Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1267268270272273433

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭cunnifferous


    Have to disagree with this. We saw how Trump lite DeSantis got on. The loonies don't seem to follow the same when someone else is saying the same toxic drivel. Trump seems to have some weird charisma for these folk that keeps them coming back to the trough for more and more slurry. Thankfully their dear leader is 78 but unfortunately there is plenty more damage he can do before his demise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    But he didn't he then go on to call for elections in Ukraine, basically implying Zelensky does not have the backing of the people? Another claim Putin always makes.

    I don't there's a remotely positive way to spin any of his remarks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    That's an absolute worst case scenario and I don't think Russia could take all of Ukraine unless it is literally given weapons and intelligence by the US. Is that possible? Under Trump yes. But unlikely.

    Most extreme predictions have all been wrong so far. Most obviously 3 day war. But also the constant wishful thinking here over the last two years forever saying Russia was on its last legs and pre 2014 borders would be restored soon.

    Most likely will be a very uneasy pause in fighting along current lines while waiting for either for Putin or Trump to die or Zelensky to be assassinated and then see what changes.

    Either way it's a catastrophe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,062 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Just saw this on BBC

    Ukraine war latest: Russia won't accept Nato troops in Ukraine as part of any peace deal, says Lavrov

    Source: BBC

    https://search.app/EGNj

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭aidanodr




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,729 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    You really have to wonder if Putin has something serious on Trump.

    ''In The Art of the Deal, Trump writes: “In January 1987, I got a letter from Yuri Dubinin, the Soviet ambassador to the United States, that began: ‘It is a pleasure for me to relay some good news from Moscow.’ It went on to say that the leading Soviet state agency for international tourism, Goscomintourist, had expressed interest in pursuing a joint venture to construct and manage a hotel in Moscow.”

    There were many ambitious real estate developers in the United States—why had Moscow picked Trump?

    According to Viktor Suvorov—a former GRU military spy—and others, the KGB ran Intourist, the agency to which Trump referred. It functioned as a subsidiary KGB branch. Initiated in 1929 by Stalin, Intourist was the Soviet Union’s official state travel agency. Its job was to vet and monitor all foreigners coming into the Soviet Union. “In my time it was KGB,” Suvorov said. “They gave permission for people to visit.” The KGB’s first and second directorates routinely received lists of prospective visitors to the country based on their visa applications.

    As a GRU operative, Suvorov was personally involved in recruitment, albeit for a rival service to the KGB. Soviet spy agencies were always interested in cultivating “young ambitious people,” he said—an upwardly mobile businessman, a scientist, a “guy with a future.”

    Once in Moscow, they would receive lavish hospitality. “Everything is free. There are good parties with nice girls. It could be a sauna and girls and who knows what else.” The hotel rooms or villa were under “24-hour control,” with “security cameras and so on,” Suvorov said. “The interest is only one. To collect some information and keep that information about him for the future.”

    These dirty-tricks operations were all about the long term, Suvorov said. The KGB would expend effort on visiting students from the developing world, not least Africa. After 10 or 20 years, some of them would be “nobody.” But others would have risen to positions of influence in their own countries.

    Suvorov explained: “It’s at this point you say: ‘Knock, knock! Do you remember the marvelous time in Moscow? It was a wonderful evening. You were so drunk. You don’t remember? We just show you something for your good memory.’”''



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,062 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    the above headline struck me as odd ..

    So the US wants to impose a Russia friendly peace deal on Ukraine - while also not supplying more weapons or financial support to Ukraine -

    So the US has no direct leverage on Ukraine -

    The main leverage the US would still have would be energy sanctions on Ukraine -but since Bidens departure Ukraine is kinetically sanctioning russian oil effectively, all by themselves ..

    Basically - Russia can put any conditions they like on their peace deal - if Ukraine doesn't agree to the deal then Russia can't extract themselves from the war - which is what Russia really needs -A 6 months to a year break , to consolidate,retrain ,re-arm and start all over again - under the protection of their good friends in MAGA..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Absolute nonsense.

    NATO without the US would still beat the living sht out of Russia.

    Russia can't even take over Ukraine so how are they going to get at the NATO countries.

    Your fantasy isn't going to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,062 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Balls in Europe's court really .

    Dig deep and back Ukraine, ignoring Russia's protestations , and Probably US grand standing..

    And ignore Russian red lines as meaningless .

    And if Europe is going to dig deep , does Ireland row in with funds ? Or do we sit back and expect everyone else to fund this ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    Hope you are correct, I truly do. My gut is just telling me there are bigger things happening here that we dont know about. The US cosying up to Russia etc just makes no sense, even for Maga. And this meet tween US and Russia in Saudi.

    Re your NATO comment - It is definitely weaker w/o USA but so also, individually are much of the militaries in EUROPE, Ireland being the weakest/non existent. Add hybrid war and "terrorist" activity across Europe from Russia + interference in elections like in Romania and one could argue UK with Brexit



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Well that's Ukraine more fucked

    Screenshot_20250219_165844_Samsung Internet.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    We have sent loads and are putting together another 50m package right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Remind you of those pictures of your wife as a warning?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,555 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    THAT stupid. Probably not. It's far more likely he's doing as he's told because he's being coerced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,740 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Yes they would win now if they act together not if they don't. Remember they could have stopped Hitler in 1938 but they felt their militaries wern't ready so played for time with Munich.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    what a cnut



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Trump is now a full on mouthpiece of Russian propaganda, he has setup the US without agency, to do whatever Russia wants.

    Demonstrates the absolute nonsense of the claim that Putin wouldn't have invaded had Trump been in the White House.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "Make America Great Again"

    By bending over and letting Russia use you to pleasure itself.

    And it's just insane that it's the Republicans after all their years of "reds" fear mongering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    Trump just feels emasculated by people who have an actual backbone.

    We know trump is spoofing, because if he actually thought zelensky was a dictator, he would have rolled over for him already



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,729 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Trump and Musk clearly now are Putin Puppets

    Both have something held over them, and if they don't dance to Putin they'll be exposed



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,555 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I'll challenge you on this: name his replacement?

    MAGA might rally around Musk but he's the definition of unelectable and constitutionally barred from the presidency even IF whatever remains of the "traditional" Republican party didn't go for the jugular if he tried (which I have no doubt they would do after the disaster that Trump has been for them).

    Vance is a busted flush. He made a show of himself at the Munich conference, got next to no support on the campaign trail and, quite simply, doesn't have the charisma to unite the MAGA crowd (half of whom probably think he's a "race traitor"). He might get to see out the term but he'd be destroyed as a presidential candidate and wouldn't have anywhere near the clout of Trump to kick off the second American Civil War if he tried to cling on to power without one.

    Marjorie Taylor Greene couldn't organise an orgy in a brothel… Don Junior falls and DeSantis fall at the same hurdle as Vance: they're simply not likeable/charsimatic enough to front a US wide movement.

    So, who's left? Who would MAGA unite behind in the absence of "The Donald"?

    Post edited by Sleepy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,804 ✭✭✭yagan


    At this rate no one will bother taking a call from the US as it will either be lies or insults, but probably both.

    The US century ended with Trump's reelection. His first term was written off internationally as a blip, a result of the disruptions of the social media age, but now the US's slow wheel to the dementia ward is confirmed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,819 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    it’s like the plot of a 90’s Cold War thriller where the US President is a Russian agent….. but to me it looks increasingly like the most likely explanation of reality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    There is very little he could have on them that would matter now. Why is everyone so mad to give them an excuse.

    I think they are both just horrible people who actually agree with and like Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    Trump really is a cancer, the Americans deserve him for voting him in but the rest of the world shouldn't have to suffer this disease, Id love to see the EU step up nowbut whether they will or not I don't no, the cost of doing nothing now will be disasterous down the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    no matter what he had on them, his supporters either wouldnt believe it or wouldnt care.

    A video of him murdering a rent boy……. fake news, altered video



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭ronjo


    any chance they appropriate funds to send to Russia to help them finish the job?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,555 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    His supporters would probably justify that as "doing God's work"…🤮



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,487 ✭✭✭circadian


    Exactly, they'd be cannon fodder for the likes of Poland and Finland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    The presidential line of succession is clearly defined in the US constitution. In the event that the president dies in office (which is what we were talking about) the vice-president assumes the office. It's not as if the role just comes up for grabs.

    It's a ridiculous question frankly.



Advertisement