Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1281282284286287434

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    Even people who aren’t Trump supporting in the U.S. media keep trying “Trumpsplain” it’s all maybe he’s trying to push Europe into spending more on the military. Maybe he’s trying to bounce Putin into a position by creating a sense of chaos.

    They never seem to conclude: maybe he’s an elderly windbag with all strategy of a late night caller to a talk radio station…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Great article here that I think captures everyone's intense frustration with recent days very well.

    Trump seems to want to simply negotiate a surrender on Ukraine's behalf and treat/reward Putin like a powerful equal that deserves his respect.

    Why? Really, no-one seems to have the faintest clue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,003 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    It's striking how its been open season on Zelensky amongst the supporters of Trump in the US over the last day or two. Trump himself doubled down on describing Zelensky as a dictator, and the missing billions. Musk reminded X about the American, Gonzalo Lira, who died in Ukrainian custody, and accused Zelensky of having Lira killed. Trump Jnr posted a mocking fake video of Zelensky dancing with the comment that "Zelenkyy [sic] should really just go win the war without our endless $$$. Let's see how that works out". So on and so forth.

    There really seems to be an effort to salt the earth as regards Zelensky. Presumably so its easier to walk away from Ukraine.

    Despite the adoring media coverage Zelensky has never been a good diplomat or politician. He is a comedian, who has no political experience prior to 2019. He and his staff are known for being arrogant, abrasive and entitled with a panache for irritating and angering people they really shouldn't. The Polish PM in 2023 told Zelensky to never insult the Poles again after sneering remarks he made at the UN. Scholz was regularly insulted despite sending aid to Ukraine. One of Zelensky's team incredibly foolishly insulted a Chinese diplomat by mocking his name. Even Biden found Zelensky unlikeable and had rows with Zelensky where he accused him of being ungrateful for US aid. There was rumours about the Biden wanting elections to replace Zelensky in late 2023/early 2024, but in Biden in the end endured Zelensky.

    Zelensky must have thought he could carry on in his normal way with Trump. Trying to fact check Trump is a massive error of judgement for someone utterly dependent on US goodwill. Trump has no particular need to indulge Zelensky and every interest in discarding him and Ukraine. It's crazy to think the whole row blew up over the media trying to misrepresent what Trump actually said. I just wonder if Trump deliberately set a trap for Zelensky, or if it was a simple mistake by Zelensky to think he could scold Trump and win somehow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    There have long been stories that he was seen as an optimal asset by the KGB



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    “If Zelensky was actually loved by the people of Ukraine, he would hold an election. He knows he would lose in a landslide, despite having seized control of ALL Ukrainian media, so he canceled the election,”

    -that insecure twat who makes electric cars



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 985 ✭✭✭Glenomra


    Please listen to the interview before concluding it was a softening of his attitude. Imo he spoke of President Zelensky with derision. Things became worse not better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    "Trump seems to want to simply negotiate a surrender on Ukraine's behalf and treat/reward Putin like a powerful equal that deserves his respect. Why? Really, no-one seems to have the faintest clue."

    Could this be a WHY? An alt view that doesnt seem too off in these strange days:

    Philip is a Prof in University of St Andrews and not given to conspiracy theories, none that I have seen in the past anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,332 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I can't see that they (the Republican members of Congress) will do anything significant. I think they are jellyfish to a man. If they weren't, they would have stood up to the appointments of people who are unfit, poorly qualified, and in some cases of dubious loyalty to the US (!) to key roles in the Trump cabinet. They would have opposed the power that Musk seems to have been granted by Trump.

    The ones around Trump now in that cabinet (e.g. Marco Rubio) seem to me to be slimy sycophants. That is why he has appointed them I expect. Whatever Trump (or Musk) want, no matter how mad, they will rush headlong to try and do I think. They sound like beaten dogs - every second word that comes out of their mouths must be some strident praise for Trump, lest he turn his ire on them.

    It's kind of (edit: - er, very!) pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,003 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    If its not a conspiracy theory its an on/off interpretation of events with no nuance. Either the US is fully committed to Ukraine defeating Russia OR the US is working with Russia to defeat Ukraine. Only those two options exist.

    There is many alternatives - most of which are explainable by there being no US critical interests at risk in Ukraine, and no justification for the vast expenditure of resources it would require to defeat Russia. The US simply has higher priorities and can walk away from Ukraine. No support for Russia required. For all the crying and wailing about the US-Russia meeting earlier this week, all it amounted to was an an agreement to restore embassy functions, normalise communications on a number of topics and to meet again. Ukraine was barely even mentioned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,198 ✭✭✭Addmagnet


    I take it your Kremlin paymasters have furnished you with new talking points, all aiming to besmirch and smear President Zelenskyy. It must drive them batsh i t crazy to have such a formidable opponent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,134 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    I honestly think Trump wants to take Ukraine and maybe more of Europe.


    He wants the EU out of the picture in his new world order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    Assuming that Russia has the same resources as before. This is not a certainty at all. As I said before, 2025 is the year when Russian war machine runs out of almost everything. Of course, Trump's behaviour encourages Putin a lot, but the Russian army may not be able to attack in 6 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,810 ✭✭✭threeball


    Hardly a new take. If he read boards 4 weeks ago he'd have heard that at least 3 times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Waltz, the national security advisor said in a presser that the US wanted to invest in Ukraine to help "grow the pie". Like, they're not even trying to hide the planned carve up of the country. It's mad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Zelensky is genuinely popular because he's a good leader under very difficult circumstances. Naturally MAGA and it's sycophants are attacking him because he's everything they aren't.

    He stands up to Putin, they are Putin apologists.

    He stands up to Trump's BS, they all bend the knee to Trump.

    He's spilling blood for a democracy, they are busy supporting a dictatorship

    We're only a month in and we have these increasingly awkward damage control attempts from supporters, because deep down they know they are being exposed on a world stage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,882 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    can Zelenskyy afford to gamble on that though? If he tells trump to stuff his peace deal, can he be sure he’s not opening the gates of hell, unleashing a continental- scale rape of nanking on his country?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Although a lot of Americans couldn't even point out Ukraine on a map...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    "I asked from Poland something no other German statesman could have dared. I asked for the return of the old German provinces, then only with a plebiscite. If Churchill and the warmongers felt half the responsibility toward Europe that I did they never would have started the war.

    "On Sept. 2, 1939, war still could have been avoided. The British and the French wanted war, however-they wanted a three-year war in order reap profits from their war investments."

    After alleging that the Germans had obtained possession of documents proving the "machinations of the warmongers" aimed at the spread of war, to Finland, Scandinavia, the Balkans and the bombardment of Baku and Batum, Hitler said that "after 18 days the Polish campaign ended. Then I issued an appeal to responsible men.

    "I warned all against war, particularly the French against the pursuance of a war which would be horrible. This only served to incite the Franco-British warmongers, who saw their war profits most endangered. They began, however, to call it danger to civilization and culture."

    Hitler said that only the armistice in the Russo-Finnish war prevented Allied intervention in Finland.

    "Nevertheless, they determined to occupy Narvik and if necessary defeat any Norwegian-Swedish resistance," he said.

    "When we learned this we were determined to anticipate them."

    Sounds familiar? Trump has alraedy stated that discussions on a new world order would include The US, Russia and China he didn't see anyone else being involved. A massive change in mindset and a challenge to the EU and others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,616 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    The sooner someone with good aim is successful, the better for all of us.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Seems like the nervous breakdown of European politicians continues as German foreign minister Baerbock threatens to pressure the US. If you take away those two Kremlin spies in Hungary and Slovakia it is probably the worst bunch of European politicians in history.

    Sounds like Macron and Starmer will be getting an earful this week also due to the lack of diplomacy when it has been badly needed

    Speaking on a Fox News podcast, Trump was asked about his upcoming meetings with Starmer and Macron and interrupted the host saying, "They didn't do anything...no meetings with Russia!"

    "They haven't done anything," Trumps adds.

    "Macron's a friend of mine", he continued, adding that Starmer was "a very nice guy" but that neither of them have done anything on Russia.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    I don't believe that a peace deal is on the table at all. I think Trump had realised that the war cannot be easily stopped and now he is just trolling Zelenskyy to force him to reject Trump's ridiculous demands, so that Trump can say that Ukraine doesn't want peace and he can walk away from his stupid promise of finishing the war in 24 hours. See, the deal Trump offered is basically a reparations plan for a defeated country, without any commitment on the part of the USA. It is not a peace plan at all, it is basically a threat — give us 50% of your minerals for free for all eternity or else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,012 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    As we all predicted

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,134 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Trump said today Zelensky isn’t important enough to be involved in the negotiations.


    What a piece of **** he really is. I hope his time is only around the corner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Apiarist


    What is extremely disappointing is the slavish subservience of the Republican party to Trump, even in matters that harm USA's interests. Land of the free, my ***.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,775 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Trumps childish obsession with, and maybe more so his definition of, "doing something" is something to behold.

    His first action in "doing something" is telling the whole world Putin is a great man who wants peace, present him as reasonable, should basically be rewarded for his illegal invasion, spouting completely false Kremlin propaganda points like Zelensky started it, is a dictator hated by his own people, Ukraine has zero hope, all while treating Putin like his equal deserving respect and admiration and Russia like the second coming of the Roman Empire.

    I don't know how Trump imagines this version of "doing something" translates, but the world starts to wonder if Putin has 4K footage of Moscow hookers taking dumps in his mouth.

    Even his own party outside the cabaal of yes-men and women in cabinet are stunned. An incredible achievement in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    indeed ha ha. Looks like got paid extra for those long unreadable waffles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,003 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Why would Zelensky be invited to US-Russia negotiations about their bilateral relations? It makes no sense for Zelensky to sit in on talks about embassies and reopening dialogue on topics like arms control and the middle east.

    If Zelensky wants to be involved in negotiations then he can repeal the Ukrainian law against negotiations, appoint a credible negotiator and send them to Russia. That is completely within his own remit to do. Putin has repeatedly said Russia is open to negotiating with Ukraine and has never rejected negotiations.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/2/19/putin-rates-us-talks-highly-says-russia-ready-to-negotiate-over-ukraine

    “We are not imposing anything on anyone. We are ready, I have already said this a hundred times – if they want, please, let these negotiations take place. And we will be ready to return to the table for negotiations,” he said.

    Mod Edit: Warned for trolling

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭Polar101


    I think he's just upset that his trolling gets ignored, even though he pretends to be a statesman.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,077 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I give you the most popular dictator of our time:



Advertisement