Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Match Thread: Leinster v Northampton, 03/05/25

11820222324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,090 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    I think the key was there was no Saints player near him competing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,070 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That's been the flaw in the team for the last few big games, and it's the area I think Leo does deserve criticism. They should be making better decisions in this moments. Trained to understand which options are best, situational football.

    We lost the first final in part for being aggressive enough in going for the try. Second time out we're way more aggressive, but lose in part for not looking to take the points. Last year was just a tight match at the highest level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 791 ✭✭✭jackal


    Would not have personally been praising Leinster if they had got it done there, but of course the result is all that matters and it would have been largely glossed over.

    When the result goes the other way, there is no glossing over it, and the result is all that matters, not the what ifs.

    There’s no shame in trying to win it, however they didn’t need to win it with a try. It’s a low percentage play vs a high percentage play with a huge downside if it doesn't come off.

    I think your take is probably right on the money and it was a lack of leadership rather than arrogance.

    Maybe the arrogance thing is being easily tacked on because Leinster were such heavy favourites etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭almostover


    Deegan had the ball on the ground for a second or 2 alright, could well have been pinged for not releasing / playing the ball off feet. But in the spirit of the game maybe the best decision was made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭almostover


    The arrogance thing is a bit off really. That had nothing to do with what happened on the pitch. Maybe the team selection could be criticised as arrogant but what happened in the final minutes was rabbit in the headlights stuff. Every decision was awful, not to pick for the posts 4 minutes from time, not to kick with 1 minute remaining and then to tap and go straight into contact v 14 men, who had a forward in the bin. Surely a scrum or lineout vs. 7 was the better option if not kicking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    he couldn’t have been pinged for any of that because he is allowed according to the rules to do what he did



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 579 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    The laws (14.7) say ‘immediately’. Other aspects of the laws define a time - 3-5 seconds to use the ball off a stationary scrum. He could have been penalized but I would assume immediately does give some interpretation leeway to the ref.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,070 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I think Deegan absolutely ought have been pinged there. That was an eternity when you consider most rucks take less than 3 secs



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,397 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    you can't start the action from a position where you're off your feet. You can go off your feet during the action of scoring, passing, tackling (but not rucking, even if it's not often wnforced).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭ersatz


    just watching Leo’s post match presser and I swear he is saying the exact same stuff as every other year. He’s fairly masterful with saying nothing much but I think I’ve heard the ‘we want it so much that sometimes there’s desperation and ‘a lack of composure…now we need to turn out attention to the URC’.
    ‘we’ve a stronger group now, improving year on year’

    This is pure PR hot air, a lack of composure leads to bad decisions…that is the problem, not a desire to win. He’s purposely misidentifying the most difficult problem, year on year pressure results in bad decisions, but that is the very end of the line of decisions that produce those moments, and those decisions are to do with rotation, selection and mental prep, all his responsibility.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The rules of the scrum don’t apply because it’s not a scrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭flatty


    Leinster are an outstanding club and team who played well, it's just NH played a bit better. Leinster didn't "choke". They go to the well again and again and keep trying. Lads calling them bottlers from the keyboard should be ashamed. They've been in epic games. Bit of luck here and there and they'd have another star , but they have four FFS, and are constantly up there with the very best. There is clearly a great culture, a great team, and folk want to rip that up and get rid of Cullen, who seems a thoroughly decent man to me, and has fostered this excellence.

    And going after Sam Prendergast. He's only a young lad learning his trade, and he looks an outstanding prospect to me. He mistimed one tackle (possibly, that NH lad is a flier) over 80 mins of brutal hard rugby.

    Some people should take a look at themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,316 ✭✭✭✭phog


    He never said it does. He quoted Law 14.7 which is about the tackle and then as an example of time he used a scrum law as the scrum law defines time whereas the relevant law on tackles just says "immediately"

    For me, Deegan & Leinster got lucky there, on another day he could be penalised for not releasing the ball quicker



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭The Guru 123


    This right here is why Irish rugby will continue to underachieve.

    The whole culture is way too nice themselves and no one takes responsibility for the sane failings occurring again and again. “We were unlucky”, “we played great just they were better”, “the ref robbed us” Etc


    Leinster were 1/25 to win that match yesterday. I doubt there has ever been a semi final in living memory with such a clear favourite. They had by far the stronger team, playing at home, had an extra man for a significant period of the game and blew it against a team that’s in the bottom half of the premiership.

    Players and management will get massive criticism for this and I’m sorry to say it but they deserve every bit of it. The team selection, the on field decision making, the missed tackles (Prendergasts effort on Pollock down the touch line is the worst attempt by a professional rugby player I’ve ever seen) all need to be called out or the same things will just happen again and



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    If Cullen is still there next season then we know nothings been learnt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,618 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Cullen keeps saying the same thing again and again every year after all these knockout defeats, he can't see what the problem is, poor decision making under pressure, Leinster are making the same mistakes over and over again in these knockout matches. Obviously no team is going to win every tight match they play, but, if you continue to lose tight matches, then you have to look at yourself and see what you're doing wrong and work on how to solve that problem. Leinster haven't learned from these losses and probably haven't learnt a thing from Saturday, they probably still can't understand why they didn't just blow Northampton away like they do against most URC teams.

    Poor decision making both on field and off field are the mean issues, plus there seems to have been an element of complacency too, an expectation that Northampton should just lie down and roll over, and when this didn't happen Leinster went to pieces and panic set in. The fact this Leinster team has won nothing over the last few years given the resources and playing staff is absolutely scandalous, Cullen should be replaced if only to send the signal that what's gone on is no longer acceptable. Cullen might be a decent man, but, doesn't appear capable of getting this Leinster team over the line when it matters most.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Bit of luck here and there......ah c'mon

    This is a professional outfit with some of the best home grown players in the world, one of the biggest professional squads in Northern Hemisphere, the resources to recruit even better foreign players, top class facilities, world cup winning coach, routinely selling 30,000 tickets for home games. They have summer camps all over the province which are sold out.

    Leinster need to be doing better! This is not a "bad luck" situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    he doesn’t need to release the ball because no saints player is trying to take it.

    The scrum and the breakdown are different situations and nothing to do with each othet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    These things have been called out and happened again.


    Prendergasts tackling was called out numerous times in the 6 nations and it was exploited by saints. His efforts at tackling come as no surprise to anyone who has been watching rugby this year.

    Leo’s decision to not start his best team in the league semi final a few years back was an error then and it was repeated again this weekend.


    The time to call them out is past, the time to take action is better late than never. Prendergast is in a position where Leinster dominate most games so he doesn’t need to make many if any tackles, it’s when there is parity or a loss of the gain line that he gets called into action, something that will happen more and more at international level, he needs to spend the summer and pre season in tackling practice, get him lessons from stringer or someone, It’s that fearless mindset he needs to learn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Law 14.7.1: Tackled players must immediately:

    a. Make the ball available so that play can continue by releasing, passing or pushing the ball in any direction except forward. They may place the ball in any direction.

    b. Move away from the ball or get up.

    c. Ensure that they do not lie on, over or near the ball to prevent opposition players from gaining possession of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,316 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I'd need to see it again but I'm certain there are two Saints players involved in that phase. If Deegan had ended up face down rather than up and held that ball under him instead of waving it about then it's a 100% penalty against him.

    If you're not getting the point being made about the 3-5 seconds at scrum time at this stage we may as well leave it.

    As an aside, is the game available to view on RTE Player, I see it there but unable to watch the game but the ads play perfectly for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Great photo in today's Irish Times. Furlong the debagger!

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,316 ✭✭✭✭phog


    It's a tackle, the law is clear, the tackled player must release the ball immediately and make it playable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,070 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    A lot quicker than what Deegan did



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,316 ✭✭✭✭phog


    When a poster tried explaining that to you, you dismissed it. I'm not going to waste my time trying to do it for you but it's quicker than with what Deegan got away with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    a poster referenced the rules of the scrum which have no relevance to the breakdown / tackle area, you may as well reference the rules of baton passing in the 4 x 400 mixed relay as that because neither are relevant.

    The word immediately is subjective, there is no definition in time as to how quickly that should or shouldn’t be. Deegan was completely legal in what he did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭almostover


    You've hit the nail on the head with Prendergast. It always appears to be a fear thing with him around defensive contact. He is a decent sized lad, 6' 4" and 90 odd kilo. He looks gangly but ultimately his defensive issues are attitude based. He really needed to scrag Pollock there, into touch if possible. He delayed making the tackle and Pollock just accelerated past him. That defensive hesitation is always there and hasn't improved this season despite a lot of high level game time.

    I'm hoping he can work on it over the summer tour. Just like Crowley needs to work on his goal kicking and touch finders. Neither should go on the Lions tour on current form. And I think that would be a good thing for Ireland. Both players need to be getting minutes on the summer tour to improve those facets of their games.

    Post edited by almostover on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,272 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Every player has a weakness, it’s the ability of the team to compensate for and stop that weakness being highlighted and capitalised upon that matters, and the ability of the opposition to attack that weakness that can win games. Look at Munsters current lineout as the perfect example.

    Some international teams have no decent left footed kicker - Ireland and Leinster have Lowe - it means exits from the 22 can be a strength for IRL while it can lead to terrible field Position for other sides.



Advertisement
Advertisement