Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1279280282284285288

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I normally thank posts that quote me, regardless of whether or not I agree with them. I'll make an exception here in case I'm seen to endorse the 2nd paragraph in particular. You have missed the disconnect and hypocrisy in your own post. When I introduced Jennifer Sey to the thread you said she had "bitchuted herself retarded*" during covid, yet you gave no evidence, and no analysis of her opinions and lived experience of the subject of this thread. On the closed thread you referred to Trina Budge as a "melt", without a word of analysis of why she felt the court challenge was merited. A photo of a group of women's rights activists prompted your characterisation of them as a group of nutters - again no consideration of their history, opinions, behaviour etc. Now all of the above may be what you mean by critical opinion - I recall you claiming to be precise in your use of language - but to my mind it falls far short.

    I am dismayed that anyone would vote for Trump, and attend in person in the White House when he signed the EO, but Sey is entitled to do thatif she sees fit. Considering she was a Democrat for 30 years, I suspect she felt deserted by the party on this issue. I doubt she's a fan of abuse of any kind - iirc she wrote a book about abuse in gymnastics.

    *I'm just using the r word to accurately convey what you said; I disapprove of it as others did at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I am dismayed that anyone would vote for Trump, and attend in person in the White House when he signed the EO, but Sey is entitled to do that if she sees fit

    I wouldn't really be dismayed that anyone voted for Trump.

    But someone who claims vehemently to be a woman's rights activist and champions Trump is just beyond bizarre.

    It certainly opens pertinent questions to that persons motivations.

    When I introduced Jennifer Sey to the thread you said she had "bitchuted herself retarded*" during covid

    *I'm just using the r word to accurately convey what you said; I disapprove of it as others did at the time.

    image.png

    Rant 6 on that chart is interesting for many reasons.

    Post edited by Boggles on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Yup, totally concur with you here. There seems to be a massive amount of bigotry from that poster targeting anyone who identifies as a Christian (to add to their obvious bigotry earlier exposed by their horrific use of the "R" word). We see it again and again from them in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    Agree @aero2k - light weight whataboutery that’s akin to a background flapping noise, lol.
    I cannot for the life of me take any of that input seriously, lol.

    Thank you for the detailed post. It’s very interesting how this issue continues to fall victim to our default global political extremes. To move it along would require balanced arguments and understanding which I see no evidence of. The daily misinterpretations of the law are proof of that.

    Anyone see Alastair Campbell (The rest is politics) today giving his skewed interpretation based on his daughter’s feelings and that a family friend’s teenager? For a one-sided flop it’s worth seeing.

    “The fact that society believes a man who says he’s a woman, instead of a woman who says he’s not, is proof that society knows exactly who is the man and who is the woman.”

    - Jen Izaakson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    She claims she was kicked out for misgendering Hiltz. Apparently, that's the worst thing you can do to someone nowadays. It could get you banned here as well.

    She finished 110th which is good going for a professional runner 6 months after giving birth.

    The trans runner finished nearly 9000th almost 2 hours slower.

    That's exactly the point that Hiltz was making which misses the point completely. Boston is the most prestigious marathon in the world and is one of the hardest to get into. The trans runner took a woman's place by using the female qualification time instead of the male one. The runner would not have qualified as a male (with the time they ran in Boston).

    For clarity it was Daniels who unprovoked called out Hiltz in a Zoom interview with a self styled Christian Conservative podcaster.

    So what if she called Hiltz out? She was perfectly entitled to do that as was Hiltz to respond. Since when do people get thrown out of their athletics club for calling people out?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,959 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    I remember challenging him multiple times on his use of that word. He kept avoiding it as he knew he couldn't justify it. Pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,683 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Well that's the pool sorted. Shame it's a few weeks too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭BP_RS3813




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    She claims she was kicked out for misgendering Hiltz.

    Claims where?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭circadian


    Are people still happy to continue to ignore the scientific studies that appear to be confirming that transgender athletes do not have an advantage in most cases and at times are actually at a disadvantage, particularly in relation to cardiovascular exercises?

    I notice a lot of these people also claim that it's science that there are only two sexes. Science is science, you can't cherry pick which is valid or not, it's all based on research and study.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    What studies are those?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭eeepaulo


    There is a load of garbage being churned out of brighton university, just muddy the water and pretend its real



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Who cares? Men in men’s competition and women in women’s competitions. It’s really that simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭circadian


    Hamilton, B., Brown, A., Montagner-Moraes, S., Comeras-Chueca, C., Bush, P.G., Guppy, F.M. and Pitsiladis, Y.P., 2024. Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 58(11), pp.586-597.

    • Transgender women (assigned male at birth) have reduced lung function compared to cisgender women, requiring greater effort when breathing.
    • They also performed worse on jumping tests, even when body composition was similar.
    • While their overall oxygen capacity (VO₂ max) is similar, it’s lower when adjusted for body weight, meaning they may have lower fitness levels.

    Chiccarelli, E., Aden, J., Ahrendt, D. and Smalley, J., 2023. Fit transitioning: when can transgender airmen fitness test in their affirmed gender?. Military Medicine, 188(7-8), pp.e1588-e1595.

    • "Transgender athletics research thus far has focused on documenting physiological changes. Transgender males improve in most aspects of physical performance on GAHT, while transgender females experience deteriorating performance."

    And a follow up paper to that one;
    Chiccarelli, E., Ahrendt, D., Smalley, J. and Aden, J., 2022. 21. Effect of Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy on Athletic Performance: A Four Year Follow Up Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 70(4), p.S12.

    • After two years of hormone therapy, transgender women's 1.5-mile run times were statistically equivalent to those of cisgender women, and this equivalence persisted through four years.

    Harper, J., Effects of gender affirming hormone therapy on exercise performance in transgender athletes (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University).

    • GAHT in trans women leads to significant and sustained decreases in strength and endurance.
    • GAHT in trans men results in consistent strength gains, aligning them closer to cisgender male performance levels.

    Obviously there are limitations in these studies as the transgender population is around 1% and those engaging in athletics smaller again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    In the X thread that I quoted. You will have to click on it and read it to see it.

    As for the science that shows trans women don't have an advantage in women's sport, there is a lot of bad science(*) out there. We've seen proof that WPATH suppress any science that doesn't say what they want to hear.

    Similarly, any experiment with human subjects who have a direct interest in the outcome and by sandbagging their performance can influence the outcome, is not good science. But, that's not going to stop people like trans researcher Joanna Harper (bankrolled by Nike) from trying.

    https://thepostmillennial.com/nike-trans-scientist-conduct-medical-study-on-trans-teens-to-see-if-men-are-stronger-than-women

    (*) https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04253-w

    Nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers think there is a reproducibility crisis in science, according to a survey published in November. The leading cause cited for that crisis was "pressure to publish"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    In the X thread that I quoted. You will have to click on it and read it to see it.

    I did click on it. It is a tweet by Jennifer Sey. Which contains.

    She Ran Boston in 2:50:04. Then Got Cancelled.Natalie Daniels aka "Natty-ice" (@natty_ice2010 ) is a 5x marathon winner, new mom, and fierce advocate for fairness in women's sports. She's 6 months postpartum & she'd been training hard to run Boston, her 18th marathon.

    She claims she was kicked out for misgendering Hiltz

    Have you evidence to where she claimed that? I can't find it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    There's no point in looking at it any other way. It is a land grab and people will use whatever they have to to justify a land grab.

    The only question to answer is: Is the category of "born" women a valid one, worth protecting? The answer is yes.

    Seems to me, all this nonsense about science is about getting past the judges in CAS. No reasonable person thinks it would be a good thing to find some formula where males can be handicapped so they should be allowed compete against women.

    @Boggles I said thread. You have to read the whole thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭circadian


    That Nature study suggests sample sizes are small (in all research, this isn't a transgender athlete specific article) by choice. Research into transgender athletes relies on small sample sizes because the sample sizes are inherently small and in reality the methodology and rigorousness of the studies should be scrutinised rather than sample sizes.

    As for that postmillenial link. Nothing more than hyperbolic pearl clutching. I await the research to conclude before passing judgement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    Take it up with the international sports governing bodies that disagree with you then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    @Boggles I said thread. You have to read the whole thread.

    I'm not on twitter. Can you just link to the tweet please by Daniels where she claims she has been kicked out of her club for mis gendering Hiltz?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭circadian


    Which bodies are they?

    Appealing to international sports bodies doesn’t prove your point, it just shows you’re outsourcing your argument to institutions still scrambling to keep up with evolving science. Policies made under pressure aren’t proof, they’re politics.

    The actual research, published in peer-reviewed journals, doesn’t support the blanket claim that transgender athletes have an unfair advantage, especially after undergoing hormone therapy. What does support that claim? Opinion articles, cherry-picked anecdotes, and culture war punditry.

    If you're going to argue that an entire group of people should be excluded from sport, the burden of proof is on you and so far, all you've offered is noise, not evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    Maybe you should join Twitter then if you are going to need access to it. Daniels herself posted on the thread, not denying any details of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    So Jennifer Sey claimed it not Daniels? We got there eventually.

    She wouldn't be the most reliable of narrators, now would she?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Common sense prevails, even if it took a court judgement.

    It's all very simple, have a mens category, a women's category and an open category.

    Winners of men's sporting events would be men.

    Winners of women’s sporting events would be women.

    Winners of an open category sporting events would be men.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    Is that because of the gotcha tweet you did manage to find above? She is entitled to her opinions on those questions. I would agree with her on some of them, and disagree on others. But, they have nothing to do with whether she is a reliable narrator.

    She is the founder and CEO of XX XY Athletics, which sounds to me a lot like she believes in women's rights in sport.

    https://www.xx-xyathletics.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,762 ✭✭✭plodder


    Take World Athletics for example. You need to read their transgender policy and point out where it is wrong. I'm not doing that for you. Under current rules, anyone that has undergone male puberty is not allowed to compete as a woman in international competition. They seem to be moving further in that direction by moving to a chromosome test next.

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/feb/10/world-athletics-plans-tougher-rules-for-transgender-and-dsd-athletes

    Under World Athletics’ existing rules, introduced in March 2023 anyone who has undergone male puberty is barred from the female category – after research reported that trans women retained an advantage in strength, endurance, power and lung capacity, even after taking medication to suppress their testosterone.

    However, World Athletics now wants to further toughen its policy because of “new evidence which clarifies there is already an athletically significant performance gap before the onset of puberty”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Is that because of the gotcha tweet you did manage to find above?

    You mean the tweet you linked to?

    Sey as is a common tactic with the MAGA community used this girl to manufacture outrage.

    That is the absolute opposite of a honest narrator, that's before we even get into her crack pot conspiracy theories regarding Covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭TokTik


    No one is being excluded from sport. Another disingenuous point made by those who want males vs females. They are 100% allowed to compete in their biological sex category.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    Do these studies actually have good participents? You could have an unfit transgender female who only runs 20k a week and compare her to an olympic marathon runner who runs 100 miles a week. The study would presumably suggest that the cisgender female would have no advantage?

    I would argue most of these studies are using recreational athletes who's participation isn't a fair representation of what would happen if a proper athlete, lets say Jacob Ingibretsen suddenly transitioned?

    Fairness and competition comes first, participation and transgender females mental health comes second



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,416 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I don't know what a "proper athlete" is, I assume you mean an elite level athlete?

    How many trans elite level athletes are there?



Advertisement