Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M28 - Cork to Ringaskiddy [under construction; 2028 completion]

15556575961

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Cork's not getting any light rail anyway, the City Council dinosaurs put the nail in that coffin with their repeated "WhAt AbOuT dE cAr pArKiNg?" meetings when NTA wanted to push it through. The culture is changing albeit slowly.

    Mind you there's plenty of dinosaurs in Carrigaline too, blocking the greenway and pushing back against the proposed urban realm project. TLDR: Car town by car people for car people.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41572876.html

    Looks like CCC will have replied by the end of this week and it should be good to go soon then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭Mr.CoolGuy


    Important to note that nothing in Carrigaline has been help up. The urban realm projects have all received full planning with very few changes and the Greenway is going ahead with majority support from both public and councillors.

    The dinosaurs are confined to Facebook comment sections mostly. They have not been succesful in stopping or even delaying anything. It's a "car town" but it certainly wants more public transport and active travel options so I don't think it's fair to dismiss it based on pretty weak pushback to new projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭sonnyblack


    Slightly off topic on M28 but is it correct to say that the refusal of the Planning application by ABP for Lidl's planned relocation into the circus field has somewhat torpedoed the proposed Carrigaline public realm works?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I participated in the public consultations for both schemes, and there was heavy pushback to be honest. I wouldn't describe it as weak at all. The general theme from the vast majority of submissions was "other parts of Carrigaline should have these things implemented but not near me". Herons Wood to Bridgemount - the core spine of the whole cycle scheme - was what many people were particularly against. There was savage NIMBYism there.

    There needed to be a public campaign to get additional positive responses in, such was the organised, vocal and aggressive nature of the pushback against it. Councilors and engineers had to come down and placate them practically one by one. It took enormous effort from the Council to get it over the line and they did a great job IMO. There was talk of vigilante groups being set up and all sorts of mad stuff at the time.

    Having seen it from the inside and having been involved in other similar schemes elsewhere, I personally would say that Carrigaline wants active transport options alright, they just want those active transport options to be "somewhere else". Or maybe "anywhere else" would be more appropriate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I wouldn't agree with this synopsis. The TPREP was broken into multiple sections and section 1A (Main street and the North-South cycle artery) are not alone going ahead unimpacted, but are specifically bounded such that Lidl's current property has no way of impacting them. So the overall works have not been torpedoed and cannot be. So that's positive.

    So that's:

    The Main Street short-perm project progressing OK.

    The inner Western Relief Road short term project complete.

    The Carrigaline to Passage West Cycleway progressing OK.

    The Carrigaline to Crosshaven greenway short-term project is the only one that could be impacted from what I see, and the land take there should be very small, I really don't see how Lidl could impact it any way at all.

    TLDR, no I don't think that's correct to say that the ABP refusal has any real impact on the TPREP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    But you know what, you're right though to say they have not succeeded in blocking or delaying the new schemes. And you're right to say plenty of people in Carrigaline are fighting to have a better quality of infrastructure. But it remains the most car-dependent town in Ireland, as of the last census. And people there were very organised against the proposed cycle infrastructure.

    I joked at the time, the council should propose to put a short section of horrible industrial rail line back down the protected alignment and shut them up about "antisocial" greenways!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,474 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    No wonder it's car dependent the bus service is brutal and that's being polite. 220(x) is still a disaster. I have regular appointments in Bishopstown. If my appointment is 12pm I'm at the bus stop in Carrigaline no later than 10.30am.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's in a really bad situation due to decades of basically unplanned development with no foundational infrastructure. I believe it's the largest town in Ireland with no rail line proposed or planned.

    There's some improvements planned under BusConnects, with a the current Haulbowline bus planned to go to Crosshaven instead of just Carrigaline. Albeit still at 30 min frequency. And there's a bus to Apple planned (I think almost everywhere in Cork is getting a bus to Apple!).

    But other than that, local cycle infrastructure is the only future really for Carrigaline, in terms of future sustainable mode share shifts. Ireland's forgotten town, from a transport perspective. It's pretty much the same size as Sligo. It's twice the size of Ballina, three times the size of Westport. There's a major port 7km away, a major naval base 8km away, a major pharma hub 8km away, a major airport 10km away. All of these are within cycle distance, let alone mass transit, but everyone is trapped in the car. It's a pretty crazy situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,474 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭sonnyblack


    image.png

    This proposed town park in carrigaline as part of an approved part 8 is surely affected though. I thought the loss of existing parking in the owenabue car park was to be taken up over in the existing Lidl when Lidl moved into the circus field.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't know too much about it, but the car park being made into a park is being pursued separately to the rest of the TPREP. They insulated it from the TPREP by saying that main street bus lane, crosshaven road access changes and church hill will progress regardless, they're a priority.

    They have by 2028: Main Street, Western Relief Road, Full Pedestrian and Cycle Network, Carrigaline to Crosshaven Greenway, Carrigaline to Passage West Greenway (the one that caused all the uproar). All shown in black below

    tprep2028.JPG

    Here's what's already approved for the road junction at Aldi: you can see that the cycle network progresses despite the car park / park issue.

    tprep1B.JPG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭cork_south


    Bloomfield is going to be some laugh when this road has been completed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,142 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Yeah, I've been prodding at that one for a while now. Bloomfield westbound will be the countries worst bottleneck when this is done. Expect jams at almost all times of the day, I'd say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    New video from Dronehawk showing the current state of the Ringaskiddy to Barnahely protected road development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    Hopefully it's just a mix-up in the scheme of things, but the Boyne Bridge M1 project was certainly not built by BAM/Ascon, or Sisk, and as I couldn't remember exactly I spent some time googling. I can't seem to link-text here, so here's the source: https://www.newcivilengineer.com/archive/up-to-speed-2-23-01-2003/ it was built by a joint venture of SIAC and O'Rourke.

    This alone isn't interesting in itself, but I'm from the area and I noted the stark difference in ride quality between the M1 Gormanstown to Monasterboice stretch and the M1 Dunleer-Dundalk from as early as 2010, particularly between junction 13 and 14. Dips and bumps in the road surface. Over the following years various lanes have ended up being resurfaced. It's not hard to see the newer surfaces, when I last drove there in 2023.

    To add to that, the M1 Gormanston to Monasterboice section (including the Boyne Bridge) has to my current knowledge never needed to be resurfaced since opening in 2003. And just a quick google shows that these repairs are still ongoing: https://droghedalife.com/news/temporary-closure-of-sections-of-the-m1-to-facilitate-road-works as contrasts go, it's rather damning in my opinion. Though it's newer, the N1/A1 Dundalk to Newry, built by Ferrovial, has also not shown signs of surface deterioration in its first 15 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,368 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The original Dunleer bypass was very good work and lasted 30 years with only one or two small areas with problems.

    The N1/A1 does have cracks at right angles to the road, as if there was an expansion joint below.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,251 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Contrary to many opinions, cycling is far from the answer to everything. I am very familiar with Carrigaline, and the idea of cycling from there into the city, or the airport is just fantasy (now or in the future). Unless you actually work in the town itself, a car is essential.

    I live in a bigger town myself where a lot of these new "community bike" (or whatever they're called) racks have been installed in recent times. They're almost always full and there's certainly no surge of people peddling around the town.

    Beyond enthusiasts, active recreation, and those with no better alternative, they will just never be an attractive option for most people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,408 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Electrically assisted bikes make cycling the distance from Carrigaline to Cork trivial. The reason nobody's doing it should be obvious.

    You can't use the number of bikes in those bike docks as a measure of how many people actually use the service. You rent the bikes from one dock to another, so apart from the fact that trucks move bikes from low demand places to high demand racks during the day, how do you tell the difference between "bike dock is full of unused bikes" and "bike dock is full with bikes of people who cycled here".. smelling the saddles?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,251 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I tell the difference by the fact that there's not a whole lot more cycle traffic around the town (large midlands town in my example) at any time of the day. It's actually very rare to see cyclists at all in most areas outside of Dublin city centre.

    Even yesterday in Cork city there were more protesters on the road than cyclists (the apparently weekly idiotic Gaza march) .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,570 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    How many protesters, cyclists, which road and what time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Oh lovely another culture war how original. Right, so let's start with "contrary to many opinions"… nobody in this thread has ever said that cycling is the answer to everything. In fact I've never heard anyone ever say it ever. If they did, they'd probably be laughed at.

    Next, are you suggesting that the town with the highest levels of car dependency in the entire country should NOT focus on the very obvious mode share problem it suffers? Cars are just ESSENTIAL unless you actually work in the town: do you really believe this, that nothing could ever be done to fix it?

    On the issue of cycling to/from Carrigaline, I've cycled to and from Carrigaline to town loads of times. It's a fairly trivial journey. I've also worked in Carrigaline loads of times and happen to know plenty of people who cycle to work in Carrigaline from outside of Carrigaline.

    People living at the Northern end of Carrigaline are 8km to the Airport. 5km to Ringaskiddy. 4km to the other side of Carrigaline where the employment centres are. 8km to Douglas. 10km direct trip to Mahon, or 14km on the flat (greenway).

    Is there any particular reason that you think that improving the connectivity to these is NOT desirable? And is my lived experience "just a fantasy" like you say?

    Would you be willing to consider that all the design manuals stating that trips of 5-7km are the "sweet spot" for cycling could be accurate?

    I mean, we all know we're probably not going to get anywhere near 30% of people in Carrigaline on bikes, but I think we can surely aspire to only 50% of Carrigaline people commuting in cars which was the original point of the conversation.

    Edit: also, an ancillary question and feel free to state you'd rather not say, but do you have some kind of vested interest in cars? I only ask because there's a few people who seem to pop up in many threads seemingly ill-at-ease with any discussion of improving mode shares in urban areas. Having spent time in urban areas with very low car usage and having young/old family members myself who can't drive, I genuinely struggle to understand why people would be against it. What's bad about it, other than car sales being lower?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭blindsider


    I know we don't like 'backseat modding', but I'm not going to start reporting posts - it shouldn't be necessary.

    However:

    1. Could we stick to the M28 Ringaskiddy (which is coming along nicely)
    2. This thread doesn't have too many aggressive keyboard warriors, and I think it's all the better for that.

    Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep sorry if I've been a part of dragging this one off-topic. Certainly not my intention. Hopefully M28 with BusConnects will be a big help to wider traffic and the TPREP will be a help to the local traffic issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭Mr.CoolGuy


    I think the recent discussion, while not directly related to the progress of the road, is still relevant to the topic. Carrigaline and surrounds are being completely left behind now apart from this road.

    Bus Connects will actually reduce services for most of the town and the city councillors have succeeded in making it pointless anyway. It looks like delivering a 14 km greenway is going to take decades the way they're going. Rail or light rail? Forget about it; Society ends at Mahon apparently, a mere 10 minute cycle from the city centre.

    This road seems to be all the area is getting and it's going to bite the region in the a** if it's not supported with literally anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Can't agree more really.

    It's of course a different topic and deserving of its own thread but there needs to be a serious discussion about rail or light rail to Ringaskiddy and Carrigaline (and ideally the airport). I won't pretend I have answers, and of course it would be hideously expensive but surely we shouldn't be just leaving it off the national rail strategy the way they did. If there's merit in discussing "new rail alignments" through Meath, then surely there's merit in discussing "new rail alignments" to/through these three, given their economic output.

    Whether that's linking over the river to the Cobh line or under the Airport/Farmers Cross, it doesn't sit well with me that nobody is even discussing it. Yes, green fields and relief etc, but we should be discussing these constraints and mitigating them any way possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭cantalach


    It’s now more than a month since this latest update and still no contract. The mind boggles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭cantalach


    I reckon you can read something into that figure. When the main contract went out to tender (17 months ago now!) the Examiner article said the contract would be in the €250-500M range. For the sake of argument let’s take the midpoint, i.e. €375M. For a 3 year contract that works out at €125M per annum. If they’re only allocating €50M this calendar year, this suggests to me that full construction won’t start until the tail end of the year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭Corkladddd!!


    I'd think it's more like the heavy value doesn't start until you drive finishes etc, any bridge etc. would only be ordered at the signing of the contract and likely only have Hello money, once you're in the main project execution stage the value earned will skyrocket in the middle.



Advertisement