Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning added to OP 10/1/26

15265275295315321577

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,916 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    All this scandal/chaos in the space of 70 odd days. No way this administration is going to last 4 years.

    I know a president can be impeached and removed but can an entire administration?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,812 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Trump could get up of a morning and do four impeachable things before lunch, and maybe this day has occurred, but it looks like he has the lowest likelihood of impeachment of any US president in history since the Republican party has pretty much said that their loyalty is to him, not the US constitution. They'd never vote it through.

    This administration is looking to last not for four years but for perpetuity. It won't be brought down by procedure but by public revolt. It's hard for me to see the latter happening given how much the US public seem prepared to put up with. What would be the point that the frog jumps out of the pot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,045 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Exactly. Nothing is an impeachable scandal when after an impeachable scandal you just walk out, say "There's no scandal here, everything's fine", have your party acolytes go on all the news shows saying "They said there's no scandal here and everything's fine, so forget about it", and then just use the numbers game to knock down anything raised in the House/Senate.

    Not to mention that some of the Dem leaders walk around saying "Well, we think it's an impeachable scandal, but if we impeach them over every impeachable scandal, we water down the real scandals. Donate to us so we can eventually decide to do something."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,510 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I'm sure someone said the same thing about 8 years ago, and some how they survived the first term. Although arguably Covid helped a bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Its a major fcuk up but given that US has already been compromised with Trump storing top secret documents in Mar A Lago, copies of which are certainly in Moscow now and the head of national security a fan of Russia. I doubt too many countries will be sharing information with the US now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,155 ✭✭✭eire4


    Reality is when you put people into powerful positions based pretty much on their subservience and obedience to the boss rather then based on their experience and or competence to do the job then this kind of monumental screw up is going to happen and given that this regime is filled with extremists and sycophants like the fox news, alcoholic sexual predator then I think we are going to see a fair few more screw ups like this in the coming months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,252 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Precisely- forewarned is forearmed- and boy has the world been forewarned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Anytime he is faced with a question he can’t answer or who shows up his lies he just discredits the news channel or reporter by saying they are a failing company or has never heard of them.


    Unbelievable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,829 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Same way that when the pressure comes on in the media he challenges the journalist or their organisation seeking to dismiss them.

    He's such a weak, vacuous leader, how did he fool so many to think he is strong and capable?



  • Site Banned Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Heh my own employer even has its own in-house chat, voice, video application for desktop and mobile

    It’s mad to think we have more secure in house capabilities than US government/ military



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    BREAKING: Atlantic Editor Jeffrey Goldberg Weighs Releasing Trump War Planning Texts

    Here's another one for @Manic Moran . An interview with Goldberg himself and describing the kinds of information that he was privvy to in the chat. Including the name of an undercover CIA operative. You still think that it's just a wee snafu?

    The White House seems doesn't at all seem to be in "lesson learning" mode. So far all I've seen them do is denigrate Goldberg and tell obvious lies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    I mean its worse than that. The US government, and I'm not an expert here, almost certainly has the most sophisticated encrypted areas/channels(SCIF), security protocols and technologies available.

    But the morons at the top of the chain, the ones who should be espousing and enforcing these protocols are actively flouting them. And then lying or deflecting to distract people from the fact that noone will be held responsible.

    And they're putting everyone who relies on western intelligence at risk while they're at it.



  • Site Banned Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    The absolute nightmare they imposed on my team in last few years to be able to run our platform on the US gov cloud especially around encryption, auditing, access control

    And then to read they themselves are so cavalier with security at the very highest level

    Graah me mad now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,916 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Y

    Yes I'm aware how impeachment works and how unlikely it us but my point is that if a president is removed from power for any reason he's normally replaced by the VP but this person is also malignant and a threat to US democracy.

    So does the US constitution have a tool to remove both?

    I think next year's mid terms will be very important with both house may swing Democrat and make Trump a lame duck and vulnerable.

    There must be another way to remove an administration rather than pubic revolt or a military coup?

    Prefer our parliamentary system where a government can be brought down by a parliamentary vote and new election called.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Yeah, think it is a form of corruption basically, so they can have their "secret" little chats (secret in the sense of holding private meetings and discussions among themselves, and perhaps also with their special friends of the admin. like Musky and god knows who else, that are kept completely off the record and leave no trace).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    Nevwrmind impeachment, imprisonment is where this should be going.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,829 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Hey, the US Military only had a budget of 13.6T in the 20 years between 2002 and 2022, how could they be expected to fund or source their own secure communication platform. Go easy on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,546 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm pretty familiar with classification levels. The journalist demonstrating more consideration and care than the officials involved with sensitive information precludes us from knowing the exact details. I would wager that if the information alluded to by Goldberg is correct, it would meet the level of TS. Anything that touches electronic collection systems is almost always at the TS level, and this sort of coordinated operation would absolutely involve collection and EW assets. Sequencing, assets involved, locations of forces. That's some of the most critical of information, subordinate only to technical or intelligence assets information.

    Whether precise details of the attack would rise to that level would depend. Regardless, even transmitting SIPR level information would be illegal, and given it's related to an active operation, not one that can be dismissed as a minor IO violation. You or I would be likely be prosecuted and jailed for such actions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,510 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    In 2014 (Jesus was it really 11 years ago??), the shellshock vulnerability was released and I spent the day and subsequent days on the phone with worried clients telling them either they were not vulnerable and they didn't need to worry or, they were vulnerable but we were patching stuff as quickly as we could. That first day I went home, super stressed and decided to watch a movie so I booted up my Raspberry Pi which was the server for my entertainment system and I got a blue screen saying "Please wait as we patch for the Shell Shock vulnerability". It brought a smile to my face as now my 30 euro Raspberry Pi was more secure than some of the Enterprise grade network devices I had been talking about all day long.

    In this case it wasn't a software bug in a piece of commonly used software(for a change), it was improper use of a well secured application. It was akin to adding Dave the IT intern to the administrator group.

    I bet Piers Morgan is sick today. In his day as an investigative journalist(hehe), he had to actually hack into celebs voicemails. All Jeff Goldberg had to do to get this scoop was have his number in the chief of staffs phone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭jobeenfitz


    This is a really big problem. Giving top secret info to the likes of Trump, Vance and Hegseth and other trump officials could be very dangerous. It could have serious consequences especially for Ukraine. Only a fool or a person with bad intentions would want to share some of their most sensitive security information with these people.

    We saw Vance and Hegseth at that security conference in Germany, just weeks ago. They dislike European democracy. They show that they are more complimentary towards and comfortable with right wing neo Nazis than to their allies.

    Europe also need to keep the Americans onside to aid Ukraine's and Europes goal of survival against Russia. It's a tight line they are walking. Europe has let itself down by outsourcing our security to America for decades but that's another whole day's work.

    The old and overused saying " We are where we are ", is very apt here.

    I'm sure Europe and there allies need to have a lot of discussions but even having these discussions would be very difficult to organise. Who should be privy to these discussions? Who can we trust?

    Europe and our allies have got themselves into a very dangerous place and time. We now need some brave leaders and a willingness to spend loads of money on defence and preparation for a possible war which hopefully doesn't arrive.

    The problem with democracies is we the people, like our government to spend our taxes on the good stuff which does not encourage bravery from our leaders.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭jobeenfitz


    When you say this is a mistake by Hegseth that can't just be waved away, I agree. Then we think about who's boss, big Ol' Donnie, shur he sent his mob to attack Congress and here he is again.

    Congress could now take up this recent F**CK up but alas the republicans have the numbers to block.

    Most of the norms don't matter with Trump. I know Roberts gave Trump a little rap on his knuckles recently but the American supreme court gave him status close to a king. The norms have changed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭jobeenfitz


    I definitely agree that many of Trump people are clowns but it would be a mistake to take these clowns lightly. These people could cause a lot of deaths especially Ukrainians and also the alliance of the willing who may end up in Ukraine in the near to mid future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,812 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Public revolt is pretty much how the founding fathers of the US foresaw the overthrowing of a government that goes rogue and become tyrannical. It's how the US became an independent country and arguably the whole point of the 2nd amendment of the US constitution.

    If opponents of Trump are hoping for orderly procedure to boot him out, they're onto a real loser. Trump's administration is currently busy disabling or nullifying all of the usual safeguards, as well as just ignoring the old norms of US democracy where those norms don't suit their agenda.

    Might be time for US democrats to start stockpiling guns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,252 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    In fairness I think most people with cop on stopped laughing at these “clowns” a good while ago - as the saying goes, it would be funny if it weren’t so serious .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,558 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Watching some of the questioning at the hearing today, Tulsi is way in over her head, but it is impressive that she has become the first KGB officer to make it this far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Absolutely, she wouldn’t even confirm she was the TG on the chat even though the CIA director confirmed she was.

    At this stage it’s obvious Russia is completely controlling the GOP, the US this afternoon looking to restart Russian exports despite sanctions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    I would love to see the US people rise up and revolt against this, but the ordinary folk who oppose Trump do not really have the propensity for this kind of action.

    They still naively believe that the American checks and balances will still prevail.

    Trump supporters on the other hand would revolt on command.

    The people who oppose Trump are in shock and don’t know what to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,114 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I think most people are just going to put the head down and wait out the four years until it's time to put responsible adults back in the White House.

    I would hope by the time that comes around all the ejits who voted for Trump just to see what would happen would have learnt their lesson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,011 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    It is somewhat ironic that the majority of the 2nd amendment gun nuts lean Republican, as the tyranny they always say the need to prepare for is actually now here and actually, they support this particular flavour of tyranny.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    at this stage its like homer simpson is the president…no…wait…his dad…abe simpson!

    tis a wee bit of a security breach all right!!

    yo! donnie vonredactedpants,vlad putin,benji netanyahu,vic orban..you sirs are the skidmarks on the jocks of humanity!!!



Advertisement
Advertisement