Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1693694696698699723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Aurelian


    What has gone so badly wrong for them over the last few years to put them in this situation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,710 ✭✭✭yagan


    I'd imagine Chinese companies like Huawei and SMIC providing their own chips has taken a huge chunk out of their traditional global business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,543 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Technology is dog eat dog.

    ARM chips - Apple successfully switched laptops and desktops to their own licensed ARM chips recently. Much better performance and much less power usage. Also, much better marketing.

    "AI" and Nvidia taking a huge amount of investment and sentiment.

    Quantum chips coming down the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,042 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Biden Derangement Syndrome

    1000006902.jpg

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,443 ✭✭✭circadian


    TSMC beat them to the punch on sub 10nm fabrication. A number of other design missteps also held Intel back and their foundry base simply could not compete with TSMC and as a by-product of that, AMD. Intel still have a large share in datacentre chip production and their GPU technology is improving with time (chips produced by TSMC AFAIK) so by diversifying production and markets for their chips they might be able to correct the decline.

    I don't see Intel being the behemoth they once were, and Trumps tariffs will further constrain them but there's no reason to think they won't be competitive going forward.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,646 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    There's a difference, though, between the Brexit situation you describe and what I think the chart is showing.

    If you're poor in Britain, you have a safety net and free health care. If you're poor in the US you're living under a highway in a box and visiting food banks to keep from starving. You might get some medical care in emergency situations but good luck with no insurance.

    THis is where the mention of Medicaid in the chart is really important. (the amount of money one gets from Social Security is based on some 1950's model of expenses and incomes and is laughably small. Likewise if you have disability, which takes 18 months to qualify for, you might be eligible for a bit more.) If 25% of Americans are relying on Medicaid to handle their medical expenses, that means 25% of Americans are living under something like 13k year as individuals. Barely 1k/month. Think about that in 2020. What my point is, is that the number of people living at this absurdly low income level in Red states skyrocketed, and I think it's long term effects of the shift of jobs overseas (Nafta, outsourcing), lack of construction jobs (for whatever reasons, Biden's admin took small steps to move that along), automation (robots) and, well, the cause of all problems these days, unchecked population growth, so more people for fewer jobs. The minimum wage is still very low and likely not going to climb - why should it, there's plenty of people that'll work for it. Lack of union representation (the 'right to work for peanuts' states) doesn't help.

    Trump, of course, made things worse in his first administration with his tax cut, and is actively destroying everything now. But Trump didn't arise in a vacuum, these are system problems with no obvious fixes for either part. Grim times indeed. Plus the extra bonus in the US that no matter what they'll be able to afford firearms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,855 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    They really do love to gaslight the American electorate and the worse is the MAGA crowd lap this shìt up.

    20250423_145332.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,712 ✭✭✭storker


    The presidents who were better presidents than him seem to live rent-free in his head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,392 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    What's really annoying about these press conferences is that there is no follow up questions to these stupid answers like

    1. Are the proposals coming from other 18 countries to us or have we written 18 proposals for other countries?
    2. If we wrote the 18 proposals on paper have we shared them with the other 18 countries?
    3. Or are you just full of sxxt Karoline Leavitt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭Glenomra


    As I glance recently on the Dow Jones, it seems to fluctuate dramatically arising from any statement issued by president Trump, be it negative or positive. Huge gyrations, often over 1,000 point movements. Doesn't look healthy to me but I am no financial expert.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭poop emoji


    graph looks like Donald’s signature

    Tho down and to the right since he took office, like the trajectory of a falling plane struggling to not stall



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭randd1


    I'd imagine the stock market is mainly built on bullsh!t and hype.

    And anything that's built on bullsh!t and hype is very open to being hit with a bat to the face if something threatens to impart reality and reason on it.

    Take TESLA for example. Pretty much the definition these days of more hype than substance, massive share prices based on being the vision of the future. But get down to the nitty gritty, and they're not going as well as others sales wise, they're technology is falling behind, and they won't meet their promises. And once that reality hits, the stock price will tumble to nothing.

    Once something doesn't live up to the hype, downwards she goes.

    That's the problem the US is facing under Trump, and possibly beyond him too. The whole thing seems to be based on hype, and now that it's being shown America isn't all that and the future isn't so great and the rest of the world can move on without them, then the hype is starting to fall away, and so is the stock market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    You think they would have let him loose a long time ago....the ejets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    Apparently, the CEOs of three of the nation's biggest retailers — Walmart, Target and Home Depot — privately warned Trump that his tariff and trade policy could disrupt supply chains, raise prices and empty shelves, according to sources familiar with the meeting.

    That's why he backed down on China. He was told by businessmen who haven't actually managed to bankrupt their businesses that his policies are idiotic, and like a child being chastised by an adult, he backed down. MAGA will spin it the other way though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭poop emoji


    US with empty stores shelves

    That would have been epic reversal from the good old days when communist states had empty shelves

    Imagines Tucker Carson go around empty Walmart 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,946 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    There is a 40-60% drop across US ports for arrivals starting in May, the effect of this wont be seen on store shelves until mid May but they are absolutely going to start feeling pain from what he did and nothing he has done since then has actually stopped the bleeding its just not visible yet.

    Also seen reports that trucking companies are already finding it hard to keep drivers busy as they dont have enough work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    image.png

    Vance got himself a new suit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,543 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    The US has been promoting hyper consumption, waste and bad debt for decades. Generating economies across the world that are dependent on people buying **** and generating debt. Creating resource wars and huge environmental problems.

    This is not just a Donald issue. He's a reflection of the greedy and selfish people in the world.

    Edit ...it's true ...but ...

    I'll get off my high horse 🐴 now 😁

    Post edited by SuperBowserWorld on


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 94,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Trump's tariffs won't magically translate into increased customer budgets. Less kit will be bought with the same money.

    Back in the day of 16 and 32 bit CPU's Windows was Intel's killer ap. But AMD stole their thunder becoming the standard for Windows 64 bit CPU's.

    Microsoft are now producing version of Windows for ARM processors.

    Microsoft are moving to web based Office365 so you don't even need Windows, just something that has a browser. You don't need Intel for most of the stuff that's in the Cloud.

    Virtualisation and remote access technologies like Citrix means it's looking like the only place where Intel chips will be needed are in servers running legacy programs. And with Emulation even that's not certain.

    Intel had vendor lock in. And yes Windows 10's October deadline will force a hardware refresh for businesses. But for many home users tablet or phones or something like Linux Mint are alternatives to buying a new machine.

    It's interesting because Windows + Intel/AMD are American as are a lot of the PC makers. The alternatives are more international. It's another erosion of US soft power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,710 ✭✭✭yagan


    Chinese suppliers are going to give preferential treatment to other markets and us retailers will have to pay upfront before shipping so sellers don't get burned.

    This is the new normal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    Trump's approval ratings are already dropping fast. I wonder how low it will go when the medium term effects of his stupidity become apparent to Americans. I would hope this would finally give the non-maga Republicans (if any are left) an excuse to properly speak out against his policies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    This day on the WH lawn was heavily sponsored, think it is a certainty Melania stuck in an invoice for appearance fee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Bernie Sanders would be a viable candidate if he wasn't so Old. AOC is running on basically the same policies

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭dasdog


    I saw this mentioned also recently - regardless of what happens next some damage at least has already been done. A summary was posted only this evening.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The Tariff conversation continues to be an embarrassment for the Trump administration.

    Trump said that they'd be reduced, Karoline Levitt went on Fox and said there would be no walking back of tariffs until a deal is made.

    I also saw a clip from a China spokesperson saying they wouldn't be changing their strategy based on comments from Trump.

    A mess of a situation and none of it paints a picture of Trump knowing what it is that he is doing.

    Aside from that, the mess in Ukraine where Trump is trying to force Zelensky to roll over, the ongoing immigration debacle where the judiciary is growing more and more annoyed with Trumps admins actions, the rowing back on the letter sent to Harvard trying to extort them, oh and signal gate 2 (this time it's the same as the last time) as well in the mix.

    Not once in 4 years of the Biden administration did he have to deal with a single event that painted his administration in the same sort of negative light, Trump has like 5 of these at the same time. Within 3 months!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,443 ✭✭✭circadian


    I was making the point that the tariffs will impact their ability to import the resources required to fabricate in the US and their ability to bring in chips made by Taiwan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Pete Hegseth has told the Pentagon to kit out a room near the press briefing room to be a make-up studio.

    The same lad who tried to deflect from his sharing of classified information by saying that he was returning the fighting warrior mentality to the DoD apparently thinks these warriors must look a certain way when talking about it.

    The White House also released a statement supporting Hegseth in the communications disaster where they said Hegseth was working alone against the entirety of the Pentagon who were resisting his ideas. I'd say that'll go down well within the DoD and have people rushing forward to support Pete and to make sure he looks like the fearless warrior he is. They're just delaying the inevitable with this guy, I can't see him surviving in such an environment where he and his boss look to alienate the workforce at the Pentagon just to save this guys skin.

    Separately, I wonder how DOGE feels about government money going in to a make up room for Pete at a time when they're spouting on about waste in government spending. I suppose the DoD have to spend that 260B extra their getting this year somewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    "I also saw a clip from a China spokesperson saying they wouldn't be changing their strategy based on comments from Trump"

    A situation where Trump reduces significantly from the current 145% tariffs on China because the stock market spooks him and China respond by....doing nothing and keeping the current 125% tariff on US goods would be objectively hilarious



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭pad406


    The White House also released a statement supporting Hegseth in the communications disaster 

    Wonder is this the same type of support that Premier club owners give to their struggling managers?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,032 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Possibly. NPR reported at the weekend that they were already looking for a replacement.

    Thing is though, if they had decided to remove him, you'd think they'd just shut up and not give people a stick to beat them with or do anything to make them look indecisive.

    But, strategy on these matters is clearly not their strong suit.



Advertisement