge anyway so you just accept the cost and go direct. That's what anyone I know with a car or van does anyway.

    I wouldn't rather a bypass being swamped by commuters at all: it's not much of a bypass if it's swamped by local commuters. You're not "bypassing" anything. You end up with a big dysfunctional traffic jam mess…like the M25 is at Heathrow and Dartford, where it fails in its function as a bypass...because it's doing two jobs…because it has junctions into busy urban areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Galway needs and integrated transport plan which includes increased access restrictions to the centre of of town for individual vehicles and provision of more public transport, cycling infrastructure and pedestrian and public spaces, however is not possible without providing an alternative where needed, as as much as people want it to not be the case, there will always be a level of neccessary car transport

    I think everyone here is in agreement on all those points. The problem is the council have not got any plans for the former, only the latter road alternative.

    If the council submitted public transport improvements alongside the ring road application, they could point to that reallocation of road space and the GCRR would breeze through the courts. The city council are far too incompetent though. Because of their incompetence the ring road plan will again fail in court because of the climate act and the people of Galway's will suffer another decade trapped in traffic jams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    100% this - if the Council's had a plan in tandem to be launched in parallel to show what ALL the freed up space would be used for back in 2013; GCRR project would be over the line by now.

    It is not incomentence though - they just don't want to do it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭gilly1910


    I couldn't agree more, Galway City Council have always been totally inept, and they think with a small west of Ireland mentality. They are destroying the great, vibrant city that is Galway, and have been doing so for decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Could someone provide a link to the survey being quoted here ad nauseam by the anti development posters as an excuse to block the road.
    Firstly, if this survey took place over the Covid years, it should be thrown in the nearest dustbin. It is not accurate and neither are commuter practices during that time.
    Secondly, what about current commuters observations. Clearly any time I’ve had to go near the city in the morning, the vast majority of traffic is being held up trying to traverse the city BOTH WAYS, not going into it. In fact if you go into the City Centre in the morning, those roads, while busy, are relatively quieter compared to those roads where people are trying to cross over. Google maps daily information re traffic will show where the hold ups are, it’s clear this ‘survey’ isn’t fit for purpose and not a reflection of what’s happening in front of our eyes via direct links to google traffic and other apps. It’s a direct opposite to my own observations also.
    Thirdly, there are already some good public transport links from the likes of Oranmore and Athenry re trains and buses with very big uptake. So people will use the services if it’s there. And still the traffic issues persist despite those on here claiming public transport alone will solve the problems, it won’t. It’s not an either/or solution.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,824 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    What evidence do you have of this? This sounds like absolute nonsense. If it was true, there would be a severe parking problem in the city with cars thrown everywhere - would be like st Patrick's Day everyday in the city.

    Where in the city are they all going? Dough bros?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭MBSnr


    Yeah I struggle to believe this as well. I work in Parkmore. Of the 20 or so people there, over half have to cross the river at some place, going West to where they live. At present some are forced to travel into the city centre to do that via one of the bridges. Literally every journey to get over the river (apart from the Quincentennial bridge) would be classed as going into the city centre… So unless they asked each driver do you live in the city and 5% said they did, then I don't see how that figure adds up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Are you referring to the Galway City Council docs submitted to ABP that we've all been directly referencing for the past week?

    You're not REALLY just calling people "anti development posters" and describing them as using a document "as an excuse to block the road" without having read the council's own actual submission to ABP are you?

    I mean, you're not really waving away what we've all been discussing without having actually read what we're discussing…right? Because that would be very….ignorant…I'm trying to think of a more polite way of saying it and I don't mean it as an insult.

    You're presenting your idea of the traffic flows, which may be founded and accurate, but they're irrelevant because the project team needed to account for current and future traffic flows and have published them. That's what we're all referring to.

    (And yes, they accounted for all existing public transport links, and projects committed to in the pipeline.)

    I'm genuinely exasperated having read your post. I really am.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Right.

    Great.

    Tell the project team they need to re-do their numbers so, and delay the project by another wedge of time.

    Honestly, I don't understand what's so difficulty about reading the project documentation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    The 'survey' people are quoting is the planning application for the ring road... I.e. the actual thing that has to justify itself to ABP and further meet the legislative requirements that exist under a Judicial Review.

    Roads don't get built based of feelings, anecdotal evidence or even just raw politicising (any more)

    The application has to be able to justify a significant expenditure of public funds by showing a measurable benefit to the city/country and public at large.

    What the anti development group (aka. people who have read the actual application being made) is saying, is that the document that will decide if this road gets built doesn't do the job it's supposed to (justifying the need for the road) and that in order to actually justify getting it built they should include plans for public transport/traffic reduction in the centre, because doing so might actually show the traffic reduction numbers everyone here wants

    The pro development argument seems to be, "TRAFFIC IS INSANE, BUILD IT NOW" and then totally ignoring that the hard documentation for the actual application says the new road will make that traffic worse!

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    For the last few posters who have been saying "those numbers are nonsense", here is the direct link:

    https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/318220

    Appendix 6.1 is here

    https://www.pleanala.ie/publicaccess/FurtherInformation/318220/Galway%20City%20Ring%20Road%20RFI%20Response%202025/Part%20VI%20Updated%20EIAR/Volume%204%20Appendices/Appendix%20A.6.1%20Traffic%20Modelling%20Report.pdf?r=779042755091



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    Is Pauline O'Reilly a member of Friends of the Irish Environment? I don't know that she's not but I'm pretty sure I've never seen it mentioned anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Welcome to how most of the population of Galway feels re the delay constructing not only this road but other roads and developments also. You failed to answer the question so I’ll ask again, what year is the survey referring to?


    Edit - I can only find a traffic report on the An Bord Pleanala dating from…Ireland’s biggest economic crash of the 21st Century 2012 and 2013 and prior to it? Is this seriously the data being used to make the case on here re road traffic travel? Honestly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's all in 1.4.3 [insult removed - sorry I'm just incredulous].

    November 2024.

    Please read the document. It's pretty damning. You'll probably come back here, just like a bunch of us have and post "what kind of moron submitted this" and then transition to "what kind of moron submitted this AGAIN".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Perhaps you're not looking at the right document: Appendix A.6.1 of the current submission to ABP. They needed to re-do all the modelling, precisely because of what you've noted: time makes all traffic data invalid.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,952 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    ABP document with the overview summary of the figures here:

    https://www.pleanala.ie/publicaccess/FurtherInformation/318220/Galway%20City%20Ring%20Road%20RFI%20Response%202025/Part%20VI%20Updated%20EIAR/Updated%20EIAR%20Volume%201%20Non%20Technical%20Summary.pdf?r=303231193847

    This is the updated document, with observations redone within the last year, as this was requested by ABP as part of the Request for Further Information. The details that you'd be looking for are on page 36, NTS03.

    The year that the traffic modelling is based on is 2023. Covid may still have had an effect, but I wouldn't say that it was severe enough to cause a major problem in the data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yes you're right, maybe they're asking about the 5% figure. I thought they wanted the traffic modelling data showing that the outcome will be worse if they build the current design than if they do nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Green Peter




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,768 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    She made a public statement in support of FIE’s Judicial Review of the original planning. That doesn’t make her a member of FIE, and I could find no evidence that she is.

    I agreed with FIE bringing a Judicial Review of this scheme, but I still think they’re hobbity ideologues. Just because two trains are in the same station at the same time, it doesn’t mean they’re both going to the same place.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    I took for granted when you took for granted. Thought I heard her on Keith Finnegan talking about winning the last challenge against it



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Green Peter




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/green-party-chair-consulting-on-challenge-to-galway-ring-road-1.4769465



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,817 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    …and what?
    Jesus, youre determined to blame her for something - she is inconsequential no matter what group she is with or what action she was involved in.
    If you want to be critical of someone, maybe look at someone in the council who decided to push ahead with a plan they knew would make things worse and when it failed, pushed again with it and again, etc.

    Or are you just following an anti-green agenda and not really bothered by the ongoing crapshow that is Galway's transport system?



Advertisement