Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

14950525455359

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    I don’t disagree at all. It does cut both ways. The problem is that it’s usually people who call themselves left wing who are quick to call people with a different view point nazis, fascists, hitler and other names



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,032 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Left and right are primarily based on economic theory. There are plenty of right wing theories that rely on mass migration, just not all.

    Neo liberalism, laissez faire capitalism and anarchic capitalist libertarians almost completely rely on open borders or no borders. The goal is to exploit the migration for maximum profit. Conservatives and fascists have a much more rigid idea of the nation, and are anti immigration.

    Left leaning people tend to view migration in a more sympathetic light. We should take in genuine refugees and welcome multiculturalism, and so on. Except for the extreme left anarchists who want to tear down all nation states. But very few of them exist.

    To blame the current migration situation on the left is absolute bolloxology. The left haven’t held power in the history of the Irish state, they’ve been involved as the minority party with a few governments.


    The problem with migration is extremely nuanced and there are no simple answers, but it’s FFG that are mismanaging the **** out of it. Not some cabal of Trotskyites.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,032 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I used to agree that fascist was over used. But l, by Jaysus, there are a lot of fascists about these days.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,859 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod: Please don't descend into labelling or pejorative terms for ideologies you disagree with, and don't use these to describe other posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭creeper1


    I'm afraid neither left nor right can be trusted on this issue.

    The whole political establishment is on board with this.

    Tories in the UK allegedly right wing had record immigration levels even Starmer called them out on that.

    When the financial incentives are there so will follow the politicians the consequences to society be damned.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Mount street residents have contacted government officials about the IPAS centre that is due to accommodate 700 people. No one wants this in their area



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 43,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The fact of the matter is that economic growth is impossible without immigration. I'm not talking about refugees or people claiming asylum here, just immigrants in general. The problem is that politicians pander to the masses. Here in the UK, they did it with Brexit for instance. If people want to drastically limit immigration, that's fine. However, they'll need to be honest in explaining that the economic growth demanded by the electorate will not come to pass if that policy is implemented.

    Look at Japan. It's facing demographic catastrophe and it's dragging 50 and 60-year olds back into work. The Japanese people can vote for whatever immigration policy they choose but it's fair to say that the choice they've made comes with serious consequences. Germany and Italy also face serious demographic struggles. Anglophone countries tend to be better-insulated due to being extremely attractive destinations for foreigners.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    ”It’s dragging 50 and 60 year olds back to work”. Hasn’t the pension age increased in Ireland? I don’t see how you’re arguing that Ireland is better than Japan in that area



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,512 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Is economic growth the be-all-and-end-all though?

    We know infinite economic growth is a logical impossibility.

    We know migration is high-carbon in terms of the increasing number of flights - one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon today.

    We know migration leads in places to a race to the bottom in terms of pay - cleaners are an obvious example.

    We know migration here means emigration elsewhere - so again we can see the selfish mindset that we're the only ones that matter; we don't care about others. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction and an that.

    There's a strong case to be made that immigration (and an associated GDP-at-all-costs mindset) allows societies ignore matters of sustainability and equality. Plenty leading sustainability speakers would agree (David Attenborough and Mike Berners-Lee to name two)

    Is that a good thing?

    Edit - I missed the line "it's dragging 50 and 60-year olds back into work". I sincerely hope that's a typo, because if not, it's an absolutely prime example of the sort of self-centred privilege that's behind your typical pro-immigration mindset.

    Post edited by cdeb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,321 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I have noticed recently that everything is excused by 'think of the economy'. No matter the problem, it's all for the benefit of the economy, especially immigration. We need immigration for the economy is the default answer.

    Well what about society, is immigration good for society. We are told the economy is booming, yet society doesn't feel like it's booming.

    Immigration is putting a strain on all sectors and tbh, if the whole thing is to create a society which can't sustain its citizens, then it's built on shaky ground and will eventually come tumbling down.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,512 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Yep.

    I mean - things obviously need to change in society. The pension age needs to increase to at least 70 for example. That's a hard sell. But we need to be open about it, rather than hiding behind "Won't someone pleeeease think of the economy". That's the only way to address the far, far bigger issues of sustainability, climate change, etc.

    Even medical staff - it'd be interesting to know why Irish people are leaving those roles in droves. I presume it's to do with conditions - the stories you'd hear about nurses doing 70 hour weeks and so on. But with that escape valve of emigration, you can find some other suckers who are happy working 70 hour weeks, and you can dodge a pretty major societal question. (One of the reasons East Germany never had a major uprising until just before it fell is because it had the escape valve of selling dissidents to the West - so the pressure points never built up to full-scale protest)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    We know migration leads in places to a race to the bottom in terms of pay - cleaners are an obvious example.

    An obvious example of what exactly?

    One of the problems with native people who have an innate fear of migrants is they automatically assume migrants will be exclusively taking up a position as a cleaner or whatever other job they would describe as menial.

    There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that migrants coming to Ireland is a "race to the bottom" in terms of pay.

    People who come and live in Ireland are also consumers and service users, as Irish people who migrate elsewhere.

    We know migration is high-carbon in terms of the increasing number of flights - one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon today.

    I imagine the tourist industry dwarfs that number by some amount.

    But people can do something about that.

    Forgo foreign trips and go on staycation, help the local economy more.

    Everyone is a winner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    A staycation is a nice idea in theory but a lot of hotels in Ireland are already in use to accommodate AS and what’s left is very expensive



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭H_Lime


    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/social-affairs/2025/02/25/mount-street-community-group-threatens-legal-action-over-asylum-housing-proposal/

    Something tells me rte will be less than enthusiastic to apply tags like "far right" to this kind of protest lol.

    Likewise the man from up north will not be pointing his water cannons at this set.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The vast majority of hotels in Ireland do not contain "AS".

    7 per cent of all registered bed stock now remains under contract, though this has come down from 10 per cent during the period

    Peak for Ireland is an occupancy rate of between 75% and 80%.

    If you listen to the hoteliers though you would think there wasn't a hotel room to be had, this was little to do with reality and all to do with keeping the lower VAT rate which they didn't bother passing on to the consumer. So they lost.

    But. If your main concern is your carbon footprint by air travel, a staycation is the alternative.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,922 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Failte Ireland registered tourism bed stock under-contract”, and gives a new more accurate estimate of “all registered tourism bed stock” that is under Government contract: 13%. (Nov 2024)

    https://www.thejournal.ie/is-a-third-of-hospitality-accommodation-outside-the-m50-or-outside-dublin-used-for-ipas-or-ukrainians-6553876-Nov2024/

    January 2025-

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2025/01/10/state-contracted-beds-for-refugees-and-asylum-seekers-fall-15/

    Not really a lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,955 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Ludicrous comparing us to Japan. Very hard to get work permit for Japan. Their population is shrinking.
    Ireland’s population is surging through immigrations. Suggesting immigration can be scaled back, like Australia, is not the same thing as Japan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    I’m not prepared to take that 13% figure and call it case closed. Without seeing figures by area it’s meaningless. For example Drogheda town has one hotel that’s not taking bookings because it is being used to accommodate asylum seekers. That’s the biggest town in Ireland that has a hotel that’s blocked off. How many other towns and areas are like that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That’s the biggest town in Ireland that is blocked off

    Really?

    I just checked a few random dates in peak summer, plenty of accommodation available.

    Which isn't really surprising, Drogheda would hardly be a hot bed for tourists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Yes it’s the biggest town in Ireland. Yes one hotel is blocked off due to AS. That’s why I said I’d like to see figures by town

    And to say it’s not a tourist town is just pure ignorance



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Nice edit.

    A tourist town would grow it's accommodation offerings because it has a product that is sought after, accommodation providers have been pulling out of Drogheda for decades because of extremely low occupancy rates.

    It may attract some tourists but it ain't a hot bed, further evidenced by the availability of accommodation for peak summer.

    It's not just tourists it lacks either.

    Mod - warned for trolling

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    What are you talking about? I edited my post two minutes after I posted it because of a typo. Not because of anything you said



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Original which I replied to

    That’s the biggest town in Ireland that is blocked off

    Edit

    That’s the biggest town in Ireland that has a hotel that’s blocked off.

    It changes the context.

    No big deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,522 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Drogheda isn't somewhere people go on holidays for a week or 2 in summer. It's a place for tourists to newgrange to stay a night or 2. Last stop before airport. Golfers to stay a night or two to play the links courses.

    The d hotel made a million profit the year before changing to asylum seekers.it wasn't close to what was on off compared to refugees. Drogheda now gets 500 asylum seekers in the town instead of tourists - what a boon to the town!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,522 ✭✭✭enricoh


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123208814#Comment_12320881450% of hotel beds gone in Donegal in 2023 , cold comfort to tourism and hospitality businesses up there whether they are bord failte registered or not

    https://www.donegaldaily.com/2023/03/30/summer-concerns-as-50-of-donegal-tourism-beds-contracted-to-state/amp/

    There was an error displaying this embed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Go back and look at the timestamp of when I edited my typo. Literally 2 minutes after initially posting, 7.18 and 7.20

    Now go and look at when you posted, 7.31. Your ‘nice edit’ comment was unnecessary



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,197 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Show me the incentives, and I will show you the outcome.

    The government have deep pockets and can provide a stable and guaranteed income. If you've owners of a hotel who aren't local, or aren't even in the country, they won't give a jot about the impact on the town. As long as they get their cash, they can keep their investors and the banks happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Economic growth, however, needs to be based on more than just adding people to the economy. That just leads to pressure on housing and services. GDP might go up but quality of life goes down.

    Also surely it is good to have people in their fifties and sixties at work rather than being marginalised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,197 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    We haven't done Ukraine any favours. How many of these people have left for good? Ukraine is already in the midst of a demographic crisis. Ireland and many other EU countries have only exacerbated that.

    I can't help but feel it would have been better for all parties and more cost effective if we had helped provide for Ukrainians to remain in safe areas in Ukraine. We're spending €2.5bn a year on ~100k Ukrainians in Ireland. Probably could have helped 500k for the same money if they had stayed there or went back.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 43,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    My point was that cutting immigration means cutting growth and that affects everything. If people want to do it with that trade-off in mind, that's fine. However, there is nobody in politics being honest about this, especially the far right. Pensions, house prices, investments. Everything will be affected adversely. There's a reason the UK went to pot only 44 days after having Liz Truss in charge.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



Advertisement