Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1655656658660661709

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Keep up, sock.rocker*! The latest latest message is that electronics don't need to be made in America. Trump has just exempted computers, mobile phones, semiconductors, solar cells and memory cards from tariffs.

    This has the bizarre outcome that:

    • Import a battery from China - attracts a tariff of 145%
    • Importa a battery from (say) Vietnam - attracts a tarrif of 10%
    • Import the same battery installed in computer - zero tariffs.

    And the same goes for all the other components that go into a computer, or a mobile phone.

    So we have higher tariffs on intermediate goods used in manufacturing than on final goods. If you manufacture computers in the US, you will be subject to tariffs on the components you require. But if you offshore your manufacturing, no tariffs.

    This pretty much explodes the never-very-credible claim that Trump's intention in imposing his absurd tariffs was to restore US manufacturing. A regime like this makes manufacturing in the US even less attractive than it already was. Even a man who is solid bone from ear to ear, like Trump, must be able to understand this when it is pointed out to him.

    So, why has he done it? Reportedly, it's the result of, um, representations made by Big Tech — the likes of Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia.

    Paul Krugman puts it well:

    The stench of corruption around these policies keeps getting stronger. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence for massive insider trading around last week's tariff announcement; the big beneficiaries from the latest move are companies that made big donations to Trump. Investing in plant and equipment looks like a bad idea given the uncertainty, but investing in bribes for the ruling family clearly yields excellent returns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    From Sunday:

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/13/business/tariffs-economy-trump-china/index.html

    “(Electronics are) exempt from the reciprocal tariffs, but they’re included in the semiconductor tariffs, which are coming in probably a month or two,” Lutnick told ABC News’ “This Week” anchor Jonathan Karl on Sunday.

    Tariffs targeting specific business sectors will be imposed in the next couple of months on certain products key to national security, which will be “not available for negotiation,” Lutnick said.

    Although they're all saying different things so who knows what the actual plan is, if there is one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Creating confusion and uncertainty like this is a strategy — intended or otherwise — for eliciting more bribes. You make, and then reverse, dramatic announcements; you trail yet more announcements; you have differet people in your administration say different things. You give people the impression that things are not yet settled, and therefore that there is still an opportunity to influence the decisions that will be made.

    Of course, the resulting confusion and uncertainty discourages investment and paralyses business decisions, but that is a price that must be paid if the office of president is to be effectively monetized for the ruling family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,196 ✭✭✭amandstu


    I wonder how much money Trump could make from such a scheme.

    Does he have somewhere where such proceeds can be kept hidden and secure ?

    What might he use it for ?

    Bribes of his own?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I'm not sure that Trump would particularly feel the need to hide payments. It's being widely reported that you can arrange a private dinner with the President at Mar-a-Lago for up to $5 million. Obviously people who pay that kind of money for a meeting with Trump expect to secure some influence and/or goodwill by it.

    The money doesn't necessarily take the form of unmarked bills in a brown envelope that Trump slips into his back pocket. It could be a donation to a foundation operated by Trump, or to his political campaign, or it could be business placed with one of his companies, or one of his children's companies, or . . . almost anything. Trump would see nothing wrong with any of this and so would see no need to conceal it. The concept of "corruption" is entirely beyond him. He would regard this as nothing more than smart business, and he very much wants to be seen as a smart businessman.

    What might he use the money for? Well, I dare say he could find a use; his style of life is fairly lavish and his salary as President of the United States is $400,000. He has many other commercial and financial interests which, in contrast to all previous presidents in modern times, he has neither disclosed nor divested himself of, so we don't really know what his aggregate income is. But, in truth, I don't think Trump would be seeking this money because he needs it for any particular purpose. Acquiring more money is something he would see as good in and of itself. Too much is never enough; there are always more bathroom fixtures that can be gold-plated.

    On edit: where corruption is systemic, there isn't always a one-to-one correspondence between this payment made and that favour done. Rather, we have a fundamentally corrupt relationship, in which I regularly provide you with flattery and funds for no obvious reason other than my admiration for your sterling character. In return, if and when a public issue arises that affects my private interests, I am confident that you will favourably consider my private interests, so that the flow of flattery and funds will continue unabated. But at no point might it ever be possible to say that I made this particular payment in order to secure that particular decision, or that particular contract, or whatever.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,388 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Trump is clearly abusing his power by declaring everything a case of national security so that he can push through an executive order.

    There will only be push back on this when Republicans in congress look like they'll start losing their seats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/14/trump-warns-exemptions-on-smartphones-electronics-will-be-short-lived-promises-future-tariffs-president-china

    In the post on his Truth Social platform, Trump promised to launch a national security trade investigation into the semiconductor sector and the “whole electronics supply chain”.

    A flippant prediction but I think Taiwan will be told that TSMC must produce the latest chips in America or there won't be any security guarantees against a Chinese invasion. I think he'll treat Taiwan like he's treating Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Mmm, possibly. I think a large part of his treatment of Ukraine is driven by his passionate crush on Vladimir Putin. He doesn't have the same feelings towards Xi, so he won't have quite the same impulse to bully Taiwan to win the notice and approval of his crush.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,028 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    1000006386.jpg

    State censorship. Just another step on the road to fascism.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,028 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    1000006390.png

    And a reference to how great he is as a golfer too.

    Ffs

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    My wife is from Pittsburgh and uses that word all the time. We go “grocery shopping” every Sunday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Trump has likely never gone shopping for groceries at any time in his life. It has always been done for him.

    And since "groceries" is a word we use almost exclusively in the context of shopping, and since Trump is a monumentally incurious man, it is entirely possible that the word is a novelty to him.

    (And this isn't a British English/American English thing. According to Google Ngram, "groceries' is more frequent in US English than in British English.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,657 ✭✭✭yagan


    I've no doubt that people close to him are making money off his constant tariffs changes, but I think he doesn't have a general plan other than "tariffs good", which he then tweaks as big political donors ask for exemptions.

    But even they doubt that what they explained to him yesterday will be remembered today, and so yesterday's waiver gets tweaked again etc...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,778 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I believe that was a joke. Trump keeps saying that groceries is an old fashioned word that he hasn't heard in a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes. The point being made is that this belief on Trump's part is probably genuine, and it illustrates how disconnected he is from the lives and experiences and concerns of the great bulk of Americans.

    (That, or it illustrates he is developing aphasia — the inability to remember or recognise words — which can be indicative of dementia or of several other conditions.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,903 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Even if they moved manufacturing to the US component parts would make them more expensive due to tariffs never mind labour. Easier to manufacture abroad, might even move to cut costs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,456 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    That's the point.

    Back in the day, when Irish governments sought to use tariffs to protect/promote employment in Ireland, we had a tariff on vehicles but no tariffs on vehicle components. The thinking was that this would encourage the development of a car assembly industry in Ireland and, to some extent, it worked — a number of manufacturers imported "car kits" (chassis, engine, transmission, etc — the whole caboodle) to be assembled either in Irish plants that they owned and operated, or by Irish companies with whom they contracted. (Of course it did mean that the cars concerned were more expensive in Ireland than they otherwise would have been.) The policy was progressively abandoned in the years leading up to EU membership, and by the early 1980s the motor assembly industry was gone.

    Trump is doing the exact opposite here — allowing the finished product to be imported tax-free, but taxing the components if imported separately. If this policy is maintained it will have the exact opposite effect to the Irish policy — anyone still engaged in the domestic manufacturing/assembly of the products concerned will move their operations offshore PDQ to avoid the component tariffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    so, let’s just say, manufacturing of whatever, returned to the US- just how much more expensive would the end product be?

    One of the key reasons manufacturing has departed ghettos shores of America is for lower costs .
    Would be interesting to see say Pharma products vs computers vs cars etc what products would increase in price as a result of returning to American home ground



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,657 ✭✭✭yagan


    Don't know about pharma but there's been a good few estimates about iPhones ranging twice to triple what they cost now if made in the USA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Then you have the whole complication of tariffs - unless all parts of wherever good are made in America, there’s gonna be higher costs there straight away - leaving aside the recklessness of what Trump is doing, the end game is completely unworkable



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭randd1


    That would involve smarts.

    Who needs that when you have Jesus and Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,015 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Pushback is highly unlikely. The policy in Trump-sceptical congressional districts is just not to really mention him and try to create distance that way.

    Besides, that'll be too late. Trump and co got busy with their agenda on day one and you still have his opponents going, 'Ohhhh, just wait until the midterms' as if there'll still be a democracy to protect by then. This is like starting a fire in your kitchen cooking breakfast and instead of calling the fire brigade, you say 'Nah, it'll rain at midday. That should sort it.'

    People call Trump an idiot, but if he is, he's been more than facilitated by the extreme complacency which has met his every move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,385 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Bit of a stretch to claim Viagra, Botox et al as essential to national security!

    There's a list of essential medicines somewhere from the WHO, I'd be surprised if the US isn't producing any of those it needs already.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,657 ✭✭✭yagan


    The tariffs of parts might actually shutter the bit of production apple does do in the US making MacBooks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,028 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Bit of a stretch to claim Viagra, Botox et al as essential to national security!

    Both of these are required for MAGA to breed offspring...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭Will_I_Amnt


    Just went thru US Homeland Security at Dublin airport. No queues whatsoever, anywhere. Sitting at the gate and the whole place is eerily quiet. I've travelled to the US many times, often on Monday mornings and I've never seen it quite like this, ever. It would usually be extremely hectic at the start of Easter holidays.

    That says it all doesn't it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,282 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There is no "plan" whatsoever. Trump hasn't got a clue what he is doing, hence the constant flip flops and U-turns. That would be fine if he was playing it very safe, but someone who is clueless trying to turn the entire global economy on its head is clown show territory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,321 ✭✭✭trashcan


    My comment has really gone “whoosh” for some people it seems. I was referring to Donnie very kindly explaining to us all what groceries are last week. It’s fantastic when he learns a new word and takes time out to explain it to the plebs (that’s sarcasm btw)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭Will_I_Amnt


    His crypto coin launch the Friday before his Monday inauguration



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    For holiday goers, price (of ticket), exchange rate etc will be taken into account - if the dollar falls against euro to the degree that it becomes unbelievably cheap to fly to America and stay there, I think a lot of people will set aside their “concerns” and go.
    It will be interesting to see if Aerlingus starts a “sale” and promotional campaign on America - if numbers are down, then prices will fall to try and attract passengers



Advertisement