Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Rugby peaked in 2023 and is now in steady decline. A Very Barron decade ahead

1246713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Part of the issue is them getting game time at the Provincial level. Like Osborne would be be forcing his way into the centres, if not for Barrett coming in. Frawley similarly effected. Now add Cooney to that. Situation is better for some of the other lads, but it's that frustrating log jam that happens too frequently for the national team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭exiledawaynothere


    nonsense. He won a grand slam. Do you know all our coaches since 1995?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    He has the worst record of any coach since 2000, his team got worse every season.



  • Subscribers Posts: 43,091 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    This summer obviously.

    Plus, the bedding in of those younger players has already started. 4 of those you named have been with emerging Ireland, and Cathal forde has been with the senior squad as a development player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,534 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think there is some exaggeration in what people are saying here. Form is temporary but class is permanent.

    Do we have legitimate worries? Absolutely. Something was badly off in the attack this tournament and it was the way we turned over ball rather than poor defence that ended up in 15 tries conceded.

    We only really put together two purple patches, 35 mins against England and maybe 25 against Scotland, and there were extenuating circumstances for the latter.

    And the question of Andrew Goodman's role in the above cannot be avoided any more than it was avoided at Leinster, where you will note, he doesn't work anymore.

    But the fundamentals of our rugby structures are strong. To be ready for RWC27, we will have to face up to some major clearing out and blooding of players. No more than France and England have done in the past decade.

    We've got 8 games between Autumn and 6N against ever Tier 1 nations except Argentina. By necessity, they could well be video nasties.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 Gaztric


    Granted players will be blooded on the summer tour, I am more intrigued by Farrell' s plan in regards to an ageing team and a World Cup in the not too distant future. The summer tour will hopefully give him confidence to accelerate the process as I said above. The approach with Boyle G McCarthy and Clarkson is positive and exciting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    You mention clearing out and blooding in new players. The question in my head is why didn't they (Farrell & Co.) push this harder last year? It seem now to rotate the older players over to the younger ones is going to be certainly more rushed now in time for the next WC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    There's never going to be a 'clear-out'.

    We still have the bones of a very good team and the spine of the team will be very much around come the next RWC, so it's neither needed nor possible.

    The only path forward is to continue the gradual regeneration of the team and to improve the performances of everyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    He also played in by far the toughest 6 nations era of any coach since 2000 with France, England and Wales all challenging for the tournament for the majority of his time in charge. France were an absolute shambles for the majority of Schmidt era and Farell's success has come at a time of historic weakness for Wales and a transitional period for England.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Another consideration here. We're in the post Sexton era and have been for a while and the position is being contested by two players who lets face it at this point are not filling his boots as was hoped. Before I get mauled … yes I know their young and need time yet. Prendagast literlly only turned 22 recently.

    I'm obviously not blaming the vacancy and disruption of the no. 10 position for everything that has happened but its definitely a contributing factor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    Being mediocre for 5 years is called “transition” now? England are good, they just aren’t as good as France or Ireland.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    England are as good as Ireland. I dunno how you can say otherwise.

    England finished second this year and beat France, they lost to Ireland by less than a score in Dublin. They beat us in England last year.

    The difference is England are on an upward trend whereas we are on a downward one. I would not be confident of winning in Twickenham next year barring some turnaround in performances on our part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Yes, but our team was badly coached, at time when we had one of our best ever rosters. He was a crap coach. Won a Grand Slam with Eddie's team and went downhill from there. France were entering their lost decade and England didn't get their **** together until Lancaster took over. Wales won in 2013, but were pretty up and down in the 6Ns otherwise i during his reign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    Simple, just look at the world rankings…5 gap between the two is a pretty massive gap.

    And? You think 1 tournament changes anything… if anything you just proved my point. If Ireland or France had Englands tournament we would consider it underwhelming and hope for better going forward, England on the other are celebrating like they just won the bloody tournament… Great job England at finishing 2nd, but they still have a LONG way to go before the belong in a discussion amongst the top 4 sides in the world.


    How many years have people been saying “England are in an upward curse” now? It seems like many fans think that if they say it enough times they might be able to speak it into existence…that’s not how it works!



  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You're putting too much emphasis on the world rankings, I don't think you understand how they work. Ireland just about beat (nearly lost to) a team with 22 fewer ranking points for example.

    It's not 1 tournament ether. They beat us last year. We beat them by less than a score this year.

    Your point is confusing. You suggest England coming 2nd is proof that they aren't that great, but Ireland, who finished in 3rd are a lot better?

    Suggesting that Ireland are a long way ahead of England is laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We hammered France last year and they should have lost to Italy. We lost badly to France but that game was a lot tighter than the score suggests. I'm more concerned with our system and aging team, we didn't fall off a cliff



  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    We convincingly beat them last year but again they played most of the match with 14 men due to the red card.

    We haven't fallen off a cliff at all, but we have been trending downward. The decline has been gradual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,504 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Is around the same age Sexton started playing for Ireland?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    I understand fully how they work, that’s why I am placing stock in them.

    I don’t really care, this is England’s first top 2 finish since 2020… No you see, now you are just twisting my words to suit your argument. If you are going try put words in my mouth then this conversation is over.


    Like I said , this is just you trying to speak something into existence. You say England are on a upward curve AND that England are on par with Ireland until the cows come home, the facts show that you are wrong.

    In a world where rugby journalism has sunk to an all time low and tried to take the average viewers rugby knowledge with it, the World Rankings have remained a shining light.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Nope he was about 25 when he debuted for Ireland (not Ireland A) if I recall. Not 100% sure to be honest but i know he wasn't 21 or 22 when he hit full stride and became one of the dominant Fly halfs in world rugby.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Sexton was 24 when he won his first cap against Fiji in 2009. It's interesting to note that he struggled from the tee for a season or two after it being a strength initially (I think he kicked all our points vs SA in '09). It was partly for this reason he ended up as a sub against Wales at the 2011 RWC.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You say England are on a upward curve AND that England are on par with Ireland until the cows come home, the facts show that you are wrong.

    This conversation is surreal.

    England beat us last year and finished above us this year. In your head, this is proof that we are a lot better than England. The mind truly boggles.

    You clearly don't understand the rankings.

    When England beat Ireland last year they were 7 points behind us in the WR table. When we beat them this year, they were only 5 points behind. In this time, Ireland had dropped 2 points, England had gained 0.5 points.

    Which is to say, England have got better in the rankings, and Ireland have got worse in the rankings, yet the result switched from Ireland losing last year to Ireland winning this year.

    Ireland came very close to being beaten by a team who are 22 points behind them in the rankings this weekend just past. In your world, this result should have been almost impossible, since in your head a 22 point gap means Italy should have been lucky they were even allowed to take the field against Ireland, such is the gap in ability levels.

    It is almost as if the rankings are the not the exact correlation with current ability that you believe them to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Lets not forget England have been scrambling around desperate for some sort of consistency for a few years now. Looks like something is actually clickng for them. Doesn't mean their "fixed" or anything. Improved yes but they've a lot more to do. They looked great against the weakest team in the 6 nations. (Yeah and we didn't … )

    And lets also not forget they were handed victory over scotland at the hands of Finn Russells mental kicking. And how they beat France …. voodoo or something? I was baffled.

    I think the outlook for us a bit less positive alright. Seems like we're only starting down the long path of rebuilding at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    Like I said, if you want to believe this then that’s totally fine, it’s you’re opinion at the end of the day. However, I’m just here trying to give the objective side of things and objectively speaking you are totally wrong.

    England are 5 points behind Ireland for a reason, remember that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,504 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    OK… well, hopefully we'll have Prendergast and Crowley match the trajectory!!

    I was at Sexton's first match!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,830 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    I'm genuinely not sure what you're on about tbh.

    I was saying England are far from good now just because they hammered Wales. And somehow through witchcraft or something managed to beat France who nobody would have put money on to lose. And see my previous comment on the Scotland win.

    They finished 4th in 2023 6N and 3rd last year.

    On the face of it they've improved. But thats from a low bar they set in the previous few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    Well duh, of course they aren’t. Thats the point.

    I question have they improved because if anything they were better in the last 6N. Against Ireland and France they were clearly 2nd best despite the scoreline yet some on here want to pretend they belong in the same conversation as them.

    What I think has happened is Scotland and Wales have gotten worse which has made England look better by default.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,086 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Comparing 2024 and 2025 England have:

    1. Scored 12 more tries in 2025 than they scored in 2024, in fact only 1 try short of doubling their try count
    2. Picked up 6 points more in 2025 compared to 2024.
    3. Improved their points differential by 80 points.
    4. Conceded 2 more tries in 2025 vs 2024, yet still conceded 18 fewer points over the course of the tournament

    Last year they beat us by 1 point, this year we beat them by 5 points, a combined 6 points difference over 2 games speaks to 2 teams who are of a very similar standard.

    Your idea that there's clear daylight between us and England, or that they don't deserve to be spoken of in the same conversation as Ireland, stands up to absolutely no scrutiny.

    In reality, they are two teams who would be favourites to beat each other at home. If Ireland were going to Twickenham this weekend I would have very little confidence in us getting a win.



Advertisement