Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

13637383941

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭kc56


    Are the yellow boxes Eurobalises for the ETCS?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Apparently unit 39 is reformed with one end of another TPWS 3 car set.

    Other question is are all the 6 car units with two new intermediate cars, operating with one engine isolated?

    They appear to have fixed software issues?, seem a more reliable over last while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,886 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    A Mark IV train going from Dublin to Cork had got into some problems yesterday evening.

    The train left Heuston Station in Dublin at 5pm. The doors on the train carriages had jammed shut without warning while passengers were trying to board/disembark the train at Limerick Junction. The staff eventually got the doors reopened on the train within 15 minutes.

    However the passengers on the train were told at the station that if they wanted to continue their journey to Cork; they had to board another 2 trains to get there. The next train after this one which arrived at Limerick Junction was going to Tralee. The passengers going to Cork had to get the Tralee train out to Mallow to then wait for another train to get them out to Cork.

    The staff told the passengers on the Dublin to Cork train which broke down yesterday that it was a failed train.

    It had to go out of service and it was eventually moved onto the sidings at Limerick Junction.

    However the train to Tralee was already full to capacity while it arrived at Limerick Junction. Some of those passengers already on the train to Tralee had to get off at Limerick Junction to allow the Cork passengers to get home on their commute from Dublin.

    What a monumental headache for all of these passengers yesterday.

    Have these issues with passenger doors being jammed shut on these trains ever happened before on the IÉ network? These Mark IV trains built by CAF in Spain are quite old now within the IÉ fleet of rolling stock. They have had a lot of mechanical issues before this incident occurred yesterday at Limerick Junction. Do IÉ have any plan to eventually replace these trains in the near future?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    “are quite old now”

    The CAF Mark IV were built in 2004-2005 and delivered in 2006. In IE/CIE terms barely reaching their prime and currently undergoing some upgrading/eefurbishment. No replacement planned at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    The article is a joke.

    I assume what happened is the doors didn't open when released by the driver. Probally just a minor electrical issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Sounds like quick work by IÉ on the ground. The 17:05 would have been one signal behind at LJ. There isn’t going to be a spare empty train running behind. Rammed full I’m sure, but at least people got moving and ahead of the next Cork train which would be another 40 minutes behind and also very busy.

    Changing trains can be made out as such an ordeal, but it really isn’t.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    On a 4 car 29k today, 2 of 8 doors out of order. (same side) Not great and noticed it's an increasing trend with the 29k over the last few months.

    Normally IE are usually quick to fix these problems but suspect the 29k is stretched currently.

    What is the cut off to remove from service 3 or 4 out of order?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I suspect that they’re running a bit short due to the PIS upgrade. I don’t know how long that takes, but they’re sent to the old Heuston valeting shed for it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Only one four car set at a time taken out for that. There's also a set taken out for the floor replacement that's happening at Connolly. New PIS giving its own share of issues too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I saw it rebooting a few mornings ago on a Drogheda to Bray train. It runs on Debian Linux, which I was surprised to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭myfreespirit


    The PIS application must be very slow to start up - my old Dell laptop running Debian 12 boots up to the desktop in about 20 seconds 😁

    Debian Linux for the win 🏆



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    The old one runs XP and only takes two minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,612 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    New PIS giving its own share of issues too.

    has there ever been an Irish Rail PIS that's been reliable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    The 8100 and ICR PIS has been pretty good from my experience. But the original 8500 one was broken more often than it worked!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    The new one has caused trains failures, delays and door malfunctions at stations. Due to be addressed with an upgrade to the system, hopefully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,373 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    8100 and 8520 PIS is/was rock solid

    The new 29k PIS is the same as that fitted to the 8500/10/20 fleet, its not a safety critical system and while it has interfaces to the train to detect doors opening/closing they are monitoring interfaces they shouldn't break anything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    New PIS is equally as bad as the old system on both the DART and 29k onboard. Externally does appear more reliable.

    Someone also needs to address the graphics on the internal screens, not great when they do work. System appears very basic and the station data should be presented better.

    Why sets are released to traffic once upgraded and have continous faults that are not addressed. Then they just upgrade the next set and not fix the problems.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I used the DART 8 times this week.

    There were 2 failures,

    Last week I used it 8 times and there was one failure.

    I don't know what exactly failed though.

    DART Fleet is old, 20 years and 40 years.

    Seems to be a lot failures lately. Just becuase the 8100 lasted 40 years, that doesn't mean the 85** series will.

    I think in total they can run a max of 15 trains (assuming every set is working) in trainsets of 6 and 8 coaches. I don't know how many they actually run during peak periods, probably 12 as there's usually 1 or 2 at fairview depot.

    I have it from a good source that getting parts (particularly for the 8100 series) is becoming increasing difficult… Light bulbs for example cant be got and they've taken them all out where they are not needed.

    Something doesn't feel right, sure hope it's not the tip of a bigger problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    So a MMI doesn't show the consist or status of half the train, and that isn't safety critical?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    that's not surprising with the 8100s due to age and the fact their original manufacturer has been no more for god knows how long having been taken over.
    certainly one lot of trains lasting 40 years is no guarantee others will last the same but the 8500 series are solid trains over all similar to their 26 and 2800 brothers/sisters/whatever term one wants to use so they should last that length if not more if looked after.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,373 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    8100 are rapidly approaching end of life. Parts aren’t a huge problem, the 8200 fleet was raided for ATP parts. Extra traction electronics have been ordered. It’s just age and need for more and more interventions to fix things


    The light bulb issue has been solved, there is a single coach with all LED tubes fitted. Tricky job as there are emergency lighting fittings and two tube lengths. Looks great uniform colour

    8500 will last the course, highly reliable, stainless steel so no corrosion issues and based off massive Japanese metro fleets so parts don’t seem to be an issue, distance to ship the parts is an issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Have they run out of replacment bulbs for the ICRs. Few sets this week had a few lights using what looks similar to the shade on the lighting on the IV fleet. The ICR fleet looks quiet smart so hope it's not part of a wider replacement.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Great video on the testing that they're putting the new Dart+ trains through, and how it's going. The news out of it is that the testing is bang on their predictions, and that they've now got a second set that's entering testing. They've also started testing at full speed, 145km/h.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭PlatformNine


    https://www.stadlerrail.com/en/solutions/rolling-stock/mainline-rs-zero

    Stadler is making a new version of the RS, a railcar designed to keep branch line services as affordable and accessible as possible. The new version is going to be available both in railcar and 2-car MU variants, with battery and hydrogen options. It's an interesting concept and I wonder if something like this could ever have a use case here?

    On one hand I could see it as something to replace the 2800s operating on the Ballina and Nenagh lines, maybe even be used to free ICRs from some other shorter regional services such as Tralee-Mallow (not Tralee-Cork or -Dublin) or Waterford-Limerick Jnc. It could also be used for future regional services to supplement RT/IC services such as Claremorris-Galway/Athenry, Limerick-Foynes, Waterford-Wexford, etc. I think these services would at least somewhat match the ideal use case for them, shorter services with a lower frequency (at least compared to regional commuters), demand that in theory a 2-car unit could meet. Some of the lines also have line speeds matching the capability of the model (120km/h).

    At the same time, the point of units like the RS would be to make it easier and/or cheaper to serve some of these lines. But with our loading gauge and small scale of operation, could it still be easier and/or cheaper to serve them with commuter and IC units? The Limerick and Galway based services might be easier served with the future 2800 replacements. Especially if routes like Limerick-Foynes and Galway-Claremorris, instead of lower frequency regional services (maybe 2-hourly at most), they have service patterns like Dundalk or Greystones services. Longer and still somewhat frequent services, but less frequent than Adare, Tuam, Drogheda, or Bray services are/would be. For the other regional services IE may just prefer 3- or 4-car IC units because that's how they currently run them and would keep the fleet more standardised. The only exception is Ballina, but I can't see why if a unit is available, they would be against allocating a 3-car set for it. Especially since post-2800 retirement, what else would they put on the branch line?

    I am curious to hear people's thoughts about using the RS zero (or similar units) on our network. Do you think it would be a good investment? How would you like to see them used? Do you think there are better options? etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    galway to mayo might be quite long for such a unit but then it would depend on the interior configuration and the journey times and line speeds achieved when it's rebuilt.
    the 2800s are a suburban unit that just got cascaded as there was nothing else around and to be honest their removal from the dublin suburban left it short but what's done is done.
    however the use of a unit like them on the likes of galway to limerick shouldn't really be repeated, same with waterford to limerick unless they can throw up the speeds and get the journey time down to maybe an hour or a bit over it but ideally lesss.
    as it is waterford to limerick is capable of higher speeds i believe and it was renewed over the years but it hasn't been signed off for a speed improvement but i'm sure it could be done and with a signalling upgrade there would be lots of improvement to be had.
    it's a viable line if operated properly this is very clear to see, it just needs the will now and away we go and we will be railing along nicely.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It's difficult to say without knowing what the final line speeds would be. Though I think the Foynes line should give us a good idea what standard new lines are being laid to. Athenry-Claremorris is about 50-55km making Galway-Claremorris 70-75km. It wouldn't be unresonable for this journy to be 60-90 minutes. However if they chose to extend this service all the way to Westport (something I didn't even think of, but would make a lot of sense) it would make it closer to 115km and would likely need to be served by an IC set. However I do agree that just because these could be served by something like the RS, doesn't mean they should be.

    I fully agree that units like these should never be put on Limerick-Galway services, the service is begging for more capacity and I think these units would be a slap in the face to anyone using them. I think it is best served with IC sets as with its currently possible to complete the service in just over an 1h50m, and with some improvements could potentially be brought much lower.

    Along side the Nenagh line and Limerick-Ennis, Waterford-Limerick Jnc is one of the only lines limited to 80kmh, and I think its a shame because I think if it had a higher line speed it would be great for an expansion of non-Dublin IC services. Looking at the last census it does seem like Waterford-LJ services are seeing decent patronage with >200 across 4 services(not even counting LJ because Im not sure how many were to/from Waterford). I am hoping that as the national ETCS rollout continues, they will look into giving the line a proper signalling system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,223 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I don't thnik ETCS will have much to do with improved speeds on the Waterford-Limerick Junction or the Nenagh line. The real problem is the numerous user-worked and farm crossing with reduced sight lines.



Advertisement