Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland vs England - 6N 2025 match thread

1212224262731

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,493 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Yeah watching it back at a more relaxed pace, what struck me was so many lineouts went to Baird and then Conan, far more than either second row.

    And with 100% success, you can’t argue with that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,348 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,348 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Anything to be said for giving jack carty another shot? /S



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,523 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Because it’s one of the few things I’d rate Baird ahead of Conan on. Particularly defensive lineout jumping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭almostover


    Ye he can do things no other Irish lock or BR can but then he doesn't seem to do some of the basics that many Irish locks or BRs can! Therein lies the issue. Jack Conan is quite athletic in open play too, but he can also ruck, tackle, take lineout ball, offer a breakdown threat etc.

    I'd go as far to say that we don't need anything special at no.6 to make this backrow click. We've 2 top class guys there already. What we need at 6 is a bit of a bully and a workhorse. A guy who will hit everything that moves and hit it hard. And maybe take 3-4 lineouts per game. Nothing fancy, a bit of a brute is what's required.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭almostover


    My main worry with Baird's poorish performance is that the coaches may be tempted to try Beirne at 6 again, especially if Joe McC is fit. That would be a serious retrograde step. I'd rather see POM at 6 than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭almostover


    Looking at ESPNs match stas there, Ian Hendersons contribution is worrying. 2 turnovers conceded, 5 tackles completed, 0 passes, 0 carries and 0 meters gained. 18 mins on the pitch and doesn't touch the ball in attack, only Irish player not to do so. Granted he won't be involved if Joe McC is back fit but surely his place in the squad could have been given to someone else? Tom Aherne? Niall Murray?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭flatface


    how can so much match discussion not be about how bloody gorgeous Dan Sheehans try was? I miss Venjur and his Splosh posts celebrating rugby excellence 😢



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    There are 3 certainties in life. Death, taxes and Dan Sheehan scoring a try.

    The pop pass to put Conan through the gap. The huge skip pass to Lowe and then to finish barrelling through 2 defenders. It was majestic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭Joma4good


    Agree with all of this but think Cian Prendergast offers as much as POM these days and l say that as someone who loves POM. His lineout work for Connacht has been outstanding over the last miserable months.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,528 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He's already the joint top forward try scored in 6N championship history with that one.

    He'll be bloody well threatening BOD's record at this rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,860 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Don't think Baird was particularly poor, he just didn't do anything of note bar that run down the sideline. If the goal is him surpassing POM, he had a pretty standard POM type performance in fairness to him.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭fitz




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,031 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Hmmmm, POM has had performances at this level that Baird can only dream of currently. Long, long way to go to reach POM's level, fabulous athlete and all that he is (and I do admire him) but there's a lot more to this game than being able run faster than the other fatties you pack down with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,180 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Why not indeed.
    I’m not 100% Izzy can bring the nitty gritty level required of a 6 at this level, but he’s worth a go now.

    Ahern the same albeit he’s not even in the squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭tbm


    I saw no evidence that Baird had a poor game, and the stats really do back that up. His opposite number had a barnstormer, but Curry was asked to do a different job to Baird. It seems to me he did a fine job in a match winning effort. I’d have him start again on Sunday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Ok. You want to build depth in Ireland by backing youth. I think Gleeson should have been bought into the 6 nations to start ahead of Doris.

    Doris is getting older, hasn't been playing very well and Gleeson was absolutely outstanding in the U20s and is universally regarded as a massive prospect for the future.

    Maybe we can keep Doris as an impact sub.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Why was Baird playing AIL rugby until a few weeks ago?

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭niallm77


    No, Because we have depth in backrow.

    We don't have massive depth at 10 and it's been an issue for a long time now.

    We also have an issue at LHP given Healy is 37 so we need to start bringing others into the equation there too. otherwise we become overly dependent on Porter in the same way we were overly dependent on Sexton at 10.

    But you knew that and your just upset that Prendergast started ahead of Crowley.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    Because Doris is one of the top 3 number 8s in the world. And Gleeson doesn’t get his game for Ireland? Jack and Sam are of a similar level and both are starting 10s. There are also a raft of options ahead of Gleason.

    Oh wow. Another cracking argument. Could it possibly be to give him minutes and improve fitness since he has just returned from a number of concussions? Baird is consistently in Leinster’s 23 when fit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭darkened_scrum


    Because he'd had two consecutive concussions, first against Munster and then second immediately on his return against Argentina, and it was part of his management and return to play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,180 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    The defence coaches will be reviewing today the two big line breaks by Eng in the 1st half.

    Marcus Smith and Ben Earl - 2’ and 38’ min. Baird was out of position in the defensive line for both.

    The Irish defence coach (Simon Easterby!) will be seething.
    Easterby himself been renowned as a workhorse machine ‘Blindside Flanker’.

    Don’t get me wrong Baird or POM* or even U could start at 6 v Scotland and Ireland will still win.
    *(Luv POM & so does Easterby)

    My thesis was:

    This is going to come across as very harsh, but after that performance I don’t think he’s good enough (yet) to play 6 v Eng, Fra, NZ, SA or Aus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Jack and Sam of a similar level? Crowley was the starting 10 for a 6 nations winning campaign. Only in the fantasies of certain rugby pundits are Sam and Jack on a similar level. Sam is at least a year behind developmentally.

    Jack is now where Doris was 3 years ago, showing great potential and breaking through internationally.

    Doris has plateaued and Gleeson has just as much potential in his position as Prendergast has, so using your logic, it would be perfectly reasonable to bring him inyo the international set up and have him start ahead of Doris in the 6 nations.

    Or maybe hes not actually ready yet, and neither is Prendergast

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,600 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Think this debate has gotten into silly territory now.

    Prendergast was selected. Did ok and maybe enough to warrant selection for another week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,860 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Doris has plateaued. That is out and out nonsense. Your making a fool of yourself now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,959 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    Makes no sense. Even if he has plateaued, it's to the level of the lions starting 8 and captain.. 😂



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dan Sheehan, what a man!! How exciting he looked when he came on, we are absolutely blessed. How on Earth does he manage to perform like that after being out for months.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    If Doris has plateaued it is a very **** high plateau. There are many players ahead of Gleason to get into the Irish squad let alone start. There is nobody between Jack and Sam. I don’t disagree that Sam is probably a year behind developmentally.
    I probably would have started Jack. But I think Sam has proved this year that he is ready for this level with both his performances for Ireland and for Leinster.
    They both have areas of the game where they are stronger. Jack is obviously better in defense and in contact. Sam has a better passing range and distribution and kicking from hand. Yesterday’s poor performance off the tee aside he has a far better kick percentage.

    Gleeson is pure whataboutery. There is not a single aspect of his game that he has demonstrated that is better than Doris. He has a huge future ahead of him but there are about 10 back rows more deserving of a place on the Irish squad. 0 issue with him being called up as a training panellist to gain experience in the squad.

    We have 2 very good 10s. You are more than entitled to believe that Jack is better than Sam and should be starting. But the attacking of Sam is over the top one eyed inter provincial crap.



Advertisement