Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

1134713481350135213531425

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Here is where your mask has slipped imo.

    That you can find justification in a Hamas act, like justifying if they had held onto the hostages, is surely totally hypocritical, given the way they got those hostages? And surely gives anyone on the israeli side the right to see some sort of justification for their stance after the October attack.

    Go way outa that with your holier than thou rhetoric after that for me anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont see justification for killing 40k people, levelling Gaza and then supporting the expulsion of its people even the face of such a heinous act of taking hostages and the attack on october 7th. Also Israel committing war crimes is not justified by Hamas committing war crimes first. There is justification for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Similarly, I won't be expressing gratitude to Israel either when this is all over.

    The only congratulating I see going on is those "expressing gratitude to Hamas". When I see that written down coldly like that, it is horrific.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That is why resistance groups are guilty of so many war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I have answered a number of your questions, you keep reframing the question.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Really? It appears like you avoid 95% of questions. You have zero balance. Even on the last few posts, anything to respond with regards to detainees (pre war), collective punishment war crimes or Israeli violations of the ceasefire (e.g blocking aid/tents)? How about you start with those...

    The other lad won't defend his claim that the people of Gaza are well fed.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Well done the restaurant staff- as if there isn’t enough trouble going down without trying to stoke the fire just to sell newspapers- gutter press-


    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/feb/14/news-corp-team-confronted-after-alleged-attempt-to-provoke-staff-at-sydney-middle-eastern-restaurant-ntwnfb



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Suckler


     "expressing gratitude to Hamas". When I see that written down coldly like that, it is horrific.

    Again with the misrepresentation and wilful wish to simply paint posters as "supporters of Hamas".

    The poster unequivocally did not express gratitude 'to' Hamas (as you rewrote it). They clearly expressed that they were grateful that the disingenuous actions of Israel, in this instance, did not result in a deterioration of the cease fire. It's in no way a statement of support of either party.

    All you have left is to insinuate others are 'supporters of Hamas' / 'The mask has slipped' by misrepresenting what has been said.

    "When I see that written down coldly, that is horrific"…..Indeed. You have to make things up to simplistically put yourself on some imaginary moral high ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Incorrect. A reply talking about something that I haven't asked isn't an answer, and any reframing of the question was requested by you

    First you replied with legal something something on a question I didn't ask, which was v odd but perhaps it was meant for another poster and you made a mistake? Fair enough if so, accidents happen and I understand you have a lot of people asking you questions.

    When I pointed this out, you told me you couldn't answer my actual question because of how it was worded, so I went to the bother of updating accordingly, and accommodating your request.

    Seems like I was more the fool because normally when somebody accommodates you, manners would dictate you then accommodate them in return and address the point, which is quite straightforward.

    what specific actions that Israel have carried out do you condemn, with regard to their treatment of Palestinian civilians during this war??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    And there you have it - that's not what I said.

    If all you have is the tactic of twisting words to suit your own narrative, crack on. Everybody can see right through it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    That old chestnut. Again.

    If this is your only tactic left, you're grasping at straws.

    Feel free to post a cogent argument in favour of your position if you like. But it seems to me you simply have none - otherwise you would have done it already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I must be v nieve but I genuinely didn't think journalists would be allowed to manufacture events like that - surely they have some sort of ethical standards body who would come down hard on this sort of thing.

    What's the reason for it - to make Muslims look bad? and what reason they had to do it in Australia? I never fail to be surprised by the stuff that gets posted on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Like when one enters a hospital dressed as doctors and nurses to kill patients in their beds?

    Did you condemn the Israelis for that war crime?


    Of course not.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    I'm no fan of Israel, I'm no fan of Hamas, nothing justified in either of their actions. Anyone that finds justification in either of their actionsor any part of it and then goes on to criticise everything on one side while they can see justification in something on the other side, has picked a side.

    I think what Hamas has done is reprehensible, I think the israeli response is reprehensible. Nothing can justify either sides actions on or since the October attack.

    But you can, so go you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    You don't even have to look at potential war crimes against Palestinians. They actually committed one on day 1 (in response to Hamas' war crime on that day I'll absolutely add) AGAINST THEIR OWN CITIZENS…. but what with them being a state actor, this amounts to legal justification and is difficult to prove…. even with an admission….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    They obviously wrote their story and had the narrative before hitting the city streets in Australia - then it was down to getting the footage and photos to fit that narrative - the owners or staff not sure which , of the restaurant in question are apparently known for supporting Palestine on social media - I don’t know what they’ve written, how militant they are, what they’ve said about Israel - and frankly I don’t want to know either.
    If the newspaper took issue with anything they said - they should have just asked for a meeting. It’s tabloid at its worst - manufacture a situation and your story will be written for you.

    There’s enough of this false narrative being pedalled on social media - when established media such as newspapers start this crap- it’s not good to see this happening -



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,916 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    A dishonest poster on here which is why I only see their posts when someone quotes them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The blinkered, dogmatically pro Zionist posters won’t condemn these Israeli war crimes. Israel killing its own citizens is fair game but anyone else killing them is a modern holocaust.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I've never justified what Hamas has done. Since day 1. The Israeli Govt. has acted exactly the same as them. So, we're on the same page there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That is a false equivalence, certainly from a legal perspective, in that it denies Israel the right to self-defence as set down in international law.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I can't speak for the poster you are arguing with, but one can understand why Hamas said they would refuse to release the hostages, whilst being completely against them taking and keeping hostages in the first place.

    I don't understand why Hamas broke into Israel and killed innocent people on Oct 7th, or what their goal was in taking hostages. I'm not well read on it, and tbh it's so evil that I don't care to find out why.

    But now that they have the hostages in their possession, I understand why they'd keep them if their release was dependant on Israel holding up their side of the ceasefire agreement, which Hamas said they didn't. That doesn't mean support of Hamas holding hostages.

    Most "anti Israel" posters on this thread, that I can see, are arguing out of defence of all innocent civilians, Palestinian + Israeli. But when the Israeli military and gov has inflicted 95% of the civilian casualties in this conflict, and are using a fully fledged military might on civilians (whose only 'defenders' are a terrorist militia who don't seem to care about them either) they are going to get most of the criticism and it is, imo, completely justified.

    I don't understand the other posters here who parrot October 7th as justification for all this mass civilian bloodshed, as though the people killed that day outweigh all that have been killed since, and going about an agenda of dehumanising Palestinians, using whataboutery, or portraying people who defend civilians as anti semetic or supporters of terrorism.

    Many are at it, and rightly or wrongly I suspect some of them don't care too much about Israeli civilians either, and are just happy to see a narrative where westerners are blowing up and dominating Muslims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Thanks and yes - I understand biased reporting of a situation that naturally occurs, every person in the world is biased one way or another so that's to be expected.

    Manufacturing an event is a totally different animal. Probably seems obvious to many that this happens, so not sure why it surprises me!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,103 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Not nearly as many as the Israelis -

    https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2024/0319/1438840-gaza-doctors-un/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Do the Palestinians have a right to self defense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    A simple case of a preacher trying to preach to the converted. My posts were misinterpreted quite willingly and used as just another chance to vent anger at everything that was wrong with the world it seems. My stance nor my posts have never been in support of israels actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    No.

    Only Israel has that right. And by that right, it's meant that they can continuously steal other people's land on the west bank and elsewhere and corral the people of Gaza into an open air concentration camp where they can get to control every aspect of their lives.

    But that's all ok, cos those people are just Palestinians and are a lesser people. So for the Israeli cheerleaders, there's no foul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Exactly.

    It's a bit rich to be talking about war crimes when Israel are topping the league in that respect.

    Talk about wilful ignorance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    the restaurant was definitely trolled and on this occasion they didn’t take the bait - in Ireland Sunday World is the sort of newspaper that doorsteps criminals - probably say something to them to illicit a response so they get a headline, story and quote all in one - but it’s usually criminals of some description they do this to - I can’t see even them trying to manufacture a story like this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭taratee


    I’ll save @markodaly some time, if he (I’m guessing) doesn’t mind. I dealt with this a few days ago. Israel has successfully facilitated the entry of over 1.3 million tons of aid to Gaza within the last 15 months. The number of calories delivered between January and April 2024, for example, constituted a mean of 3,268 calories per person per day. This is over 50% more than the 2,100 calories per person per day required by the Sphere guidelines for humanitarian food to conflict-affected populations.

    Am Yisrael Chai - Bring them home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    No it isn't because I mentioned nothing about legalities.

    But seeing as you mention that, legally, there are two cases ongoing - both involve Israel breaking international and humanitarian law. That's it. No- one else.

    1200 people were murdered on 7th October. Most by Hamas, some by Israel, including their own citizens.

    Since then, known and reported deaths in Gaza have exceeded 48,000. Estimates of the final tally of the dead are over 200,000.

    Of course, most of those are Palestinian civilians. And they were killed in breach of the law by Israel.

    Everyone is entitled, in law, to defend themselves - within the bounds of law. That is what Israel is alleged to have breached.



Advertisement