Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Renewables on the Irish grid

  • 20-02-2025 02:08PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,764 ✭✭✭✭


    Post the Eirgrid chart here, see how low or high we can get. Currently:

    image.png

    Not bad, but should have been 100% on a windy and sunny day like today.

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 8,332 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jonathan


    The grid SNSP limit is 75%. We need more synchronous condensers to increase that towards 100%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,567 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    We need more things to spin!!! 😂

    On a more relevant topic, I was watching a video about data centers recently and they have these almost frictionless flywheel UPS systems

    It's effectively a drum held up by magnets and then spun up by an electric coil. When the power goes it switches from motor to generator and gives out power

    The amount of time you can get power is only a few minutes, but you can pull several hundred kilowatts out some something the size of 3 server cabinets. They're great for sudden changes while you're waiting for a generator to cycle up and don't have enough batteries to cover the instant load

    A bunch of those attached to the HV substations would probably go a long way to stabilising the grid

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,764 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Relatively cheap solutions like Tesla's megapacks (about €1 million each for 4MWh) have built in software that can handle grid stabilisation too

    It is absurd that there are new gas peaker plants in planning and development in 2025. And even more absurd that there are calls for data centres to have their own fossil fuel on site power generation as part of future planning permission approval

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    https://youtube.com/shorts/SUK4Og2ty1M?si=rdvhH96pQlQje1w9

    "I like things that spin" ....

    I think there's a few flywheels going in at powerplants for this reason



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,872 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Have you costed the batteries for running the grid for 11 days? I'd imagine that would be why they are going for gas.

    No wind .jpg No Wind 8-1-25 record.jpg No wind 13-1-24.jpg No wind 13-12-24.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    unkel mentioned peaker plants. There was no mention of using batteries to power the grid 24hrs a day. Just the the few hours of peak demand.

    You wouldn't run the grid for 11 days on peaker plants either because they're so inefficient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    I had spotted this and wondering where might be an appropriate place to ask. Is there an issue with the data feeds or do they have more synchronous condensers running?

    It's just under 16% thermal at the moment which is the lowest I've seen. I have seen 100% renewables at times over night when we're been exporting an amount equal to the stabilisation generation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,872 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ok, but the maths is likely near identical in that calculations were done that indicated renewables couldn't recharge batteries sufficiently between lulls and/or that the cost of batteries was prohibitive.

    Efficient or not, a peaker plant can keep the lights on, long after batteries have gone flat. Cost is seemingly of no concern when it comes to measures required to make renewables seem viable - ER called for €100 B of expenditure on OSW, for example. Running peaker plants inefficiently is as nothing compared to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,567 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    There's going to be a need for thermal generation for the foreseeable future, but if we can get from 6 hours a day to 6 hours every 3 days, then to 6 hours a week that'll be a major difference

    If they could co-locate the generators with some renewable thermal power like waste burning then that would be better again because it allows for more heat recycling

    Even better would be if they could get gas demand down enough to enable us stockpiling biogas instead of relying on fossil fuels

    It's good to have the backup power available, there'll be cluster **** periods where it'll be snowing and no wind and the UK isn't exporting

    I look at it as a game of averages, fill in as much of the demand with renewables over the year as possible

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    Who said anything about charging the batteries from renewables. The batteries are for grid stabilisation and peak power demand so you charge them when your CCGTs have spare capacity. If there's excess renewables available that's a bonus.

    CCGTs can keep the lights on as well but significantly more efficiently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭ECO_Mental


    https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/stories/irelands-great-grid-stabilizer.html

    They have one if these in Moneypoint...one of the biggest in Europe 4000 Mega Watt Seconds...that's a new unit for me😀

    6.1kWp south facing, South of Cork City



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    So.. joules? 4Gj ?

    A joule is power (W) x time (s) (yes a kWh is also joules...)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,567 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    And the energ ratings are close.. kWh/annum or kWh/1000h... I digress..

    Works out to be 1111kWh or 1.1MWh

    Anyway more things that spin. Sure the battery banks can help stabilise the grid. But they aren't instant.

    The flywheels are instant as they are physically tied to the grid, like a thermal plant or hydro.

    Any change in the grid the flywheel will instantly respond, giving time for the battery storage time to react.

    If something happens the grid, every synchronous generator experiences it at the same time, throughout the grid.



Advertisement
Advertisement