Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Rugby Discussion 3

1156158160161162

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    No from a throw in. Even fans don't understand this stuff.😋



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,970 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,545 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Hmmm. You can't be offside from a throw in anywhere on the pitch, not just the 6 yard box.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,970 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Is this the point where someone posts "stop digging"? 😜😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Well Japan feels novel at least.

    I'm sure other matches will be good on the day but I'm sick to death of the fake sense of importance drummed up for these now constant "test games".



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,610 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    To move off the soccer discussion, the NFL is equally an incredibly complicated sport and one that is actively growing into international markets. And they don't try to dumb the sport down in order to do it. If you watch a broadcast of it they are never really trying to "explain" the sport, but just getting into what they find to be fascinating details.

    I love rugby - I will watch almost any match of it that happens to be on at that time. I do not care for those in charge who start talking about how we need to change it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Exactly! Arcane, complicated, contradictory rules that accrue to make the game more compteitive/enjoyable to watch but in isolation are non sensical. Boils down to Podge's point above, other sports don't prostrate themselves and apologise for the rules, and don't tweak the rules to appeal to people who don't watch the sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The other problem with all this change is it's clearly failing in a massive way. Wales, England and Australia are all on the brink and it feels like something really apocalyptic is on the way if spending isn't brought back to a level befitting a small sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Thats ultimately why all the changes are neccessary. As CatInABox outlined, if revenue isn't growing (which is the aim of changing the laws of the game to attract more fans) then the only other option is to reduce costs. And that will also involve significant changes to the game.

    But either way changes are going to have to happen, because the game is struggling hugely financially in too many of its already very limited number of countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The game financially is struggling because it is overstretching itself out of those few countries. Players/staff chasing football size contracts should be told to go off and play football even if that means the game loses some top talent.

    I just see no evidence across any sport that dumbing down, adding "razzmatazz" or jetting off to places who don't give a sht actually work.

    It's only a small example but who the fuk actually asked for flamethrowers and lazer light shows at Thomond Park or stupid songs after every try ant Lansdowne. Did it actually add any fans ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I find the razzle dazzle to be a pain in the arse but seen in the context of improving the game day experience, particularly for families, kids and girls, it's a good thing. Some of it works and some of it faceplants but overall the more attractive the experience the more appealing it is and the more value is there for punters. It's a very entertaining sport and it needs to appeal beyond young lads and aul lads whose playing days are over. The risk of commercialisation is more acute when venture capital enters the picture honestly, that feels like borrowing money for current account spending that will ultimately be funded by mergers, acquisitions, paywalls and asset stripping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Again you are working off the theory that these things actually work to grow a sport. I see no evidence to suggest that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    You could say the same about seating and covered stands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Covered stand keeps you dry. Having a mix of seating and standing to suit everyone is a good option. All seater though is detrimental to sport. Probably not essential though for the growth of the sport as there doesn't seem to be a correlation between a good stadium and a well supported team.

    Not the same as some daft flamethrower though which adds nothing. Fans got excited and loud as the team came out long before they had to be announced via flamethrower so I don't see the evidence that they add to the atmosphere. It's just corporate wnk thought up by a guy who has never seen a ball in his life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The flamethrowers etc, the "razzle dazzle", is generally some of the most posted social media from games on instagram and tiktok. Which would suggest its a huge hit with younger generations.

    The salaries, while clearly unsustainably high for the income coming in, for most players also aren't even that high as far as salaries go - these are nowhere near football levels. And bear in mind these are average figures, so inflated by the elite / high earners. Most players aren't on a huge amount more than players would expect to be earning as successful solicitors, accountants, IT/finance professionals etc.

    Which is why revenues need to rise - professional rugby is a very demanding, physically destructive, and short duration career. Its not possible to pay someone 50k a year and expect them to do it.

    Screenshot 2025-02-20 at 12-39-19 Average pay of each position in the English Premiership for 2022_23 r_rugbyunion.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Most sports aren't up there with soccer (or American sports). What other sports make is immaterial and the only thing that counts is what rugby can pay while remaining sustainable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Full backs being paid more than scrum halves ???

    Strange value proposition.

    Imo the thing that makes rugby union amenable to expansion is the same thing it's often criticised for ; 'Rugby values'

    If Rugby is identified as a sport that instills & maintains values that people favour then the game will spread. I don't believe it will ever reach the levels of popularity that basketball, soccer or fishing have & no amount of showbiz will change that. However I understand that all leisure time activities are essentially in competition with each other & anything that initially attracts audience & builds participation shouldn't be ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,996 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    It’s funny you mention accountants, a friend of mine who I played with was offered a 2 year deal with Connaught a few years ago and turned it down because he was making more as an accountant and had a stable career path. He doesn’t regret not taking it and is still an accountant!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,913 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Thats just what an accountant would say.

    People can start careers at 30 and above. Not many get the opportunity to attempt to be a professional rugby player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You're the one who brought up football salaries in the post I quoted…

    That aside, what other sports make is very material because players will choose to play them instead, thats what is happening at scale in Australia.

    Or at the Prem salary points above, the players will chose other non-sporting careers with similar (or better) salaries.

    We absolutely need stricter salary caps to help club finances not over paying for the elite players mind you, ideally world-wide ones (adjusted for Cost of Living). But the idea that in general rugby players are on astronomical wages just isn't the reality. They're mostly on very reasonable, not excessive at all, salaries.

    Which is why revenue needs to increase more-so than costs being cut.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's the mix of specialized positions and statistical averaging. Any pro team will have a minimum of four scrum halves on their books so there are many more journeymen and young pros filling up squads than there are internationals and high value players. You're not starting a pro game without two fit scrum halves. Lots of clubs invest in one or two good fullbacks who can generally play wing, then supplement the position from elsewhere in the backline.

    Exactly the same effect can be seen at hooker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,738 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    If players choose to move to other sports for the money they need to be let go.

    Those big rugby salaries will be worth fek all when Australia, Wales and England are all bankrupt which it looks like we are not far away from.

    I never ever said they were on huge salaries. I said the salaries are too big for what rugby can afford.

    Changing the rules to make the game supposedly more watchable won't actually grow revenue. It never does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,690 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    La Rochelle lost last weekend to Racing 92. It was the lattere first victory in almost 3 months. That's now five defeats in a row for La Rochelle. and their last victory was a three point squeaker against a Toulouse B team.

    Post-match ROG was talking about his squad not playing for him and players not listening to his messages. I doubt we'll see a sacking or anything like that. He's done too much good there for that. Could potentially see him leaving on the summer if things don't turn around though.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,610 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'd say he is angling for the Australia job pretty hard just to get out of there. It would seem his time has run its course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Cheika to wales growing legs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,732 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Would they not give it to Sheratt? Though maybe it's a step too far to give it to an Englishman.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,732 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Might swing it for him. Still, he would be the first Englishman to get the job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I'm not a huge fan of the 20 minute red card but there's a strong argument that it saved our arses on Saturday.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,876 ✭✭✭✭phog


    💯 As someone who saw some merit it when the trial was announced way back I was happy enough it benefited from it.



Advertisement