Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pope Francis has died (updated 21st April 2025)

11618202122

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,072 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    The fact that women cannot become priests in 2025 is just plain weird. It just boggles the mind.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,605 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Not weird at all. The Catholic church simply cannot backtrack on it, it's too ingrained.

    It's one of the main issues a long standing church which claims to speak for God suffers from - they cannot admit to being wrong in past because that'd in essence be admitting that God was wrong. Or that they don't actually speak for God.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    The whole celibacy thing is a money saving measure. They used to until somebody came up with a cost saving idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,072 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    No no, it's very very weird. Creepy really.

    People will look back at it in years to come and be unable to comprehend it.

    They'll will let women give out the communion but they can't have the "power" to make it into something it's not. Weird.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,605 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I know what you mean, but there will have to be some utterly epic retconning of Catholic doctrine to allow women to be priests.

    As I mentioned above, if they allow it it'll raise the question about what other basic stuff they got wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,199 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    So who's getting hyped for the white smoke show?

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,489 ✭✭✭pureza


    To be honest that’s disrespectful

    If it’s how anyone feels about Catholicism,why would they be bothered as to whether they have women priests or not or married priests

    On the latter,they already have the,converts from Anglicanism whom they’ve accepted as priests,so there’s strong double standards there

    The non approval of women priests is misogyny imho but it’s also something ancient like in Islam where the women pray in a different room

    It’s not too different to the rule in Ireland that if as a woman working for the government here you had to resign if you got married as your place is in the home

    Some of these religions do not agree with going with the times

    The fact that their own teachings mean God gave us these times seems lost on them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,853 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Any readers who are wonder which of us is correct should go and look at the websites of the respective organisations themselves.

    On this page, read the information under "is a humanist wedding right for me":

    https://www.humanism.ie/ceremonies/weddings/

    Also remember that though humanists are by definition secular, not all people who are secularism are humanist. Many are interested in no one but themselves.

    The Spiritualist Union of Ireland don't make their Rites documents publicly available: you will need to ask them for specifics. But they are clear that they have a belief system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,072 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I am sorry but that's just an excuse. Where there is a will, there is a way. It's an organisation that has changed the rules and beliefs to suit them as they went. They can make up some excuse to change the "doctrine". Nobody sane would care. It's 2025 and women are still not allowed to become priests. When I grew up they certainly weren't allowed give out communion but they somehow got over that obstacle. Sometimes you need to stand back to see how weird it is that they can't be priests. It just struck me when I saw all the old men essentially wearing red dresses yesterday. These 70+ year old men are deciding 2025 rules which involves excluding 50% of the population because they are tainted somehow. Creepy stuff.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,605 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    It's not being offered as an excuse. It's being offered as a reason. I'm not trying to excuse them in any way; I think it's kinda funny. One of the dangers you face when you claim infallibility, or to be the voice of God.

    It paints you into a corner when you get it wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,072 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    The civil service rule was removed in 1973 because it was ridiculous and weird. And disrespectful. It's 2025 now and there is no sign of women becoming priests anytime soon.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    They'll never have women priests it would require separate living arrangements that they don't have money for.

    Might see lay priests at some stage when all the ordained lads die off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,072 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Very few believe the infallibility or voice of god stuff either so they can get over that conundrum. Legend has it that the holy spirit decides the pope but that's plainly not believed either. The RCC equivalent of a corporate male only shark tank will decide the next pope. It's just business at the end of the day. It was often a political decision in past centuries with France and Italy pushing their choices and sometimes having 2 popes.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Complete with other hangers on, all at taxpayers expense, not their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,276 ✭✭✭Rawr


    They could try some form of presto-chango rebrand of their doctrine like they sort of did with Vatican 2. Just call it «Vatican 3» and spin it as a reinterpretation of biblical teachings, so some such waffle. However, I’ve a feeling that a lack of desire to change that rule is more of an issue, rather than the possibility of change itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Allinall




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,489 ✭✭✭pureza


    That’s the difference between democratic institutions and venerable ones

    The latter aren’t subject to Societal norms

    Why do Muslims seperate men and women at prayer time ?

    Because it was written some where 1000’s of years ago

    But I suppose people do have a choice to be in any church and the Catholic church is growing not shrinking at the moment

    You can worship God independently

    Christianity is not a religion,it’s a belief

    Religions are clubs that formed to practice Christianity,there’s 100’s of these clubs at this stage,the Roman see being the biggest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Really enjoying the the continuing high level of intellectual discussion on this thread. 🤡



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Don't have money for? I do not believe that poor mouth stuff, not even when the RCC failed to pay agreed compensation with their abuse victims in this country. The Catholic church is very wealthy / have a fortune in assets worldwide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    They have,but the day to day running costs come from church collections and they have dwindling numbers. They've already merged a lot of their presbyteries and sold off the spares.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,107 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The humanists don't say that they won't marry you if you believe in a god. Your claim that they discriminate is rubbish

    Yes the spiritualists have a belief system, nobody said they didn't. But they don't force it upon the couples they marry.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,942 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Would love to see the vote counts as they happen just to see where their thinking is at and just who’s in the mix and indeed who isn’t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,312 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The civil service rule was removed in 1973 because it was ridiculous and weird.

    Not really, it was removed as a pre condition of joining the EEC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,360 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    It's a blocking majority. Where schools have failed to be divested it's because a majority of parents of children in those schools voted against it.

    The responsibility for that failure lies solely with those proposing change not convincing enough parents to back them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,978 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    It'd be like the Eurovision back in the day. You could watch it on BBC if you had it and listen to Wogan take the piss out of all the cardinals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,942 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Watching certain cardinals give reciprocal votes and no one voting for names they can’t pronounce 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭silliussoddius




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,107 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Forcing change on a majority that don't want it?

    No, they'd still have kept a majority of the schools as RCC controlled - just not 100%.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    these kinds of conversations always remind me of Superintendent Chalmers (simpons)


    what was it he said?

    A prayer? A prayer in public school!? God has no place within these walls- just like facts have no place within organised religion!”



Advertisement