Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is it time to rethink the death penalty?

24

Comments

  • Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not a fan of death penalty but would be a fan of solitary confinement for the duration of their sentence for certain crimes. Only allowed books and radio. One 30 mins of exercise a week outdoors alone. Visitors only allowed every six months. Something like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,968 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    That still has resulted in innocent people being executed...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,906 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Well that wipes out any justification in terms saving prison time etc if they are going to be kept in prison for a couple of decades in all cases.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    How would you feel if you were on a jury and then later on the executed person was found to be innocent ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭New Scottman


    plenty of innocent people are unlawfully killed by others every year. I hope that bothers you too.



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    I’m sure it does and what a thing to say. Very much a straw man. If you don’t think the death penalty is good you therefore don’t care that people are murdered, I mean?

    I’d personally view the death penalty as less of a punishment for the crime and more of a decision the individual cannot ever reengage safely with society.

    In any case 22 years in prison after doing this to a baby it’s safe to say he won’t be popular.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Raichų


    his wife even more so in a women’s prison is unlikely to be making many friends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭New Scottman


    I don't agree with the death penalty either. But not for the same reason as Capt'n Midnight.

    I just don't think the state should be executing people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,879 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Didn't the judge at the Guilford 4 trial say he would have sentence them to death of he could. That to me is a reason not to have the death penalty. What happens if someone turns out innocent after they are executed. Oops we got that wrong to the family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,349 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    What you're suggesting has been tried in America.

    The fundamental problem is that most of the people who commit crime are just as unlikely to see the benefit of labour in prison as they are outside of prison.

    The death penalty offers a more humane solution for society. Why divert the limited resources of government to maintaining habitual offenders when we can free up these resource for the health system and education?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,349 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    This tough justice regime won't work either.

    Quite a lot of people who end up in prison for the long term do so because of a fragile mindset.

    What you're suggesting is that we sever whatever few threads of humanity they might have left before releasing them into the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,345 ✭✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭Rothko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    It's an absolutely horrendous case and utterly sickening, but I think the legal maxim that "hard cases make bad law" is very much applicable.

    This state, in line with all of the other members of the Council of Europe, not just the EU, moved away from the death penalty.

    When you look at it rationally, and look at murder and similarly serious crimes in places that have the death penalty, those rates are not lower. In the US they're actually far higher. So it clearly has no deterrent value. I've actually read articles theorising that it can have the opposite effect as people committing murder for example can also be quite fatalistic and see it as a quick way out vs very long term prison sentences and life imprisonment.

    It's also debasing the state and basically dragging itself down to the level of a murderer itself. The moral high ground is somewhat lost when you say that someone has the right to life, except when they don't.

    Then you've got the not insignificant risk that no legal system is perfect. Miscarriages of justice happen, including in murder cases, and you can pick out cases in various justicitions that would have attracted the death penalty in the US, but have turned out on new evidence and appeal to have been incorrect verdicts. You can't un-execute someone, so you can see how it's a problem.

    If you take in a NI context, there are plenty of examples where people in the context of the troubles that would in a different time or jurisdiction have lead to capital punishment, and can you imagine the political implications of that?!

    You have to ask yourself what you're doing - is it just satisfying some ancient notion of vengeance or justice?

    While it's incredibly unlikely that Ireland would ever reintroduce the death penalty - it's not even remotely on the agenda and political opinion and public discourse is absolutely not going to suddenly do a 180º turn. Even if it were, doing so would likely result in an enormous clash with the Council of Europe and the European Union. Not having the death penalty is a rather fundamental principle universally accepted in those institutions at this point. You'd be looking at serious sanctions or being asked to leave. Not to mention a country doing so would no longer be able to use EU arrest warrants for serious crime, and would have significant issues with extradition etc.

    It would have enormous implications for Ireland as a member of the EU - simply isn't even a point of discussion, and also for Northern Ireland as quasi-associated non-member with the ECHR baked into foundational aspects of law, and also for the UK, where you occasionally do get these debates, it's mostly tabloid bunkum, and as a member of the Council of Europe. It would suddenly be putting itself into the same category as Belerus, the only European country that still retains the death penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    I wouldn't have supported the death penalty in her case or any other case.

    Taking a life, no matter how appallingly evil the crime (and no matter how overwhelming the proof of guilt) is simply not a power that the state should have.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    In places with the death penalty it's often used as a political tool. Like in the USA where it's used in election campaigns.

    Rich well connected people don't get executed.

    Minority demographics on the other hand are over represented.



  • Posts: 697 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    @PixelCrafter "You have to ask yourself what you're doing - is it just satisfying some ancient notion of vengeance or justice?"

    It's not any deeper than learning about one of the most heinous crimes possible (the torture of a baby) and thinking the perpetrators don't deserve to live. But it's just a thought. It's not actually gonna happen, nor would I want it to at state level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭trashcan


    Absolutely my position too. You don’t have to have any sympathy at all for some scumbag murderer to think that the State really should not be in the business of executing people. Life imprisonment, with no parole for especially heinous cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,541 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The fallacy that it's cheaper has already been dealt with here. It isn't. The legal costs of the process involved vastly outweigh the prison costs.

    Executions themselves are exceptionally expensive too, and the least barbaric method is not available as Denmark will not export the drugs that only it makes for that purpose.

    So it is done, at huge cost, to be performative for wannabe hardman leaders and little else



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    If we had actual prisons and actual sentencing I'd settle for that. No probation in offences against the person. Minimum sentences, Rape/SA/GBH/Murder/Manslaughter/Violent Crime 15 years and all to be served in jail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    And why is that? Those minority demographics are also overrepresented in the perpetrators of said crimes.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1466623/murder-offenders-in-the-us-by-race/

    https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045224

    Shows us 8k white vs 6k black, but 75%:13% white:black population ratio. Therefore black folks are 5.76 times more likely than white folks to be murderers when you apply the 75:13 to the 8:6 ratio.

    Similar numbers follow other violent crimes like rape, drug crimes etc

    (in before the 'that's racist' brigade, statistics and raw numbers are not racist.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    There is a lot more factors at play in why some people become criminals. A lot more. Your claim is about as relevant as hair colour or eye colour.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,531 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Is the death penalty actually punishment though? Sounds to me like it's the negation of punishment, unless your intent is to make the process painful. And if pain was key to your reason to do it, you're better off keeping them alive to cause them pain because dead people feel no pain.

    But if you did that, you'd be a sadist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,241 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Whatever about the death penalty, there is definitely a case to be made for bringing back corporal punishment.

    The Cat o' nine tails would be a great deterrent for repeat criminal offenders.

    A few lashes in public or a week in the stocks would be far more effective than the rotating prison door system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    According to credible sources such as the IPRT…The average annual cost of an available, staffed prison space during the calendar year in 2023 was ….. €88,523… so a person in for manslaughter say with a couple of previous convictions could cost the taxpayers in the region of 1.3 - 1.4 million over the incarceration. A murderer who the death sentence argument pertains to would cost us millions….Add free legal aid etc to that…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Correct. However the incorrect claim that more white people commit violent crimes in the US than blacks is often trotted out and must be confronted with raw statistics debunking the claim whenever that lie is posted.

    On the topic of the death penalty I actually think proper real sentences would be better. No suspended sentences, remove discretion within reason, ie if a murder conviction you must give a sentence of at least 15 years and all of those must be served.

    A table of offences and statutory minimum sentences would be better at tackling crime. And proper prisons too. Prisons deter the middle class but they do not deter the so called working class in the same way.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    The only correct reply to your incorrect claim, is that skin colour is not a deciding factor in whether someone commits crimes or not. No matter the skin colour.

    Murder, carries a mandatory life sentence and while people may get out on parole, but are not eligible until 12 years have been served, the average time served is 20 years. And they can be sent back to serve the rest of their sentence at anytime in their life if convicted again.

    We definitely need more prison spaces and linger sentences, but it should be mandatory for prisoners to do something while in prison. Study, work etc



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    It's an argument but it's not the full picture. Factor in things like IQ and finances for legal teams. And election cycles.

    Rich well connected people don't get executed. O J Simpson was found guilty in a civil court and fined $34million.

    https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/research/analysis/reports/in-depth/lethal-election

    Elected supreme court jus­tices in Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio are twice as like­ly to affirm death penal­ty cas­es dur­ing an elec­tion year than in any oth­er year.Elected gov­er­nors were more like­ly to grant clemen­cy in the past when they did not face vot­ers in an upcom­ing elec­tion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Anyone with over 20 convictions, I don't care what they're for, should be removed from society in perpetuity using the least cost method. They've had more than enough chances. Ditto anyone guilty of murdering more than one person.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    What is incorrect? I posted raw numbers. The only incorrect claims were the non substantiated ones I replied to. To claim skin color is not a deciding factor would also be incorrect, given the skew in numbers. You could post an argument for causation vs correlation but as you did not do so I won't expand on that point either.

    More prison spaces, mandatory minimum sentences for all offences against the person, the elimination of parole, are all great ideas. I don't think prisoners should be allowed do anything except wait their time out. Why should the taxpayer fund study placements? These people are in there for a reason. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

    IQ - not relevant as it's not a mensa application. Are you saying one race has a lower inherent IQ? I wasn't saying nor expecting that. Finances for legal teams, again, not relevant when everyone has an entitlement to representation for free. Expensive lawyers and representation are not necessarily better.

    I think this is an instance where 3 strikes you're out could work. 3 convictions of offences against the person (serious ones like armed robbery, assault, SA, rape,murder etc) and you're on death row.



Advertisement