Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1282283285287288433

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,458 ✭✭✭zv2


    This is not the first time I heard this theory

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭csirl


    I think people are over thinking this.

    Trump got elected on a platform of reducing government spending. The 10s of billions being spent on Ukraine is a very big item of expenditure..........on a country most Americans couldnt find on a map and probably never heard of until 3 years ago. Ukraine isnt on the radar of priorities for most Trump supporting working class Americans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Ukraine is currently in the position of having to fight on with whatever they have and can get. If they don't Russia will take what they want, kill and colonize most of Ukraine and be hungry for more. They have been offered nothing. No guarantees by US or Russia no reparations no territories returned no NATO or NATO boots in Ukraine no return of children stolen no control of their resources. Probably a worse 'deal' that Hitler offered Britain in 1940.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,077 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Since the US is going to withdraw it's troops from Europe, the Germans needs to say, well you won't be needing Ramstein airbase then, quit from there on your way out; The UK should say bye, we'll be having RAF Croughton back, thanks ("RAF Croughton is by far the most important military bases run by the United States of America in Europe.") and you can piss off out of RAF Menwith Hill, Mildenhall, Lakenheath and Fairford, while you're at it.
    Rinse and repeat across Europe.

    I'd give it no more than 15 minutes before that little threat gets reversed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Amazing how the actual life-long dictators in these autocratic hellholes always seem to score uptopia-like approval scores and votes on a scale unheard of in a western democracy, even in "landslide" victories.

    Remarkable as well that the one candidate that had a decent backing against Putin in the 2024 election was deemed ineligible, all the signatures he gathered wittled down via "irregularities" to just under the threshold needed to run.

    Just as remarkable, all exit polls from actual free and independent democracies in which Russian's could vote remotely, showed overwhelmingly support for candidates that were not Putin.

    “Boris is just an unhappy person my age who apparently decided, in his old age, to make some money on anything whatsoever. I feel bad for Boris. The fool didn’t realize that he’s not being set up to run for president but for a criminal case on charges of betraying the Motherland,” said Vladimir Solovyov, calling Nadezhdin the candidate of the “Ukrainian Nazis.”

    Let's not forget that little slice of paradise, Belarus, where Russia had to intervene to keep life-long dictator Lukashenko in power, who then managed to rally and achieve an astonishing 90% of the vote.

    But of course, Zelensky is the true dictator, with his low, low approval rate of 55-65% depending where you look. Higher than Donald Trumps own approval rating, which ranges from 45-55 despite only being back in power a few weeks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    Not being a dick and not cosying up to dictators is free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    OK? There's a gulf of difference between reducing aid to Ukraine or even walking away, and publicly decrying Ukraine as being led by a dictator who started the war, and heralding Putin as a reasonable guy who just wants peace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I think people are under thinking this

    Trump has given a signal to other countries that they need to massively increase domestic defence spending. They cannot rely on the US to protect them or even reliably supply them.

    Insane tariffs that go against all economic logic.

    It makes zero sense on any level and eventually will impoverish that same working class Americans duped by Trumps lies.

    Already the Dow is taking a nosedive. It wont be just working class hit. Everyone except the mega rich are going to get screwed over. Federal employeees sacked. Pensions wiped out.

    Yeah they under thought it for sure. Alas the impact will hit more than just the racists, the sexist, the not even enlightened selfish and fools that voted for Trump. It will hit in Ukraine, Ireland and beyond.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    He has already indicated a world conference with those parties Russia and China. That's it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,881 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Well whether you want to call the arrangement Trump is proposing a peace deal, the point is things could get vastly worse for Ukraine if Zelensky tells him where to stick it and Trump takes his call and storms off the pitch



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    But what's the alternative for Ukraine at this exact moment given Trumps idea of peace seems to be to reward Russia with everything it wanted by invading, including lifting sanctions, and publicly signalling as much before any negotiations even took place?

    This isn't a murky dispute over contested territory. This is Russia thinking it can roll into a neighbouring and completely soverign country and seize all its richest lands, commit ethnic cleansing, and WW2 style "purging" of those it deems potential enemies of the new state.

    Notwithstanding that Trumps idea of "peace" lets Russia achieve all that and allow it to busy itself rearming for another slice of the pie a few years down the line.

    Hardly a cosmic shock that Ukraine is saying we're not signing up to that. We saw how that worked out in 1938.

    Despite what is made out Russia cannot wage war forever, it has a terrible demograph problem, its economy is under immense strain, and ultimately the economy of Russia isn't even that big, relatively speaking, it simply cannot keep going indefinitely like this.

    Neither can Ukraine fight forever, obviously, but only one country is under complete and total existenial threat. Putin can withdraw at any time or even try and settle for a negotiated peace that falls far, far short of his stated goals without him having to publicly accept it as being a complete defeat.

    Putin's already said his minimum (in terms of land) is Ukraine handing over all four of the annexed regions, even though they don't fully control a single one and would take countless years at the current rate to control all, if they ever could, and that's even assuming they could maintain the level of military spending and losses indefinitely as the invading force.

    I don't think anyone has a problem with "real" negotiations. But sham negotiations preceeded by Trump denouncing Zelensky as a dictator and responsible for the war, describing Ukraine's situation as hopeless, Putin as a good and peace-loving guy, suggestions that sanctions could be lifted, aren't even worth talking about and Zelensky called it out for exactly what it is, as did most of Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,531 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Weird. Trump had meetings with Russia but he hasn't done anything either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Flex


    Completely agree, it would take a number of years to equip, grow, and train our defence forces, but we need to invest immediately in a larger professional defence force and reserve defence force. I was shocked to find that we spend only 0.2% of GDP on defence (around 0.33% of GNI which is more representative for us due to MNCs). Compare this to other states our size. Our full time army is 7500, with a reserve of just 1700. We will never have a navy of dozens of battleships, or an airforce of hundreds of fighters and so on, but we are so far away from even doing the absolute bare minimum now (ie. ~1% of GDP) that its alarming.

    If we refuse to do so we deserve to be treated as pariahs as we are expecting to leach off of other EU taxpayers. We should make TDs aware of this as their primary concern would be being slated on Joe Duffy if they were to do so. The EU needs to ramp up defence and integration and unification as things outside of our control are in motion that are distracting from us right now, but will very quickly take aim Europe.

    Croatia

    1.78%

    Lithuania

    2.72%

    Slovakia

    2.02%

    Finland

    2.42%

    Norway

    1.61%

    Denmark

    1.95%

    Bulgaria

    1.85%

    Serbia

    2.85%

    Georgia

    1.68%

    Albania

    1.74%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Whatever about stoping aid. The point now is will Trump allow paid for munitions going to Ukraine paid for by the EU?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    Is that an elaborate way of saying “Russians just haven’t tried genocide Ukrainians hard enough”


    Without article 5 guarantees all this “deal” does is ensure things get worse for Ukraine quite possibly without someone as capable as zelensky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Europe, NATO, Zelensky, Macron, now Starmer.

    It's amazing to watch Trump systematically blame everyone but Putin for the ongoing invasion.

    Even the Boards Trump supporters, who are used to frantically re-writing the script daily, are struggling with this one..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Boris Johnson has been memory holed as a scapegoat cos he makes the right noises about Trump.

    The about turns are completely discrediting. But the then when you peddle fake news, lies and disinformation without any anchor to the truth anything goes for vatniks.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Exactly he said it in his last term and they didn't take him seriously. Even Russia invading eastern Europe hadn't led to a big increase in spending for a lot of countries. He's not in the mood to ask again. Either cop the **** on or Russia will win is the ultimatum.

    If Putin can reduce the aid paid for by Americans and replace the difference with American weapons paid for by the EU he'll use that as a massive PR win for his party.

    I think that's why the Russians are wary of celebrating too early.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,881 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I'm starting to think total surrender to Putin and allowing him to annex whatever bits of Ukraine he fancies. With America effectively on Russia's side looks like we're heading that way anyway…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No its completely different to first term. Trump isnt even trying to sell the US as a reliable partner / supplier and get NATO countries to order from them. If you were Canada or Germany would you buy from the US under Trump? Nope.

    At this stage I think Trump has gone so far down the rabbit hole countries will look to increase their own capacity for producing munitions. Wouldnt even trust Trump to supply ordered and paid for weapons. Untrustworthy and unreliable. Countries going to do their own thing.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭poop emoji


    All stock market gains since Trump came in wiped out, we now at where Biden left it

    Incredible who knew **** about and uncertainty leads to negative investment performance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    There's a huge list of countries around the world wanting to buy American weapons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Who could possibly have foretold that taking a dump on Europe and Ukraine, launching scathing attacks and threats against your nearest neighbours, threatening to destroy century-old alliances and fluttering your eyelashes at one of world's most notorious dictators could lead to this.

    Few more weeks of this unhinged and illogical lunacy that offer no tangible benefits and endless downsides for the US and Trump will probably face a serious internal pushback. Republicans have backed their man thus far, but in a matter of days we're already seeing cracks.

    When someone like Mike Pence is publicly telling you that you're wrong, as well as a large amount of old-hand, die-hard republicans, you're on dangerous ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I mean hopefully but why the fcuk isn't it a military super power right now. We were living in fantasy land thinking there would never be another war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,900 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    We are also forgetting about Italy and the numerous bases they have there.

    I bet Naples would love nothing more but to tell the Americans to leave Italian waters.

    For all this talk about how much we need America, we seem to overlook how much America actually needs us.

    They can **** right off then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,804 ✭✭✭yagan


    Did mexico build a wall for Trump?

    Nope.

    Hes all blister.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Yes surrender to putin is the only sensible thing to do seeing as you can trust his terrorists to look after everyone.

    xes3d515tkke1.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Poland alone is already well on the way to being a regional military superpower and it's the one country that has taken huge strides since day one to bulk up defense and is now spending over 5% on military.

    Europe is disorganised, but even without the US a European NATO response at it stands would cripple Russia.

    European land armies are in complete decay and disarray to be sure, but their air power and force projection abilities alone are vastly and incomparably superior to Russia.

    I think what people seem to miss is that such a response to Russia would be so overwhelming in the first few days that attritional capabilities wouldn't really be a factor as they are with Ukraine.

    Hence why Putin has zero desire to engage with any NATO country, not pre 2022, not in 2025. It has to always be remembered that the plan was to roll into Ukraine and takeover in days at best, weeks at worst, they were not prepared at all for an attrional war either.

    What we've basically seen is a reverse Barbarossa, a complete reliance on Plan A with no actual plan B, hence 3 years later Russia is bogged down in a gruelling stalemate despite having, at least on paper, a military tenfold superior.

    Russia itself is completely disorganised and in complete disarray with poor logistics, hence the botched invasion. They can't seem to grasp effective combined arms and have basically had to rely on mass artillery, ground assaults and hit and run aerial strikes despite their enemy, on day one, being supremely vunerable to effective and decapitating first strikes which never materialised.

    Trump is horribly wrong about most things, but not wrong when he said Europe has to play a bigger role. Why he didn't chose to exert far more pressure on Europe as opposed to take the baffling strategic choice of winking at Putin is one for the history books.

    But nonetheless, any conflict with Russia would be primarily about overwhelming air power to create an untenable position rather than being reliant on ground forces, no European coalition would have the faintest interest in crossing borders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,881 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I'm talking about an evolving scenario where all options facing Zelensky are terrible. If he came to the conclusion that without American support Russia was overwhelmingly likely to overrun Ukraine in short order no matter what he and his armed forces did he might conclude that standing back and letting the Russians take what they want would be the least damaging approach for Ukraine's civilians. Perhaps some kind of international monitoring of this 'peaceful, orderly' Russian takeover could be negotiated.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,022 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And how many of these Countrys are in Europe? Lots of european countrys manufacture high quality weapon systems too.If Trump pulls the US plug on Europe, sure there will be upheavals, and maybe massive upheavals, but Europe will adapt and recover. And the pull out will affect the US negatively too. Its a double edged sword



Advertisement