Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1691692694696697703

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Trump wants to burn oil and drill so this isn’t much of a surprise- having the renewable energy army on his doorstep is an inconvenient truth - what’s laughable is he’s also clear in his understanding around limited earth resources for rare earth materials and minerals to build electronics and weapons - given his sights in Greenland and Ukraine - fck hell he’s super aware - another inconvenient truth and proof his spouting about drill baby drill is complete boll0x



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,380 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    I would love someone to ask Karoline Leavitt, Pam Bondi, Tomi Lahren, MTG and all those MAGA women who fawn and fall at the feet of Trump for their fame and fortune, what would they do if Trump did to them what he said he could do to any woman.

    What would they do if he just came up and grabbed them by the pxxxy?

    This may be a crass post but I would seriously love to hear their answer. Would they allow it as Trump claims all women allow it because of who he is?

    Or do they still have an ounce of self respect and integrity

    Post edited by dogbert27 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭pad406


    Not sure the last 2/3 words exist in the vocabulary of Trump cult members tbh.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,512 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Because she would have to start campaigning (and thus not really working her job) a year into it.

    Obama was considered incredibly fresh with only 3 years in the role when he started campaigning. It just is not feasible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Vance is giving India a political blow-job right now, pushing American fighter jets and what not on them - I reckon there’s an announcement in the coming weeks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭CFlat


    Sky News just said that Musk, from May, will no longer be involved with the Trump Admin and DOGE. He'll be concentrating on Tesla. Hopefully he won't be the first rat leaving that sinking ship that is the Trump Administration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,888 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    That was planned as he can only be a special government employee for 130 days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    https://newrepublic.com/post/194245/rfk-jr-disease-registry-track-autistic-people

    RFK getting a registry made of all the autistic people in the US... Definitely nothing ominous or reminiscent of some deadly regime in that..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭For Petes Sake


    I just realised I made a grave mistake and that Schumer's seat isn't up until 2028 -facepalm-

    Either way, she's already out there campaigning and is the only Democrat who keeps building momentum. She has a +61 point approval among Democrat voters. Only Obama, Harris, Sanders, Biden and Walz are higher.

    She is very, very popular and has a much different message than your run-of-the-mill moderate Democrat. Plus, the DNC leadership is much more liberal now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 745 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel


    this administration governs by different rules, they'd change them if they wanted to.

    he is out the door because of the disaster happening at Tesla. He even said he'll continue to work for Trump as long as the president wanted him to but in reality investors with serious muscle have told musk to sort his **** out or else...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭trashcan


    I still rate Walz highly. I think he comes across as very genuine, and has a real vibe of the common plain spoken man about him, and I think he could have widespread appeal. I know people will hold it against him that he was on the losing ticket with Harris, but arguably if he had been let off the leash more there may just have been a different outcome. Most of what he says seems really sensible to me. Plus he really got under the skin of Musk, which is hugely in his favour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭CFlat


    Sure, the Trump Administration always follow the rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭threeball


    Loads of cheap solar for Europe incoming in that case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭For Petes Sake


    Walz comes across as a good man to me. Having said that, I don't think he's a Presidential figure (and I don't think he personally wants to be President himself), but he'd be a perfect VP and I thought he was a great pick by Harris.

    People say he has 'woke' policies but at the end of the day he's in favour of people being themselves without judgement and that says a lot more about him than it does about his detractors.

    Not to mention his own story. Issues around fertility, his son having profound autism etc. Just an all-round good guy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭For Petes Sake


    If the current sh!tshow continues until 2028, and she keeps ramping up support and momentum, the Republicans are toast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,064 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Trump won the popular vote, aka a majority. The Dems need to hold their own base as much as possible as well as turn at least some of the Trump voters to them. I suspect they will need to move at least on some social issues to capture these votes.

    If they run AOC they will have at best a contentious election, where given the current **** show it should be a Dem landslide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,820 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Who is " she " ?

    Have read back and can't see the name .

    @For Petes Sake

    Edit I see a reference to AOC ..is the she Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ?

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,512 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Aka a plurality. He didn't win a majority of votes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,421 ✭✭✭circadian


    I keep seeing this DNC is more liberal statement but how? Socially? That's easy enough to achieve but I seriously doubt economically liberal is on the table. AOC has a mountain to climb to even attempt to push a presidential run and Waltz will most likely be constrained by the big money in politics.

    Citizens United made sure that the economically liberal do not stand a chance in either party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,421 ✭✭✭circadian


    I think Bernie is right in his current objectives. He's largely ignoring the culture war. He's pushing for day to day economic benefits and that strikes a chord with both democrat and republican voters alike. He's actively avoiding "establishment democrats" and supports "independents" who are focused on things like education, healthcare and social security over social issues. I think of people see a genuine improvement on their lives then it becomes much more difficult to use minority groups as a scapegoat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,011 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I wish Bernie all the luck in the world because I think he's bang on with his general message, but he's working against some deeply, deeply entrenched cultural values and general human tendencies.

    He says he's for access to education, healthcare and a decent social safety net. Right wing media will say that he wants to tell you where you can send your kids to school, which doctor you're allowed to see and wants to give your tax dollars away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,380 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    1. Make list of all autistic people in America
    2. Deport all to El Salvador without due process
    3. Trump makes announcement that he has cured autism in America - Winning!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭francois




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭Field east


    where is Antony Blinking in all of this searching for a democratic candidate?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭McFly85


    AOC would be a poor choice for 28 imo. I think she’s a brilliant congresswoman but for her to work, she’d need the entire party behind her and her policies, which isn’t going to happen. Too many senior members of the party are nowhere near as left as her and would staunchly disagree with her on a range of topics.

    Also - she’s too young. Not to do the job, but once you’ve been president you’re basically out of the political system. She’s too good where she is to leave that now.

    Best case scenario is someone centre left that most of the party can get behind, with AOC gunning for 36.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,766 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    And it's not going to happen because the Dems aren't actually left wing, they're just left of the republicans

    This is the problem with the 2 party system. Having Bernie Sanders caucus for the dems and run in their elections alongside someone like Joe Biden

    If this was any other western country you'd have a MAGA party, a traditional Conservative party, a centrist Libertarian party, a left of centre Democratic party, a Green party, a Socialist party, and a bunch of others at the extremes.

    Some of these exist but can't compete because the 2 main parties are so large they skew the spectrum.

    The dems are at least 3 parties rolled into 1 for me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭Field east


    then retire and apply again for another gov position - the admin just use a different choice of words to make it ‘ALL LEGAL’



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    AOC has several things going against her.

    She's a woman, a POC, intelligent, well-spoken, educated and has backbone and integrity.

    Not a chance will the average flyover knuckledragger vote for her. It's extremely sad, but that's where we are now. The average voter is like a toddler, you need to jangle a set of keys in their face and make cooing noises. Three word slogans with simple words and repeat, repeat, repeat. Construct a simple reality for voters and give easy answers. Hammer that home non stop. Any difficult questions, waffle and bullsh1t.

    There are plenty of educated and intelligent people in the States, but they're not the majority. The majority are barely literate, little education, used to propaganda being fed to them in small, easily digested pieces with little to no critical thinking ability.

    The democrats will never be able to tap the sexist, racist, religious extremist market, but your average morons is a possibility. They just have to stop trying to appeal to intelligent, educated people and go for utter morons.

    It worked for Trump.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,819 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Honestly yes. It would, IMO, be suitable for the chief to feel how the masses under his control feel when they get the touch of ICE on their shoulders. I was tempted to describe him as a charlatan and a con-man but will stick with chancer as his ability to con people has been slipping lately.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,213 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    If AOC has no hope of winning against literal fascists just because shes a non white male, then America can get fucked and the rest of the world should just complete the pivot away from them economically and militarily

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



Advertisement