Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Match Thread: Leinster v Northampton, 03/05/25

11819212324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I agree with a large part of this post - we see the same throughout Irish rugby. No province is currently playing to the level their resources should allow them to and all we hear are excuses.

    Having said that, the Prendergast point is either an example of you finding an excuse to take a pot shot at the young guy for the sake of it or highlighting that you dont watch much rugby if that was the worst attempt you've ever seen.

    The biggest issue with his tackle down the line was just getting his angles completely wrong, something that happens multiple times in every match - there were several in the other semi yesterday. It is even more excusable in this situation in open field when player has unexpected pace or acceleration, something that Pollock absolutely has. It isn't effort, it is just incredibly difficult thing to do that Prendergast did poorly.

    Given Prendergast's priors he could have absolutely been blown through by Pollock if he'd gotten his angle right but what you've done in your post is take a pot shot at a young player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,767 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    image.png

    Oh Foxtrol, never change😝

    MOD: Warned

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭luckyboy


    Re neither Irish outhalf going on the Lions tour this year, and whether that would be beneficial: ROG always makes out that his experiences on the 2001 Lions tour (also to Australia) were the making of him as a top class player. He got to witness Johnny Wilkinson up close and see what it took to reach the very top. Not sure if the same would apply this year (are Fin Smith or Finn Russell really at Wilkinson’s level), but just something to put out there …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭Dozz


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Looks as though this columnist got a bit of sand lodged painfully under his foreskin over the weekend:-

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/sport-columnists/arid-41625787.html

    Colin Sheridan: Demise of a Leinster empire that never conquered much

    There is little glory in the province's victories and much less in the way they lose. 

    There are few things more compelling in sport than watching a team that is absolutely supposed to win, who instead capitulate and lose. And not just lose, but lose on the buzzer, with the game and a season and their entire reputation on the line. Such was Leinster's fate on Saturday. Their defeat to Northampton in the Champions Cup semi-final was a gift to rugby – I'd be quite certain that a fair proportion of those who were watching by the end of what was a pulsating encounter were only doing so because Leinster were losing. Had they been ahead early on, the prospect of cutting the grass on a fine Saturday would've been far more enticing and certainly a better use of time. There is only so much eulogising of Jamison Gibson-Park one man can take. Lions bolters, the Leinster way, it’s all a bit gout inducing. Schadenfreude or not, it’s human nature to revel in the decline of an empire. Only in Leinster's case, this is an empire that never conquered anything.

    Just to recap – Leo Cullen's side is stacked with internationals. So stacked, they could afford to leave their best player, Jordie Barrett, on the bench until the final 30 minutes of a game they were losing, despite him being fully fit. Two seasons ago, they brought in Jacques Nienaber, a World Cup winning coach regarded as one of the best in the game. They signed Barrett, RG Snyman - a player Munster could not afford to keep – and French prop Rabah Slimani. They also acquired another highly regarded coach in Tyler Bleyendaal at the beginning of this season. With Barrett’s short-term deal set to expire in the summer, last week the team announced the signing of All Black star Rieko Ioane. With Ireland’s other three provinces struggling to recruit players, attract crowds and win matches, Leinster’s profligacy has understandably made them a target for derision, not least because their obvious affluence has only yielded one Champions Cup title in eight seasons, a sorry return in the context of their dominance of the domestic game and their incredibly inflated opinion of themselves.

    To compound the mirth derived from Leinster's loss on Saturday was the apparent ordinariness of their opponents, Northampton. Languishing seventh in the Premiership – a league constantly undermined by commentators in Ireland for its lack of quality – and without many of their best players, the expectation clearly was that this game would be a formality. Which might explain the thousands of empty seats in the Aviva. Either the fans stayed away because of a lack of interest, or they were too busy swamping pints in the premium suites to be bothered to sit back down and watch Northampton school the “best team in Europe.” Either way, this was a humiliating loss. Even the tries Leinster scored were so formulaic and rehearsed they looked like they were bought in Brown Thomas. Northampton by comparison were reckless and feckless and fearless and brilliant to watch. They will probably lose the final to Bordeaux in Cardiff in two weeks, but in terms of the service they did the game of rugby by winning in the style they did, they deserve immense credit.

    It’s OK to dislike Leinster Rugby for all the reasons stated. They have their pick of players and coaches; their entire model is predicated on winning the European Champions Cup. Everything is weighted in their favour. Funding – both IRFU and commercial – home draws, squad depth (they can afford to rest entire XVs for URC matches) - their stockpiling of players would be outlawed in most other sports, but for them it’s the norm to have four international out-halves (Barrett, Sam Prendergast, Ross Byrne and Ciaran Frawley). The Dublin media's veneration of the team, too, only heightens the sense of excitement when results like this happen. And they do. Every year for the last eight.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,928 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    It’s a big issue for the lions that they have absolutely no clue who their starting 10 is going to be.

    Before yesterday I was thinking Finn Russell might not even travel, but today he might actually be the only player you could trust to start.

    What’s definite is that the most crucial position in any team is completely wide open now for the Lions test team and it’s going to make the selection and the warm up games very interesting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,027 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Incredible that an actual columnist threw in a Dublin meeja jibe. Stockpiling of players outlawed in most sports? Conor George types do well it appears.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭The Guru 123


    First up, I don’t watch much rugby that much I will admit. I tend to dip in and out around the big games so that probably makes me extra aware of all the hype around those games. And of course Irish teams seem to lose a lot of those games.

    I wasn’t taking a “potshot” at Pendergast. I genuinely don’t mind either way if he’s picked for Ireland at whatever. I hope he has a great career. But in my (admittedly limited) viewing I can’t remember such a weak attempt at a tackle especially when he had the touch line to help him.

    But Prendergast is 22, he’s not 15. Look at the way Evan Ferguson is judged and he’s 2 years younger. If Prendergast is playing for Leinster and Ireland then he has to be judged at that standard. Simple as.

    Also wasn’t the guy that torched him down the touch line only 20?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Well not watching too much rugby makes sense then.

    Getting angles wrong is a common thing in rugby and the likes of NFL when you misjudge the pace of the opposing player when concerned about them cutting inside. I am in no way excusing his tackling in general just that one - to me that wasn't even his worst tackle attempt during that match.

    There is judging him to a standard and there is pure hyperbolic bile - like claiming that tackle was the worst attempt you've ever seen if you hadnt clarified that afterwards that you dont watch much rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭Jizique




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,397 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Imagine being fined for your players being too good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭The Guru 123


    Sorry but watching a lot of rugby or not he absolutely has to make that tackle.
    I’m not sure why but you seem very keen to make excuses for Pendergast for whatever reason.

    He’s a professional rugby player playing for Ireland and Leinster. He absolutely has to make that tackle. No excuses.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He absolutely should have made the tackle but he came in at the wrong angle and was beaten for pace. If he'd flung himself at Pollock it would have looked better but the outcome would have been the same ultimately.

    I suspect other teams don't have quite the same introspection when Sheehan scores down the tramlines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    one of the first things a player learns is to use the touch line as another defender, you cut off the space at the line and force the player to go inside, it slows him down and allows other get back.

    You would cringe if a player did that at underage level not to mind AIL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭tall chapy


    You do not deserve to win a game with 58% tackle success. The mentality from ALL the Leinster player was awful to a shocking extent. During my live WhatsApp chat during the game, we could see live..

    They kicked the ball away too much to a team that will run it back at you.

    The kick chase was awful and clear outs too slow.

    Poor tackling from Prendergast.

    His tackle attempt reminded me more like something from tag rugby rather than something form an Irish International player!

    Leinster not up for it and the line speed is shockingly slow compared to the Harlequins and Glasgow games

    These are comments are just from the first half!!!

    We both believed they should have taken the 3pts at 76mins and questioned why it was not a penalty try.

    As one of the other posters said, It was a sad day when the players at 76 mins had to scream towards the bench to decide what to do.

    I was never a big fan of the neinaber defence at domestic level, people forget he used it at Munster and it did not get them far. We went from a team that sliced teams open with a sword, to a team using a hammer instead.

    One big disappointment for me is Leinster's attitude towards their fans. The narrative is that the players are devastated, not one fking mention of the fans. The fans have supported Leinster for years forking out money for expensive match tickets and travel to games. What we more or less got from Leo was ..'we move on to Zebre...nothing to see here..and as for Neinaber he said the fans will have to accept it, so suck it up Leinster fans....

    Watch jordie Barratt at the full time whistle. He had a face of a guy, why did you not start me, why did I come here...

    I'm afraid Leo must go, my choice to replace him Noel McNamara, attack coach for Bordeaux. He will get us back playing Leinster style rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,070 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Watching back, **** McCarthy is such a waste of space on the pitch. Has to be one of the laziest players I've seen come through in a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 416 ✭✭roverjoyce


    Listen to Ben Young's and Dan Coles new podcast

    Good to listen to different views compared to Irish commentary

    Their views on SP and Barrett especially



  • Administrators Posts: 56,309 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    There was certainly an element of hubris in the Leinster team selection. The most egregious being the benching of Barrett, a decision that I think pretty much finds inexplicable. Starting Deegan, who just is not at this level of rugby. Playing Healy for 20 minutes, in fact, picking Healy at all.

    This nonsense of starting a player you intend to sub after 20 minutes needs to be thrown in the bin. Healy offered nothing. Henshaw was an empty shirt. Deegan may as well have watched the game in the stands.

    Beyond this, Furlong is clearly not the player he was, McCarthy's 3 year central deal is starting to look like a mistake, Snyman displayed why he only makes the bench for the boks while Lowe and Ringrose struggled to put any stamp on the game. Unfortunately for Sam Prendergast his current limitations came to the fore again, for 3 of their tries he was an empty shirt. Pollock gassing him on the outside, his half arsed attempt at a tap for their 3rd try and he may as well not have existed when he tried to tackle Augustus for their 4th try. I am a big Prendergast fan but if he cannot learn how to defend very quickly he is going to find his career is underwhelming.

    But to move on from 10, which wasn't the biggest issue of the day, to the issue that really was the biggest issue. Leinster are mentally weak. They absolutely cannot cope with a team that has the mental fortitude to take their punches and then punch back. They rely far too much on blitzing teams and then running up a score when that team is mentally checked out.

    You could argue that it's cause they don't get tested enough until this time of the year, but I don't think this stands up to scrutiny after the weekend. Leinster weren't beaten by world beaters, they were beaten by what is in reality a fairly average team that came to Dublin and decided they'd have a proper go at it. They are bottom half of the Premiership for a reason.

    The decision not to take the 3 with about 4 minutes to go is one of the dumbest decisions I have ever seen in a game of this magnitude. It's dumber than the similar decision Leinster made last season that pretty much cost them a league win.

    I think this is a game Jack Conan will want to forget very quickly. He made that call to go for the line out (why would he even look toward the bench, that decision is so easy), and then to compound it all he was the one who lost the ball in the last play. Getting ripped in that situation is embarrassing, there are many players playing in Ireland who would be eviscerated for making that sort of mistake.

    The weekend shows the importance of imposing the right mindset on the squad. For all of Leinster's previous wins in this competition they've had a talisman player who led by example, usually Isa Nacewa. They had this player at the weekend in the form of Jordie Barrett but for reasons beyond all comprehension thought he should ride the pine instead so they could start Robbie Henshaw who has been fairly indifferent for the entire season.

    Cullen's time is surely up, it is incredible that this Leinster squad has a good chance of going down as the best team that has never won anything. His cliche-ridden robotic interviews after yet another failure are surely rage inducing for Leinster supporters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭almostover


    Great post. It's interesting you mention that talismanic figure being key to success in the past. Names like Elsom, Thorn, Nacewa spring to mind. And two homegrown names, Sexton and BOD.

    It's something sadly lacking in modern Irish rugby. A real leader. That's what Leinster lacked yesterday. Well, he was on the bench for most of the game. Like the good sitting room in a traditional Irish household. Never used but always ready.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,070 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Doris is every inch the leader that those lads were. He singlehandedly brought us back into the match. For all the lauding of Jordie, he was right there when Conan chose not to kick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,027 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Doris played about 15 minutes of the second half. In that time he scored a try, won two turnovers and kicked a 50-22. He's one of the few Leinster players on Saturday that played to the level required to actually win the game. Shame he went off.

    I don't know if he would have decided to kick the three either though. But maybe had he not been injured we wouldn't have needed that. There was a period right after he was taken off that Leinster lost their heads again and let Northampton back into it. It was a collective failure of the squad of management that one player going off, even if he's world class, led to such a deterioration in play so quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    What this comment also identifies, how many players did Leinster have out there who had a below par performance, just far too many.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,397 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    He did exactly the same thing against Glasgow. Barrett wasn't there to bail him out this time. It wasn't even the worst of his 'tackles' against Northampton. How anyone could look at him literally throw himself on the ground rather than attempt to make a tackle in the first half and not be disgusted, I don't know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭crusd


    How dare the mean journalist criticise Leinster with reality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭crusd


    Ireland dont like giving players any game time until they are at least 22. Prendergast is a rare one that got some game time at 21. For Leinster and Ireland Sam Prendergast has had a total of 35 matches. At only 9 months older Fin Smith has played 98!

    The biggest problem for Ireland is minutes. In the past it was talked about as a virtue, and when you reach your peak, being able to manage minutes is an advantage, but the trouble is players get so little game time from 18-23 that they never get the opportunity to reach their peak in many cases.

    If you look at 10s of the past, Sexton and O'Gara, both had a lot of gametime at AIL level when it was more competitive than it is now getting minutes in the legs and in the head.

    Can anyone imagine an Irish backrow only just turned 20 who has already had almost 30 professional appearances like Henry Pollack. Would be lucky to have that many appearances by 23. And thats why we fall down under pressure. Players just dont have the game experience when they are expected to deliver.

    Until we both start trusting young players and re-energise the AIL, we will continue to see players who reach their mid 20s without the game time or exposure both to reach their potential and perform under pressure.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I tend to reserve my disgust on a rugby pitch for acts of foul play.

    He needs to improve or it will be a serious impediment to his career. But he wasn't even the worst defensive player for Leinster on Saturday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I dunno Podge, he seemed to have 4-5 really, really poor defensive moments. Some of them related to the tries conceded. I'd be hard pushed to name another who performed more poorly defensively.

    I think if you listed the weaknesses of the players in that 23 (maybe Healy excepting) the biggest gap between weakness and what's reasonable at this level would be Prendergast's defence.

    There was more going on on the day, and the stuff like his pass for the TOB try was class, but his defence remains a massive issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭standardg60


    I'm finding it quite humourous reading their floundering attempts to defend SP's floundering attempts to defend.



Advertisement
Advertisement