Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Read OP for mod warnings before posting*

1103104106108109146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Coolock said no !

    Congrats to the locals on their victory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,258 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The latest I can find on this is the developer can't gain access to the site so it's delayed again. Massive victory so far for Coolock. Crazy to think they could have had thousands of chancers thrown into their community.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 666 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Nail on the head. Some here seem to think subversion is reasonable when it applies to minorities. I think such acts would be more likely to fragment society and build serious resentment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭sekiro


    It raises serious questions about what life must be like inside these centres. How long are people expected to be there?

    You have people there who have spent thousands of Euros to get here, sometimes totaling many multiple months of the average earnings in their own countries, and they just get shipped off to a hotel or renovated office block or factory while we scramble to build housing and while more and more people arrive.

    We actually need some of our more prominent journalists looking into stories like this.

    How much does it cost to actually get to Ireland? Who is actually paying for that? What is life like when they arrive here? What are the future prospects for those who do arrive?

    If the answers to those questions are disturbing or troubling then so be it. People should know.

    Otherwise we are just pretending that things are all OK and will be OK right up until the point we realise the disaster we've created on our own doorstep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    I hate to use the term but the 'MSM' are slow on reporting. Its over. Its not happening.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    The difference with the 40s,50s etc is that the population number was stable and we could plan accordingly. Now we have got to cope with c.20 k arriving annually while we are told to expect more arrivals due to climate change. It’s a completely different scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Did we have 20k arriving annually in the 50s etc? 100k over 5 years and likely more and that’s not counting the number of Irish people looking for housing. How many houses do you think we can build over the next five years to cope?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,069 ✭✭✭prunudo


    This was mentioned before and can't be over looked. Ireland is at the end of the cul de sac when it comes to European migration (well maybe Iceland but not easy). When they've exhausted every other country, Ireland is the last chance, one big dumping ground. We have sold the world we are a rich successful country, but the reality is far from true. I don't blame the guys themselves, its the politicians, media and those making money from this that are the problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    So, it's just asylum seekers that are the issue then? The ones who have to live in sh1thole old factories and hotel rooms?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,197 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Interesting this taxpayer funded NGO was blaming everyone but the AS who were causing trouble.

    So instead of her "culturally appropriate " supports how about immediately cancelling the culprits asylum application and kicking them out of the country ASAP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,973 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    There's a level of laisse faire-ism in Ireland that had led to lots of problems. For example 20 years ago the health system was very poor, but no one with ever thought it was serious enough to take effective action. We also have extremely high public sector pay, because there wasn't the appetite to get value for money. Everyone knew that Gardai were cancelling penalty points wholesale for friends/family/acquaintances, but rather than tackle this the then Commissioner came out and called whistleblowers 'disgusting'.

    I think we have had something similar on immigration. For most of the 21st century the level has been way too high for a country of our size. At some level everyone knows it, and every couple of weeks we get new statistics telling us that house prices are rising and rents are at an outrageous level.

    But still no one wants to acknowledge that the level of immigration is too high and policies need to be introduced to address it. That'd be commonsense, but our leaders find it easier to say that St Patrick was an immigrant, or our health service has a lot of immigrants working in it, or the population isn't even as high as it was in the Famine, or that people who say that the level of immigration is too high are racist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,258 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Did I say that? You quoted how we built houses back in the 50s etc and I said it’s a completely different scenario now but you didn’t answer that. Leaving aside asylum seekers we have lots of foreign workers we didn’t have back years ago. I have no problem with those, I work in the health service so I know exactly how much we need them. My issue is we have to spend so much money coping with applications from the likes of Albania, Georgia etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Its not particularly different to the early 2000s, when we build over 660,000 homes in ten years.

    My issue is we have to spend so much money coping with applications from the likes of Albania, Georgia etc

    You started by saying that 20K coming into the country was the issue for house building, at least now you have acknowledged that there are others coming here, so it's wrong to just blame asylum seekers. Now you say the issue is the amount of money we spend on asylum seekers. It's just hard to figure out what you are saying.

    Fwiw, I think everyone agrees on the crazy amounts of money we spend on AS, mostly accomodation costs. Government owned accomodation would see a reduction in that spend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,255 ✭✭✭enricoh


    God be with the days no one outside of the refugee industry had heard of family reunification eh? It's the gift that keeps on giving ( giving taxpayers money realistically!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    If we're going to be paying for immigrants' education, wouldn't it be better for all concerned, and especially for the country of origin, if we paid for them to be educated in their own countries so they could then contribute to improving that country with their education?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,279 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Seemingly we should be importing the best from developing countries to ensure they can't properly develop as a country and we get cheap labour.

    Exploiting developing countries is someway e progressive and a good thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Above you said that 20% of the population was foreign-born. Isn't that inconsistent with the claim that just 20k are arriving every year?

    And if by foreign-born you actually meant (as I suppose) people born abroad to Irish parents, who later came back to Ireland, then your point about the proportion of non Irish who commit violent crime doesn't hold up - even if it's correct that it's 1 in 5: I can't see the original figures, but someone else said it was 1 in 3.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    People seeking asylum are leaving their country because they have a fear of persecution in their home country, primarily based on their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. They often flee conflicts, violence, or human rights abuses, seeking safety and protection in another country. So educating them in their home country wouldn't make much difference would it?

    Other immigrants to this country are either UK or EU citizens, we hardly need to educate them.

    People on visas here are usually working or on student visas. Not sure what educating them in their own country would do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Yes, absolutely - that is another but equally serious problem: this habit of western countries of deliberately not training enough doctors and nurses because "sure we can just import them from poorer countries once they've paid for all that expensive education".

    That also needs to be examined critically, but, again, it seems a lot of people have bought into the notion that this is a purely far right issue.

    Meanwhile, EU countries in particular often pay their foreign healthcare employees less, or else provide worse working conditions than local staff would accept. Seeing as they often prefer to go to Australia.

    How is any of that "progressive"? It's deeply exploitative.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I do not understand what you're trying to say here. I didn't claim just 20k arrive here. Where did I claim 1 in 5 violent crimes are committed by non Irish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Money has nothing to do with seeking asylum. Apart from getting out of their own country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,637 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Sorry wrong poster - it was Goldengirl. (Not who made the original claim, but who said 1 in 5 violent criminals was the same proportion as non Irish in the general population).

    And since you didn't say that, the rest is irrelevant to your posts. My mistake.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,763 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    I didn’t say that, I just said it was a factor we didn’t have to deal with in the 50s you mentioned with house building when IRELAND wasn’t an attractive destination for the worlds poor back then. But you’re probably right, we need to ramp up building more houses as the numbers arriving here will only increase and there are only so many office blocks and county hotels we can use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 616 ✭✭✭RandRuns


    That would only be true if every single asylum claim was genuine. Given that this is not the case (around 60% of claims are rejected), we cannot say that money has nothing to do with claiming asylum, and in fact the opposite is likely the case for a large percentage, possibly the majority, of cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Hmmm, I don't think this will age well at all. You and a couple of fellow travellers accusing posters of repeating out and out lies and untrue "facts." So let's take a look at this and see is it reported anywhere else rather than just some random Telegram page shall we?

    Reuters - Germanys incoming government agrees to get tougher on illegal migration.

    "BERLIN, April 9 (Reuters) - Germany's future government of conservatives and centre-left Social Democrats on Wednesday agreed on measures aimed at curbing illegal migration, including rejecting asylum seekers at borders, enabling deportations to Syria and suspending family reunions.The parties want to suspend family reunification for people with a so-called subsidiary protection status for two years and to end all federal admissions programmes for refugees and not establish new programmes in the future, according to the coalition agreement document."

    That seems to put the lie to your statement: "It's very clear from the actual links to real media linked, that Germany are NOT stopping their refugee programs and it is temporarily suspended while a new government is being formed." Unless you know more about German coalition negotiations than Reuters, Deutsche Welle (Germanys International Broadcaster), The New York Times, CNN, BBC, The Economist and even the Guardian?

    This isn't a pop at you, and actually I have some sympathy for you. It must be exhausting to continually argue an increasingly untenable position when uncomfortable facts are increasingly being confirmed by government ministers and major news organisations, I'm not including RTE in this of course. We all know the phrase about people in glass houses etc. Sometimes it might be better for mental health to go outside, enjoy the sun and take your shoes off and walk in the grass. I know that's what I'm going to do.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,351 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    And people that are not accepted, their claims are rejected, do not meet the criteria for claiming asylum. The reason for claiming are as I outlined them above.



Advertisement