Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

I already provided the thread with sources. With a very well researched article on the issue.

The vast majority of the established feminist organisations strongly support trans inclusion, this is backed by polls in the USA and UK.

The problem is these new conservative women's organisations pretending to be feminists shout the loudest, so they appear to the majority opinion.

They just are not.

Going back decades the feminist movements support trans rights and continue to do.

This is irrefutable.

These conservative womens groups have never once campaigned on domestic violence, gender-based violence or anything that is a more prevalent danger to women. Just this one.

They also achieved the possibility of men entering their spaces claiming to be biological women, and not a peep out of them.

A truly sensational achievement.

People wonder when this will end.

The answer is simple: whenever the money dries up.

Just look at the changed since the USAID cuts (lamented by the utterly craven Social Democrats).

Defunding NGO's pushing it is one half of the battle, the other is getting ride of central banks that pushed ESG and DEI via their accomplices like Larry Fink of Blackrock.

The cuts that are overwhelmingly effecting the lives and rights of women and girls?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/13/usaid-funding-freeze-health

It is.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyw9qjeq8po

The guidance also states that "in some circumstances the law also allows trans women (biological men) not to be permitted to use the men's facilities, and trans men (biological women) not to be permitted to use the women's facilities".

Personally I can't see how that is even remotely legal.

But here we are.

What was stopping biological men from waltzing into these spaces claiming they are a biological woman before the UK Supreme Court ruling?

Can be?

I'm not so sure that would hold up to scrutiny if tested in court.

If men and women have to be segregated by biological sex then I can't see how that is reversible in any situation, especially under equality law.

Exactly. Nothing.

That is the whole point of this. Trans women were never the issue. The issue is about men, and predatory men.

However, some dark-ages women wanted to ostracise a small cohort of people because they might all be rapists.

Now they’ve opened the door to the very men they are afraid of just claiming to be biological women. Those predatory men they were talking about don’t even need to wear the wig and dress anymore.

Still don’t get your point. Is it not the case that both before and after the ruling, a biological man could have entered any space designated for women and claimed they were biologically a woman?

That hasn’t changed.

But where are you getting the idea that there will now be an invasion of biological men into women’s spaces?

Hypothetically- a biological man claims he is a biological woman in order to gain access to women’s spaces. This could have been the case before the ruling, so nothing has changed in that respect.

What would have happened in the above case before the ruling and how is it any different after?

the way that interim guidance is laid out it is so clear what a victory for women only spaces that judgement was.

At the same time it also makes clear that trans rights are human rights, they just arent womens rights.

So when a convicted sex offender like Darren Merager was allowed in a women's section of a spa, where both he and women and girls were naked, and when the woman who complained was told that nothing could be done because that was the law - you're saying that this didn't happen?? And that it might happen now because of what the law says??

Because that's just counterfactual.

Again.

You're talking nonsense mate, what you're doing is the equivalent of comparing Dogs vs Labradors. "It's dogs that are the problem not Labradors". See, utter nonsense.

Nora or Tom over there says you look a bit masculine or feminine you can't use any toilet.

Because that's not what will happen, that's why. I thought you'd read the whole judgment?

Or Trans or non binary biological women who always used women's toilets no longer can use any toilet or vice versa.

Nor this.

It's true that trans women, ie biological males, cannot use the women's toilets any more (though in practice for those few who genuinely "pass" (and who don't call attention to themselves with predatory male behaviour) there will be no real change, as nobody is going to be outside toilets with a cheek swab kit).

Nonbinary biological women (ie women) will still be legally entitled to use female toilets if they wish to. If anyone challenges them on their femaleness, all they need to do is tell them, in a normal woman's voice, that the person has got it wrong and that they are indeed female. Given how reluctant many women have been to challenge obvious males in women's toilets, the idea that women are suddenly going to get all bolshy about short-haired women in them is really scraping the barrel.

We shall see. I await the first court case with very non-bated breath.