Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1144114421444144614471648

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    If Aldritt is out I don't actually think Jelonch coming in is the big issue for France, as Jelonch is a great player, its the makeup of the bench that become an issue. If you look at the rumoured bench for France at 19, 20, 21, 22 the amount caps they have are 7, 3, 4 & 10 or an average of 6 caps per player…while there is quality there, especially with Meafou, Its very green for such a big game. If you are France you'd probably want an experienced head like Jelonch coming on to help steady the ship if needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭vetinari


    Furlong playing / starting seems like a high risk move. You'd want to be really confident that he's fully healed..

    Would be a little harsh on Bealham as well given that he's gone well this six nations.

    Although I'd guess he's just happy to still be in the squad.

    No way Clarkson starting against Wales wasn't a way to try and move him ahead of Bealham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,141 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Clarkson getting an opportunity is for the future. Nobody is getting past Furlong and Bealham so long as they are healthy. And it's Furlong that's most likely to miss time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    Why would it be to try move him ahead of Bealham and not just giving time to another prop option given Furlong's obvious injury concerns?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    Nah Bealham was on the bench v Wales so to give Clarkson some exposure and so that there'd be some experience coming on alongside Gus McCarthy and Jack Boyle later in the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,334 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Teams

    Osborne or Hansen a big worry it has to be said. Think Osborne starts then Keenan shifts to 14 jersey.

    20250305_181024.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Delighted Doris is back but disappointed Coombes won't get his chance - would've been a great chance to either silence or confirm his doubters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    By not getting picked kinda confirms it though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I mean he would've more than likely started if Doris and Conan were both injured. Don't see them starting Timoney or Prendergast Sr at 8.

    (Now, even if Doris pulled out late, I presume they'd back Conan to play 80 and put on the above on the bench)

    Do appreciate the attempt though, Niall.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,345 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Does Osborne have the pace for wing at this level?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭almostover


    I'd fear Bielle-Barrie and Penaud would have a field day against us if a guy who doesn't play wing is selected there. Has Calvin Nash been consigned to the scrapheap? Osborne seems like a better fit for the 23 jersey for this game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    Rumours are Nash is injured



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Is it a 9AM announcement tomorrow or back to the 2PM?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,334 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd rather they start TOB there if Hansen and Nash are out. Love Osborne, but I think struggled on the wing for Leinster. Just hasn't had the time playing there. Don't know if he's appreciatably slower than Lowe or Hansen, but his positioning is what would concern me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Would probably be Keenan on the wing and Osbourne 15



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,973 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I would assume 1400 given they are not travelling.

    I'm not convinced on Osborne on the wing, assume it is mostly due to his boot but he has struggled a little of late and moving position isn't going to help that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭50HX


    He's completely unproven at this level & a laugh if he started.

    at Least Osbourne has played & done well at test level.

    Either way Keenan goes to the wing I'd say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,334 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Everyone is unproven until they aren't. Osborne made his debut in SA. I think he's more than talented enough for international rugby and more importantly, he's more experienced as a winger than Osborne or Keenan. We're facing arguably 2 of the best wingers in the world, I'd rather someone who's comfortable in their position personally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭50HX


    A grandslam & championship decider ain't the place to try out. Different story on summer tour.

    Has TOB even got meaningful minutes v higher end CC opposition?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,334 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    If someone is good enough, they're good enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭CalmaftertheGav


    The starting team I'm happy enough with. Would prefer is Hansen was available but of the back 3 players we have he's the most replaceable imo, plus Osborne is an unbelievable player so we shouldn't be weakened too much with him coming in. Like others have said, I would prefer him at FB with Keenan on the right wing.

    The bench I'm less enthused by. I'm happy with the 6/2 split, would have picked it myself, but the injuries to Furlong & in particular Kelleher will limit the impact of our bench. I hope Gus McCarthy & Tom O'Toole get the nod in the 16 & 18 shirt, will add plenty of umph off the bench with those 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    IF Osborne is starting i would think its because Hansen and Nash are injured. Not ideal. Esp. without Ringrose.

    Osborne would have to play FB and Keenan wing. Osborne v Billie-Barry does not bear thinking about.

    6-2 Would actually be the best option now - Best available players in the 23 AND 7-1.

    GARRYOWEN'S Galore will be rained down upon the French Wings and FB.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,781 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    If Ireland are going for a 6-2 split in the subs, it makes total sense. unfortunate for Nash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,367 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Nash went off early on Friday so I assumed he has a knock, hence TOB being called up?

    I don’t love Osborne on the wing, he’s a great fit for 23 but I’d play JOB ahead of him at 14.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,664 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    France have named their side. Alldritt starts and there's a 7-1 split on the bench.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    image.png

    France have gone for the 7/1 split. Serious beef on the bench with Meafou and Jelonch. Alldritt makes it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    Dupont is effectively covering 10-15. One back injury and they have to start shuffling. It's a massive risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,668 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Barring injury enforced I think it's crazy to see 7-1 split of the bench



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    Thornley was saying that they are going for this approach from a tactical perspective in that they want the forwards to absolutely empty themselves so that they can get the space to go wide. Something to that effect anyway.

    It's a massive risk.



Advertisement
Advertisement