Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland vs England - 6N 2025 match thread

1171820222331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭TheRona


    That pass is a standard pass that any rugby player, let alone top flyhalf, should be able to make. It's one thing I don't understand about rugby. Most of these players have been playing for at least 20 years of their lives, they should all be able to throw a simple flat 10-15m pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,993 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Thrilled to see Conan rolling back the years. Sheehan was phenomenally good too, within 60 seconds he rocked England. The Sam/Jack issue is a problem only for selectors to use both of them optimally, they got it right today. Bot these players are top drawer and SP compared to any other player would be doing well to have one or two early season URC starts for lenster, but once the team settled today he looked right at home. I was very disappointed with how poorly we started today, but a lot of that goes down as credit to England whose line speed and hustle was insane for the first 20-30 minutes. For a few years we got used to Ireland flying out of the blocks and scoring one or two tries very early in games. We are playing differently now and doing a lot more damage later on. For me that's an evolution, this team is very dangerous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I think a lot of us are seeing the game from the Irish side only.


    At times in that game England were demolishing us. Their BR selection got a lot of change out of the breakdown, their BR was immense for 45-50 minutes.

    I don’t think the game turned on the Irish subs as much but as on the English BR completely running out of steam. When Curry scored his Try he could barely walk not to mind run.

    It’s also the reason Conan looked so good, and Crowley wasn’t under the same pressure Sam was, England for years have prioritized size over stamina and continually get the balance wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Conan and Sheehan made a huge impact. That spell from 50-60 completely changed the game. The momentum swung and England couldn't stay the pace.

    Yes they got tired but they also spent a lot of time defending in the first half And a combination of good defence and poor decisions by our forwards kept them ahead at ht.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,869 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Stuart Barnes with a balanced view of prendergast today, in contrast to the hyperbolic nonsense being spouted here.

    "In the sharpest contrast Ireland will be delighted to have backed a genuine youngster in 21-year-old Leinster fly half, Sam Prendergast. A mere three as opposed to 39 caps; he’s precocious but in the balance of probability Ireland only really required him not to combust. To stay cool, to kick his goals and move Ireland around the pitch. A fledgeling Johnny Sexton. Smith — you sensed — had to make it happen. Prendergast had to make sure it didn’t go wrong for Ireland. Challenges for both men but of a different sort.

    The England fly half stood alone with his thoughts, ball in hand, as the crowd sang Fields of Athenry. His kick-off was regained; with his first touch he made a scything break, his cross kick was close to perfect. Close wasn’t good enough as the ball went out on the full. Fine margins and all that.

    Fine margins as Ben Curry almost charged Prendergast’s cross kick down. He did enough to put the the youngster off, had time to utter a “next time”. The next important moment was an awful kick from defence by Prendergast. Smith was positioned to catch it, England roared upfield and Cadan Murley scored in the corner. Smith converted. Advantage the 25-year-old.

    Five minutes later, Prendergast had a shot at a tryscoring miss pass. It came to nothing. One of the Curry brothers shoved him in the back. Don’t ask which one. A pass with his back to England only found the turf. He was 16 minutes in and struggling to strike the ball cleanly.

    Ten minutes later and we witnessed the best of the Irishman with an arcing run and devastating pass. Irony of ironies, it was Smith sin binned for (necessarily) slowing the breakdown. The Harlequins player looked on as Prendergast threw a sweet pass off his left hand. Suddenly he was everywhere, a one-man attack, like Sexton with a young man’s legs. Freddie Steward, alas, again showed an old man’s athleticism in a young man’s game to miss a try saving tackle on Jamison Gibson-Park. Prendergast, his own man, missed the easy conversion. Was he too relaxed?

    Smith continued to impress — understated — as he passed Ben Earl brilliantly through the heart of Ireland. From the ensuing penalty he kicked three points. He had been impressive throughout, Prendergast impressed in the manner of a youngster rebounding from a sticky opening quarter. At half-time the present was just about shading the future.

    But it was the Irishman, with a perfect try-creating pass (unconverted) which levelled the game in the second half. This was a pass you would expect an international ten to make but at 21 and under pressure … some pass. Minutes later he put Ireland ahead for the first time with the calmest of penalties. He had missed a few kicks but mishaps don’t affect him. We were witnessing a display, not so much of quality, as character. In the 58 minutes on the field before Jack Crowley replaced him, we were witness to a class act who will be around some time."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,014 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    In fairness Awec I think your post comes across as overly negative and personal. Although you’re a mod, I wouldn’t see you as being a particularly balanced poster on here. You tend towards hyperbole frequently.

    You accused a poster of posting ‘scutter’ and followed it up with accusing them of ‘talking absolute ‘rot’ recently as you didn’t agree with their point which I pointed out at the time was against the charter and I reported although it was conveniently ignored.

    I don’t think anyone was saying Prendergast shot the lights out, but to say he was really bad actually isn’t true either unless you’re looking for reasons to put him down.

    His fist missed conversation was really poor. You blame one of the English tries on him for a loose kick, but don’t seem to have the same issue with the other 10s on the pitch getting exposed such as Crowley been beaten on the outside by Theo Dan and missing the tackle that led to England’s LBP try or Marcus Smith getting run over by Aki to score our second. Were they really bad as a result too or do you just want to focus on Prendergast’s negatives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,014 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Sheehan had 3 involvements in his try getting the initial carry and pass at the line off to Conan in our 22, then the long pass out to the wing at the 40m line before getting it back in the English 22 and powering over. Superb all round skills. Absolute delighted for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,525 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think that appraisal shows a few made their minds up too early about Prendergast, some after half an hour, and some, I suspect, long before the game began.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,493 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Watching the Conan try again, there’s an argument for playing Sheehan at 10 next week, the range of skills and his awareness of the game are amazing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    They made an impact but the space was there and the work was done to make that impact. It was a much different game to come on as a sub than it was to start. All of the subs looked good when they came on.

    Chandler south was a complete different prospect to Earl / Curry. He looks to make headline hits and carry but is nowhere near the groundhog the others are.

    The point really is that France and probably Scotland wont fade as much as England did at 50/55 minutes, and our bench will not find it as easy to make such an impact.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Borthwick's "analysis" is basically cap counting. How is this spoofer still in the job?

    Defeat by Ireland means England have won only two of their past nine games – with both victories coming against Japan.

    Steve Borthwick, the head coach, blamed inexperience, saying the performance of an Ireland bench containing more than 500 caps was “certainly a factor” in their victory.

    Dan Sheehan, Jack Conan and Jack Crowley provided decisive contributions. England’s replacements, meanwhile, boasted a collective total of just 81 caps with Borthwick choosing to omit some of his more experienced heads in George Ford and Elliot Daly from his match-day squad.

    “If you look at today’s game, you see two different teams,” Borthwick said. “If you look at the game, you see an Ireland team that has been together for such a huge amount of time with 1,200 caps and an England team that has been together for six months and has half that number of caps.

    “The guys went out and if you had been watching that start of the game, you wouldn’t see that difference. It is a team that wants to play aggressively with the ball and I think we took a step forward in that attack and the defence has improved. To be clear, we want to win every game but we didn’t today and we are disappointed with that and I think there are elements we take and build and show the progress we made in the training camp the last 10 days.

    “And they've got quality in their team. I was looking at the teams beforehand and I think on that bench they had almost as many caps as we have in our whole 23. And I was looking at that going, this is, this is gonna be a great test for us. And ultimately we came up short and I'm really disappointed we came up short because I thought we could come here and win this game.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭Homer


    Bor-exit looming with a predictable spanking by Les Blues at home next week!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Scotland will be very different game to England. If we are a lot less wasteful in their 22 then I see Ireland winning reasonably comfortable.

    We spent a lot of time in England's 22 with attacking lineouts yesterday and didn't capitalise. We fix that and we will do a number on Scotland.

    Two years ago we had no hooker for an hour and replaced 5 (?) players through injury in the first half and still gave them a bit of a beating.

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Its not that anyone has made up their minds against Sam, its that he's not ready yet and hasn't earned his place.

    Crowley earned his spot and did nothing to deserve getting dropped, so people are understandably hard on Prendergast because to justify dropping Crowley for Sam, we cant then give Prendergast an armchair ride and pretend he's ready when he's clearly undercooked.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭niallm77


    The only person truly able to make that judgement is the coach. The coach has access to so much more information and has made a far more informed decision then any of us can make. CLEARLY they think Prendergast is ready.

    How can you say Prendergast is undercooked? On what basis can you Come to that conclusion?

    Conor Murray went to the RWC 2011 yet he hadn't played in the HC at that stage. Did he earn his place after a handful of Celtic league games.

    Had Furlong played in the HC for Leinster before he went to the 2015 RWC?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭mun1


    i watched the match again this morning .

    Our pack were blown away in the 1st 30 mins and England should have put more points on the board. Their back row outmuscled our back row and Marcus smith tactical awareness was excellent. So would have to give credit to England for that time period. England also successfully targeted Sam and made inroads there as our back row tried to cover the Space that you expect your 10 to cover. SP was very poor in this period of the game, but our gameplan couldnt adjust .

    England started to tire and we came into the game more, and SP stated to get some decent ball and space, but at least 3 kicks from hand were too long for the chasers. This changed before half time and he stated to find his range .

    He was still lying too deep in attack and couldnt attack the England defence or provide a viable attacking threat in his own right, so depended on his excellent pass choice. it nearly ended disastrously on one occasion but came good for the two tries.

    Crowley came on and the whole tone of our back line attack changed. His attacking threat and his choice of play was aggressive and hard to defend . The English were tireing at this stage and the entire Ireland bench proved their worth.

    Player ratings are clickbait, what is important is the team and how players fit into that team.

    IMO Crowely should have started yesterday with SP coming on to close out the game. Whatever Farrell and Easter by are seeing from SP in training isn’t yet translating into Match day. The phrase train like Tarzan, play like Jane comes to mind. He’s definitely one for the future, as his passing choice is excellent , but not the now against tough physical opposition like England or France

    PS, if Lowe wasn’t on the field , i dont think we would have won the game as his attacking threat demanded at least 2 defenders stretched out wide every time the ball was sent to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,525 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think you need to stop feeling insulted and using pejorative terms like 'dropped', he is being 'developed' as is Crowley. I think the two of them are mature enough to cope with not starting so too should the support.
    Personally, I think it's what we should be doing if building to a WC.

    And it is certainly the mature and professional attitude we should have to having two fledgling talents vying for the position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭OldRio


    IMHO I'd rather have Crowley close the game than Prendergast. I might be wrong but....

    Anyway the coaching ticket got it right. We beat one of the top 5 sides in the world. Obviously things to learn on for next week. Ireland are in a good place. Happy days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,543 ✭✭✭DBK1


    Absolutely on the money with that assessment. It’s a pity he didn’t write a similar assessment of Crowleys performance just to get an experienced neutrals take on it as well.

    Prendergast was nowhere near as bad as some make out on here and equally Crowley was nowhere near as good or as influential as being made out. I’d have put both of them down as being equal.

    Imagine if the roles were reversed and Sam was on for the last 20 minutes and got isolated a few metres out under the posts when we were ferociously attacking their line after he decided to go alone instead of pass and gave away a stupid turnover? Or if he missed a tackle in the last few mins which allowed them in for a try that gave them a losing bonus point (I know Henshaw was equally to blame here but no one would see that if it was Sam on the pitch)? There’d be uproar over his defence ability and his decision making and we’d be told he should never play for Ireland again as Crowley would be so much better in them positions. Yet after Crowley making both them mistakes, which could have been a 14 point turnaround and been the winning or losing of a tight game, we’re being told he was the saviour and turned the game around for us.

    Equally if Crowley had started and missed the 2 conversions he’d be being hammered and we’d be told Sam should have started and he’d never have missed them kicks. Or if Crowley had made that run and pass, a play that ended in Smith being sin binned, we’d be told this is why he should always start yet when Sam does these things they are glossed over because he made a few kicks too deep before that.

    We should be glad to have the 2 of them there, at the minute Sam is the front runner and nothing that happened yesterday will have changed that, but that role could easily change one way or the other multiple times over the next few years and that’s exactly what we should be hoping for as it’ll mean both are getting better all the time and that puts us in a better position at 10 than we’ve ever been in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭blackcard


    Crowley played better than Sam yesterday. He did miss a tackle to concede a try and got turned over for a penalty in the 20 minites he played. If he made 3 times those mistakes in 60 minutes, the shine would be gone off his performance

    However, Jack is a better tackler.Over the course of the season, Sam is statistically a better penalty taker but was off yesterday. Sam kicked too far yesterday. But if you wrte to reward performance, Jack would start the next day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued,

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,487 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You need to compare like with like. Murray came into a squad with an aging Stringer and Reddan, there was nobody standing in his way.

    Jack Crowley was brilliant for Ireland last year in the Six Nations.

    Furlong was brought to the World cup due to Marty Moore being injured and Janes Cronin struggling for form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,198 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    English fans are sore losers as usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭flatface


    Great result and what an impact bench. I think Crowley off the bench to close out the game is a good tactic and may get the best out of both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I don’t really understand the criticism of Borthwick. He’s not the sharpest tool in the box but he’s improved them some bit all things considered.


    He has taken on a **** show after eddie jones, he has had to reside over the introduction of new players in key positions like Props, 2nd row, 9 & 10.

    A team that lost the Vinopolous, launchbury, dan Cole, Danny care, Owen Farrell, Young, Tuilagi, lawes, underhill and Marler and others.

    His team has been decimated of talent, he’s bringing in new players and still staying some bit competitive.

    They are a team that’s building, we are a team that’s peaked if you look at out autumn performances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Keep at it bud, you're not convincing anyone who wasn't previously convinced. And making yourself look bad to boot. But I could just select any post from you to see that :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,487 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I agree that Sam is very light and it worries me for him.

    The rest of your post is absolute crap. SP is the future at 10 and a very exciting prospect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,842 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Both 10s had good games, both had errors they'd prefer they didn't, it should be ok for a poster to call those errors out, unfortunately any criticism of Sam (in particular) is pounced on with a certain viciousness.

    If Borthwick had name checked Sam as the reason England couldn't get a foothold in the game I'd put my house on it that he wouldn't be referred to as a spoofer

    Yes, the coaches picked Sam to start and I think they need to pick him again for next week unless they had already told him that he was benching v Scotland.

    We're not going to develop an international outhalf by chopping and changing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    How so? Ive found them to be decent fans over 20 years of interacting with them in Dublin, Twickenham and European matches involving both leinster and munster.

    Are you just talking about online posts? Look at the nonsense here sure.



Advertisement