Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1405406407409411

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 536 ✭✭✭vswr


    pushing a pro-Russian agenda is 100% justifying the war, no matter how many ways you want to dress up that you aren't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,108 ✭✭✭BKtje


    While the US is a large part of NATO, it is not NATO in and of itself. What NATO does and what its individual members do are two different things. The US cannot force NATO countries into a war that is not in line with the alliance's articles.

    People may not believe that NATO is solely a defensive organization, which is why they "side" with Russia, and I can understand their skepticism. However, my counter to that would be to judge each organization on its actions rather than words. NATO has never invaded a country (there have been military operations, but usually for peacekeeping or in response to specific events), while Russia has invaded and/or annexed multiple regions.

    EDIT: For further clarification, even article 5 does not mean that a member is forced to invade another country. All it states is that the state must aid the aggressed member in some form but not necessarily militarily.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭macraignil


    So you really think no one believes the reality that NATO is defensive pact?

    Not sure why you are mentioning another war again.

    I understand some Americans hating russia with their record on war crimes and atrocities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    is this minerals deal going to be any good for Ukraine?


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    "You are him…the one they call the "Baba Yaga"…

    yo! donnie vonshitzinpants..you sir are the skidmark on the jocks of humanity!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Going by the sharp rise in people jumping on various conspiracy theories over the past 5 years it seems that there's no shortage of people willing to 'get on board' with the kinds of posts from our engineering friend… in this case it ticks a number of boxes - US bad, NATO malevolent, Russia provoked, Gaza hypocrisy - and so anyone spouting that kind of rhetoric will get plenty of "well said"s. Most of that kind of back slapping and mutual appreciation seems to go on in dedicated echo chamber forums, threads etc… Facebook, Reddit… the usual suspects… where it can appear that actually there is a groundswell of support for your views, when in fact there isn't. That's the danger of social media - the distortion of perception. Just take a look at the attention given to that scrote McGregor over the past while, tipping dangerously close to the "a man standing up for the masses" guff.

    No balanced mind could consider the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its conduct in waging war for the past three years and reach the kind of conclusions that are being spouted above. Whatever about harmless contrarians and uncompromising peaceniks… what is always striking about posts like those above is the inability of the posters to speak directly to the atrocities committed - as painstakingly evidenced by the likes of dedicated UN agencies.

    Important to keep calling them out on it, frustrating as groundhog day is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭jmreire


    1st, off, when I hear the name Mearsheimer or rand mentioned, thats it for me. Theres a few other unmentionables around too, a McGregor, Tucker Carlson etc. As for Ukrainian corruption, any state where Putin was the father and Russia the mother, whan else can you expect except Corruption? Sure Ukraine has a corruption problem, but Zelensky is tackling it. Same as all the other ex-USSR states had to do. That self-same corruption was the very reason why so many states sought independence, and Chechny / Georgia as well. Having lived a Nr of years in Russia, inc. Chechnya and also in Syria, I know damned well what Russki Mir is all about,having up close and personal experience of it. And in straight out black and white, and to hell with the "nuances", Its these self same "Nuances" that Putin has used to drive wedges into EU Governments to create confusion.He's good at that. Straight up, clear and simple, Putin is a murderous psychopath, and has to be stopped dead in his tracks. and the sooner the better, for the good of everyone, including the Russians. And F**K the Nuances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,009 ✭✭✭scottser


    Zackly. Ukraine's accession to the EU depends on them correcting the structural opportunities for corruption and they have made huge strides over the past 10 years. There's an OECD report due out in a few days on their progress but it is admirable given the strain on the country's resources.

    Ukraine's progress in anti-corruption over the past 10 years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Of course, Ukraine are not getting a free pass into the EU, the rules will be followed, no exceptions. But they will get EU membership, no matter how long it takes…they belong in the EU, and its a mutual need. With the Russian bear on the prowl,( or its cubs) the EU needs a strong military bulwark between it and Russia. Ukraine, Poland etc fit the bill admirably. Theres a lot of "Oh, but Ukraine is corrupt" fanboys around, but no comeback when they are asked when is Russia going to start anti-corruption measures like President Zelensky has implemented?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Time will tell, I guess. But it doesn't look bad at all from Ukraine's point of view. I mean there doesn't seem to be anything unpalatable or demanding from them. It keeps Trump thinking he's won because it's the best deal ever etc (until he trashes it and blames everyone but himself) ... So it keeps him on Ukraine's side, or not totally on Russia's side... For the moment.

    1000015272.jpg

    Looks like Ukraine knows how to play cards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And very important, it will keep Putin from attacking anything Trump considers "his". so any area currently under Ukrainian control,containing mineral or any other kind of wealth, should be safe from Russian predations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭jmreire


    You don't even have to leave Russia to find Russian haters…..ethnic Russians are universally unpopular throughout all the Russian Federation.And with good reason!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    Some day Russians will learn how to live civilized and transform from orcs into elves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,651 ✭✭✭Infini


    Honestly Zelenskyy's patience is probably the biggest reason he does so well, sometimes to get somewhere it just requires engaging with most people and reminding them of the facts and circumstances to get them to change their mind. When it comes to the likes of Trump, easiest way is to just blue ball them and then quietly remind him he'll look like a pussy if he waits too long or messes about. In the end he folds like a cheap lawn chair because he's all about optics and needs to look like a winner and not a loser.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Theres a few other unmentionables around too,

    There's nothing in the thread charter forbidding talk of Mearsheimer.

    You've outlined your position very very strongly and I have to wonder, if you are able bodied, what is holding you back from fighting Russia on the Frontline when you believe so strongly in war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I have to wonder, if you are able bodied, what is holding you back from fighting Israel in the streets of Gaza, when you believe so strongly in war……



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You really don't need to plop back to people fighting for Ukraine to defend your position. Your argument should be able to stand by itself rather than engulf itself in constant whataboutery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,407 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭engineerws


    I don't believe in Hamas and I am in favour of a negotiated settlement in Gaza.

    I would imagine I wouldn't be allowed in Gaza to fight against Israel and having spoken to a Gaza friend recently, it sounds more like a concentration camp than a warzone. The only thing stopping people leaving Ukraine is Zelensky whereas in Gaza there is almost no escape possible. Spoke same friend who escaped Gaza recently and he said that the Israeli's should kill them all or let them to leave as what they are doing is hell (akin to torture). Very very different from Ukraine.

    I participate in marches and BDS. I do not advocate for arming Hamas with the latest western technology although sometimes I feel it might not be a bad idea.

    I understand a lot of Ukrainian supporters are also pro Israel in line with USA policy but in that situation I am very very strongly against the Israeli genocide but even so do not resort to calling Israeli's human animals as they refer to the Palestinians or orcs as the pro Ukrainian people refer to Russians. I remind myself of the three nice Israeli's I met although still remember the twenty or so asshole Israeli's I met too.

    In both wars I'm pro peace and would love to see Palestinians and Israeli's reconcile but it is very far from that currently. I think the first step is for NATO's leader to stop arming and funding Israel and then Israel would have to face consequences.

    Hope that clarifies my position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,982 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    There are many political commentators. You've chosen one of them who is well known for having controversial and Russian leaning views (whose views have been roundly picked apart by many of his peers). That's not a coincidence.

    Like Hitler, appeasing Putin only results in war and aggression. Two decades of Europe bowing and scraping to him - we've learnt bitter lessons, he's demonstrated, again and again, that he will never stop unless stopped. The peace that we've all enjoyed for decades has been replaced by hybrid warfare from Moscow, constant aggression, images on Russian evening news of setting a nuke off the coast of Ireland, continuous threats to European cities and countries, dragging anchor chains over undersea cables, cyber-attacks, political meddling, troll factories, annexing Crimea, starting a proxy war in Ukraine then launching a full-scale invasion.

    One man is the root cause of all this. He can end all of this at any time of his choosing.

    Yet you faithfully parrot his propaganda here that he's somehow the victim and desperately attempt to shift blame away from him at every opportunity. Amazing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I don't believe in Hamas and I am in favour of a negotiated settlement in Gaza.

    I never mentioned Hamas.

    I would imagine I wouldn't be allowed in Gaza to fight against Israel and having spoken to a Gaza native recently, it sounds more like a concentration camp than a warzone. The only thing stopping people leaving Ukraine is Zelensky whereas in Gaza there is almost no escape possible. Spoke with a friend who escaped Gaza recently and he said that the Israeli's should kill them all or let them to leave as what they are doing is hell (akin to torture). Very very different from Ukraine.

    I understand a lot of Ukrainian supporters are also pro Israel but in that situation I am very very strongly against the Israeli genocide but even so do not resort to calling Israeli's human animals as they refer to the Palestinians or orcs as the pro Ukrainian people refer to Russians.

    Fluffy white noise.

    In both wars I'm pro peace 

    Then you should agree that the simplest way to peace is Russia simply going home or a ceasefire and negotiation. Ukraine have agreed to both of these scenarios. Russia has rejected both. So what's the solution?

    Hope that clarifies my position.

    Oh I'm well aware of your position. It's just extremely selective and hypocritical.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭engineerws


    From my reading, there's a lot worse in Moscow than Putin. Putin is a moderate, just listen to what Medvedev says....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭engineerws


    I never mentioned Hamas.

    I suggested the previous poster fight for Ukraine. You asked why I didn't fight against Israel (presumably for Hamas?). I contrasted my opinion against that of the poster who said **** nuance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    presumably for Hamas?

    Nope you presumed incorrectly.

    And you weren't just suggesting they join the Ukrainian army. You were suggesting they were pro war for supporting a victim defend themselves.

    Now you can address your peace inconsistency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    US senate majority backs 500% Russian energy tariffs to pressure Kremlin into peace deal - Euromaidan Press

    Here's an interesting move that could actually bring Russia to it's knees.

    From my understanding the loophole that's used for Russia to sell its oil is that it's sold on to India who then refine it and sell it on to western nations.

    If this occurs it would effectively place an embargo on refined petroleum product made with Russian crude in India. Then Russian oil basically becomes poison. If it weren't already.

    Interesting times if it comes to pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,306 ✭✭✭Guffy


    Wildy curious about the pro peace stance in general.

    At which point do you think Russia in this case should be stopped? If Ukraine rolled over and allowed Russia to occupy it, then the Baltics were invaded, is that too far? Then the rest of the Eastern bloc and East Germany and the Balkans right, and all the old Soviet states were put under the Russian heel. Before or after that is ok to resist?

    Like if they then took western Europe are we still pro peace in that scenario?

    Are war crimes still ignored in London?

    It's a genuine question btw, I'm honestly asking you to play out the scenario for me.

    The only thing I have to go off for pro peace is appeasement. So if you can paint a different picture I'd appreciate it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Field east


    and a.sl I think that the FIRST STEP - re the Special Mission would be for China, NK, IRAN stop supplying arnaments/ assistance to Russia along with economic assistance supplied by India et al.!!!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,441 ✭✭✭zv2


    In my opinion Modi is a war criminal. He put realpolitik before the welfare of Ukrainian children. Fail.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭engineerws


    The poster with extreme vitriol who said there was no **** nuance was so extreme that I suggested he join the Ukrainian army or at least that was my intimation by saying 'the frontline' given his views are so strong and his belief so high.

    The victims are the stupid Russians and Ukrainian's that have joined or been forced to join their armies, the civilians on both sides that have died and the huge toll on the economies and citizens of all the participants.

    You were suggesting they were pro war for supporting a victim defend themselves.

    The victim ... Maybe you mean the homeless in the USA that could have been housed if billions had been spent on them instead, those burnt alive in the Odessa massacre or the Ukrainian civilians killed in the recent award ceremony. There's lots of victims in this war....

    Now you can address your peace inconsistency

    I don't know what you mean by my peace inconsistency.

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,441 ✭✭✭zv2


    @engineerws "The victims are the stupid Russians and Ukrainian's that have joined or been forced to join their armies"

    Unfortunately war is not as simple as not joining. What would have happened if the Brits. refused to join during WW2?

    "Maybe you mean the homeless in the USA that could have been housed if billions had been spent on them"

    Twitter is full of ideas about how so many problems could be solved if only we would let Ukrainians die.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    The victims are the stupid Russians and Ukrainian's that have joined or been forced to join their armies, the civilians on both sides that have died and the huge toll on the economies and citizens of all the participants.

    The victims are the stupid Palestinians who etc etc……

    Maybe you mean the homeless in the USA that could have been housed if billions had been spent on them instead, those burnt alive in the Odessa massacre or the Ukrainian civilians killed in the recent award ceremony. There's lots of victims in this war....

    Pure unadulterated whataboutism. I mean the victim of this war. Those who were attacked. Ukraine did not invade Russia. Ukraine were not going to invade Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine. They are by dictionary definition the victim. Ukraine are not bombing Russian civilian playgrounds and hospitals.

    You seem to have trouble understanding extremely simple concepts. I'd try to get that straight before moving on to any nuance.

    I don't know what you mean by my peace inconsistency.

    You claim you want peace to this war. Yet you never denigrate the ones perpetrating the war. Russia could go home to end the war. They have refused and continue forward. Russia could have agreed to the unconditional ceasefire and negotiation that Ukraine agreed to 7 weeks ago. They did not and they continue to bomb civilians.

    You are apoplectic every time Israel rejects peace and bombs civilians. But never Russia.

    Your position and by extension ,you ,are hypocritical. That's your peace inconsistency.



Advertisement