Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

1174175177179180183

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,014 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Coukd tou tell us how you, and those you've interacted with, believe that the ring road will, despite the council's modelling, make traffic congestion better?

    Could you also tell us why the council have not planned for viable alternatives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'd be fairly confident it will get the thumbs-up from ABP too, it got rubber-stamped the last time. I don't think that's the issue.

    The bigger questions are whether it can either change from the originally-stated "this will increase traffic", or now state "it doesn't matter that this will increase traffic because…". I suspect if they go for the latter it will end up in court and get delayed for years. Even your 2035 estimate could prove optimistic to be honest. You're certainly not being unduly pessimistic here.

    And no question there's massive desire in Galway for this project. Anyone I know in Galway "just wants it done". But also, anyone I know in Galway don't know any of the details, just that this is "the solution" to their traffic problems. They also do not foresee a time where they won't use the car for all journeys. So there's a long way to go before Galway city transport will improve, if it ever improves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    In all honesty, almost everyone I know "just wants this project done" but also knows almost nothing about traffic modelling or the design. They just know that "it will fix the traffic problem". Some know that they "need another bridge" and that they "need another way across the city".

    Most people aren't infrastructure or transport nerds like we are on here, they just want to get to work and get home, drop their kids to school etc. They're being told by politicians that "this road is the solution", and why would they not trust that?

    We had around 2-ish years before "Dunkettle Interchange is the transport solution" shifted to "we need holistic solutions". So who knows, maybe one big transport infrastructure project which doesn't miraculously solve all problems (and butter people's toast) might be what Galway needs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,434 ✭✭✭markpb


    The delay with the road isn't a lack of public support, just a lack of competence by GCC.

    Also, people who think the road will reduce congestion are in for a surprise it it does eventually get built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 963 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    I don't work in the council. Why not reach out to them. They get paid to sort this stuff out. GCC from what I can see are totally incompetent.

    This ring road is being talked about for 25 years. If it won't help with congestion then build an alternative solution (rail, dedicated bus routes on all routes etc ).

    This is a typical public service scenario of kicking things down the road, and it moves at snails pace.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,014 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I don't work in the council. Why not reach out to them. They get paid to sort this stuff out. GCC from what I can see are totally incompetent.

    I didn't suggest where you worked or anyhting like that - I simply asked you a question based on what you stated in your last post!
    I've absolutely no interest in liaising with the councils.

    This ring road is being talked about for 25 years. If it won't help with congestion then build an alternative solution (rail, dedicated bus routes on all routes etc ).

    That's the problem - the council seem completely reluctant to discuss any other options or approaches to relieving traffic congestion. They came up with a plan a long time ago and have rigidly stuck to it, ignoring everything else.
    Galway = poor public transport infrastructure with no intention to improve it
    Galway = poor active travel infrastructure with no intention to improve it
    You are left with a situation where you have a council saying the only way to make traffic better is to build a road and at the same time they are stating that the road will make traffic worse - it is literally that farcical!
    Oh and it will now probably cost between 1.5 and 2 billion to make that traffic worse and all the while not one public transport improvement is being included!

    This is a typical public service scenario of kicking things down the road, and it moves at snails pace.

    Not really - many other roads have been considered, planned, built and opened since Galway first started scheming their failure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    You're kind of on the same page as the rest of us then to be honest. They're effectively saying mode share improvement projects won't be considered until this road is done. But this project is failing to be approved exactly BECAUSE it doesn't consider the mode share. It's very very frustrating.

    The project team know what needs to be done, and even if they just want to build this road as a vanity project, their best route to do it would be to couple it with some sops to other transport modes.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,110 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    There's still strong calls in Cork to build more and more road:

    North ring road must be developed to keep traffic flowing in Cork City https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41621164.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep I'm surprised at how he's framing that to be honest (his point was when the tunnel shuts, the city shuts down). I've been hearing a lot of "we need alternatives" particularly from Cork East Councilors and TD's, where one upon a time it was all "fix de road!".

    I think to be fair, there probably is a need for both a Cork North bypass and a distributor. It might take decades, but there probably will be a Northern Bypass in the end because aside from Kelleher's point the North Side of Cork City is pretty much a copy of Galway other than the fact that they left the N route connecting N20 to N8 right through the very centre of the city. Which isn't sustainable.

    If we want to Pedestrianise McCurtain street, get bus lanes on Tivoli, develop Horgan's quay fully etc, TII aren't just going to give up on their N route without an alternative. We've seen this recently during the BusConnects, the whole of Corridor A was watered down to nothing to allow the N8 Tivoli to stay dual carriageway: that was all the TII's doing. Similarly with Corridors C and D, the dual Carriageway stays on Leitrim street: we need to give that space back to the city. So HGV movements to/from Ringaskiddy and to/from Blackpool direction need to at least be studied and something needs to be done. Whether that's a big massive greenfield project, or some kind of upgrade of the R635 or whatever (removing a load of junctions?) is a different question entirely.

    I suspect the council are fighting one battle at a time by getting the distributor done and coming back a few years after completion to study the need for a bypass. By which time the traffic will likely have increased.

    But sorry you're right, to come back to your point, some people are still "roads priority" minded. It's irritating because the same people were nowhere to be found when Bus Connects was getting watered down to oblivion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,156 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The Cork Northern Distributor needs to be built as the north of Cork really does not have any roads (or transport system) at all. Its utterly unsuitable as it stands and this multi modal corridor will do wonders for that part of the city.

    The Cork North Ring needs to be built as well. The M8 to M20 link will be the stupidest motorway gap in the country. Throw the new M28 to the port, which is needed urgently and is finally under construction, and it gets even worse. Any freight landing there going to Limerick, Galway etc will be on motorway the whole way apart from a few km through Blackpool which is just daft no matter what way you think about it! The M20 to Ballincollig link is less likely I think but the M8 to M20 link will be the most needed section of road in the country once the M28 and M20 are both done.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    National roads are defined by laws, and laws can change. There is nothing to prevent a ministerial order moving the origin point of N8 to Dunkettle, N22 to the Ballincollig bypass or N20 to the Commons Road. Dublin has no national roads in its centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep, but to-date the TII (and likely Cork City Council) have been holding tightly to the current N8 routing. It's crazy really to have a national route listed against McCurtain Street and Horgan's quay. Can't fault them though, they've created a situation where it will be noticeable if it's changed.

    Different topic entirely, but people in Mayfield would probably push back against re-designating the R635, even though I'd actually be surprised if most HGV's aren't already using that route! Given how little the R635 actually does (no bus lanes, few bus routes, large stretches of no junctions and wide space adjacent, would there be scope for a "bypass" right through the heart of the city with the future distributor outside it? You'd have to contend with private resident access, Blackpool and Mayfield.

    Back on topic, yeah I don't foresee a Cork Northern Bypass for many decades personally, and it's not even on the radar for most people I know.

    In Galway, on the other hand, the whole city knows about "the ring road", is my impression. Everyone from young to old seems to think that "this one will fix everything" unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    The response to An Bord Pleanála’s queries are now lodged and available on their website. The promoters seem to be addressing wider concerns and commenting on how the road will fit in with the wider GTS. Hopefully enough to get it over the line.

    IMG_7371.jpeg


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,014 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    If it is as vague as that blurb then it's staying dead in the water!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    That’s from an introduction to the entire suite of documentation which runs to hundreds of pages…



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I can't actually find the docs, as I'm not sure what the case number is, could you link it here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭?Cee?view




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    TThat's Not my mpression,most people I talk to see it as a necessary part of the solution to improve Galway,and most are sick to their back teeth of a very small but very vocal group impeding any progress on improving hhe situation in Galway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    100% true. They’re the same types who stopped the development of a sewage plant for years in Galway. Galway Bay was literally full of sh1t as indeed are most of the said small vocal group



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I've read two of the main docs that they've submitted, and my opinion on it comes down to two points:

    First, it has plugged the climate action plan hole, and will almost certainly get through ABP.

    Second, it hasn't dealt with any of the complaints around it, and will definitely end up in a JR or two.

    The interesting and somewhat obvious way that they try to get around the problem (this project will increase car usage) is by saying that this project is part of the GTS, and that will cause modal change, thus being compliant with the climate action plan.

    This is a bit of a legal and planning stretch, as there's numerous problems with this line of thinking, first and foremost is that there's no guarantee that the following steps of the GTS will actually take place. They say that they can't do any other traffic solutions without using the ring road to reduce traffic, but they don't really address the fact that new/better roads lead to an increase in car usage, not a decrease. What happens if there isn't a drop in traffic on the existing roads? Is there a legal requirement for them to take action to reduce traffic and implement the GTS? Why have you ruled out making traffic changes in the existing roads instead of this project?

    Honestly, I wouldn't like to have to defend this in court at all, the issues with the plan that have been brought up here again and again and again haven't been dealt with at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Not from Galway, but a quick question, where is it proposed the Galway outer bypass would cross the Corrib and the N59 / moycullen road ? Is there land left clear along the N59 for its route? Thks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    It's unclear who the "vocal minority" is?

    Are there active protests etc against the project?

    All I see is an application being challenged on grounds of failing to follow the existing legislation. If they don't want it to fail that test (a test that, while it takes some lamentably considerable amount of time to complete, a great many major projects have managed to pass) the submitters could simply ensure it genuinely meets its obligations.

    Except that might mean they have to shock! horror! Actually address remediating the existing roads in Galway as part of a solution.

    Found this illuminating from the GRR Documentation

    IMG-20250429-WA0000.jpg

    Mode share outcomes are better if they do literally nothing.

    There is no way this should pass the legislation requirements to address climate change targets

    Post edited by riddlinrussell on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Really? Ya are going with the Mutton Island sewage treatment plant that cannot be expanded in a sufficient manner to cater for a growing City just 30 years after been built? I am guessing it is your sea view?

    For me that's a beautiful comparison of the outcome for the GCRR if its ever built. After 30 years we will also be back to square one again swimming in a sea of cars - just like Galway's Waste Water treatment plant on Mutton Island which is the main reason for the stifling of growth in the City as it cannot now be expanded upon now. Lazy decisions were made on that over 30 years ago , will the same lazy decisions occur again in 2025?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's almost certainly going to be rubber-stamped again by ABP (will they even read it?) and end up in court, with someone like Friends of the Irish Environment taking a case against them.

    This additional phase apparently took more than two years and plenty of money. For what seemingly amounts to "it doesn't matter what this project does, because other projects…" I'm far from a legal expert but it really looks like they've left a mountain to climb here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    I'm not sure it would be wise for the ABP of today to just rubber stamp it tbh, they have that big wind farm judgement re-the climate bill hanging over their heads. (Appealed currently?)

    Surely any judgements they make in the meantime they would want/need to ensure they dotted the I's and crossed the T's in that regard or their appeal failing would negate all their decisions since?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, the legal climate has gotten more complex, not less.

    Courts could look at the UK case on who gets to decide what projects comply with climate regulations, which decided that the government gets to decide, however, I'm not sure that this is going to translate across.

    The government, the state, the courts, the EU and the voters(climate action is still a high priority, despite the greens taking a kicking) have all declared a climate emergency. I don't think that this will be easily ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think they will still rubber-stamp it albeit with a delay.

    Just reading through it some more, the EIAR 7.3.2 says:

    Similarly, the ‘Do-Minimum’ was updated for this updated EIAR to include the GTS measures advanced since the 2018 EIAR, such as the Cross-City Link which received approval with conditions from ABP on27 September 2024, the construction of the Salmon Weir Cycling and Pedestrian Bridge, the submission of Bus Connects Galway Dublin Road scheme to ABP, and the 30km/h city centre speed limit. The reassessment of the updated ‘Do-Minimum’ alternative concluded that whilst it would achieve more economic benefit than the ‘Do-Nothing’ alternative it would not serve to reduce the existing congestion sufficiently such that the overall transportation issues would be solved. As this was unsatisfactory, this alternative was discounted.

    I don't think your "do minimum" is the right thing to be looking at, with regards reference numbers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I apologise, you were absolutely right

    5.2.1: the future Do-Minimum network includes the 2023 base network, plus all of the schemes (highway and PT) that are already built, or are committed, or are likely to be built by 2031 and 2046. The future year "Do-Something" networks include the Do-Minimum schemes plus the N6 GCRR.

    Section 4.7 of the traffic modelling document (Appendix A.6.1) is also grim reading. Finished road will see an increase in people driving 2-6km…

    https://www.pleanala.ie/publicaccess/FurtherInformation/318220/Galway%20City%20Ring%20Road%20RFI%20Response%202025/Part%20VI%20Updated%20EIAR/Volume%204%20Appendices/Appendix%20A.6.1%20Traffic%20Modelling%20Report.pdf?r=904975011401

    They wave this away by effectively saying "it's not large, so it's OK"

    Guys….how can you publish these numbers and hope the project succeeds…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yeah, it’s insane. “It’ll cost upwards of €600 million but don’t worry: it’ll only make the city slightly more car-dependent than it is now…”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 963 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Whats the alternatives?

    I keep hearing people opposing the GRR, but is there an alternative plan?



Advertisement