Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Rugby peaked in 2023 and is now in steady decline. A Very Barron decade ahead

1356713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭ersatz


    It's managed competition, just like capitalism used to be before the capitalists fully took control of team USA and decided oligopoly, oligarchy and monopolies were a better idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 164 ✭✭VeryOwl


    It's the steep decline in the quality of coaching that's worrying most of all I think, a big part of what's given us an edge. The younger players will come - there is plenty of talent - but into what kind of environment?

    The O'Connell lineout is still a liability and our attacking game - once the envy of the world - has disappeared. I hope you're right and Farrell refreshes the coaching because we need something better during the rebuild.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The thing about England and France is that an injury can bring on a player who fits at least as well or better into the team. Thus JG-P matters much more to us than Dupont did to France. That’s usually true of our props and second rows too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I would rank Sheehan as our best or second best player at the moment with JG-P. Aki is down a bit in my rankings and declining further, still spectacular with the ball in no space but not the guy you’d want to see chasing a winger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    The reality is every team has period like Ireland has now during a WC cycle (France had it last year as did NZL, Ireland this year and you get bet on it SA will have it at some point this cycle) so this shouldn’t alone set alarm bells.


    What matters now is how Ireland respond, if we respond correctly we will be fine as most of our issues are fixable.


    if we don’t and let the issues manifest then I will start worrying.

    2026 will be a huge year for assessing where this side is at.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭crusd


    I think some sort of "draft light" system could be considered. With a dual goal to maintain identity and spread talent. Take an example of Sheahan and Kelleher at Leinster. In this case two best hookers are both local. Leinster should get first option on the number 1 "draft" option coming from the province, eg. Gus McCarthy, however it would be a choice, if you wish to keep the two front liners you pass on the draft option. This would prevent a log jam of talent in one setup. Or a system where you get first call on a set number of academy prospects from your own province every year, say 3-5, but after that its an open draft. This ensures you keep the top local talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Just a question how on earth do you get a young fella to move home and/or college?

    They are not commodities. NFL treats players as disposable assets. Surely we are not going down that road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,828 ✭✭✭fonecrusher1


    Its hard to disagree with the narritive here and something I think we've all observed before seeing it called out in this vid. Basically Ireland has turned into Leinster (with the exception of a few players from Munster / Connacht) playing to a different play book for the international games.

    Whats the fix here? Is it just a case of pump more money into the other provinces youth / academy set ups to catch up with the Leinster system?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭crusd


    God help the poor 20 years olds moving a whole 2 hours away. Its hardly 3,000 miles and they are adults



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 771 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    On that topic, why is the U20's captain Éanna McCarthy - a very obvious Corkman (from Ballinhasssig I think) - playing for Connacht?

    Post edited by StormForce13 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭conquestscarer


    He was floating himself to all the provinces last year for an academy contract. Munster didn't bite so he ended up in Connacht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 geoff2204


    agreed on spread. lets get our top players playing as often as we can



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭OldRio


    So you want a draft for 20 year old then? 2 years into college studies then move. That's not going to work is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,592 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Happens all the time. In many areas there will be similar courses so they can move. Doing courses part time etc look at henshaw started in nuig moving over to ucd when he moved to leinster doing ii all pretty much part time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,575 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The fundamental problem there is if you expect them to act and live like adults, you have to pay them like adults.

    The current academy salary is €8,000 per year. That's less than the dole, btw. If each province has 20 guys in the academy, each of whom now needs to be paid enough to live independently, that's an enormous additional cost.

    And if player X has to give up his place in college because he's been told he has to go to another province, what happens when he doesn't make it as a pro?

    These are tip of the iceberg as to why any draft is completely unworkable.

    The NFL is utterly meaningless because a) they've all been living away from home in college anyway and b) the money is outrageous. The very last guy picked in the draft - "Mr Irrelevant" - gets a contract worth $1 million per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It's also a cartel. The NFL would never be legal in the EU



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 540 ✭✭✭Madeoface


    Yeah I'm not sure about all 3 kiwis being the best at the moment; Sheehan, JGP and either Doris / Beirne for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Here's my take on where we are.

    A very well run business, prudently managed and well structured for the demands of the professional game. Income stream from the top down needs us to have at least a chance against all nations to keep the bums on the seats for the big income internationals.

    We have around 180 professional players at anyone time of which maybe 50-70 are the right age and general ability to play international rugby. Allowing for injury we probably select 36 man squads from 50 players.

    Academies and under 20's are the lifeblood that we require to keep this going. Every ounce of potential talent has to reach the academies.

    Leinster: A little like Ireland, well managed and being kept in the conversation about winning each year. Success is consistent top 4 in all competitions. Winning something regularly may actually hamper the financial performance. Good academy pipeline based on the schools and population should keep them operating at the higher levels while careful use of higher gates income and sponsorship to select key external talents to keep the brand on track will need to continue.

    Munster: History and population buy in keep Munster in every conversation. They are consistently struggling to reinvent themselves in a longer term perspective. Ethos, playing style, coaching etc. Many false dawns, hope this one is it. Lack consistent numbers to keep the academies stocked but have yet to recognize the flaw of admitting the best Munster youth over the best available Irish youth. The change in mindset needs to be Ireland first supported by a strong and powerful Munster.

    Ulster: A little like Munster in that the historical identity is there to be built on but to find the model to compete is not easy. They have more recently recognized what Munster do not. Young Irish talent into the academy is the priority where they were born is secondary. I believe that this is now started and coupled with their strong identity they are poised to compete in coming years despite the current lack of international stars. Careful selection of NIQ'S is required to complete the reshaping of the Province. Ireland needs Ulster.

    Connacht: The runt of the litter but ironically the weakness at Connacht is the strength. Lack of population and playing numbers mean that Connacht are ahead of the game in academy terms as they have always needed to dress in the other provinces hand-me downs. Filling their academy with guys who can be tempted away from the bright lights of Leinster and Munster or those just below the standard is the way to go for Irish rugby to broaden the playing pool and it also works for Connacht.

    Anytime Ireland win against England, South Africa, France or New Zealand ( for different reasons) we should be celebrating like like David after beating Goliath and all his brothers. We are punching consistently. Australia, Wales, Scotland, Argentina these are the comparable nations. Unfortunately our golden generation missed their shot at the last World Cup and who knows when we will next have that chance. Perhaps Farrells success is in fact failure to achieve with the best squad ever produced from this island. Key question for me is did we over achieve due to quality coaching or under achieve with the best group we ever had. As time goes by I'm moving towards the latter.

    The job is always to get the next crop to peak because we are always in decline as our very very limited professional stock of players age out. No province will be or remain successful if Ireland isn't, province first always but only after country.

    Ireland Abu & Connacht Abu but Leinster, Munster and Ulster academies Abu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,592 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Yes pay is poor but they get addional supports from their ail clubs, university, the province theyre with

    Nobody is saying someone has to give up a college place. They simply transfer to a similar course in the new city



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    The other aspect of the NFL draft is they are only competing with themselves. If the Irish provinces only played each other a draft system would make more sense as it would equalise the provinces. But when we compete against other nations you would effectively be weakening Leinster and we would have 4 less competitive provinces. Which is better?



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 43,083 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    and that would be the death of ulster rugby. They already suffer disproportionately due to the 'brain-drain' of their young to the UK.

    a draft system in ireland would never work.

    1. It rewards failure of production to the point that production becomes unnecessary
    2. options to attract academy prospects ALREADY exist in the system. There is nothing being fixed here.
    3. the cost of such a system would put already financially tight clubs to the sword.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,575 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    What support does an academy guy get from his AIL club? Genuine question, I presume it is a pittance and completely discretionary?

    The support from the province they're with is exactly the issue here - they can't afford it.

    Nobody is saying someone has to give up a college place. They simply transfer to a similar course in the new city

    That is a gross oversimplification. It might be valid for someone doing business or arts, but what if a player is studying a specialised course in UCC and is now told he has to go to Connacht but NUIG doesn't offer it?

    Robbie Henshaw was on a central contact when he moved to Leinster btw, he didn't need to worry too much about Plan B.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭OldRio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    What you really want at 20's is one of the best 5 players or a flawed but talented player who could round out his skillset and be elite. Munster have had an abundance of both since 2019 with multiple top 5 players:

    2025: Foy, Smyth

    2024: O'Connell, Gleeson

    2023: Quinn, Gleeson

    2022: O'Sullivan, Campbell

    2021: Kendellan

    2020: Crowley, Ahern

    2019: Hodnett, Casey, Wycherly

    And flawed but talented prospects like O'Leary Kareem, Sean Edogbo, O'Connor, McSweeney Okeke, Philips and French.

    What's happened is that the prospects have really struggled to make the jump to international level. If you look at minutes played, Munster are vastly more conservative than Leinster and Ulster when it comes to giving players under 23 years of age minutes. This season Jack O'Donoghue has double the minutes of Gleeson, Quinn and Edogbo combined. Edogbo, who started for emerging Ireland this year, has zero competitive minutes this season, the only player on the tour with this distinction. That is absurdly conservative.

    Post edited by snotboogie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Think the IRFU/ Munster Branch have really been deficient with their coaching hires. The quality has just not been on the same level as Leinster's, and think that's played a not inconsiderable part in their struggles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I assume you mean struggle to jump to provincial level from your list?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I mean to be fair all 6 from pre 2022 are provincial level at least. The issue has been in taking that next step. Also there has been a 100% miss rate on the flawed but talented group from that same time period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 251 ✭✭noc1980


    Ireland has a habit of getting worse as a tournament progresses. Limping over the line against England 2 years ago, losing against England and limping home against Scotland last year, Destroyed by France and awful away to Italy this year. Same story at World Cups. By the time the QF comes we're a spent force.

    Questions must be asked about squad fitness and until the age issue is addressed it's difficult to see how this trend ends. We benefit from the Leinster continuity and familiarity early in tournaments but as the other teams get more and more time together that advantage disappears.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    From watching the NZL performance I don’t really see where age and fitness were factors in the loss…we lost that game because we had no scrum or consistency at LO time.

    You are massively overthinking things by bringing the whole “Leinster” stuff up, Again looking back at the RWC I don’t see where all this was an issue…we just lost to the better team on the day, which happens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18 Gaztric


    While I appreciate there is a big gap in experience, the likes of Gavin, Forde, Osbourne, Devine, Odogbo plus the younger internationals like Sheahan, Doris, McCarthy, Keenan and Hansen give me much hope for the future. The question for me is when does Farrell start to accelerate this process.



Advertisement