Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Is Elon Musk hurting Tesla? (Mod Note Post #1)

1636466686983

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,908 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    After he was embarrassed in the Wisconsin election it’s be hard to stick around. A big FU to him and his money. Some things can’t be bought



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,978 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,980 ✭✭✭yagan


    Tesla stock price likes that news while the rest of the market remains subdued.

    Did Tesla shareholders give him an ultimatum?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    there’s definitely an element of the anti-Midas touch about Musk at the moment.

    If he leaves doge, the reality is that he would need to also go back to actively working in Tesla and not keep the same level of (publicly obvious) Involvement in politics in order for people to return to Tesla - and that assumes they can maintain their market leading position with the 2 cars they have -

    But overall, people have short memories



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭prosaic


    We'll soon find out about early demand for optimus. Musk mentioned production ramping up: "There will be a legion of Optimus robots this year."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    there will be no domestic/retail demand for a $20-30k humanoid toy. No chance.

    As for Musk’s quote - he’s lying. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.

    We’ve been saying for years here that whenever there’s a cliff-face of a day for Tesla stock, he pulls out the smoke and mirrors - low and behold, they deliver AWFUL numbers, miles below even the Bear estimates, and right on queue there’s a leak about maaaaaybe he’s leaving doge and going back to running Tesla, just a rumour, a leak, and it’s enough to turn a -6% opening drop into a 5% close. The man is a frickin genius!

    Post edited by sk8board on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,359 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Fake news says the Whitehouse, in the words of Karoline, the scoop is Garbage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,315 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I'd prefer if he stayed in DOGE and left Tesla.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I think Tesla is a Ponzi scheme, it wasn’t one in 2019 that’s for sure, but something happened in the meantime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    were Musk to leave Tesla and sell his stake, I think most people’s attitude towards the company would be changed overnight. As said so many times, this is very much a personal anti-musk problem, not a problem with Tesla.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    well nothing has changed to their bottom line since the Y was announced in 2019.

    Revenue remains 90% car, 10% energy, 0% all the ‘stuff’



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Completely disagree: I think the company has lost its engineering prowess, its cars are aged, the cybertruck has failed, and the Chinese have won the EV race, and to top it off the brand has been diminished.

    I reckon another few years and Stellantis will be selling e Berlingos as Teslas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,980 ✭✭✭yagan


    If Musk were gone in the morning, his CT dumped and a compact EV was added to the range there might be hope.

    But otherwise I agree that their latest refresh looks very dated already in the Chinese market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭Zurbaran


    Funny thing is they let them copy their tech to get into the Chinese market. Now the Chinese are ahead in a lot of areas and the euro big brands aren't far off it at all.

    With that taken into account, you look at the clown running it. Most people hate this man. That will affect sales massively when there are other options.

    The new model 3 and more importantly new model y are really good cars. It won't matter if everybody hates the owner and there are other viable options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭JohnySwan


    Have you driven these Chinese offerings? I did about 2k in an Atto 3 and it was truly awful. When I was upgrading the M3, I took a Seal for a test drive and couldn't wait to get back in to the M3. Those BYDs at least are totally devoid of any feel or feedback from the steering wheel, horrific things to drive. The Atto 3 was especially nasty on the inside, with plastics that felt like they were from a Fisher Price toy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,015 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    That's the Chinese replication model though.

    What a Chinese buyer wants in a vehicle and what a European buyer wants may be very different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    that may well be true, if the narrative remains that Tesla is a manufacturer of 2 cars.

    I get the impression that musk is bored of being a manufacturer of cars, and is chasing the moonshot projects.

    All the vehicle projects, CT, Semi, roadster etc, are all DOA.

    The taxi thing is YEARS away from commercial reality,

    people won’t pay for FSD now that BYD and Co are including it for free

    The Optimus project is as bizarre as it is not going to have a domestic business model - perhaps they will be used in factories etc, but with signifiant costs to manage and maintain them.

    I’ve no idea what Tesla uses Ai for, but presumably it’s related to FSD. It’s many years from a safe release outside the US, as we saw in China last month - pulling it after just a few weeks.

    I’m bearish on Tesla not because of Musk, but because I struggle to see where the revenue (and I mean the MASSIVE revenues needed to justify the SP), will come from outside of manufacturing 2 cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭prosaic


    "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home", attributed to Ken Olsen, DEC, 1977 (just before the whole thing exploded

    “I think there is a world market for maybe five computers”, Thomas Watson, IBM (admittedly 1943)

    Well, Tesla have bought parts for more than 10,000 obtimus. They plan to produce 5000 this year and up to 50,000 next year.

    It's April now. End of year is < 8 months away. So the timeframe for seeing actual results is quite short. You can't really spoof much on that.

    They must have an idea of a market for these. Why would you produce them if you haven't a hope of selling them? It may not be low-end domestic for a long while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,098 ✭✭✭Mr Q


    Didn't they also claim there was a market for 250k Cybertrucks per year, they sold under 40k last year.

    Until they actually produce a commercially available robot and start selling it they can make up any number they like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,353 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Just to point out the obvious, all of Teslas big promises over the last few years have amounted to pipe dreams that never come to fruition. They continuously just push out those promises. And realistically what we've gotten over the last few years is the cybertruck



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,978 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    They must have an idea of a market for these.

    does the market want them? or does elrond want the market to want them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    FSD is possibly the biggest flop of the last decade in terms of column inches and R&D spend, versus potential future revenue stream.

    the initial $12k cost 5-7 years ago might eventually end up having to be a $1k spec option, and it’s still US-only for years to come (as the China experiment failed in a matter of weeks in March).

    Originally just 6% of US cars optioned FSD, and zero in other markets.

    TLDR: By the time it’s ready, the market might well have passed it by.

    LiDAR eh …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭prosaic


    Cybercab is expected to be running in Austin in June - 2 months from now.

    Let's see what happens come June and year-end, for cybertaxi, fsd and Optimus. The projected timelines are quite short so it will be clear to one and all.

    If you are right, shares fall. If projections are close to right, shares rise.

    Maybe this hate-athon will be dead by year-end too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    you’re linking these projects to the Tesla share price - the share price has now surpassed the car business case, the side projects business case (which you’ve listed), and into the “Ai something something something” business case - and even beyond that into a show of support from the Muskateers. The retail buying of the stock yesterday was bonkers

    In the US, you’d be amazed how many Tesla drivers are also longterm stockholders. It’s hard to argue with someone who has made you market beating returns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭McHardcore




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,353 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I'd actually say the dislike of Musk and it's hit to Tesla has been progressive for well over a year. Just he accelerated it when he tried the act of unelected president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    the robotaxi trail in Austin is just smoke and mirrors to deflect from the Q1 numbers.

    God there are so many reasons to be sceptical -

    Tesla FSD versus waymo has been described this week as like a 12 year old driver, versus a competent adult driver (Ross Gerber)

    Another Tesla bull Gary black said the Austin Q3 trial date will be “a non-event”.

    The ex Waymo CEO literally laughed it off last week on Bloomberg, when he was interviewed about it after Tesla tweeted it - he highlighted 2 simple things:

    1. The car is barely a rolling 2 seater prototype
    2. The trial car has to prioritise safety over all else - which means huge amounts of redundancy in ALL areas, sensors, camera cleaning ability, lidar & cameras etc etc etc etc

    basic stuff, that’s a long way away.


    his expert view was that Tesla couldn’t possible take the prototype ‘vehicle’ shown to something that is ready for trial without it looking like the Back to the future delorean, so they’re still so so far away from trialing anything.

    Just look at the complexity and number of sensors on the waymo currently operating with customer journeys in California:

    image.jpeg image.jpeg

    Meanwhile, over at Tesla:

    image.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,015 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    In fairness, that kind of response is a bit like the folks that tore down the Lidl in Tallaght during Storm Emma.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭prosaic


    Musk's idea, and it may be proven wrong in the end, is that humans use 2D vision with all the inference that goes with that. We don't even use paralax much at distances over a few meters. His bet is that eventually vision will be all that's required and all the extra sensors are just adding expense and complexity.
    Tesla have some way to go to demonstrate better than human level safety. I read that they have of the order of 500 miles without intervention but this needs to get to something of order of 500,000 miles. We'll see what happens in Austin and any statement of where they have gotten to with non-intervention.
    I kind of believe that the vision based thing will be shown to be adequate with enough training. There is the possibility that this is wrong though. "Success is one of the possible outcomes".



Advertisement
Advertisement