Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1138613871389139113921424

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    For the billionth time, the Geneva convention came in after WW2 to stop civilian atrocities.

    Yes yes, the IDF are a great bunch of lads to kill almost 1000 innocent civilians in refugee camps and then claim they got a few Hamas terrorists. Throw in the journalist angle too in order to make journalists legitimate targets, again. You're one of these duck in and duck out posters too. When the questions get tough, they get going.

    What are the legitimate war aims that couldn't have waited for all the hostages to return home?? I mean Hamas haven't fired a rocket or bullet in months. Why end the ceasefire? Is there an imminent threat?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,813 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Criticism of either israels or hamas's actions are not "bashing". People can choose to blindly follow one side or the other but unfortunately they will always be met with legitimate criticism. We have two parties lead by war criminals with the civilians of Gaza stuck in the middle. Its a very sad situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,978 ✭✭✭Suckler


    That's usually how it works in war - we usually mainly blame the people who started the war for the bad things that happen during it. Like

    Except that's wholly incorrect and not in anyway in line with reality; Just because one side is not the aggressor, it does not give them automatic approval to conduct their response without any modicum of care for civilians and even the opposing forces.

    To even put that down shows a real willingness to excuse any sort of depravity; but only by one side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Now where did I say that under circumstances its ok to murder innocent children? That was a deliberate misinterpretation. You appear to be trying to get some kind of reaction out of me instead of addressing the point I am making.

    What moral conundrum? Look again at what I said:

    If Hamas had surrendered on October 8th, releasing every single hostage, and handing over the ringleaders of the terrorist attack on Israel, I believe not a single shell or missile would have been launched at Gaza by Israel.

    It is as simple as that, doesn't need any more complications, additions or whatabouts.

    That is a truism. The ones with the moral conundrums are those like yourself who cannot bring yourself to accept my statement. Once you acknowledge the truth of it, you are forced to examine the subsequent actions of Hamas, the numerous times that they could have surrendered and stopped the war that they started. In your lust to blame Israel for everything, you ignore this inconvenient truth.

    It took nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, truly horrible acts, to make some (and frighteningly, only some) of the Japanese leadership realise that their futile determination to war was doing more damage to their own people than anyone else. The courage of Emperor Hirohito has been absent from the leadership of Hamas in a similar situation.

    It is said that those that don't learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them. Like the Nazi generals and the Japanese warmongers, the leaders of Hamas put their own wealth, mad desires of conquest and their bloated egos ahead of the welfare of their people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    So, do you think Israel has learned the lessons of the Holocaust? "Never again"?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    The only person obsessed with Israelis being Jewish is you. You constantly other them, make them into some hive mind who all support this butchery. There are plenty of Jews who are horrified to their core with this 'war', plenty of Israelis too from what I can see. Why don't you ever talk about them when you are speaking to us on how all Jews feel? What makes you so qualified to slander them all as complicit in this slaughter?

    But that's not only it - the innocent dead pile up, and you cheerlead it and explain it away.

    Blowing up children in the manner the IDF did over the last few days has nothing to do with religion, and this isn't a war. There is only one army in this, and they are receiving no fight back. They broke a ceasefire with no cause, and began again in their horrific acts of blowing up poor people living in rubble amongst the bodies of other blown up people.

    Destroying Hamas is not a valid military aim. It is impossible and completely unmeasurable. Removing Palestinians from their country could be a military aim, but would be a genocide. I don't even think you would care if they did.

    Honestly, I thought I was dealing with somewhat normal people on this thread, albeit ones I didn't agree with. I now know this is not the case. Extremism has taken hold of many. Morality and decency has gone out the window. There is nothing Israel can do to those poor people that you and you ilk won't defend, justify or make excuses for. No level of suffering will move you. I am shocked in that people like this exist in Ireland, though I don't know why I am. I have ever met or spoken to people who think this way before, outside of this thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You never let me down, whatabout Israel as the standard response.

    Interesting that you conflate the experience of the Jews in the Holocaust with Israel the nation, despite telling us for months that the Jews and Israel are two different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,326 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    This "consequences of starting a war"/"Hamas as the 21C Nazis/Empire of Japan" argument as excuse for what Israel is doing depends on Hamas being some kind of peer to the IDF and posing a threat to Israel.

    It was poor argument even on Oct. 8th (and a few months after).

    IMO it's just quite farcical to persist with it at this stage (over a year later), when Hamas is now small bands of (likely) teenagers and young adults with guns penned up in Gaza, spending their days hiding and running while overwatched 24-7-365 by one of the most technologically advanced and lethal miltaries on Earth.

    It's like your thinking on this is set in stone.🤷‍♀️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,230 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    "You never let me down" That is high praise coming from you(s)

    Post edited by My name is URL on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    There's nothing wrong with associating Jews and Israel lads. Its a Jewish state. You can be against the states policies without being against their religious ethnicity. Just thought I'd throw that in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,230 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    A bishop would say that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Well Blanche just like your assertion that what Hamas didn't do defines them, I can say the same about you - what you didn't say defines you in my mind.

    I asked you over a dozen times in this thread

    what specific actions that Israel have carried out do you condemn, with regard to their treatment of Palestinian civilians during this war??

    You could have said, oh I dunno, take more care when aiming, and not killing so many children. But no, time and again you said nothing. In fact, I seem to remember comments about child soldiers and female Hamas fighters. Care to answer the question now?

    To your second point. Hamas are a jihadi terrorist group. Terrorist groups are criminal organizations that exist throughout this world, and usually take hold in places of extreme inequality and hopelessness. Their reason for being is to inflict terror, and destruction. They aren't a valid army. They aren't there to protect people in the same way an elected government is, they don't have the same responsibility. You have told us this numerous times. They don't care a jot if you or I think they should surrender, or how many Palestinians die, they are radicalized jihadis. They are not normal people. That is a fact that has been proved out.

    Democratic countries, like Israel, should be the adults in the room. They have responsibility to their people yes, but also to the international community, including Palestinian civilians. Israel should be governed and adhere to international law, and international human rights, for the good of all people. This is true of all democracies. They get lots of benefits as a democracy btw, trade openly with the world, their people are free to go from all other democratic countries and are welcomed everywhere. With this comes a responsibility to uphold certain standards for the good of all of us all.

    They should not, as adults in the room, act so violently on the whims of a jihadi terrorist organization, partaking in ethnic cleansing, calling for genocide (many of their politicians did this), and the violent annexation of land that is not theirs.

    They are responsible for what they do. So are Hamas. So am I. So are you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Doesn't contradict in any way the statement that I made. This would have all been over on October 8th if Hamas had stopped to think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    So why did Israel break the ceasefire? The hostages were coming home under the agreement laid out, Hamas were upholding their end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Hamas and thinking? Only one thing on Hamas agenda, Israeli destruction. Failure to see that has blinded some to the fact that there are 2 sides here. It's hard to accept what Israel is doing and it's wrong imo on so many levels of barbarism. But while Hamas are in control in Gaza there will be strike after strike on Israel too. A ceasefire for Hamas is just a step to getting ready for their next attack of barbarism too. I blame the backers of both countries for their non action in letting this go on. Netanyahu and his govt are bloodthirsty, but no more than Hamas. Israelis v Palestinians is an endless war, unless outside countries back peace and quit supplying arms and munitions to both. The tragic loss of lives of so many people, men, women and indeed many children is the unconscionable result of two fairly intransigent populations, let alone politicians and soldiers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,028 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Another way of putting it is that there is no slam dunk evidence, no smoking gun, and that the full evidence and defence needs to be heard. That doesn't apply to other examples of war crimes in this conflict where the evidence is more than clear.

    Lol. Israel gets special treatment that doesn't apply to anyone else… Why is that?

    Also, tell me, Israel has killed a similar number in the last 2 days as Israeli's that died on Oct 7th. What level of response do you think is proportionate for those fighting for Palestine to use with respect to this? We've seen what Israel did and how that was justified on here and elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    You appear to have a peculiar notion of of "whatabout" means - I simply asked a question.

    I never mentioned Jews at all. The Holocaust was not exclusively the extermination of Jews. Just like Israel is not exclusively Jewish.

    Glad to be dependable for you and correct the facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The fact that Hamas has not attacked Israel in any meaningful way except for Oct 7th is a good thing. And as agreed with the US, they have stated they will vacate Gaza for up to 10 years.

    But the response of Israel has been utterly disproportionate to the detriment of Palestinian civilians. As a functional military organisation, Hamas (terrorists of course) have no ability to attack Israel in any meaningful way. So the emphasis on "there will be strike after strike" is a bit on the heavy side (given a 2000lb bomb response by Israel will proportionally cause a magnitude more harm). As regards Hamas being bloodthirsty, indeed they are. And so are Israel. But stack of the numbers of dead side-by-side and see who talks the talk and who walks the walk. There is only one side able to carry through with the violence in any demonstrable way. Hamas may vent their spleen and scream death to everyone in Israel - but they are impotent. Israel on the other hand have been able to kill nearly 50,000 known people in Gaza. Estimates put the true numbers at circa 200,000. And Israel has started Genocide #2 so there's a lot more headroom to go. Hamas murdered circa 1000 Israelis. And I've not even mentioned Lebanon, the West bank, Golan or East Jerusalem.

    Of course, that the Israeli campaign has resulted in minimal hostage releases (bar the ones the IDF murdered of course) is very telling. All that military might and the hostages remain.

    I posted a long time ago that Israel actual has a crack hostage rescue unit. Used to be headed up by none other than Netanyahu. Go figure why it has not been brought into play.

    You do have a balanced view though and I agree with much of what you say. So the above is not a direct response to your entire post. I do agree with your sentiments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There is a distinction between State actors and non-State actors in the rules of war. The legitimate self-defence argument is available to State actors in a way that isn't available to non-State actors. The reason for this is that the foundation of international law is that States have rights that don't apply to non-States.

    So no, I was not arguing for Israel, I was arguing for States and the application of international law. Similar arguments applied up North where there are different standards for what the British Army did and what the PIRA did. Like Hamas, nearly every single action of the PIRA was a war crime, while the British Army could and did justify some of its actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,103 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Your post is very clearly victim blaming so I believe it was a fair question, no misinterpretation from me. It's also very naive to think evil terrorists would just surrender. If criminals were to rob a bank and they took 50 hostages and the cops stormed the bank killing the criminals and hostages what do they tell the hostages family? Do they tell them that a well we wouldn't of murdered hostages if the criminals didn't rob the bank. Now before you say hamas was voted into power I'm talking here about the innocent children under 18.

    Waffling about Hamas not surrendering is just whataboutery as everyone on this thread already agrees that Hamas are evil scum. Clearly the IDF are not learning from history either as murdering civilians is the guaranteed way of making sure terrorist groups get stronger.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Again, that's nonsense. There is zero distinction between state and non state actors when it comes to protecting the civilian population. Why don't you post a link showing indiscriminate bombing is fine when there are non state actors involved. You are just muddying the waters and pretending to know the law. You have been caught out before on this so please provide links anymore. To be clear, IHL applies to all parties where it comes to protecting innocent civilians. As the poster above said, you are victim blaming.

    I'll provide a link from our government

    gov.ie - International humanitarian law

    IHL also applies to both states and non-state actors involved in international armed conflict.

    The parties to a conflict must at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants in order to spare the civilian population and civilian property. Neither the civilian population as a whole, nor individual civilians, may be attacked. Attacks may only be made against military objectives.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Very good question. Some of us have been asking about the acceptable level of proportionality for a long time. No answers.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Brave IDF hard at work again last night.

    At least 70 killed in latest Gaza strikes - authorities

    Addressing the "residents of Gaza" - governed by Hamas since 2007 - Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a video: "This is the last warning."

    Hamas says it is willing to negotiate and has called on the international community to act to bring the war to an end.

    A UN Office for Project Services employee was killed and at least five other people wounded when a UN building in the central city of Deir el-Balah was hit by "explosive ordnance", the agency said.

    "This was not an accident," UNOPS chief Jorge Moreira da Silva said, adding that "attacks against humanitarian premises are a breach of international law".

    Thousands of Israeli protesters massed in Jerusalem, accusing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of resuming strikes on Gaza without regard for the safety of the remaining hostages.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,776 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    The deaths of tens of thousands of civilians isn't a bug in the assault, it's a feature



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The tide of protest does appear to be turning:

    Haaretz:

    Tens of thousands of people marched in Jerusalem to protest against renewed fighting in Gaza and Netanyahu's decision to fire Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar.

    The protests are the largest the city has seen in recent months.

    Many in the crowd repeated a chant that denounced Netanyahu as a "traitor."

    Democrats party head Yair Golan, National Unity party MK Gadi Eisenkot and former Labor leader Ehud Barak attended the protests.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Great to see it.

    Wonder where it leaves all the ghouls on this thread that tell us being opposed to the IDF and Israeli governments shameful conduct in this war as being against "the Jews", as though every one of them support, stand by, and are complicit in it.

    These people out protesting don't fit into their little narrative - why are they never mentioned I wonder?

    Mod Edit: Warned for uncivil posting

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 526 ✭✭✭taratee


    More deaths were reported in Gaza overnight. This situation is entirely avoidable, which is the real shame. Return the hostages, and the violence stops. It’s also time for Bibi to step aside in Israel. The people of Israel want him to go now.

    In other news, rockets were fired from Gaza into Tel Aviv this afternoon/morning — though there’s been no mention of it in the media here, which is interesting. These rockets were launched by the same Hamas that claims it is willing to negotiate. The IDF’s response tomorrow will likely receive coverage, though.

    I’ll leave you all to continue blaming Israel for everything. As you were.

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    Don't think the violence stops if the hostages are released unfortunately, Israel believes in collective punishment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The violence would stop if HAMAS allowed free elections again. They beat the Palestine authority fair and square many years ago but that's where it ended for the Iranian proxy. What are they so afraid of?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,028 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This is quite a stunning shrugging of the shoulders to read which displays absolute ambivalence at what the Palestinians are suffering. To take your post at its face value, and the suggestion that state actors are held to a lesser standard than non-state actors, why do you think that the Palestinian defenders are considered non-state actors in this respect?

    Is it not for the actions of Israel and the US in particular in ensuring that they have not achieved full statehood by which to then justify their defence. This view is like a group of kids in the playground and the bully both hits the other kids and tells them that because they (the bully) are the one who makes the rules, the other kids cannot hit back.

    You didn't answer the main question in my last post (I'll come back to that in a moment) but I'll give you another one. How do you expect a non-state actor to reasonably defend itself in the face of such brutal and damaging attacks from a state actor?

    And again, for the second time, please indicate what you would consider a reasonable response for the Palestinians who have suffered attacks (during a ceasefire) that have resulted in the deaths of circa 1000 people. We know Israel used such attacks to justify their levelling of Gaza and killing at least 50,000 people outright so leaving aside the 'State Actor' rule that is apparently now being used, what would you consider a proportional response to Israel's barbarity for the Palestinians to consider?

    The longer this conflict goes on, the further and further I move from seeing the Zionist project as having any justification. I am appalled at how so much of the West has shown such disdain to tolerate the abhorrent behaviour by those currently leading the Jewish state.



Advertisement