Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1507509511512513

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,747 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Both Luas lines going down Westmoreland and OCS was considered absolutely impossible for Reasons. Would have to do some document archaeology to find out what they were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14 Paul_798


    I expect the F spine on the south side of the city centre to significantly increase journey times.

    It is planned to take a very circuitous route between College Green and Clanbrassil Street. Parts of the new route have never had city buses running along them ( in the last 40 years anyway.)

    Even since the original routings were drawn up.it has now regular practice to shut down streets around Leinster House.

    The proposed routing is also likely to make it very difficult to interchange with other spine routes because of the road junctions.

    I think it would be much better if they ran the F spine buses via Dame Street initially and do the College Green rerouting later. That way they'll attract passengers and reduce the increase in buses and drivers needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭Daith


    Really little point in routing them down Dame St now when that's going to change.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The reason is DCC really wanted to build this bridge, but it wouldn't make sense without the Luas. TII supposedly wanted the obvious route of down OCS and Westmoreland St but in the end they agreed to compromise and route it down this new bridge, even though the whole thing makes no sense.

    Here is the issue, if you think about lots of the decisions around Luas, you realise they built it in such a way to avoid impacting cars. The routing of the Red Line down Abbey Street, rather then putting it on the quays. Also the only reason to build this bridge is if there isn't enough space on OCB because there are cars in the way.

    DCC were basically obsessed with maintaining car access to the city.

    Fortunately it seems opens have changed in the last 20 years and they are now onboard with reducing cars, like we see on the quays and OCB.

    If these Luas lines were being built today, it would definitely be routed down OCS and Westmorland Street, the Red line down the quays and they wouldn't bother with this bridge.

    With the Vision 2050 plan, I expect we will see some of these decisions corrected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,710 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Rosie Hackett Bridge is anything but stupid, as it is an absolutely essential piece of infrastructure that facilitates buses making turns across the river away from O’Connell Bridge, which is something that DCC have wanted to eliminate for all traffic for decades.

    It will be used by the D & G Spines westbound and the B & C Spines eastbound along with several radial routes (a lot more than just “some bus routes”) and means far less pressure on the bus stops along D’Olier St and Westmoreland St.

    From a LUAS operational perspective, not requiring drivers to change ends means that the Parnell terminators keep going rather than having to sit in a reversing bay for five minutes. That increases capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Stillnotworking


    The new 150 terminus makes sense if it happens. Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,582 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    DCC really need to pull the finger out and build a public transport + walking/cycling bridge down that end.

    they restarted consultation last year, but they're not even planning to start building it until 2027! I'm sure they could bolt something onto the side of the Eastlink that would do the job and could be fabricated and installed in 6 months.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    No, it is deeply moronic.

    That is the point, there is no need for buses not to use OCB, now that so much traffic has now been removed from the quays.

    As for Luas, a turn back could easily be avoided by just routing it around Parnell Square.

    I can't express how deeply deeply stupid it is to split one of our most important forms of public transport and send one arm down off a very dodgy and unattractive side street, rather straight down our central boulevard, a street that has almost every major bus route running down it!

    And it will become even more stupid once Metrolink station opens on O'Connell Street.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,710 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Once again, you are missing the long established DCC goal of eradicating all traffic turns at O’Connell Bridge and thereby facilitating longer pedestrian light phases on all crossings there.

    Sending the eastbound B & C Spines away from OCB and D’Olier Street but rather via Eden Quay, Rosie Hackett Bridge and Hawkins St reduces the numbers of buses using D’Olier St significantly which is a nightmare of a street for them to pass along right now.

    The D & G Spines westbound have to get from the river wall on Eden Quay to Aston Quay - using Eden Quay means not blocking the bus lane on Burgh Quay while driver changes happen.

    Sending empty trams on a long unnecessary loop around Parnell Square sounds more of a waste of time to me.

    This discussion is rather pointless given that the bridge is built and is used by hundreds of buses and trams every day. It's not going anywhere.

    I thought this thread was about discussing actual plans rather than fantasy?

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Not only was it stupid to split the Luas tracks on green line by building a bridge that kind of ruins the visual sightlines of the Liffey and creates this horribly uneven spacing between bridges, but it also makes the luas only attractive to use in one direction for short cross city centre trips. If you're on OCS, you're not going to walk over to Malborough Street to use the Luas to get down to Grafton Street area, whereas you'd be much more likely to use it in the opposite direction.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yes. I get the Luas a fair bit at OCS and frequently get people, not just tourists, asking me where the southbound track is. When the Metro comes in, it's going to me it even more odder.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just because it was a long held goal of DCC, doesn't make it any less stupid!

    Sending empty trams on a long unnecessary loop around Parnell Square sounds more of a waste of time to me.

    Who says they need to be empty! Put stops on Parnell Square East and West and you have a fantastic easy interchange between Luas and all the various bus routes with stops on Parnell Square.

    Routing the Luas around Parnell Square and down OCS and across Westmoreland Street would be so much better then the current ridiculous routing.

    This discussion is rather pointless given that the bridge is built and is used by hundreds of buses and trams every day. It's not going anywhere.

    Sure, the bridge isn't and of course I'm not suggesting we don't use it now that it is in place. I'm pointing to it as a monument to DCC planners incredibly poor planing in our city, that resulted in a worse Luas service.

    With the Luas 2050 Vision we are likely to need changes to the Luas lines anyway and with a Metro station on OCS, hopefully this stupidity will be corrected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,710 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    What has any of that to do with the new BusConnects network?

    It’s reading like a personal rant about a whole load of other things tbh



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The interaction between Luas and Busconnects routes is a major part of BusConnects! If the Luas green line was routed down Parenll-OCS-Westmoreland St, it would make interchange between the green line and the North - South BusConnects routes far better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,710 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    With due respect, isn't this thread about the actual BusConnects plans - not some fantasy idea that you might have, that has no basis in any published plans?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭Daith


    Sorry but you seem to have a very narrow view of BusConnects in that it only means interconnection between buses and not other transport. When it's clearly not the case and never was



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This thread covers all aspects of BusConnects, which would include how it interacts with other forms of public transport + walking and cycling infrastructure and the roads and bridges that support it.

    This conversation developed out of a conversation about the lack of bridge space and thus connectivity on the Eastern end of the quays, how as a result there is a clear hole in the BusConnects plan in this growing area of the city. It badly impacts BusConnects in this area, but also cycling/walking in this area between the quays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭Daith


    Tbh, I think restricting cars from O'Connell Bridge as a plan by DCC is as much fanciful as the Luas in OCS getting changed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,166 ✭✭✭trellheim


    I do think the LUAS should be underground between SSG and Parnell St , but that is not really in scope of busconnects. The tram in my view gets entirely too much priority at the pinchpoints of College Green and Parnell St . Strangely its not really an issue for the Red Line. I cannot see how BC will work with the tram priority the way it is. Look at how many buses are queued all the time at OCS north and College green southbound. I walk up and down OCS every day for work when not on the bike so I see it all the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The red line doesn't share with general traffic near to the same extent as the green line between SSG and Dominick



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Just one comment that I don’t agree with. Malborough St. is not some dodgy side street. It contains the Catholic Cathedral for Dublin, the Dept. of Education, a nice new hotel in Moxy and The Abbey Theatre. All very important places.

    The Malborough stop also gives a very handy connection to the Red line stop at Abbey St and all the buses terminating in the area. I actually like where that stop is.

    Ideally the luas should should dive under the city after Broadstone and pop up again by Charlemont, similar to many German cities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 899 ✭✭✭stop


    Do you think the 122 will be swapped to Galtymore Road in this phase to avoid a future change to the 73?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,771 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, it wasn't the greatest of streets.

    It does seem to be changing fairly rapidly now though. Perhaps it was always likely to happen, perhaps it was the Luas effect, but a load of money hady been pumped into the street over the last few years, and it's definitely changing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,710 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 transfer90


    The new E2 timetable that came into effect today doesn't seem to improve bus frequency from Ballymun. Checks on TFI app show E1s and E2s arriving at bus stops within a minute of each other with a big gap before the next pair arrive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,747 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Real Time is screwed today so the app is probably showing timetable times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I found this interesting.

    Buses to be moved from College Green by Summer 2026, paving the way for new plaza plan – IrishCycle.com

    Are the NTA saying that the A, D and F spines will all be rolled out in 12 to 15 months time or are they saying that they will move existing routes, a-la the 69 to accommodate the city council's plans for college green.

    Either way it's very welcome news.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just one comment that I don’t agree with. Malborough St. is not some dodgy side street. It contains the Catholic Cathedral for Dublin, the Dept. of Education, a nice new hotel in Moxy and The Abbey Theatre. All very important places.

    Sure, but having spent a lot of time on the street, it is very dodgy and not a great advertisement for tourists in Dublin.

    The Malborough stop also gives a very handy connection to the Red line stop at Abbey St and all the buses terminating in the area. I actually like where that stop is.

    That Red line stop should really be on the other side of Abbey Street, outside Easons. That will put it on the same side of the street as the Metrolink stop and means you can transfer too and from Metro without any major pedestrian crossings.

    Ideally the luas should should dive under the city after Broadstone and pop up again by Charlemont, similar to many German cities.

    Yep, that is basically what Metrolink is.

    And yes, we've veered far off BusConnects now!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,623 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Good news.

    But how are they going to route the A buses?

    D and F I think are okay as they will follow the Luas route, but A I'd imagine needs to be re-routed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    If I'm not mistaken, theres been options of the D spine either going via either the current 151 routing (2019 consultation report) or via Stephen's Green, Merrion Square & Tara Street (Dublin Transport Plan 2023). The 2nd option was not taken forward however due to lack of interchange opportunities.

    Interestingly, the proposed "revised" d spine routing is being compared to the already revised routing from the 2019 report, so that may be the option they're going for in the end!

    On 2nd thought, the D-spine was always originally going to use the 151 routing via Christchurch and the Quays.

    Screenshot_20250414-133348.png

    In terms of the A spine, the 2019 report shows it going via Stephen's Green South, then following the E-spine routing until Parnell Square before turning onto Dorset Street. The F-spine looks to have a similar arrangement. This would make sense as to why the new E-spine stop at Stephens Green East has a 2nd stop beside it.

    Screenshot_20250414-134335.png

    Public Consultation Report 2019:

    https://busconnects.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2019-consulation-report-170920.pdf

    Dublin Transport Plan 2023:

    https://www.dublincity.ie/sites/default/files/2024-04/06-dublin-city-centre-transport-plan-public-transport-technical-note.pdf



Advertisement