What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Note in Post #3372**

if its a consequential moral question probably average attention.

Stats are nice but theyre not always conveniently available or fully representative.

anyway, i can see you have either made up your mind, or are going by your issued political guidebook, plus your opinion is irrelevant to me so no more time for you.

Say something snippy.

Those that want multiple abortions should be facilitated to terminate by the state.
The alternative will cost the state much more over the lifetime if these children are born.

it will also make abortion more casual and frequent causing more suffering to more aborted.

presently theres no thought given to that suffering. because they lost.

it doesnt have to cost the state much either. we'll offer the first one as we unfortunately must, even the second. Its a tough call, we understand. Life happens. We have chosen to put the woman first.

But a third?

Why is there no question about this? Its been established that its her body her choice, that debate is over, but are we now muted from questioning the status quo?

You're terminating a third life, you may have caused suffering to a fetus for the third time. But no questions allowed because that sounds too much like an old debate.

Her body her choice indeed, but my country my choice. We dont have to intervene, we dont have to break the bond of her body her choice. We can walk away. We can look at the circumstances and decide not to get involved.

it was your body your choice the first two times and we respected that. I dont see the same moral obligation for the state by the third time. I think by then we have the right to some answers if shes coming to the state looking.

How many times are you going to come to us? Are you disregarding the feelings of other human/sentient beings?

by the third time we can maybe consider the rights of the fetus. This isnt a pro-life argument. That ship has sailed. We all get it. Please dont revert to it. This is a pro-moderation argument.

And this places no automatic restriction on the woman pursuing her further abortions, she can still go abroad and get that done. What it does do is remove the country from the process and the moral consequences when we deem appropriate. We have to put the woman first but we also have to place some value, any value on the fetus, some damn trace of sympathy.

And thats my controversial opinion.

My controversial opinion is that the famous sports star likely didn't commit the crime he was accused of. Well, I don't actually consider it controversial, it's quite reasonable based on the evidence, however others seemingly do deem it controversial.

Yes I agree with that assuming they aren't lying.

Cases like that are why we should have abortion available. And do.

Sentience occurs in the womb, the aborted can suffer, the fact that youd completely disregard their rights is whats really bizarre.

We moderate practically everything in our daily lives, society had learned that life requires balance. But not in terminations. The debate whipped up emotions and left a dumb binary absolutist choice, all or nothing.

Thats why I can find news stories of women having fifth, sixth abortions. On the state, but with no state oversight. Complete disregard for human life, but it cant be mentioned or youre this or that.