Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1665666668670671707

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    One of the assessments is that the Democrats needs a more radical candidate that the public can buy into. AOC might very well be that and I wouldn't say she is remotely the same as previous ones.

    Also I don't think it should be ignored that Trump is behaving like a tyrant, you and others might like that he's deporting innocent people to El Salvador but it's horrifying. On top of that, plenty of the very people that elected him are very pissed off with his tariffs policies and the impact it's having on their 401ks... His fan base are having buyers remorse so now it's a matter of if the party reacts and starts pulling back on him. Either way, the country is irreparably damaged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    Could you please quote where I said I'm happy he is deporting anyone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    Haha good post 😁

    Poor Donald staying too true to his campaign promises, what an amateur.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,633 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    It was one of the qualities you liked - keeping his campaign promises. Deportations were #1 or #2 besides lowering grocery prices (a promise yet to be met).

    Do you dislike what he's doing wrt immigrants, keeping emotion out of it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    I have never said I liked or disliked anything, again if you could quote me on that please?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭riddles


    Not a compliment to him but he isn’t normal which we all know. He’s not a career politician or bound by any political party constraints and definitely not trying to create a path for any succession model unless one of the family. For now it’s full narcissist / sociopath mode for him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    I want to throw up every time some (redacted) says "oh but Trump is so charismatic and anyway Kamala has an annoying voice".

    No! Eff off!

    Trump threw a big rock into the pond that is American society. And he stirred up enough sediment to literally muddy the waters. He appeals to the absolute dregs, the people who form the third world segment of the US. But being without good prospects in life isn't enough to be swayed by Trump. His main appeal is with morons, general crackpots, racists, fascists, people with an axe to grind against society and a general hatred of any form of government, incels, 4chan losers, conspiracy loons and the most pitiful and subhuman of them all, white supremacists. And of course billionaires who are the main benefactors of the chaos he generates.

    He has given the craven Lumpenproletariat centre stage. He didn't win because of decent people being swayed by his arguments, he won because he appealed to subhuman scum by validating their hatred and stupidity.

    Anyone who thinks Trump is in any way charismatic, instead of a whiny man baby with a voice that makes you want to rearrange his teeth with a baseball bat, is part of his target audience.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    So you're calling the 77.3 Million people who voted for Donald Trump in November Subhuman scum?

    Totally rational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,378 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So why don't you? Why the charade?

    Typically when posters engage in these weak attempts to somehow defend Trump or attack his opponents, with zero actual evidence, it betrays a sneaking regard for Trump and or his some of his policies. Multiple posters have called you out on your original claim, listing in detail how many campaign promises he is miles away from eg stock market, prices, ending wars … you have no real response and just engage in these cryptic semantics or plain ignore it and go off on a tangent.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,560 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    If you see no issue with deporting without any form of due process and sending to a pretty terrible prison then you absolutely are scum. If you view that as keeping promises then that's backing a tyrant.

    Also you appear to be pursuing the charade of being on the fence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Trump's charisma doesn't appeal to you as you have different values but he does have charisma that appeals to with morons, general crackpots, racists, fascists, people with an axe to grind against society and a general hatred of any form of government, incels, 4chan losers, conspiracy loons and the most pitiful and subhuman of them all, white supremacists that you mention.

    Trump is a charismatic sociopath who doesn't care about others feelings or emotions and that's the appeal and admiration he receives from the above group.

    People who support him tune in to hear what he says and people who don't support him tune in to hear what he says. Both for different reasons but he attracts both to his message.

    I find the people who validate him to ensure their own self interests more disgusting. People like Karoline Leavitt, MGT, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, etc.

    Kamala and AOC do have annoying voices! I'm sorry but you can be saying the greatest speech in history but you can have everyone tune out if you're not good at delivering it.

    The Democrats need another orator like Kennedy, Clinton and Obama.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    That's the issue that was there and is still there for the Democrats. There is a leadership void that connects with all Democrats.

    I've said it in previous posts that the Democrats are too divided in who they represent and have split messages.

    For example, AOC is popular with younger voters but I reckon anyone over 30 years old doesn't find her relatable. What is her message to the 35 year old white couple who are doing 9 to 5, paying a mortgage, 1 or 2 kids under 5, struggling with day to day finances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    "" People who support him tune in to hear what he says and people who don't support him tune in to hear what he says. Both for different reasons but he attracts both to his message.""

    In a nutshell, he has completely mastered the art of using media to his advantage, wether it be traditional media, social media or podcasts, his podcast run before the election was a touch of genius.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,441 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    He has clearly mastered the art of using the media to his advantage at least to this exent; he won the election.

    But, of course, you could say the same about every other candidate who won election.

    I don't think this necessarily indicates "complete mastery". Trump has used the media very effectively to establish a very strong brand. When the brand is positive that works very well for you, but when if and when it becomes negative that works very badly.

    It's already the case that people who don't like Trump really, really don't like him. That's at least partly the result of the way Trump projects himself in the media — the cruelty, the disdain, the sneering, the viciousness; the smugness; the blatant corruption. A lot of people are turned off by this. And if people who were prepared to overlook these qualities in Trump in the hope that Trump's policies would improve their lives find that, in fact, his policies don't improve their lives, then they may no longer be prepared to overlook them.

    Up above you take issue with Detritus for describing Trump voters as "subhuman scum". You ask whether all 77.3 million Trump voters are subhuman scum. Well, if they all voted for him because they actually like cruelty, disdain, viciousness, sneering, corruption, etc, you gotta say that, yes, they are pretty scummy people. If, on the other hand, you think there's a cohort of Trump voters who supported him despite these characteristics, but for other reasons, then I think the corollary is that his use of media may not turn out to be that smart. Because he has indelibly associated himself with cruelty, disdain, etc, he may have set himself up for a dramatic reversal of popularity if people's other reasons for supporting him — the hope of cheaper eggs; the desire for prosperity; whatever — start to evaporate.

    He already has the lowest approval rating that any President has ever had at this point in their term of office (including himself, last time around). The chickens may be coming home to roost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,490 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭poop emoji


    Chickens that don’t seem to be able to lay eggs and lower egg prices that are their new Trump record levels



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Vance threatening UK with no trade deal because of the lack of free speech in Britain, this coming from an administration that threatens colleges with removal of funding if they allow student protest on campus.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/trump-jd-vance-trade-deal-free-speech-b2733806.html?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-gb

    But allies of Mr Vance say he is “obsessed by the fall of Western civilisation” – including his view that free speech is being eroded in Britain – and that he will demand the Labour government rolls back laws against hateful comments, including abuse targeting LGBT+ groups or other minorities, as a condition of any deal.

    The Independent was told: “The vice-president expressing optimism [on a trade deal] is a way of putting further pressure on the UK over free speech. If a deal does not go through, it makes Labour look bad.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,369 ✭✭✭thereiver


    In this case first they came for anyone who is critical of trump or his policy's then they came for the protestors against Israeli Genocide in Gaza now they come for the universitys adopt or policy's against dei and protestors next they come for us citizens who are protesting against the government

    See techdirt.com. Long article Harvard and other universities are standing up for free speech even though trump is saying he,ll stop billions of dollars of research funding if they don't follow his policy's on dei We can hope that a democrat will be the next president and restore federal agencys so they can serve the public as before



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭randd1


    That Vance is a degenerate hillbilly. And one dangerous kunt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭Terence Rattigan


    time for Starmer to bite the bullet and rejoin the EU in some shape or form



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,017 ✭✭✭DarkJager21


    Pathetic little bitch of a man, every time he opens his mouth the immediate reaction is "just shut the **** up". A spineless boot licker, hopefully he's nice and close to Trump whenever karma comes calling for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Mattyonthepatty


    So how about all the places and voters that voted blue in 2020 but flipped to Red in 2024 to win the popular vote.

    Were those people subhuman scum back when they voted for Biden or only Subhuman scum when they voted for Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,046 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You have to ask why they changed their vote. What was new about Trump in 2024 that they felt made him better than 2020?

    If it was his promises about MAGA then they were deluded, as his time in office previously was enough to disabuse that notion. He stated repeatedly that he was out for vengeance. He was convicted on multiple counts, was found to have slept with a porn star and used campaign funds to cover it up.

    So what was it that changed their minds?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,441 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    "Subhuman scum" is not my term, and I am not going to defend it. Nor have you any reason to ask me to.

    The issue is not where people live or how they voted before; the issue is why they vote for Trump.

    If they vote for Trump because they like the cruelty, the racism, the illegality, etc then, yes, they are depraved.

    But I don't imagine that everyone who voted for Trump did so because they like those characteristics. I am sure there are many who voted for him despite those characteristics, either because they were blind to them or because they overlooked them in the hope of something else.

    I have no way of knowing how many of Trump's voters voted for him because they are depraved, and how many voted for him because they are merely deluded. And neither, I imagine, do you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The country that voted Trump for president is not going to vote AOC for president.

    The Dems will have to do more than simply not talk about the social and DEI policies that a large number of Americans clearly don't like. They will have to go further, closer to disowening them.

    In short, the Dems need to move to the right on non economic issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭poop emoji


    Just want to point out that pond scum actually does something useful and produces oxygen and keeps insects happy, we ultimately evolved from pond scum (over billions of years, not 4000)

    That’s more that can be said of MAGA cult members!

    The word people are looking for is turd 💩



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I can understand the frustration, and indeed many of these groups gravitate towards Trump, but it's missing some very large groups:

    The party faithful - the GOP could run a trashcan and it would get a significant baseline of votes

    Low information voters - another vast number, Trump is masterful at manipulating this group with cheap populism

    Then there is another swath of that group, middle America who voted for him simply because they recognised his name on the ballot (who the hell is Harris?)

    All of whom have been worked for decades by the conservative media machine, pumping them with culture wars and tribalism 24/7.

    Combine that with weak disorganised last minute leadership from the Dems, plus world events happening during their tenure (global inflation) + Trump's extraordinary luck (legal, the magical assassination escape photo op) and we arrive at him pipping at the post



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭Shelga


    I’m a woman. I wish the Democrats hadn’t run a woman. It’s pathetic, but I genuinely think America won’t vote for a woman president. At the very least, she will be at a disadvantage to any male candidate who possesses the exact same traits and experience as her. People may dismiss that aspect, but it’s hard to conclude otherwise IMO.

    Just run a straight white male with a vision and an effective communication style. I’d like to see Trump or his successor beat that.

    Edit: and if you disagree, just ask yourself, is there a bigger element of risk for the Dems in running a man or a woman in 2028?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    I never said personally that I think he is charasmatic. He appears that way to ejets and scum though - which happens to be a good portion of america who also happen to be the loudest.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    Its one thing to admit brexit was a mistake and deal with the fallout. Another thing entirely to get them to turn tails and beg to rejoin EU, even if circumstances put EU + UK against US, still an extreme bullet to bite. Especially when it took them nearly 10 years to realise brexit was a mistake.



Advertisement