Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1121122124126127138

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    This post should be highlighted again and again and again. This is the epitome of bad faith posting.

    We'll deal with the first part of your post regards the exit poll results. I quote Seathrun66 - 'The exit poll showed that housing/homelessness, health, the cost of living and economic stability were far more important for voters.' So let's deal with the raw numbers here, economic stability came in at 9 percent in this poll. Immigration came in at 6 percent. Yet Seathrun66 says this shows that economic stability was a FAR more important issue over immigration. Really? 9 percent vs 6 percent. Far more important says you - an absolute landslide in the polling percentages! Ah, c'mon now lad.

    Now, let's move onto the poll itself. What's that old saying - lies, damned lies and statistics. It's about as apt a saying available to sum up your take on those election exit poll results.

    Funny enough, I was watching rte the day after the election where they had a stats person on going through this exit poll for about an hour. I would highly recommend anyone to go back and watch it. Seathrun66, you should definitely watch that rte segment as you clearly have absolutely no understanding of these exit poll results. The first thing this rte segment highlighted was that 3 of the top 4 issues in the poll (housing/homelessness, cost of living, economic stability) should fall under at most 2 headings. Economic stability and cost of living, are all about personal finances etc and should never have been given separate headings in such a poll said the stats person on rte. Then she got into how housing feeds into the cost of living, essentially pointing that all of these top issues were effecting each other. So there was a big crossover between these issues.

    She then went on to describe how they actually polled people, giving people 2 issues to tick off out of the list. She highlighted that if you changed this and gave people 1/3/4 issues to tick off you could see very different results. Again she mentioned that 3 of the top 4 issues were financially related and this played a big role when only being allowed to tick 2 issues affecting you mostly in the poll. So, set the poll up a slightly different way, get very different results - what's that saying again - lies, damned lies and statistics.

    Taking the poll in raw numbers without digging into it as the rte stats analyst did that day - you still end up with immigration as number 5 on the list of priorities for people. The 5th most important issue for Irish voters. Now, I think most people with consider that quite high in a country with so many ongoing issues. Immigration is above Climate change. Immigration is above Crime. Immigration is above Childcare. Immigration is above Transport and Roads.

    Imagine having the temerity to suggest that immigration is not an important issue in Ireland and amongst the Irish electorate. Let me ask you Seathrun66, are you suggesting that climate change, crime, childcare, transport and roads are are complete non issues for Irish people and the Irish electorate? Imagine actually having the neck to imply such things about the Irish electorate. Seathrun66 states and I quote - 'SIX PER CENT. One in 17 people. Those politicians and activists focusing on immigration might be better occupied dealing with the many far more pressing issues identified by voters.'

    So those politicians and activists should disregard climate change? They should disregard crime? They should disregard childcare? They should disregard transport and roads? Honestly, the immigration threads on here (past and present) have seen some off the wall stuff over the years, but your reading of those election exit polls statistics is right up there with the best of them. Well played. You should probably stick to that paid research of yours in future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Yes it does more people, in a short space of time massively impacts demographics.

    If there is a baby boom you can plan for it, a massive sudden influx of adults (all of whom will become pensioners) has a massive impact on all the above.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,541 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    So it’s population growth you have a problem with it a shift in demographics. I’m lost as to what you’re saying.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Eastern European countries wouldn't accept this. I'm surprised we would after fighting for Ireland for so long but I guess when you have a humongous national debt the government will resort to desperate measures. And for the record I support all countries in the world keeping the natives as a strong majority not just Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    You can clearly plan an increase or decrease in immigration both legal and illegal. Many example's the world over. Also just letting whatever happens happen is still a plan, just a very **** one. And an extremely irresponsible one to the people of Ireland considering what's at stake.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    The CSO figures show 9 percent non Irish 8 percent Irish . Foreign students come specifically on student visas ." They pay our pensions " Most foreign workers are on low incomes and pay little tax . The repurposing of retirement homes for IPAS will only a select few be able to afford to stay in them .He was criticised by the opposition.Where was I critical of foreign workers.

    Some Primary schools have 50 percent foreign national children . The population of Ireland in 2000 was 3.8 million it's now 5.3 based on the past 7 million is a real possibility. Infrastructure is not keeping pace with the high numbers of arrivals .

    When people gloss over the negatives and don't complain government does nothing .

    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭engineerws


    When I was growing up it was possible to work abroad and earn an even better wage with the potential of someday returning to Ireland (doesn't happen that way for a lot of people) and buying a home.

    Now the wages are really high in Ireland, the cost of property is really high and there isn't an obvious alternative with cheap housing and better wages where one can save.

    I was looking at this :https://www.reddit.com/r/chinalife/comments/151idb2/career_options_for_a_foreigner_moving_to_china/

    Looks like very little opportunities in China outside teaching English.

    So people in Ireland don't seem to have that many options anymore, especially people not working in tech. An obvious solution to help the people in Ireland would be to temporarily reduce international Visa's. It seems the compassionate thing to do. I can't understand the "who cares about people in Ireland" argument that appears day in day out here.

    Once we had Noel Brown who cared so much as to fight for unmarried mothers in Ireland.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/how-the-irish-times-exposed-the-mother-and-child-scandal-70-years-ago-today-1.4524235

    Now it seems it doesn't matter to some if a working married couple have to raise their children in a box room or a shed in their parents back garden IF they're lucky.

    Surely the people of Ireland (including recent arrivals) still matter now too? Surely they deserve a quality of life that is more than being rent slaves to ruthless landlords?

    Post edited by engineerws on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    It is a shift in demographics, it is mostly young adults who are coming to live here. Our population is growing not organically. There are more people competing to buy homes.

    There are more people for whom English is not a first language which impacts so many including education.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Proportionally more non-Irish residents are in employment than Irish nationals. That's unambiguous or are you disputing the CSO figures? If so have a word with their Cork office who compiled them.

    Do you have a source for 'Most foreign workers are on low incomes and pay little tax' or is that just an un-researched feeling you have? As well as running successful businesses non-Irish workers are in every profession including law, banking, academia, plumbing, carpentry, medicine and hospitality.

    Our soccer managers for both men and women are immigrants. Many of the players on our rugby teams are immigrants including several of the national team. Many of our most famous chefs are immigrants. An enormous number of doctors, nurses, radiologists and clerical staff who stop our health service from further falling apart are immigrants. The civil service has a significant number of immigrants. A huge number of teaching and other staff in our higher education are immigrants. Same with the IT and pharmaceutical industries.

    All of there people are contributing to the running of the state and the pensions of our retirees. Many are paying high taxation and I'd venture that most are contributing more than the majority of their online critics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭prunudo


    What are demographics?

    Demographics are the various characteristics of a population. Examples of demographics can include factors such as the race, sex and age of a population that is being studied. The statistical information on the population's socioeconomic conditions is known as demographic data.

    Demographics covers a wide field of metrics, how people can dismiss the affects immigration has on demographics in Ireland is akin to an ostrich putting its head in the sand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,056 ✭✭✭prunudo


    All of there people are contributing to the running of the state and the pensions of our retirees. Many are paying high taxation and I'd venture that most are contributing more than the majority of their online critics.

    And there we have it, its all about the money, and be damned on the implications it has on for the native population or those already living here.

    Just keep embracing fdi, keep importing people to fill jobs and don't acknowledge the effects it has on people who are trying to get on the property ladder, or hoping to start a family, or struggling to get school places or hospital appointments. Keep the flow of mass immigration cause they pay tax and pay for our pensions.

    We are destroying society to protect the economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    You're aware that economic stability at 9% is a full 50% more than immigration at 6% are you not? That's far more. If you've 50% more cash in your wages or benefits you'll be far happier. And then you have housing/homelessness at 28% which is a whopping 4.7 times more of concern than immigration, cost of living 3.2 times. All very few people voted with asylum seekers and refugees in mind. Oh hang on, they did. They voted AGAINST the anti-immigration parties.

    Do you really need a reminder that those parties opposing people fleeing war and persecution got a sum total of zero seats in a Dáil with a hefty 174 of them available. Not even one seat that would have earned 0.57% representation. Zilch. Nada. 0% representation in our native parliament. Maybe it's time that sunk in and the realisation that hateful views are unattractive in 21st century Ireland.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,541 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    What’s alarming about young adults, who will work for 40 years, moving to Ireland?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Immigrants pay tax. Many pay large amounts of it. Immigrants play a large part in running our hospitals, civil service, universities, banks, legal firms, IT businesses, social media companies, construction industry, restaurant and hospitality and every other business going. Immigrants keep the country running. You don't like it. Your prerogative. We should all be contributing as much as these people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    The stats are the CSO ones twice provided on this thread. All information is therein and will not be posted again so best to check 3/4 pages back if you missed it both times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Nothing whatsoever. Many of the people opposing immigrants, as evidenced from the occupations (or not) of those sentenced after the Dublin riot and elsewhere, are contributing nothing or next to nothing to our economy. It's an odd position to be so critical of those providing for current and future pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,235 ✭✭✭enricoh


    I did read the report I didn't see any age profile mentioned, that is why I asked you whether it is all ages or working age, say 18-66.

    If it's 18-66 fair enough, if it includes all ages it's a cop out to include old age pensioners in it and is of course going to skew the figures positively towards immigrants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    The report refers to 'labour force' figures including projections for the size of future 'labour forces'. That means those in employment or actively seeking employment. That is therefore the age range you mentioned but not including students and includes those over 66 who continue to work. It does not include non-working pensioners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭McBain11


    Do all immigrants pay tax? Do all immigrants pay large amounts of it? We could go on and on, but I've to start prepping my dinner for Good Friday.

    What's that saying again - lies, damned lies and statistics.

    Is it correct to say that a higher percentage of migrants of a working age were unemployed in Ireland in 2022? And in 2023? And in 2024? I don't need you to reply tbh, as it will just be more spam. It is absolutely correct to say that a higher percentage of migrants of a working age were unemployed in 2022, 2023, and 2024 vs Irish born people.

    Strange that, you don't really highlight that part much. That's before you obviously drill way down into the report and realise that the grouping of all migrants together for chunks of the report is just silly season. So English born, EU, etc are all thrown into those headline figures (and even at that, the report still shows the unemployment percentage amongst migrants is higher than Irish born people).

    My favourite part of the report is that in 2024, 14.6 percent of migrants between the age of 15-24 were unemployed. That's not a great figure now is it. It kind of jumps off the report page!

    14.6 percent of a certain age group unemployed, roughly 1 in 7. That is some stat eh.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    All those immigrants you quoted arrived legally via applying for work visas or being eligible due to being EU or UK citizens. Asylum seekers from third world countries with minimal or no English or education who eventually are allowed to stay after costing the state a fortune will invariably end up in low pay jobs. They won’t be paying too many pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,235 ✭✭✭enricoh


    With the multinationals getting wobbly is it time for the safety of a government job. Government advisor role has opened up recently, vetting will be thorough though, be warned! ---

    Dan Ramamoorthy, who advised the Department of Trade and Enterprise in relation to entrepreneurs and start-up companies, said he learned about investors, after being asked to stand in as a ‘pretend investor’ for a group of 12-year-olds, by googling ‘What is an investor? What do investors do. What questions do they ask? What do they even wear?’

    “I had no idea,” he said.

    “I watched all the episodes of TV shows like Shark Tank, Dragons Den, where the best investors come and invest in young entrepreneurs.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Historical fact shows that the only replacing we've actually been witness to have been the white colonising of the USA, Brazil, Australia, Argentina, Colombia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Cuba, Peru, Bolivia and others where they've taken over from the native population. Do you approve of that 19th century resource-grab and widespread genocide.

    The current theory is a long-debunked one, but hey, enough of me, have a read of what the WP has to say.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/great-replacement-theory-is-ignorant-both-broadly-narrowly/

    And there it is - 'white colonising' happened, so we today should sit back and take unlimited mass migration on the chin. Ireland committed none of that resource grab and widespread genocide the WaPo alludes to. To call it 'white colonising' while Ireland amongst many other historically White dominated countries hand no hand or part in those actions is an abhorrent racist trope. The endless attempts to frame the actions of historical Empires who conducted colonisation as a 'whole of the White race' modern day guilt trip is nothing short of a weak, decrepit, self-loathing and frankly racist mindset.

    Actions by people who are long dead (and many generations have since passed) are no way the responsibility of today's peoples. We are not responsible for the actions of our forefathers, however if those on the woke spectrum feel such importance over things that happened a long long time ago there is a Trocaire box they can pop a few bob in to to relieve themselves of the overwhelming guilt and shame they obviously feel - just don't expect everyone else to part with their money.

    One thing though that I notice never gets mentioned whenever the discussion of colonisation pops up, is how Japan, Thailand, Turkey and China are never mentioned for their colonisation of other lands and peoples. Never mentioned is the huge African participation in the slave trade. Why is Japan, China and Thailand in particular who remain by and large monocultural, ignored? Why is there no mass-migration into Japan? Their fertility rates are on the floor! Surely the good 'ol NGOs should be calling this out. Nope, not a peep. It seems only Whitey needs mass-migration and if it's non-White migration it's even better for some as it soothes their aforementioned guilt trip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    What's your problem with him, he was working and paying tax correct?

    I mean like never mind he was unqualified for the job, and groomed a child, he was working....

    Great to see the level of accountability with our taxes.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,603 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Proportionally more non-Irish residents are in employment than Irish nationals. That's unambiguous or are you disputing the CSO figures?

    Isn't this just because more non Irish nationals are of working age, with very few of them, if any, being retired (yet)?

    So unless we're going to send them back when they get old (which I doubt you would be in favour of doing!), that will change within a few decades.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Not pay support to EU citizens who can’t support themselves after 6 months other than begging on the streets of Dublin?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Yes, apply EU law and send them back to Slovakia etc. We have no obligation to fund them beyond six months. Other EU countries have no problem doing this, so we should do the same.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭briangriffin


    Whats the unemployment rate for Irish born and those born abroad? What are those percentages?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Enforce the provisions within the law as it stands: Freedom of movement in the EU

    If someone from another EU country lands here and is unable to support themselves or becomes a burden on the social assistance programmes they can be served with a removal order after a few months.

    I genuinely would be shocked if the Irish Government actually enforced this provision - they are more likely to house them, give them medical cards and generous welfare payments. We are a very soft touch in this regards.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 895 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack




Advertisement