Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1364365367369370419

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Here is the READOUT of the convo from the White House:

    GmVzGV8XUAANN7f.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    A bit more detail at the BBC live feed page on this call between putin / trump:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c3e4xzd8qq8t?post=asset%3Abf73f2ed-c5ff-4d34-a92d-c162ce0be4a3#post

    • Trump and Putin spoke about the "need for peace and a ceasefire" in the Ukraine war, agreeing it needs to end with a "lasting peace"
    • They stressed the need for improved US-Russia relations
    • The leaders agreed that the "movement to peace" begins with an energy and infrastructure ceasefire, as well as negotiations on implementation of a maritime ceasefire in the Black Sea
    • The presidents also discussed the Middle East "as a region of potential cooperation to prevent future conflicts"
    • They discussed a need to "stop proliferation of strategic weapons"
    • And "shared the view that Iran should never be in a position to destroy Israel"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭Jakey Rolling


    Ukraine must be hurting Russia with it's long range strikes on oil depots using home grown drones. Putin only too happy now to offer a ceasefire on energy targets.

    100412.2526@compuserve.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    So a while kind of nothing, except Russia gets to stop Ukraine hurting them with airstrikes on their depots



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,848 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    So does this mean

    Untitled Image

    for Ukraine.

    Them agreeing to a ceasefire on these terms alters the military balance at least somewhat in Russia's favour. And no guarantee at all it'll lead anywhere…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,998 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Hopefully Ukraine rightly tells them to **** off and keeps hammering them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    This is how I'd read it. Putin may think he's being coy but he just tipped his hand. The Ukrainian strikes on their oil refineries are clearly hurting Putin very badly.

    They should immediately ramp up these strikes as quickly and as much as possible with drones and their newly minted cruise missiles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭Mannesmann


    Of course they are! Early on the Russians said that the strikes on the oil were insignificant and could be easily repaired. A lie!

    I think we have to accept Donald Putin and Vlad trump are in complete agreement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Lol

    GmVs4uca8AEi2Eo.jpeg

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,329 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Yeah seems like Putin is looking for a pause in the arenas Russia is not doing so well in and to continue fighting to their strengths where his military is well resourced vs Ukraine and where they are having success (i.e. attacks at the front with Russian air power advantage, unlimited numbers of mass produced cheap short range drones from the friends in China, artillery, missiles and expendable [from Russian pov] shock troops from NK).

    Well unfortunately, if that's what Putin wants, no doubt pressure will now be applied to Ukraine by the Americans to acceed to it if they are reluctant.

    I have been wondering will we see some of the NK troops being moved from Kursk for some attacks inside Ukraine proper now also.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Exactly. Who here speaks English most days, watches premier league football and read shakespeare plays for the leaving cert (possibly also for fun)? How many of them want to rejoin the UK?

    Post edited by johnnyskeleton on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    It’s a terrible deal and it’s Putin calling all the shots.


    Ukraine needs to bite the bullet and forget about America.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,759 ✭✭✭yagan


    Ukraine can continue to bombing Russian infrastructure while making positive noises about the Putin/Trump chat as they weren't consulted.

    What's Trump going to do, send Putin reinforcements?

    Ukraine probably already knew starlink was always compromised but if it suits them for the Russians to think they have a reprieve then good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭Craig_David


    I suppose it's hard to take any sort of polling/ research seriously since the invasion (especially if put out by the Russians) but I was wondering with regard to the population of the Donbass region.. where does one go to get an indication of the desire of the population in terms of their preference to be part of Russia or to remain part of Ukraine? Is there any research that can be relied upon?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,897 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Then you are going to be disappointed. The US miltary does not decide what policies are "acceptable" to it and the President does not serve at its pleasure. The toughest times are where principles must be protected the most forcefully. I doubt you would agree to restrictions on free speech during a time of turmoil, or specifically anti-islam legislation after an Isis attack. The subordination of the miltary to the civilian processes is fundamental to the nature of the US government and, by the way, things like "coups" are not a process defined in the Constitution the military serves.

    If the President is on a course detrimental to the US, Congress can impeach him. Thus far there is no indication that such a process is likely to fail, nor that the Congressfolk in question are not themselves accountable to their constituents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭macraignil


    The Donbass has been attacked by putin's terrorists since 2014 so I don't think it is possible for a fair poll to be taken in the area. Lots of the people most afraid of being annexed by putin's terrorist state will have fled to other places and more will have been indiscriminately killed by putin's terrorists as they demolished cities, town and villages. Others will have become victims of targeted murder once the armed forces of Ukraine were pushed out of parts of the Donbas as was revealed had happened when other parts of Ukraine were liberated from puin's terrorists. Also seen reports of forced conscription into moskovyte armed forces and deportation to russia from Donbas. All of these factors and the very real fear of reprisals by moskovyte authorities to answers that would not favour their dear leader putin make a joke of the concept of a fair poll in annexed territories of Ukraine.

    Post edited by macraignil on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭Slava_Ukraine


    “I suppose it's hard to take any sort of polling/ research seriously since the invasion (especially if put out by the Russians) but I was wondering with regard to the population of the Donbass region.. where does one go to get an indication of the desire of the population in terms of their preference to be part of Russia or to remain part of Ukraine? Is there any research that can be relied upon?”

    Pretty simple. Include the vote of all those who have been forcibly removed from the region.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭Mannesmann


    Some reports are saying a ceasefire deal has been agreed. Surely not if Ukraine hasn't agreed? Zelensky is reported to have said any negotiations without Ukraine are pointless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,807 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    Putin needs a pause to bring in half a million North Koreans



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭deadduck


    it's impossible to get a real gauge, all you can tell for sure is that it would now (artifically) skew more in Russia's favour than would have previously been the case.

    look at Crimea. given how many people have had to flee, plus the plantation job Russia have done on it since 2014, any vote now would be far more 'pro-Russia' than before. but the vote would be meaningless, as it's obviously been reduced to bullshit by Russia's actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭Polar101


    In case someone actually believed Russia would stop attacking civilian targets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 261 ✭✭AngeloArgue


    The energy infrastructure ceasefire most definitely favours Russia. All of us could see that the Ukrainians have been hitting much more energy targets in Russia lately than the Russians have been hitting in Ukraine. I suppose Zelensky agrees to it, albite under some duress from the Americans.

    Is this going to be the format of the talks from now on: The Russians and the Americans agree something and it's passed by the Ukrainians as a fait accompli?

    Also the EU and the "coalition of the willing" frozen out, unwilling or unable to go against their dominant American "ally".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,651 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭Addmagnet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    He just sees the world in terms of US, Russia, and China. That’s it . Everyone else get f**ked. . She mentioned his relationship with Zelensky he did not even acknowledge him.

    He just sees Europe and Zelensky as a threat pushing Russia and China closer together.
    He wants to stop that.
    where does Europe really stand in all of this???
    Does he really honestly think Russia is more important than Europe???
    In terms of natural resources and nukes it is.
    In terms of Human capital , culture and economics and consumption Russia is a minnow in comparison to Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Trump is going to leave a lasting impression on the world order. Anyone thinking we can just wait him out and go back to business as usual in 2028 forget about it. We are gone way past that. We had a brief window with Biden but the Global world order utterly failed to reassert itself in that time . It’s a new world now defined by geopolitical might. He wants full control of North America as well from Panama to Greenland. Much easier stop migrants and control security at the narrow isthmus of Panama than the endless deserts of the Mexican border. Panama has replaced the Wall. He doesn’t mention the wall anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    All of this comes down to - through all the bullshit from Trump is that America is fcuked. They are essentially bankrupt - imagine paying 1 trillion dollars a year to service debt. The US has 3 main "enemies" in the world. China, Russia and Iran. Now the US will forever back Israel to the hilt, why? It has the ability and airpower to flatten Iran should the need ever arise. The US needs Europe to counter balance Russia (which is ironic, as one of the reasons that the US previously never wanted a strong military in Europe was so there would be no "misunderstandings" between Europe and Russia) - hence the big push for Europe to handle its own security. Why? The US cant afford it anymore and in China they face for the first time since 1783 a "foe" they are not guaranteed to defeat in open combat or defeat economically and I think that scares them.

    So yes, Trump and the Americans will fcuk Ukraine over if it means they can concentrate on China.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    can’t face China alone if alienates and is no longer friendly with Europe, Canada, Australia and Mexico and dozens of other countries who it will need for trade and whom like good allies came to help US when article 5 was triggered (which included Ukraine too btw) when US needed help

    Should Europe have spent more of defence? Yes

    Did Trump go about undoing 80 years of relationships with closest allies and trading partners the wrong way? Absolutely

    It hasn’t sunk in yet that the last month is bigger than Brexit and will have many many more negative implications for US itself

    Tho the US markets have been ringing alarm bells for weeks now, and they are very forward looking. In few months all of this will trickle down into a deep US recession and unemployment spike and inflation and rate rises which will only make the US debt situation worse not better.

    All while Russia and China laugh as they couldn’t have imagined the American leadership to ever be so **** stupid

    We now have Trump saying “Recession will be worth it” ffs

    Post edited by thatsdaft on


Advertisement