Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How did Israel get so much influence? How can this be changed or overcome?

  • 08-05-2025 09:58PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭


    I know there is a thread already on what is happening in Gaza, but this is something I feel is worthy of a separate and distinct discussion.

    More and more over the last 18 months, we've all seen the news of that conflict and how it has been reported in a manner that is largely favourable to the Israeli narrative. And more and more I've wondered why this narrative has persisted as it has done in the face of what is very contradicting evidence also available though not communicated as mainstream as the Israeli view. And not only that, but Israel has received massive military support in technology and funding while the Palestinians are struggling to receive anything remotely approaching sufficient food and water.

    My question is, why is it like this? Of course I know the history of what led to the foundation of Israel, but a lot of time has passed since then and in any case, that should never excuse them attempting to do similar to others. Many child molesters were they themselves abused as children, but as a society we don't use that fact to absolve them of their crimes as adults. So why do so many very influential people and bodies express explicit support or demonstrate tacit support for Israel, instead of condemnation, in spite of the evidence as to the criminal nature of their actions and their expressed intent around them. I don't particularly buy the narrative that supporting Israel gives western society an ally in the Middle East, Israel has never demonstrated that it is an ally to anyone in any sort of a quid pro quo fashion.

    Has anyone any thoughts on how (and why) Israel have so much influence in many countries in the West? And what can be done about this?

    (P.S. I'm aware of the sensitive nature of this topic, and this thread is not intended to give people a platform to express any form of antisemitism or crass judgement, but, it's a topic that deserves discussion given how successful Israel has been doing in convincing so many to view their actions as merely appropriately defensible.)



«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,309 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    I continually ask myself the same question. How can a kind of collective guilt over the Haulocaust create a rogue state that is beyond International Law.

    'Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio? A nation turns It's lonely eyes to you.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭Quandary


    From a political standpoint, America want a proxy in the Middle East and Israel is exactly that.

    The fact that there is an incredibly powerful, wealthy and influential Jewish lobby group in America also helps massively to add to the unwavering support Israel get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭Mo Ghile Mear


    I too find this really strange. It’s as if Israel has some kind of hold over us all. Even regimes that would traditionally be moderate and uphold fairness and democracy seem to be afraid of them. Or beholden to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    Obviously everyone owes them money, can be no other explanation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 333 ✭✭nice bit of green


    Which is why I am delighted to see Irish political leaders call out the Israeli gvmt for their barbarism.

    I have never met a Jewish person, growing up I never understood antisemitism and still do not. I have no idea what it’s like to live in that part of the world but they are not doing themselves any favours with their land grabs and murder.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,794 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Fantatical Christian’s who believe that Israel has to be exist and functioning for the 2nd coming of Christ .

    Never underestimate the power of WASPS have on US politics .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,605 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Yeah, have a read about the Left Behind series and keep telling yourself people really believe that.

    Also, there is a large Jewish diaspora in the US due to a lot of pogroms and one big thing that happened in the 1940's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,794 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    I know about the Jewish diaspora . My view comes from an Irish theologian I knew in America . I’ve never heard of Left Behind .

    Go to the Bible Belt and talk to the people there .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,605 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    There's an Irish link to the theology behind it, a lot of that stuff the evangelicals believe is based on what he made up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,470 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Newstalk had an author on recently, thought he explained the middle east well. Israel is essentially a western fortress, protected at all costs by the western allies of US, UK, France, Germany,.. who want to keep the region unstable to safeguard their energy wants, and also because of religious guilt of how jews were treated



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,015 ✭✭✭thomil


    This is a question that goes far beyond the limits of a discussion site like boards.ie, and would likely require a significant amount of academic work to get to the bottom of, but I'll give it a try anyway, at least from my perspective.

    For starters, I don't really believe that the collective guilt angle is all that strong. Granted, modern Germany sees itself as having a special responsibility towards Israel because of its history, and I happen to agree with that view, being German myself. However, the roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict go far beyond WW2 and the Shoah and right back to Sykes-Picot and the machinations of the British Empire and France during WW1, and I can't see either London or Paris weighed down by any similar collective guilt or responsibility.

    More to the point, there are three major aspects with regard to the wests' continuing beneficence towards Israel.

    For starters, ever since 1948, Israel has been a stable government. The country hasn't had the same rolling door of western-installed kings, tribal leaders, dictators & strongmen of all type that often only abdicate power by way of a 9mm bullet to the head that have dominated the surrounding Arab nations. Changes in government in Israel have always happened by way of the ballot box, which is remarkable in the region. More importantly though, Israel is not a tribal or clan-based society, as is the case with its Arab neighbours, which means that a change in government does not mean a massive purge of unwelcome clan members from society, and that a stable civil society and civil service were able to form. This in turn means that western ministers and senior civil servants have reliable points of contact in a way that might not be the case in Egypt, Lebanon or other countries in that region. For lack of a better word, Israel's political and social structure is just more familiar to western countries.

    On a somewhat grimmer note, Israel's precarious position in the Middle East has forced it to become creative when it comes to defending itself. This is all the more the case as the country wasn't always the recipient of the type of generous military aid that seems in place nowadays. The country was subjected to several western arms embargoes, including after the 1967 Six Day War, which required it to develop its own arms industry, as well as conducting probably the last-ever "cutting out operation" in history, just as an aside. As a result, the country has one of the most advanced military industrial sectors in the world, systems such as Iron Dome, the Spike anti tank missile, or the Arrow 3 surface to air missile are considered some of the best in their sectors. And many countries simply don't want to shut off their access to these systems.

    Finally, this advanced technology infuses much of Israel's economy, which is surprisingly diverse and well-developed. It is not only an exporter of a surprising variety of products of all shapes and sizes, it is also a great export market for western countries. In the end, money talks and western countries don't want to lose out on a lucrative market.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,983 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It's truly baffling how so many large European nations are not speaking out about the embattlement of Gaza and genocide through war and starvation of those poor people .

    France ,Germany UK , Sweden to name a few , never mind the US . Let's face it no one expects the US to stand for what's right anymore .

    Oct 7th 1139 killed . Abominable .

    So far in Gaza 51000 dead including 15000 children . Also abominable .

    Needs to stop but our government and Norway , Spain , Luxembourg , and a few others are just shouting into the wind .

    It's utterly depressing .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    They're killing Arabs though, I think this is essentially why the west doesn't care. If those starving kids missing limbs and having their heads blown off were blonde and white well none of this would be happening, let's face it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    It's not a sensitive topic. It's just very unfairly moderated and censored online.

    Always beware of those you cannot speak about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    @thomil

    Your ancestors were also starved, beaten, maimed, slaughtered and yet you pay billions a year in "reparations" to a faceless Jewish entity in a guise of victimhood.

    I would have many feelings if I was a modern day German, and guilt would certainly not be one of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Straight Talker


    It's a pity that some Irish politicians aren't as proactive when it comes to calling for a release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza.

    Cork 1990 All Ireland Senior Hurling and Football Champions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭eusap


    I think the reals answers lie with three Areas,

    Money = Jewish wealth especially in the US fund a lot on companies through investment vehicles. So big corporate are afraid to mention it

    Mossad = They have spent years gathering dirt on every International politician and use it to leverage in there direction

    Research = A lot of US companies use Israel for R&D that would not be allowed in the US, which is why Israel have a lot of weapons technology patents



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    They've always called for the release of hostages as part of an end to hostilities.

    What we've never seen is those who make the Israeli hostages the priority in the conversation acknowledge the many hundreds more Palestinians that are held as hostages by Israel.

    That has always bothered me as incredibly indicative of the biased views around the conflict.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,856 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    They have an incredibly powerful lobby in the most powerful country in the world. During the last Trump administration, Binyamin Netanyahu slept in Trump's son-in-law's bed (Jared was elsewhere at the time). Nobody wants to antagonise the US and, by extension, Israel.

    I'm quite proud of Ireland for calling out Israel's genocide. The UK media is pathetically servile by comparison, particularly the BBC.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 557 ✭✭✭taratee


    To suggest that the manner in which this war has been reported in the West is favourable to Israel is nothing short of outrageous. The media here in Ireland has shown absolutely no balance whatsoever in its reporting of the war, and its bias in favour of Palestine has been unwavering.

    Outside of Ireland, countries in the West are happy to help Israel because Israel is an ally, firstly. Secondly, Israel was attacked by Hamas on October 7th and Israel has the right to defend itself and it's people. It's that simple. Nobody — not even countries in the Middle East that support Palestine on paper — has any real interest in helping the people of Gaza or Hamas. No one seems to want to question why that is the case, and that’s the question that needs to be answered.

    Irish politicians don’t care about the hostages; Leo Varadkar made that clear with his tweet when Emily Hand was released.

    https://x.com/leovaradkar/status/1728535065242612184

    Classy stuff from the then Taoiseach!

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I think this goes someway to explaining the influence at a national or Diplomatic level. I'm interested in how it has so successfully migrated throughout much of the corporate and media levels of society also.

    There was very definitely a clear editorial decision made within the BBC for example about how to report on the conflict and that was echoed in many prominent media outlets, most definitely in the US.

    I'm also not sure how or to what degree these influences managed to reach for example, regional German administrations sufficiently to lead them to banning even peaceful protests on behalf of the Palestinians. That type of directive is similar to what we've seen in Russia in quelling undesired public opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    To suggest that the manner in which this war has been reported in the West is favourable to Israel is nothing short of outrageous. 

    Journalists from multiple UK media outlets have accused their own companies of exhibiting biases in favour of israel. Including 100 journalists at the BBC.

    In the US and the UK, we've seen prominent journalists be sidelined or lose their jobs after reporting in ways that called out Israel's actions for what they were. These journalists included Mehdi Hassan who lost his show, without explanation, on MSNBC and Sangita Myska who was removed as a presenter from LBC after she had done the same thing.

    As for Emily Hand, I wonder what her father now thinks of what he said in the immediate aftermath of her kidnapping when he said he wished she was dead rather than having being held in captivity by Hamas. She was released healthy and having been treated much better than what Palestinians held by Israel experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's interesting that you reference the need for an academic level deep dive to understand this issue because I feel you have somewhat answered it from an Academic perspective.

    I'm not saying you're wrong (leaving aside western influence in the changing government faces in middle east countries over the years) but I'm curious if what you refer to explains the fluidity at which western governmental/corporate/news media influencers have weighed in with their tacit and explicit support of Israel.

    All politics are local is a phrase we've often used to explain that no matter about big picture stuff, if it doesn't resonate with people locally, then politicians will not pay excessive attention to it because what they rely on is the local votes to get them re-elected time and time again. (This is less the case in two party environments where there is traditionally a large advantage for one party and where they can focus on other topics knowing their seat is largely safe).

    I feel the actions of the western influencers I am referring to will in time lead to more trouble and acrimony and will in fact weaken Israel as public sentiment continues to shift as their actions become less and less and defensible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    There are what, 30 hostages left? So what at this stage? Why would I care about them when 10s of 1000s of kids have been murdered in the meantime? There were 5 children killed in a drone attack in Gaza last week did anyone even hear about that?

    They value these hostages over 10s of 1000s of murdered women and children because the hostages are white. Simple as that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    It was never about the hostages from the very beginning. Spilt milk in Netanyahus eyes, the kibbutz dwellers had very low support for him, and were even the cause of him not getting elected back into government a few years back. But the hostages did serve as mechanism to allow a very public slaughter. Literally every interview with a UK/US/pro israeli goes as follows:

    Interviewer: "What do you have to say about the 27 children killed in the hospital bombing last night"

    Interviewee: "You cannot mention that without first acknowledging Oct 7 and the hostages"

    Interviewer: "But I did that at the start of the interview"

    Interviewee: "You cannot mention that without first acknowledging Oct 7 and the hostages. You are clearly antisemitic, this interview is over"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Because a huge amount of politicians in the USA have Israeli citizenship.

    It should be a rule in every single country that you cannot serve in national government if you have dual citizenship.

    How can a person be expected to work solely on behalf of the country they are elected to serve if they have citizenship of another, they're bound to look after the other countries interest aswell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,352 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,061 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This isn't just about the US, although it is the most egregious example.

    Germany has introduced several laws design to minimize any public advocacy for the Palestinians, the UK continues to supply military equipment to Israel even as they use that equipment to target and kill civilians. Ursula Von der Leyen immediately offered the EU support to Israel and hasn't made any move for the union to hold them accountable. Other countries have refused to uphold their commitment to international law in refusing to arrest Netanyahu or Gallant as they are required to do so given the arrest warrants issued for them by the ICC.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,802 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Here's a good article about it.


    https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lseupr/2025/02/07/the-politics-of-apocalypse-the-rise-of-american-evangelical-zionism/

    Basically evangelicals believe that the rapture will happen and god will end the world. When that happens, they will be whisked off to heaven. The left behind series are a series of books about the end times based on those prophesies. They're incredibly popular with evangelicals and probably help shape their world view.

    However for that prophesy to happen, they believe a number of other things need to occur. One of thois is the establishment of the state of Israel (done). The other is that Israel has to also control all of the land mentioned in the bible (not yes done).

    There's more christian zionists in the world than there are jewish people. And they're especially common in certain parts of the US. There's so many that it would be practically impossible for a republican to get elected to the presidency without their support.



Advertisement