Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1177178180182183217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    One of the major considerations for the RN in supporting the AUKUS sub programme IMO. Retaining those skills and keeping a continuous pipeline of trained and experienced staff.

    The need for new Typhoon orders to keep UK manufacturing and assembly skills fresh is vital. It's part & parcel of the push to sell Typhoon to Turkey. The German's were the roadblock but have since withdrawn their objection to the sale and said that the UK would be the lead nation for the bid.

    Now I don't think the Brits will be able to sway a bid the same way they've previously down in Saudi 😉 but, Turkey desperately needs a high performance fighter to offset the Greeks Rafale and their recently announced F35A deals. Eurofighter will allow a bit of breathing space whilst they await the service entry of KAAN.

    What is also interesting regarding the funding of a Turkish Eurofighter buy and ties in with BAe & Saudi in a very interesting way IMO? The Saudi's are mulling a 100 jet KAAN buy and that would go a long towards bridging any Turkish funding gaps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Technically it seems a bit of a stretch for turkey to jump straight to a 5th / 6th generation fighter, but I suppose the technology is getting more out there / known ..

    The big thing for f35 ,apart from its stealth and different purposes seems to be the software and sensors .. does AI make that more attainable ?

    Saudi looking to buy into the project helps bind the 2 states ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    South Africa still have 12 Grippens in storage. I wonder how much it would be to buy them and get saab to fully refurb them?

    https://www.defenceweb.co.za/aerospace/aerospace-aerospace/most-saaf-fixed-wing-maintenance-contracts-underfunded



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,748 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Isn't that the cautionary tale for budgets...

    https://www.military.africa/2023/10/south-africa-secures-gripen-engine-maintenance-contract-with-gkn-aerospace/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I'm going to go with "fecking expensive" tbh. I mean when was the last time they flew?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,748 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They also have a problem keeping people trained on them. So it's manpower issues as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    In the next couple of years when the Czechia air force start handing back there gripens to sweden we should have at that stage our radar up and going so there could be an oppertunity to buy/lease the gripens off sweden so when the radar sees something the state can go and see what the fancy radar has seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    given they plan to fly them till 2031ish (assuming the 35s aren’t delayed), we might just have IOC of a radar system, unlikely to be a complete system given timeframes at this point imo. But I very much doubt we will be in position to take them on in the early 2030s. I’m still betting that we will have the minister of the day sign off an everything LoA2 says they should by 2028 but then as ever will fall back on the “nothing else can be done until all those acquisitions are operational and we have another review”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Sweden has manufactured 300 odd gripen airframes,

    The Swedish air force operate around 100 , there's around another 100 in service,( and otherwise ) around the world

    So where are the other hundred ?

    I don't know were they ever completed , so there could a warehouse somewhere in Sweden with just the shells , no engines, avionics,ect ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭thomil


    As far as I know, the Swedish Air Force has a number of airframes in long-term storage that can be brought online relatively quickly in case of a war breaking out. Exact numbers are hard to come by, but from what I’ve read, we’re talking about at least a squadron’s worth of aircraft, possibly more. I’m not sure how many more are in storage with the manufacturer at Linköping airport. Given the current political situation, I doubt that Sweden would be willing to part with too many of those aircraft though.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭RavenP


    An apache costs 5000 euro per hour to operate, not 50,000! The figure is way off. Similarly aircraft are expensive but the cost is spread over twenty or thirty years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭100gSoma


    In my completely uninformed non-military civvies armchair opinion (disclaimer :) ) the PC-9s will not be replaced with jets of any kind. It's reasonable to think the PC-9s (20 years service in 2025) will be replaced in the next 3-5 years - but I think a more realistic prospect is a move to the PC-21. It's a big step up performance wise and has climb and roll rates similar to entry level jet trainers. It's also the same manufacturer and same type (turbo prop I mean) and a direct successor to the PC-9 so presumably the training will be easier than moving to a jet. The PC-21 also has avionics and instrument systems that can closely emulate a jet in a way the PC-9 could not.
    I can see this government opting for 8-10 PC-21s with a view to complete 7-10 years training and pilot upskilling and modernization of the aer corp before even considering the commission for the defence forces Level of ambition 3 recommendation for a jet intercept capability.
    Anyone think this sounds reasonable or am I completely out of touch with what is actually going on.
    (full disclosure - I am an aviation fan and would obviously love if we got fast jets capable of intercept - I also think there is a strong case to be made given our location on the periphery of Western Europe and history of incursions in our flight control space - but I think what I said above feels more realistic and possibly best case with regards modernization).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,748 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Gets popcorn.

    Aren't the Pilatus PC-9s due to reach their 20-year service life in 2025 or was that extended?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    When have we ever replaced hardware on time? It's too late for a 2025 replacement, even a G2G would be years from now, not too mention the procurement side is supposedly concentrating on the other list for LoA2. I'd expect them to continue on till at least after 2028 most likely into the 2030's when a call comes on LoA3 (or not given our lack of energy for LoA2), the interesting thing will be when we hold the EU presidency, and whether we will need help for any air policing that might be needed during meetings of the EU27.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,748 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I meant from a technical pov. They must have major key service intervals. Airframes have a fixed service life unless some intervention happens, in terms of inspections and refresh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    True, though that would also be affected by how many flight hours we have put up on them (and one being a later purchase), but still the point remains, we don't have capacity to manage all of what we need just to hit the LoA2 target by 2028, I can't see this is a priority for replacement currently, even if it means a recertification process this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,748 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I mean given theere we no mention of the AC 135s being replaced early in that answer and we now are replacing them, you could argue that at any point in 2025 another announcement might come on the PC9s, but I would still bet they will slip into the 2030s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭mupper2


    Not getting into the fighter or not debate but apparently the PC-9 (and medium helo) replacement boards are going to sit soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    be interesting to see what the medium help decision is, and how quickly they get into service.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The helo candidates have been well rehearsed.

    But for the TP Trainers,right now my money would be on 10 new build PC-9s, to replace the outgoing ones.

    Why? Well, turboprop advanced trainers are much the same. They could opt for the PC-21, which is a little faster, but it also doesn't have the range, endurance or weapons carrying capacity of the PC-9.

    Depressing? Yes. Realistic? Unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,408 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Personally speaking…I think the Embraer Tucano would be a good contender for the PC 9 replacement...until such time as the fast jets come screaming down the runway in Baldonnel. We need something that would come in "a bit handy in a fight" and the Tucano seems to be picking up a few orders recently and looks like a right tasty and aggresive bit of kit! I see Jonny Portugeser has just bought 8 and an un named African nation has just bought 4. Fine looking plane which can be armed to the effin teeth. Just the ticket if Jonny Russian comes prowlin around offshore Co.Galway ! Leash off a couple of rockets and they'd be high tailin back to Vladvistock!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You must be on a backhand retainer from corrupt Brazilian makers, are you Jonathan Handbag?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Since the p 9 is largely a trainer and the super tucano isn't , it's kind of moot point .

    ( And I know the air corps ones are pc- 9 m

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Tangentially related to the Egyptian effort to acquire Meteor. Reports today that Turkey have done a deal to include the Meteor missile as part of a deal for Eurofighter.
    Israel will not be happy with this.
    Erdogan and whomever succeeds him are placing themselves as Israel's most potent opponent in the eastern Med and given the Israeli efforts to prevent proliferation of any BVRAAM more potent than their own, both in terms of AMRAAM and Derby, I expect a lot of diplomatic efforts to cripple this sale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah well Israel has burned up a lot of diplomatic capital. When is comes to other regional hegemonics like Turkey, its understandable why they would be concerned, but really they have no right to interfere and no say in who acquires what.

    If anyone does get shirty, it'll be Greece.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,020 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Tend to agree with about the Greeks. There is potential for huge friction when the Eastern med oil and gas fields start being exploited. The Palestinians are being cut out of that with the Turks, Israelis and Egyptians all seeming ready and willing to press claims and perhaps take action to ensure they get what they see as their "fair" share.

    The last year of brutality has hopefully burned a lot of Israeli diplomatic capital, that said? As evidenced by my earlier link to Egypt presidential website confirming they have meteor in 2018…

    The French & the Brits will put hard currency above Israeli concerns when it comes to selling Meteor IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭satguy


    We sit nice and safe under the wing of the UK and it's RAF.

    We really don't need fighter jets,, But we really need one or two really big aircraft. Maybe second hand military transport aircraft. Or even some old 747's that have been parked up somewhere nice and dry.

    How often have we seen overseas conflicts trap Irish citizens abroad, and suddenly we need to get them home.

    It looks really bad when we have to go cap in hand, and ask other with their own military transport aircraft to give us a dig out.

    These big planes could then keep an eye on our fishing grounds when not saving Irish people from harm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,805 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We already have two brand new Airbus C295 Persuader maritime patrol planes, with the most advanced surface and sub-surface detection kit ever operated by the Air Corps.

    And a third 295 model in bare tactical transporter configuration, with a capacity of 75 passengers, or lesser numbers of stretchered patients etc, will be here by the end of the year.

    We will be pretty well covered for aircraft by then, the priority is increasing numbers of trained crew to run the aircraft to their maximum service potential.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    First two isn’t near enough for our patrol area if we were being serious, second no matter how much of a step up they are for the AC over what came before they are still handicapped and lacking subsurface capabilities.

    The AC like the others need more people, but it’s still well under equipped for even basic domestic roles let alone anything more than that.



Advertisement
Advertisement