Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1175176178180181183

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Pursue further bus priority and cycle lanes along all main arteries into the city, figure out the best places to remove/reduce car access to the city core and do it, look at all this traffic modelling you've done for your ring road and figure out where you need to be running buses between for a useful service and up the frequency of those to 'turn up and go' levels.

    In addition I'd look at a new corrib bridge (effectively the same as the one proposed in the GRR) but that just connects into the existing N6 and N59 at each end (tie ins at Headford road Junction and the University park and ride respectively) for through traffic and then bus priority lanes over the Quincentennial



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 meat eating green


    Galway is not that big

    But it has sabotaged itself with sprawl and inept public transport



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The alternative is a plan that has a ring road (not necessarily this one) plus new roads and reassigned road space within the city for public transport and active travel. The reason this project will fail again is that it’s just a road, with no commitment attached to do anything except build that road. But the problem in Galway is that there’s no alternative to using private cars for travel, but there’s no space for those cars in the city, so traffic jams every morning. This road won’t fix that problem - it’ll encourage it. The designers’ own figures say that if this is road built, then in 10-15 years, Galway will be back to where it started with traffic jams every day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    On the topic of alternatives, I believe there's a whole dedicated thread on it.

    But in general, I'm OK with a dedicated bypass and a dedicated project to turn the current N6 into a proper distributor. I had read the traffic modelling before, but was still shocked when I looked at the docs yesterday.

    A few days ago I was kind of ambivalent and sort of thinking "it won't solve the problems" but now I'm thinking "it will cause bigger problems". The numbers are just crazy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,280 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    100% this is the problem. For first 10 years it will look like it has worked but with old induced demand in 15/20 years after been built (which ARUP have modelled at least with modal share) the City in 2050 will have the EXACT same problems it has today in 2025. (Factoring in that Ring Road is still 10 years away from been opened )

    We need a serious CAR traffic reduction strategy built into ANY new Ring/Bypass Road plan



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,461 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Do the people of Galway still need a bypass? 😃 🤨



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    Light rail, bus and cycle lanes, restricting car usage are initiatives that are are proposed or currently under construction.Some of the anti GRR group are vehemently opposed to any type of road building while others are for a by pass/ring road but not the one proposed.

    There is a huge majority of Galway residents who are for the GRR, I would say its 90%+. In the last local elections the most anti GRR party the greens were wiped out,and while they were replaced by the SDs, that party cant give a straight answer on where exactly they stand on the issue, they were vague during the election and are still fence sitting as far as I can see.All other parties are for the GRR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    I remember it well.We were swimming in shyte because some nimbys didnt want their view spoiled(all cloaked as environmental concerns).Held it up for 30+years.They now have the temerity to claim they were right all along, it was a shameful period in Galways history, the wellbeing of the citys citizens was put at risk by so called environmentalists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,280 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Ah Mutton Island. That massive Island in Galway Bay! ha ha

    It was said at the time and now has been proven that it was a typical short term solution. Its not even working properly today? How you are holding up this as something the City got right is very odd? It has curtailed the expansion of the City

    A perfect example of pure "short term" solution that we have to go back and fix again now by building another NEW treatment plant to the East of the City. Terrible short termism mindset, very similar to the GCRR. Such a shameful mindset that future generations are burdened with now.

    What other cans will we kick down that road so that future generations will look back and shake their heads and wonder what were those in charge back in the day thinking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    I lived near the Cladagh at the time, I remember the scare stories vividly, 200 trucks of shyte rumbling through the city every day,no more sandy beachs at salthill because the causeway would cause them to erode, the BS from the protesters was pure nonsense.

    We all encountered floaters while swimming in salthill but then the protesters condemned the people of galway to suffer another 30 years of swimming with shyte.Thank god we have had decent water quality to swim in for the past 20+ years,so yeah Ill take the so alled short term solution, it was far better than the no solution offered by the NIMBY protesters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,280 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    As an Engineer; I hate this short termism mentality.

    If we are going to do something - do it right. Wish we had a 50-100 year outlook back in the 90's; afterall the City was the 'Fastest growing City in Europe' at the time.

    Same mistakes that are obvious about Mutton Island Waste Water treatment plant from an Engineering perspective are also been done again with the Ring Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,436 ✭✭✭markpb


    The support of political parties is more or less meaningless right now. They have agreed to fund it but GCC & TII cannot come up with a plan which meets national legislation. If the government are happy (correctly, IMHO) to follow the legal/planning process to solve Dublin airport's cap problem, what makes you think they would act any differently when it comes to GCRR?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    A friend of mine got heavily involved with canvasing for one of the candidates in the locals last year. Told me not a single person brought up the ring road. Traffic came up regularly, but nobody in the team could think of a single time someone mentioned the ring road and they knocked on a lot of doors.

    There's a disingenuous attempt by some people to paint anyone against the ring road as against cars+progress+all roads. In reality we've just looked at the reports, research and best practices and realised it's not going to fix the traffic issue and likely to make it worse. Most of us just want to be able to get around without spending our lives stuck in traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Serious question: what would you suggest Galway do when all the project work is done, and mode share is worse than it is now? That's literally what their documents are saying, after all, that with all the proposed and currently-under-construction projects complete, the mode share of cars will increase above what it is now.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Indeed, it's a real catch-22 project.

    We can't redesign the existing roads because of traffic volumes, so we're going to spend hundreds of millions on a ring road that will increase traffic volumes…..

    We promise that we will redesign the roads after this is built, despite the fact that we could do so now…..

    We support densification, so we're building a ring road that will enable us to rezone land for future development……

    That last one came across as particularly stupid in the new reports. Imagine being the lawyer who has to stand up in the high court and say "yes, this project is to enable a more dense Galway", knowing that every damn near every councillor has talked about how they're planning to rezone the land to enable development…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    While your anecdote is interesting but highly unreliable,people bringing up traffic would suggest they want a solution to the traffic chaos,some might even want the GRR as part of the solution,but most voters wouldn't discuss the minutae on the doorstep with canvassers,and I say that as someone who has actually knocked on doors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    So your notion that "90%+ of people are in favor of the road" is right but my friends actual experience is incorrect because you know what people really mean even though they don't say it? Got ya.

    To be more specific they said that a lot of people complained about things like lack of footpaths, buses and alternatives to car based transport. Lots of estates around the city are surprisingly isolated from the rest of the city unless you drive or risk your life on small roads with speeding cars. A lot of families complaining that they can't safely walk their kids to school, never mind let the kids walk themselves. And lots of other things unrelated to what we're talking about. So sounds like they were happy enough to go into some detail about what their issues are. I've also knocked on plenty of doors over the years and spent countless hours talking to people on behalf of political candidates. Maybe they talk more to people that aren't coming along already "knowing" what they care about.

    You are right on one thing though. They clearly want a solution to traffic, they're just smart enough to realise this road isn't going to be panacea some people claim it'll be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    At a guess based on the issues you’ve said people raised, the candidate is one that people would have known was an active travel advocate and against the road. Probably a proponent of the whole bike bus idea? It would be known that it was a waste of time talking to him about the road



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Most voters probably don’t even know about the GRR. That’s something I’d bet money on. They know about how bad the traffic is, and they want that fixed, but anyone who says building the GRR will fix that traffic is, basically, a liar. If you explained to them what this road is, including all of the information in the planning documents, the most likely response would be “why are we building this if it’s not going to do anything?”

    This scheme should have been canned when it was rejected the first time. A new road is absolutely needed; I’d say as many as three are needed, but none of them look like a motorway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    You posted some anecdotal evidence from your friend,it means nothing.People are not going to tell you I want/dont want the GRR unless specifically asked that question,without that its just vague musings.

    I have canvassed many times, most people dont even answer, those that do engage usually have an issue and are waiting to vent to a canvasser/candidate, and then you have the others who agree with you or are already a supporter and promise undying loyalty and a No.1, and you find out later they didnt even vote.😀

    BTW Im confident that if we had a local plebiscite there would be 90% plus approval for the GRR,Im not sure a yes vote would be accepted by opponents.

    Either way, I look forward to solutions and hope Galway can be a city to enjoy once again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Your confidence is misplaced, unless you’re just asking a Brexit-level aspirational question like “Should Galway have a Ring Road?”

    I could only honestly answer yes to that question, but I oppose the proposed road: I’d hate to see another city repeat Cork’s mistakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,502 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It was fairly amusing listening to Michael Fitzmaurice wiping the floor with Eamon Ryan on Radio earlier in the week over the GRR. I'm not sure why failed entity Ryan was even on the discussion, but as the green transport minister in office for 4.5 years who failed to deliver one single new metre of railway, light or heavy, his credibility on investment and getting behind modal shift was zero at best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭poop emoji


    Ah will ya go away with your anti growth nonsense

    People need somewhere to live



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    😀I am confident that there will be no plebiscite,but if there was I would be certain that there would be a precise proposal for public perusal and not just an aspirational catch all proposition for a ring road, I would imagine there would be intense examination and debate here in Galway but the citizens would make the final call.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    100% the new road will fill with traffic. Is anyone arguing with that?

    Is it still needed though, as well as much better public services? I say yes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,502 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Correct.

    If the growth strategies for all of our regional cities are to be realised, they all need to by fully by-passed by road, AND to have improved light and heavy rail and high quality bus service, AND revitalised public realm projects at their hearts and in new growth areas.

    Look at Cork. It is planned to grow more, in relative terms, than any other city in the State. And so it is getting improved commuter rail, with higher frequency and speeds, a light rail corridor with a probable Airport link to be included before long, Bus Connects routes with high quality cycle routes, and also, vitally, the dedicated M28 access motorway to the south of Cork Harbour and a plan to complete the N40 Ring Road to the north, to open up everything out to Blarney and back across to Glanmire.

    Its not an either/or discussion. It never was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You know that the GRR plans has zero provision for anything other than the road, right?

    I personally object to it because the council is proposong this road and nothing else. All of the things you mention are needed, but Galway City Council won't commit to even starting any of them unless they're allowed to build the GRR first. Curiously, while those other proposed projects will ease traffic congestion even without the GRR, only the GRR will allow large banks of land to be rezoned for development…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,246 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    As stated earlier 90 percent of the people of Galway city and surrounds are for a solution that solves the issues with traffic in the city that provides the least amount of hassle to them. That solution has always been mooted by those who apparently know these things as being the ring road in some way/shape/form. And the powers that be have navel gazed their way over the course of a few decades during which car use has increased, construction costs have gone out of control and no significant attempts at alternative solutions have been implemented. I know I provided some thinking out lout options that could be implemented at minimal costs while the ring road was continued to be pondered(as did many more). The change from round abouts to signal controlled junctions was the only significant think I can think of.

    So we are still in limbo on this and God love the landowners/homeowners who were in the path of it. True limbo for the last god knows how long.

    There's no way this project gets done in the next decade. Zero.

    Politicians will continue to hype it up coming into elections but it won't get done for a myriad of reasons. Worse still nothing of note will be done as side by side solutions to assist.

    A complete farce.

    The city council here are as incompetent as it gets and ultimately need to drive the project.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel


    I thought the opposite. Fitzmaurice came across very dogmatic and as someone unwilling to understand that the road is not the sole solution. Eventually he became hot headed whereas Ryan kept his cool and laid out his view that along with the road, a reliable public transport strategy needs to be implemented.

    Even Clare tried to flag to Fitzmaurice that the lorry driver travelling from west to east using the road is not going to be in a better position just because the road has been built but he just dismissed it. Build the road, build the road, build the road seems to be all he had to say. zero critical thinking whatsoever, classic parish pump politics.



Advertisement