Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Civil servants told to spend more time in the office - Irish Times - Mod warning #526

1679111222

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    If you can work from home - even a couple of days a week - you don't need to move to a city or town.

    If you have to work where you sleep and eat and have no chat, no craic, no mentoring, etc. - then maybe WFH isn't for you? Good job it isn't mandatory, so! And the vast majority don't WFH full time, they do blended working, a mix of WFH and WFO.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    So it's something that happens in the public and private sector, whether people are in the office or not.

    So - why bring it up in this thread at all, then?! 🙄

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Is this actually a serious question? Or do you know literally nothing about the Civil Service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    There is very little WFH in the private sector now. Firms that have an inefficient workforce tend to go out of business. Can you imagine someone working for Ryanair or Tesco or Supermacs or Intel or Lidl WFH and spending have the time surfing the net or chatting or collecting kids or watching tv or doing housework? Most people I know who were WFH due to covid are now back in the office for numerous reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭littlefeet


    I might have phased the question incorrectly.

    I do know a bit about the publice service and know a few on blended working.

    What I was suggesting is there should be a min 2 hour at a time clock in period maybe there is?

    I'm not against WFH it's part of modern life both my daughter and her Husband WFH the majority of the time she goes in 2 days s week and he goes in 1 day, one workes in the public service and one in finance both senior roles.

    Post edited by littlefeet on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Ezeoul




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Seriously? Did you pick the wrong businesses?

    Start looking at professional private sector firms - office workers basically. ICT companies, professional advisor companies, architects, engineers, accountants and more. WFH is deeply embedded across the private sector, providing benefits to employers (free office space) and employees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    I did not say every private sector person is not WFH. The point is, the vast majority of private sector people, the vast majority of the 2.4 million people or whatever, do not WFH now. Covid is over, businesses have to be efficient to survive. WFH does not suit many people (for different reasons) and many businesses. There is a reason most office workers have been returned to the office. The extra productivity and collaboration and mentoring and face to face interactions are worth the extra overheads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Yes, everyone should be back 5 days a week by now. We all know deep in our hearts it is needed. Some people work well at home but there are too many slackers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Yours is one opinion.

    Who is this "we" you refer to? And this "vast majority"?

    Very bold statements to make without anything other than bluster to back it up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You really need to google some basic research before commenting.

    ".. one in three of the workforce are now working at least some of the week from home, or another remote location, compared to less than one in five before the pandemic…

    …The figures for those who “usually work at home” are even more dramatic, increasing from 7 per cent pre-pandemic to around 20 per cent now…"

    During the period when WFH boomed in Amazon their profits and revenue exploded. But before WFH, companies with no WFH still went out of business. That implies its working in the office that makes them go out of business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 JobTalkBoards


    this is a ridiculous take.

    no 'we' don't all know this. I have a very low opinion of anyone who thinks like this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭littlefeet


    Most professional service type jobs in the private sector are blended working now that's not going change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    According to a recent survey by the Western Development Commission, 

    38% of employees in Ireland are working fully remotely

    while 

    59% are working in a hybrid model

     (partially remote and partially onsite). Only 

    3% are working fully onsite

    Where are you getting your vast majority from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    See? You prove my point completely. Those statistics by the Western Development Commission, with more than likely most of their 30 staff "working" from home, cannot even get a basic statistic right. Their claim of only 3% of "employees in Ireland" working fully onsite, and 87% of "employees in Ireland" work at least partially from home, is so far off the mark it is laughable. Think of all the jobs in the country where is is not realistic to work from home: shop employees, most restaurant, bar and hotel employees, cleaners, people on factory floors, truck and bus drivers, warehouse people, plasterers, bricklayers, painters, air hostesses, car park attendants, gardai, army, most medical employees etc.

    Do you think Ryanair, or Intel, or Lidl, or Dunnes or Supermacs or McDonalds would be as successful as they are if half the staff there worked from home with one eye on the tv and the other eye on social media?

    The Western Developments Commissions figures show remote working does not work when it produces totally false figures. Time they came back to the office and do some work and came up with more realistic figures. Either that or they should disband.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The figures they quoted were not for their own staff.

    What were your figures based on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Stop trying to dodge the bullet. It was you who said in your previous post

    "According to a recent survey by the Western Development Commission, 

    38% of employees in Ireland are working fully remotely

    while 

    59% are working in a hybrid model

     (partially remote and partially onsite). Only 

    3% are working fully onsite"

    End of your quote. You prove my point completely. Working from home does not work when they, working from home, are so far off the mark.

    "3% of employees in Ireland work fully onsite" Oh my God. Time they got off their soft seats and worked like the 3% of all employees in Ireland who may be shop employees, most restaurant, bar and hotel employees, cleaners, people on factory floors, truck and bus drivers, warehouse people, plasterers, bricklayers, painters, air hostesses, car park attendants, gardai, army, most medical employees, Ryanair or Intel employees etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭littlefeet


    WFH is only suitable for administration and professional services type jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    You can't tell someone their bag is too big, or stack a shelf or put chicken in a deep fat fryer or fabricate a processor if you're not physically present. We're talking about people in the public service who have blended working in this thread, though?

    And most people I know who were WFH are still WFH, whether that's public sector or private sector.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,380 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Creative jobs. Customer service Jobs. Any job really, apart from the obvious manufacturing or direct customer facing roles.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    If you're going to participate here, can you at least use some logic. "What about Intel, KFC, Supermacs, Tesco staff?!" is a facile argument. (And I have no doubt admin staff in some of those companies do have remote work - and yes, a quick google confirms both Tesco and Intel definitely do offer blended working for admin/managerial staff.)

    Yes, the vast majority of people with remote and blended working work in admin, finance, HR, ICT, sales and marketing, etc. - obviously not customer-facing roles where in-person contact is necessary, or in jobs that require a full-time physical presence. I mean, I would have thought that was so obvious it didn't need to be stated?

    https://westerndevelopment.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/National-Remote-Working-Survey-Infographics-2023.pdf is interesting. Comparing April '22 to October '23, there was only a 2% drop in the percentage working fully remotely (to 38%), a 7% increase in the percentage with access to blended working (to 59%), and a 5% drop in the percentage working fully in the office (down to 3%). Actual stats, as opposed to your gut feeling or "everyone knows."

    With other research from the same body showing people moving out of Dublin to more rural areas, that's just another benefit of blended working. Great to see.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You really need to research before you post.

    "...The aim was to invite as many of the target group (remote or hybrid workers and
    those with potential to remote or hybrid work)…"

    It's a "targeted" survey of 6000 responses.

    Can't prove disprove something unless you understand it.

    I would never take a survey at face value without researching the source and how the data was collated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So you're not going to produce any source to support your own claims then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    You said 3% of Irish employees are working onsite, with 38% of Irish employees fully remote and 59% hybrid. You were and are proved very very wrong. To make things even more embarassing for you, it was people working from home who came up with that statistic, you claimed!

    Internationally, it has been reported the major technology players such as Meta, Apple, and Amazon, as well as financial institutions such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, have mandated employees to return to the office. It is clear which direction the tide is flowing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So you're not going to produce any source to support your own claims then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    Even the 2022 census blows your own claims out of the water. This found there were 747,961 people working from home for at least 1 day a week, representing 32% of workers. The other 68% of workers, even in 2022 when covid was around more than today, did not work from home at all.

    If someone is taking the piss when working at home - not difficult to do if you have kids running around, babies, tv distractions, social media, washing to be hung out, neighbours and delivery people chatting, sick relatives to care for, ….have you ever heard of anyone being fired? I know of some brought back to the office. WFH is fine for some, but there are others WFH who may be alcoholics, have gambling addiction etc - what then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    How much of this thread is off topic garbage.

    It will be interesting to see how much influence the unions still have across the CS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So where's the 'vast majority' you claimed originally?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭itsacoolday


    It was you who said 3% of employees in Ireland were working onsite, with 87% working from home at least part of the time. However, it is clear the majority of people, even during covid, did not work from home. Even less now.

    Now answer the question, if someone is taking the piss when working at home, for whatever reason, in your experience what happens?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,762 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So where's the 'vast majority' you claimed originally?



Advertisement