Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1116117119121122162

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    This was and still is a very interesting and insightful read on this utter shambles, which is from a very reputable media outlet imo.

    https://archive.is/EfdEL

    It shows a rough timeline of the situation.

    No one knows what Roderic O’Gorman, the integration minister, was thinking when he began tweeting about his plans to reform the immigration system in early 2021 but staff at the International Protection Office (IPO) were aghast.

    Months later O’Gorman’s colleague, Helen McEntee, announced an amnesty that allowed illegal migrants to gain residency if they came forward. How this was going to work was also unclear but there were concerns that it too would attract a new wave of migrants who might travel here and apply for asylum.

    Now if that's not an 'Ireland is open for business' call, I don't know what is

    I've seen the correlation of the Russian invasion of Ukraine proper and the rise in IPAS applicants made before in a way that suggests that both are connected - It's absolute rubbish of course. People in Nigeria, Pakistan, Algeria etc etc, didn't go - 'OMG Russia have invaded Ukraine, we must get to Ireland, it's the only place in the world where we can go for safety'

    It's a pure coincidence of timing. Rodders tweets weren't acted on as covid flight restrictions were still in place. These restrictions eased at the start of 2022 and our IPAS friends, who had a year to plan and research the best place to go, started on their journey's for a better life and Ireland looked really good - It's as simple as that

    I hope we don't get into a back and forth about the tweets as the article above pretty much nails the fact that they were indeed a massive part of the problem.

    I'll quote this again -

    …staff at the International Protection Office (IPO) were aghast. [at the tweets]

    Even Al Jazeera picked up on it a few days after they went out - Well done Roderic

    Under the new proposal, applicants will be housed in state-run reception centres for four months before those still waiting for a decision to be made will be moved to own-door or own-room accommodation such as houses or apartments.

    On the financial side - There are two years (20/21) where there were little to no arriving IPA going into the system, so dividing a total spend over 6 years x 6 is wrong

    On the article linked at the top - There was nothing to stop The IT, RTE, VM, Newstalk etc picking up on this and doing similar reports and articles, but they declined for some undetermined reason…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87 ✭✭_Quilombero_


    41% of voters believe that immigration has been an overall negative for Ireland.

    i.e. nearly half of voters believe that we'd be better off without any foreigners coming here, such is the mess the government has made of it.

    Plenty of voters are from immigrants backgrounds themselves yet this was still the result.

    A pretty bad indictment of the government's immigration policy. Either that or 41% of voters are far-right nazis!😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,584 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I'm confused as to why anyone would argue that the spend on dealing with this situation has been anything but an enormous drain on our national resources.

    We're doing everyone a disservice currently, the citizens in need in the country and those arriving are all getting a raw deal, nobody wins here except greedy unscrupulous business and property owners taking advantage of the situation to make a quick buck.

    The whole perception of this conversation is skewed via the filter of identity politics to the point where people refuse to see reason.

    There are glaringly obvious facts relating to this situation that we need to get to grips with before we can start digging ourselves out of this hole we're in, and that doesn't just relate to the immigration issue, that relates to all the major issues affecting this country most notably the accommodation problem which whether you want to admit it or not is entwined in a symbiotic relationship with the immigration issue and we need to collectively cop on and approach this whole issue from a different perspective going forward if we're ever going to see any of this begin to make sense.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    And a greater percentage (45%) stating that immigration has been good for us.

    Incidentally, where does it state that 41% of people believe that we'd be better off without ANY non-Irish coming here? Can you point me to the wording please.

    And 57% stating that the government gives appropriate benefits to asylum seekers or should give more. That's positive to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87 ✭✭_Quilombero_


    Voters who are strongly against the current policy could easily fall into the "positive" 45% category.

    For example, I believe immigration has benefited Ireland on the whole. Yet I also believe the government has caused irreversible damage by encouraging the abuse of the IP system. I believe the IPAS system is corrupt. The likes of McEntee and O'Gorman sicken me. However, I don't think that immigration is a negative "in general".

    If someone of my opinion can fit into the "positive" category, then it's not very well phrased. It's also worth noting that immigration came up as more important than climate change,childcare, transport.

    People voted for FF/FG in spite of their immigration policy rather than because of it.

    ExitPoll.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 441 ✭✭briangriffin


    Why on Earth does the EU have a migration pact if each country solely controls its own borders?? Why did the Irish government repeatedly claim we couldn't go it alone we had to be part of the pact? Part of a pact that fines members who refuse to take all asylum seekers regardless of the number or countries circumstances. Was the EU Dublin III regulation enforced rigidly ? Does the EU have reception conditions directives that apply to all member states? Are these not legal requirements? Why would the ECJ rule that a housing crisis does not preclude ireland from providing housing for IPAS applicants? Are you saying the irish government lied to the people of ireland and that we actually are a sovereign state who can control our own borders how we want if we had the will to do it? Who enforces our "obligations" under the UN convention and why have some European countries chosen to ignore those obligations?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 441 ✭✭briangriffin


    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/11/30/housing-and-homelessness-biggest-issue-for-voters-exit-poll-shows/

    Is immigration a positive negative or makes no difference.

    41% said negative

    45% said positive

    41% must be far right hateful racists so eh?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,402 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    There are no lies. It's all there for anyone that wants to see it. All countries in the EU do not control their own borders, Ireland does. We are not part of Schengen, unlike the others.

    Dublin regulations didn't work, which is why the EU pact was brought in. Ireland is a voluntary member of the pact. Although I don't know what we would do if we were not, as we wouldn't have agreement to send AS back to their original place of claim

    The ECJ actually hasn't made a ruling yet, the AG has given an opinion, one the court will likely go with. The High Court in Ireland has sought the advice, the ECJ are merely doing their job, and providing the information that our own High court need.

    The ECJ are not ruling in our IPA or immigration policy, they are replying to questions asked by our courts regarding our obligations under the ECHR.

    We are signatories to the UNCHR and have incorporated it into our domestic legislation. So we, including our courts enforce it.

    All this is information that is completely freely available to anyone that wants to know about it. Not sure why you think I should know everything, but if I can help further, do please ask.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    It's not in their top two doesn't mean it doesn't impact it they don't have an opinion.

    What does increasing housing demand do? What does increasing demand for social housing do, or homeless places?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    The thing is, chief, you’re the only once calling anyone racist.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Your are arguing immigration was a major issue.

    Then you end your post by saying voters completely ignored this issue when they chose FF/fg as government.

    This was a major issue for voters that in no way affected who they voted for.

    Hmmm doesn't sound like an issue for voters so.

    So bigly an issue. The biggest of issues. All the voters tell me this is the biggest issue.

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Denmark don’t have a zero refugee or IPAS policy.

    We actually have the same policy as Denmark, they’re just more efficient at it. I’ve been saying this for months now and you refuse to listen.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Where on this thread is there a call to expel all immigrants and their children?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    On page two we had a poster, quoting mein kampf FFS.

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭prunudo


    You said

    This thread is full of calls to expel all immigrants and that includes their children born here.

    This thread is not full of what you claim. I had a look back on page 2 and can't see the quote you refer to either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Your quote

    This thread is full of calls to expel all immigrants and that includes their children born here.

    Page 2, one post, and apparently it's all.

    You are trolling !

    Mod Edit: Warning issued for uncivil posting - stating people are trolling is not permitted - report posts and move on, do not call them out on thread in this fashion

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    The mods delete all the openly racist comments. They deleted the main kampf quote.

    They did not delete my comment quoting it.

    I'll quote my post now so you can verify.

    That post was thanked many times before deletion, which to me indicates support from other posters for that position.

    Other openly racist countries are similarly supported before not deletion.

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,316 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I've no particular thoughts about O'Gorman's tweets one way or the other, but as you say, those tweets were issued in the middle of the lockdown and when people couldn't even move to Ireland. It was a full two years later (mid 2023) when the anti-immigration lobby started talking retrospectively about the tweets (in 2021, they were much more preoccupied with the lockdown itself and vaccines and holding protests against the government……being anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine was their big bugbear at that point, not immigration).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 441 ✭✭briangriffin


    Ireland controls its own borders...

    almost 90% of IPAS applicants came via Northern Ireland, the state had no knowledge of these applicants until they arrived in the office to claim asylum.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0410/1506948-international-protection-applicant-european-court/

    "Ireland as an EU Member State cannot avoid responsibility for providing adequate reception conditions even in cases where there is a large influx of people seeking international protection, according to the European Court of Justice's Advocate General.

    While Ms Medina suggested that force majeure may apply temporarily, it should only be for a reasonable period to resolve the issue.

    She has concluded the right to dignity is non-derogable, an absolute right, and if a member state fails to meet the basic needs of applicants for international protection, it infringes EU law.

    Therefore the member state cannot invoke force majeure as a defence."

    If 50k refugees arrived this year we would according to the above be obligated to house them regardless of our domestic circumstances, regardless of our national sovereignty or our financial capabilites. We have gone from 3500 in 2019 to 13,500 to 18,000 and back to a likely 13,000 this year.

    Where are we going to house the 33,000 applicants in IPAS accomadation currently and the 13k coming this year?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,662 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I've just looked at that in situ: as you say, no comment so how can you tell what the poster meant exactly? Could have been a sarcastic comment on anti immigration/anti foreigner posts, or meant as a warning etc.

    Certainly from a quick look at the poster's posting history, I can't see anything that marks him out as a racist, never mind one who is on the neo Nazi extreme fringe. Even on this thread, his few other posts don't fit that description. Elsewhere he has called Trump and Farage conmen.

    From the little I've seen, I'd say he might be a SF supporter - who are more of an open borders party (though he may well not be, I suppose).

    So basically for "full of" such posts, you can in fact cite one posted that was posted without comment by a poster with no history of posting anti-foreigner posts.

    Over stating your case a tad - no?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Only a complete idiot can think that no immigration at all would be positive for Ireland, or for any country. That's insane.

    It is very debatable how much immigration is enough or too much however. Given the housing crisis I think it's almost impossible to argue there hasn't been too much over the last 25 years. There definitely needs to be policies to discourage non-Irish citizens from coming here now.

    I think the political centre of gravity has moved now, very few people would disagree with that these days. It's just a pity it took so long to have a national discussion about immigration. Even now it's kind of muted in the media, where a nuanced debate should be possible, rather than through the more alarmist and divided social media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    No, I there is no breakdown of literacy rates of AS in Ireland (if they were any higher I'm sure the NGOs would be very keen to release the numbers) but the article I posted relates to the UK. According to our former hugely incompetent minister for justice 90% of our AS in 2024 came from the UK. So 40% of 90% are illiterate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    Nope, some undoubtedly are but the majority will have genuine concerns, and much will reflect on the government's lack of preparation. I'd have huge complaints about that also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    It show that 94% of people don't see immigration as the major issue. The parties who focused on it were routed. A pretty unambiguous message from the public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,662 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Absolutely this. The problem is though that there is very little sign that mainstream politicians or the media have started to take the measure of the issue, and of people's feelings about it. And they need to do so BEFORE the far right make hay of it.

    That's why this constant sneering by some posters here about how it's only an issue for a few bigots is exactly the wrong thing to do. Untrammeled immigration should not be a hill for the left to die on - because die on it they will if this continues, and all for what?

    I see parallels, albeit over somewhat different issues, with how the Democrats allowed Trump and Trumpism to go from the near universal condemnation and even ridicule they got after January 6th 2020 to get back into power on an indisputable margin. I really hope we aren't going to do the same thing here all because the usual parties are too cosy with a number of lobbies whose interests do not align with those of the Irish people.

    In some ways it's even madder in Ireland than in the US, because here some of those lobbies are government-funded charities. A comment that will no doubt be met by scornful dismissal, and yet it's true. There's a similar issue in Scotland, FWIW, although it's less stark as they don't have the same housing issues, for historical reasons.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,267 ✭✭✭✭Seathrun66


    The figures you posted do NOT come from the UK. They come from a UNESCO report referring to global figures on refugees, IDPs (Internally Displaced People) and migrants. Thus they include info on people moving within countries owing to war (Sudan, Palestine, Ukraine, Yemen, etc). They also include internal migrants in peaceful countries moving from rural areas to cities for work.

    UNESCO do not provide figures on the literacy rates of asylum seekers. You are making a false claim on the literacy of asylum seekers arriving in both the UK and ROI.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,341 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod: Just to note - the poster who made that post was forum banned for doing so. I'm also going to delete where it is quoted now too as there's no place for that sort of posting on this website. Can we please move on from discussing other posters now. Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,402 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Im not sure why you're quoting this to me? There is nothing different to anything I have already told you in my post.

    I don't understand your point about the border with Northern Ireland? People claim asylum at the IPO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,584 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    If people are claiming asylum in Ireland after entering via the open border with Northern Ireland there is legitimate question to be asked about why they didn't claim asylum in the United Kingdom.

    The way things are supposed to work is that you claim asylum in the first safe country you land in.

    Currently we're seeing asylum seekers engaging in a kind of Goldilocks approach to seeking asylum, trying everywhere until they find a country that's just right.

    Genuine applicants don't behave this way, this is self evident.

    Glazers Out!



Advertisement