Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1159160162164165178

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Just listening to Dan O'Brien. How strange to hear someone talk about immigration on RTE with such common sense.

    Sadly the ultra-liberals talking about seeing immigrants on the bus going to work early in the day is such nonsense. It's actually infantalising immigrants. Also trying to silo housing and immigration is farcical.

    250,000 immigrants to Ireland in one year, no one with an ounce of sense can say that is a decent idea.

    People saying this did not affect the housing crisis simply are determined not to tell the truth.

    Just thinking about it the other day, Ireland has a lot to thank Nikita Hand for. A very brave woman, her impact is greater than many people realise. If McGregor, with his millions and fanbase, could be a major political figure solely on the basis of immigration if it wasn't for her. It won't happen for him now. Thank God. Someone like him could well exploit the dishonesty in public life around immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Why pick the whole population of the county of Monaghan?

    Lets drill a bit further…

    image.png

    4,077 adults in the town. 800 of them turn out, which is ~20% of the voting public in the town. Thats one you cannot ignore. Politicians need to get their act together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,001 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Because I am not 'picking' anything .

    You quoted/ misquoted original post which talked about the accredited research which decides whether a protest is significant or not. It was in response to Royal Celt a few days ago .

    You said it was gleeful which it was not .

    I credited the protest for being peaceful. But no mention of anything except what you misquote.

    I suggest if you want to continue the discussion you go back and read the original post along with the link and research and not making assertions about something you clearly have no idea about .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭briangriffin


    If I quoted here now the immigrants who were rapists and murderers who came to ireland and committed crimes in ireland, would that mean that all immigrants were rapists and murderers?

    Apply your "kind" "progressive" logic across the board and do some critical thinking, does it all make sense to you?

    Post edited by briangriffin on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    I would view him in the same category as those who support Trump and Farage . Misguided.

    Anyone who do show up and cheer on this idea of Ireland for the Irish or Ireland is full stuff being promoted at these protests seem to just be sheep who spent a lil bit too much time on Twitter. They are the people I feel sorry for.

    Ah yes, the old condescending 'yea are all just misguided sheep' from those in their ivory towers looking down upon the rabble of peasants who dare have the audacity to complain about mass-migration into Ireland.

    A hangover from the old Ireland is one where many people thought that those who were doctors, accountants, teachers, solicitors, bankers, civil servants, priests, etc… had a better knowledge than most. These people were 'credible' when they gave their opinions on the prevailing issues of the day in the wider community.

    Ah shure, if Dr. Murphy down the road says it's a good thing to vote for, shure it must.

    Those folks in those positions knew they were held in 'esteem' in their communities. This grandstanding of self importance was firmly passed on to their kids, and their next generation and so forth. Of course that was all grand and dandy pre-Internet where The Irish Times, RTE, etc… had massive sway over public opinion.

    Not any more. Social Media, especially Twitter/X has broken away from the "we won't tell you this because we think it's bad for you" style of news delivery. Think of it, only for Twitter/X nobody would have heard about the protests in Carrickmacross, Donegal, Dundrum, etc… The narrative of those who were previously held in 'esteem' is seriously challenged now and of their descendants.

    They deflect by lashing out at those leading the challenge as racists, far-right, fascists, etc… because the oldest trick in the book is to accuse your opponents of that which you are guilty of yourself.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    To be fair, not everyone who attends an anti-immigration protest is a far-right thug or a racist. Some of them are just thick. Easily led and seeking easy answers as to why their own lives are shit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭briangriffin


    25% of the population of ireland as of today May 2025 are foreign born, that means born outside of the Republic of Ireland I'm not sure how that doesn't compute for you but it's true. You are trying to conflate non citizen with foreign born. But you know that because you research a lot I beleive. It's a dishonest argument.

    Naturalisation ceremonies are happening many times during the year they are completely separate to heritage. 50,000 people were granted irish citizenship through naturalisation in the past 2 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    I won't be lectured by anyone who thinks "if I want your opinion, I'll give it to you". Anyone with half a functioning brain cell can see that McGregor is a horrible person in general. But, because he holds an opinion on something, doesn't make him wrong on that opinion because he's a horrible person, in general. People are more and more listening to the message and less and less concerned with who the messenger is. Quite a conundrum for the classists to grapple with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Carbon taxes and the lack of rail to Monaghan I suppose, thankfully Trump's policies are bringing down the price of oil so more folk will soon be able to afford to travel to these remote protests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Must be great to live in an ivory tower where the non-EU national maid comes in every morning at 9am to spray Mr Sheen around the gaff and whip up some poached eggs for breakfast.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    I wouldn't know. Unlike the kind of of people who attend anti-immigration protests, I have to work for a living.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    But you are picking something. You are moving the goalposts. You said the whole of County Monaghan should be used as the baseline to measure the protest numbers against. Your were very happy to use national numbers against the Dublin protest last weekend, no issues there - it was advertised as a national protest.

    However, the Carrickmacross protest - which almost nobody outside of the town knew was planned, and only heard about it after the protest happened. In this local protest approx. 20% of the voting public in the town (or 13.5% of the entire population) made it their business to protest.

    You said previously that 3.5% of the whole population are needed to make it an issue of note. One that politicians should really be taking account of as it represents a decent representation of people against a policy.

    With all that in mind, I think it is very fair and generous to say that the people of Carrickmacross have sent a resounding message that they are most unhappy with the plans for the town. After all, I am keeping well within the guardrails of your original assertation. The 3.5% required has been exceeded by multiples of factors in Carrickmacross. Fair play to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Ah fair play, good to hear you work for a living. One question though, does it ever grate on you that the difference between the figure on the top of your payslip and the bottom of your payslip is used to bail out failed bankers, failed developers, government incompetence and now they add in spurious migrants into the ever growing list of what the government can blow that money on - anything else but what and who really needs to be taken care of in this country? Or are you just in a slightly more comfortable place than most and don't give a feck? The old "I'm allright Jack" attitude so it's fine to poop down on everyone else who has concerns as…

    "just thick. Easily led and seeking easy answers as to why their own lives are shit"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    I wish people would protest against government incompetence and bailing out the wealthy, rather than punching downwards and blaming immigrants for society's ills. Politicians, bankers and developers must be delighted every time they see a racist protest. It takes the spotlight off themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Dan O’Brien has made a valuable contribution to discussion on immigration.

    However it is depressing that he himself, quite understandably, had to clarify that he is obviously not a racist having married an immigrant himself.

    Unfortunately you have a cohort of people, some of them posting here, who can’t accept the statistics, who won’t accept that 250,000 people moving to Ireland in 12 months is too much. They’d rather play the man than the ball.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    That is a disgraceful comment which I hope you are big enough to delete.

    ‘Bit of a prick’??

    Dan O’Brien was one of the best commentators on the financial crash, who advocated solutions that were effective. He certainly didn’t favour pain for the sake of it. Disliking him because he said 250,000 people came to Ireland in one year is wildly unfair.

    I would have expected a bit better from you.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,680 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Everyone who is anti immigration is not a far right thug.

    I have yet to see an anti immigration march organised by people who aren’t far right thugs.

    Anyone saying these protests aren’t significant in their numbers needs to wake up.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,235 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Well like it or not we need bankers and developers.

    We also need well educated skilled immigrants who come here legally through the visa system to fill job vacancies in the health sector etc.

    What we don't need is people with little or no education and maybe just a few words of English showing up with no documents who will be nothing but a drain on resources from the moment they arrive at Dublin Airport.

    Housing needs to be sorted, nobody is disputing this.

    Although for three parties who are always banging on about housing we often find it's TDs and councillors from SF, Labour and PBP that put in the most objections to planning applications especially in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    So can we expect a large number of mainstream economists to call out Dan O'Brien on his, as you say, controversial views?

    I'm looking forward to seeing these critiques posted here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,649 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    In what way is your response related to what I said?
    The meetings were addressed by rapists and racists. You are the only one concluding that everyone attending these meetings is a rapist or racist. Perhaps you should examine your own thinking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,687 ✭✭✭riddles


    the dithering “in in in terms of” M Martin and the sickly prince Harris white wash every discussion with a nod to “international commitments!” Looks like the Danes can bypass a lot of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Sgt Hartman


    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,382 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Never going to happen. As a civilised nation we willingly signed up to help others in need as we’ve been giver aid on numerous occasions ourselves.

    And we will remain civilised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,397 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Once you sign up to these things are you signing up forever or are they mechanisms for retreating from such commitments?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 20,810 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod - @Burt Renaults, please stop all the generalisations and read the OP, announcing that you work is an anecdote and irrelevant to the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,529 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    Not to mention that the interpretation of said commitments changed dictated by others, a lot of eastern European countries finding that out over the last few years. They signed up for the European Convention on Human Rights in the 90s, a convention which was mostly written in the 50s and in neither of those decades did those signing or writing it take it to mean whatever left wing nonsense that the ECHR keeps interpretation it as.

    Ireland won't do anything until the very end but hopefully at least for this, the UK does eventually leave it and then another few follow. Just need a one to start and a lot more will follow, same as with the border walls and offshoring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,397 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Are reform in favour of leaving? Because after they won the local elections, change is very likely on the way come the next GE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    The fact that the current economic system requires bankers and developers doesn't mean that people shouldn't be angry with them for the damage they've done to the country. Far more damage than immigrants, but it takes more effort and thought to punch upwards.

    Having worked and studied with many people who arrived here as refugees, I'd dispute the notion that they're a drain on resources. Maybe Leg End Reject will come along and warn you about making generalisations. Or maybe it's ok, if the targets are only refugees.

    I think housing is the only valid reason to object to refugees being allowed into the country. But when I saw people in Dublin last week waving tatty tricolours and shouting "Get them out", I'm not sure that housing was their focus. Pure hatred.

    Mod - warned for breach of forum charter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,529 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    Reform do.

    The Tories somewhat do, if you remember that was the alternative suggestion to brexit offered by Theresa May before she was PM before the referendum.

    Labour aren't for leaving but in recent days even they have started "reviewing how it's applied", which means they won't leave just make staying in irrelevant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    An opinion poll today had housing as the top concern of voters, followed by immigration. Obviously the two are closely linked.


    Tbh Ireland would be an outlier of immigration wasn’t an issue. Our wonderful leaders spent a few years pretending there was no issue at all, but they know that’s not on now and have been pivoting a little. Expect much more of it now.

    It’s such a shame that the issue got made a left-right issue. No sensible person thinks that no immigration is possible or desirable. The debate really needs to be calm and focus on what is a proper limit and how to reach that. No sensible person thinks that having a few thousand new immigrants every week of the year is a good idea.



Advertisement