Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1136613671369137113721425

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Seems the Iranian Secret Service has been undermining Israel for months and has recruited and handsomely paid for a top level double agent…


    Israeli authorities arrested a 26-year-old resident of Petah Tikva who they say acted on behalf of an Iranian operative. According to a statement, the suspect had been in contact with the Iranian operative for several months and, under their guidance, carried out "dozens of incidents of spray-painting graffiti in the Petah Tikva and Rosh HaAyin areas in exchange for payment."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Why is Netanyahu so despised by Israelis?

    "While the country took on orange colors, and the broken-hearted populace followed the funeral procession of Shiri, Ariel, and Kfir Bibas to bestow last honors on them, Netanyahu, who was in court, tried to appropriate the event for his own purposes... For Netanyahu, the bodies of Bibas' loved ones – civilians kidnapped in their pajamas on his watch and murdered in captivity – are national assets he uses for propaganda purposes, for public diplomacy, or for manipulations in court, according to his needs." – Haaretz Editorial



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Confirmed number of Israeli civilians killed in the 510 days:

    • Israel's National Insurance Institute said that 924 Israeli civilians have been killed since the beginning of the Israel-Hamas war on October 7, 2023.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    All this propaganda really means nothing until both parties decide that there are no winners in this conflict .

    Flooding the site with propaganda really shows a closed mind and no real knowledge of the complex issues involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont think quoting from a respected newspaper can be defined as propaganda. it really shows a type of closemindedness to respond to uncomfortable facts this way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,434 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,897 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    One poster paying subscription on haaretz is certainly flooding thread with citations from articles hidden behind paywall, at least some links would be greatly welcome. How does it come, as it seems to me, that no one else on this thread payed the same site?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I don’t agree, but the best answers are as I outlined in previous posts.

    It’s really pointless metaphorically waving the Palestine flag and trying to stuff a point of view down people’s throats.

    Only discussion and agreement between both protagonists can sort this stuff out, we should know this from our own experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Who's paying a subscription? It's all perfectly free.

    Good journalism too. Though it does touch nerves at times. The truth hurts I guess.

    But isn't it odd how no-one posts rebuttals from the other side of the journalism spectrum. Maybe there aren't any?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,373 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Of course those in charge of giving orders, if they give orders of war crimes can be held responsible. Individual war crimes are committed by individuals, such as robberies rapes, thefts etc.

    If someone is responsible for policies that are war crimes, then they can of course be held responsible. Slobodan Milosevic being an example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The ICC can only prosecute individuals, not states. The have prosecutors who initiate proceedings, issue arrest warrants etc.

    The ICJ can only make judgements between States. So one (or more) State has to initiate proceedings against another.

    Both the ICC and the ICJ can prosecute War Crimes.

    Hence Netanyahu and Gallant have arrest warrants against them for War Crimes (and are therefore "at large") they have allegedly committed (like Milosevic).

    Israel is before the ICJ charged by South Africa of the War Crime of Genocide (and has been "joined" by other States).

    And of course, the ICJ already ruled last year that Israel is breaking international law in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem by illegally occupying them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Judging by posts here, there are plenty of people who have no knowledge of even the simplest of issues involved.

    Justifying genocide, war crimes and the like for example. Even the murder of thousands of children.

    I recall many many posts extolling the virtues of the "most moral army in the world" and the only "democratic nation in the Middle East". Both have been thoroughly challenged with mountains of evidence to the contrary.

    The rebuttal evidence is simply nowhere to be seen. Is that because there isn't any?

    I'm not sure what "propaganda" you're referring to - is that what the likes of Likud and Netanyahu pump out? Haaretz simply reports facts - and they entertain the odd opinion piece too. As do the BBC and RTE.

    It's only propaganda to those who don't like the truth or it doesn't suit their own stance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,373 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    I'm aware of how the court works. Another poster suggested the State was the offender, I pointed out at the person in charge of held responsible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,078 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Plenty about Israel's War Crimes in this -

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/14/israels-crimes-against-humanity-gaza



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,078 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Israeli soldiers on holidays in other countries being accused of War Crimes too -

    https://www.irishtimes.com/world/europe/2025/02/25/israeli-soldiers-flee-netherlands-following-accusations-of-gaza-war-crimes/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I’m afraid this thread is beginning to wind up like a ‘students Union’ debate.

    It doesn’t achieve anything other than provide a vehicle for those to trawl the internet

    for spurious backup of their own point of view.

    Rather than address the issues maturely it seems they prefer to indulge in ‘Internet whataboutery’ of the most basic kind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    My post was not directly in answer to you. There was a discussion that appeared to be unsure how the ICC and ICJ work.

    But it does answer your second sentence where you appear to be confused.

    If an individual commits war crimes, the ICC prosecutes. If a State commits war crimes, another State(s) petitions the ICJ and the ICJ hears the case and deliver their judgements.

    The ICJ does not deliver judgements on individuals, including those "in charge". Only the ICC can prosecute individuals.

    Hence Netanyahu (who is "in charge") is before the ICC and the State of Israel (who he is in charge of) is before the ICJ along with South Africa (the accuser).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,373 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    well, by posting this

    Another poster suggested the State was the offender, I pointed out at the person in charge of held responsible.

    it appears you don't.

    And by knowing how "it" works, are you referring to the ICJ or the ICC. They are two separate courts. They do not work "together" and are two seperate legal "systems".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The IDF have issued warnings that soldiers delete existing content from their social media and their devices and post no further material that indicates they have been involved in incidents that can be prosecuted as war crimes.

    It interesting that the IDF are not prosecuting those individuals. Just warning them to not get caught.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,345 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    BB, I get the strong impression that you don't actually care and are just pretending to have some kind of deep wisdom. Your last few posts have been directionless at the risk of being rude.

    What point are you actually trying to argue?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Its not compulsory to post here or even read the posts.

    But since you are are here, you clearly have some kind of interest and you are more than welcome to debate, discuss, argue etc. Its also clear that no-one here has any direct influence on events in Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem, Israel, Lebanon or Syria. Doesn't mean we can't debate it though. Perhaps if the debate here is more like a Student's Union in your opinion, perhaps you should look elsewhere for the kind of debate you prefer?

    As for "spurious backup" - its very clear on reading the entire thread that any "spurious" information is quickly rebutted with sources/evidence from people who are very knowledgeable about the subjects in question.

    Its clear to me that any evidence presented showing that the Israel Govt. and the IDF have crossed all the lines of humanity is met with scorn and accusations of "whataboutery", "spurious backup", "internet trawling" etc.

    But the most interesting aspect is that rarely is any reputable counter evidence provided. Presumably it doesn't exist.

    All that seems to happen when Israel is criticised is that outrage posts abound. Not because of what Israel has done, but because they have been called out for it.

    Its telling to me that there are some who seem to take umbrage at posts detailing news items from Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz. And the critisism is actually not about the news items themselves but rather that the information is paywalled. Its not paywalled at all.

    Pop over to the Haaretz website and subscribe to their daily newsletter - you will receive a free email detailing all the news items. You can further subscribe (by paying) to longer articles and opinion pieces if you wish. I don't pay Haaretz anything but I'm minded to because they are a very good source of independent news. And even that is telling - the Israeli Govt. has sanctioned them because they don't like what they are saying. Seems the truth hurts. A lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,528 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    you said

    All efforts should be made to bring anyone responsible for war crimes to justice.

    So you only bring those that are responsible.

    What about the ones you think are responsible, like Netanyahu, should he not be brought to justice to try the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 773 ✭✭✭Miniegg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,458 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Profiteering off the back of ethnic cleansing -

    "Seized, settled, let: how Airbnb and Booking.com help Israelis make money from stolen Palestinian land"

    "Exclusive analysis carried out by the Guardian found 760 rooms being advertised in hotels, apartments and other holiday rentals in illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, on two of the world’s most popular tourism websites."

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/27/seized-settled-let-how-airbnb-and-bookingcom-help-israelis-make-money-from-stolen-palestinian-land



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Very in-depth article (thanks for posting) and clearly showing why the ICJ did this:

    (The ICJ) concluded that Israel should put an end to its illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories, desist from creating new settlements, and evacuate those already established. It further concluded that where Palestinians have lost land and property, that Israel should pay reparations.

    The fact that a supposed "democratic State" chooses not to follow International Law is an utter disgrace.

    It also seems from the report that the two IDF soldiers received nothing more than a slap on the wrist for throwing a famer and his family off his land and stealing his property, including food.

    Until Israel starts adhering to International Law, they will be regarded by many as a Pariah and no better than the terrorists they claim to be fighting. And there are many Israelis who would agree with the sentiment - they are disgusted with the way their State conducts itself. It has even abandoned (and murdered) its own people - both on Oct 7th and not focusing on a deal to release the hostages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Great Post. In fairness your posts are hard to argue with and you link your sources very clearly. It seems some might not like what can't be argued with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,078 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    ''I know how it works'', '' I'm aware of how it works''.

    And i'm all for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,373 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Why would you bring someone who is not responsible for an offence to justice? You're making no sense



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    One might counter these arguments by stating the obvious.

    Hamas and their proxies want to wipe Israel off the map, and Israel want to wipe Hamas out of existence.

    That’s what’s being going on since especially since the October slaughter of Israeli civilians and long before that.

    We have seen the results and I would suggest that instead of flooding the thread with all kinds of ‘claims ‘ that one might , just might, see that peace can only be achieved by dialogue in this case. The

    That simple fact seems to be ignored in preference of what I would call a storm of whataboutery.



Advertisement