Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1149514961498150015011510

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,496 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Plus there's also been some games where Leinster have been more fully stack then Munster. It's a misnomer that he's often been up against a 2nd string Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Coombes is the new Ruddock, without the injuries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,496 ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,829 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I was just checking this, was really surprised at the difference.

    If Wiki is correct then;

    Ruddock has played 225 for his province and scored 75 points

    Coombes has played for his province 115 and scored 260 points



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Of course, by contrast, Ruddock frequently outplayed his peers in red when they faced each other in derbies



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Ruddock was a great provincial player who made the most of his ability but ultimately spent his career mostly in the shadow of better players.

    Hopefully Coombes can lift himself above that standard.

    Edit: that's not a slight on either player, but Ruddock's career overlapped with guys like SOB, Heaslip, Conan and latterly Doris, and POM, Ferris and Stander for Ireland. That's the level of competition you're talking about, and he was never in that league.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Ruddock made plenty of international teams, he was cursed with injuries at the worst time. To call him a mere provincial level player is to do him a massive disservice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I didn't call him a "mere provincial level player", I called him a "great" provincial player.

    But even at his fully-fit best, he was never on the level of the other 6/8s named above. He was unfortunate with injuries but even more unfortunate to play in the only position where we consistently churn out world-class players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    great table very helpful, lots of gaps for the next generation of talent to play for



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd disagree personally, but I've always been a big fan of his. He played at 2 WCs, albeit not 1st choice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    and the munster front 5 were on a treatment table..

    do keep up ladies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,784 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Yeah this is a fair opinion. Good player who didn't get as many caps because he was simply amonst other monsters in that position. Its not disrespectful its just a fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    No idea about Conan's likely longevity but I can say with certainty that Conan is far more likely to make it to the WC than POM is.

    Not sure why there is pushback on me pointing out the contradiction of the same poster repeatedly posting their frustration about the lack of opportunities for two players, while a few posts later defending playing the oldest direct competitor to both guys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,472 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Obviously the coaches felt POM was next up after the starters of which Beirne was one.

    I'd be hard for a retired man to play in the World Cup.

    POM didn't play 8 which is where Coombes does so his direct competition is Conan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,240 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I understand the perspective of the coaching team about POM - I am not the poster who was moaning about other players getting chances while defending him being in the side.

    If POM isn't in the squad everyone moves up a position - Conan could start and then it opens up a bench slot (whether it be Coombes or any of the other backrow options that people want to see get more game time).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 223 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    I disagree, I think he’s the new Conan. I.e a quality player for his province but may take until he’s 28/29 before he starts showing that form for Ireland but when he eventually does he’ll end up being a key player for Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I would have my doubts. Like Deegan, I think he will be unlucky to fall between generations. There's going to be a lot of talent coming through behind him, that will supersede him by the time the guys ahead of him retire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    Conan has 50 caps now. He's played his first 6N game back in 2017 or 2018 and has been pretty much ever present in the squad since, though he's picked up a good few injuries over the years. He's been to two world cups.

    As far as I can tell Coombes has 2 Ireland caps and hasn't played for Ireland since summer of 2021, which was a Lions tour summer (incidentally he'll probably get capped again this summer, another Lions tour summer).

    Not really sure there's any comparison there when it comes to international rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    Something I've been ruminating on all week, after 4 good performances from the provinces last weekend, is what the heck happened to Ireland as the 6N went on? There's absolutely no way that team was playing to its ability, players looked a bit like they didn't want to be there by the final whistle against Italy, so what went wrong? The Leinster players looked rejuvenated, for Munster you had Beirne, Nash and Crowley playing way better than anything we saw in the 6N, Ulster were slightly outmatched but absolutely went out on their shields with a lot of good individual performances.

    (I didn't see the Connacht game, sorry Connacht, but good result at least).

    Did we totally underestimate the impact of Farrell not being there? Did the players carry their provincial form into camp but that faded as the tournament continued? It's worrying either way.

    Post edited by darkened_scrum on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Substandard coaching played a big part imo. Goodman and POC are average at best. Our structures were ok, but our execution was ass. We had a lot of possession in the red zone that we didn't convert into points. Our defense was markedly worse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,975 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Ireland were poor in November as well when Farrell was there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    I'd argue nowhere near as poor as the last 3 games of the 6N.

    Nobody hammered us, and both Aus and Arg are much better teams than Italy and Wales.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,021 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Ireland were playing significantly better opponents than any of the provinces have been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    Wales are absolutely rubbish. Italy aren't rubbish but they wouldn't win the URC or the European Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Yeah, tend to agree with this with the footnote that Ireland tend not to hand out heavy beatings regardless of the opposition, but Wales and Italy were schooled by strong teams in the 6N while Ireland squeezed by them. And giving England two late scores in the 6N was very expensive and basically unforgivable. On current trajectory I'm expecting NZ to absolutely demolish us in Nov. All that said, there's been a lot of churn in the provinces w coaching changes and different styles of play being introduced so the overall consistency that we had between provinces and the Irish team has been quite disrupted this season, with the absence of Farrell adding too that. Our playing pool is very strong and the Irish team is still one of the best around on their day/ It's just a pity the coaching ticket is not as gold plated as it's been, I feel like Felix and Flan were two that got away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    i think you are absolutely correct. It has been on my mind. I can’t help feeling the mismanagement of Crowley / Sam was at the heart of deflating the wider squad . There was too much unnecessary noise in the background and too much pressure passed to Sam which our adversaries were able to capitalise on. Where that series of decisions came from I don’t know but Andy can’t be blameless given his influence from afar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭thamus doku


    it was handled very badly alright. They should have started with Crowley and over the championship if prendergast had surpassed Crowley than fair enough.
    They should have let it happen naturally, instead they tried to force it and they made a complete balls of it.
    They even had ex players and the media saying prendergast has overtaken Crowley , trying to sell it.

    Do not be surprised if prendergast goes to the lions, farrell has the arrogance to double down on his error.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    What a load of shite



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,472 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Agree they should have started with Crowley and let Sam impress with his minutes off the bench. There would have been no controversy if he won his way into the team from the bench. Dropping a player who was part of a six nations winning team the previous season and bringing in a young man with very questionable defensive ability was never going to sit well with a lot of people.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,764 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Ah, I don't think the SP/Crowley situation played any part at all really, have a look back at those games, the 10 didn't play much part in what was going wrong. The same problems that Ireland had in the first four games with SP were also evident in the game with Crowley.

    I also don't think that the Irish team are that affected by the squad choices, they're professions through and through, and it was relatively easy to justify picking SP over Crowley, as Crowley was in bad to average form coming into the tournament. No player is going to be cut up over a player being dropped for form.



Advertisement