Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2024 - Dublin STILL ranked as second worst city in the Europe for traveling by car

13»

Comments

  • #62
    timmyntc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115296#Comment_123115296

    It won't be 80B. But if somehow prices inflated to that level, then yes it should still go ahead.

    It is a critical piece of infrastructure without which the city will grind to a halt (it already is to an extent)



  • #63
    Podge_irl
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115296#Comment_123115296

    The cost is not going to balloon that much, so it's an unreasonable hypothetical, but essentially yes. There is almost no realistic scenario where, with the sunk cost that would be involved, that it would not make sense to finish desperately needed infrastructure. "work from home" is not a solution.

    A metro is needed, likely more than one. The sooner it is built the better and cheaper it will be.



  • #64
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123107475#Comment_123107475

    There is a finate amount of cars not infinate.

    Also as already shown the number of cars entering the city has been dropping for years, the traffic is still appalling though.

    Again, if you want to save time, reduce congestion, reduce pollution: then get people where the need to go as fast as possible OR make it so that they dont need to go anywhere OR make it so that the journey is short.

    There's no joined up thinking, thats the main problem.



  • #65
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115307#Comment_123115307

    The Childrens Hospital was orginally over estimated at 800m, that over estimatation was completely wrong and turned out to be 3.5B, Over 4 times the prices of the deliberate over estimate.

    OPW just built a wall for €0.5M, €0.33M for a bike shelter, €1.4M for a security hut…. the waste and jobs for the boys is everywhere.

    I'm not saying don't build it, I am saying don't build it at any cost.

    Work from Home was a solution for 2 years, and it worked great. Why do you think it's not a solution?
    I'm contracted to come to office 3 days a week but I come 4, becuase I do kinda like the office, people will still come to the office especially if their teams are based out of the same office.



  • #66
    Seth Brundle
    Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115347#Comment_123115347

    You describe it as waste & jobs for the boys but was the original design of the NCH the same as what has been built to date? There has been massive amounts of scope creep in the plans for the NCH.

    The building of the wall you refer to came in on budget if you look at the detail. What drove the costs over budget were the Electrical and DCC charges for unforseen issues. Where was the waste with either project? Where were the jobs for the boys?

    The final cost of a metro will depend on the original design and how many changes to that are required - some of these changes will be essential due to unforseen issues (like the wall) but I'd say some would be changes made to placate nimbys (the latter being wasteful but the former would not be )



  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Podge_irl
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115347#Comment_123115347

    Where are you getting 3.5Bn from? It is about 2.4Bn.

    The Metrolink estimate is 9-13Bn. It has also spent an absurd amount of time in planning and those plans are meticulous. Scope creep is far less likely to be an issue.

    "What if we forced Dublin to become a ghost town instead" is not a serious solution to anything. There is no realistic scenario in which it should not be built.

    And when it is built, of course, people will continue to come up with new excuses to continue driving.



  • #68
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115426#Comment_123115426

    I disagree
    There was already a wall there, that there was nothing wrong with… Have you looked at the before and after pics?

    Why does there even need to be a wall that high there?

    2017 - Google maps

    image.png

    New Wall:

    image.png

    €490k for that?

    Just because something is written down on a piece of paper doesn't mean it's "ok".
    For example if I have on a piece of paper that I'm going to sell you Mars Bars and I'm charging you €20 for each bar, and you're paying for it with public money… That's not ok.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115546#Comment_123115546

    My Apologies, you are correct. it is €2.24B i heard on the news a few month ago that the costs could Spiral to €3.4.
    Even still, that's a hell of a lot more that the €800m (Nearly 3 times the prices)



  • #69
    Seth Brundle
    Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123115761#Comment_123115761

    My Apologies, you are correct. it is €2.24B i heard on the news a few month ago that the costs could Spiral to €3.4.
    Even still, that's a hell of a lot more that the €800m (Nearly 3 times the prices)

    Was what was agreed to be built for €800m the exact same as what was built for €2.24bn and, if not, why not?



  • #70
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123116078#Comment_123116078

    Becuase of poor planning, poor design choices, logistics issues, poor location choice, excessive changes and alterations to the existing poor plan.

    Thats how the costs has gone nuts.

    As for The Wall, The Hut and the Shed… that's OPW rubbish.

    Look, I get a different team is going to be building Metro and I want it to be built, but built "at any cost" is not acceptable. I'm not prepapred to burden my kid and grand kids with an unreasonable tax burden for a light rail system that they might never use. They're already goosed with pension / aging work force issue.



  • #71
    Idbatterim
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Lol! The budget is a pittance... we spend what here ? 80 or 90 billion a a year... what's a one off , ten billion, much of which recirculates in the economy, nothing...

    They didn't want to build it, when in would have cost far less, ten years ago etc...

    Your proposal for those thar could work from home. Is ditch metro link, because now there us no need for it ? Get real

    As for the office of public waste. Totally agree, they need to be disbanded



  • Advertisement
  • #72
    sasal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭sasal


    What hope is there are TDs blocking people accessing buses.

    https://irishcycle.com/2025/02/02/td-keeps-pushing-against-bus-and-cycling-access-in-estate-with-highest-car-mode-share-in-dublin/



  • #73
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123131110#Comment_123131110

    The wall they want knocked down is right across from the road from where there was serious protests last year.

    No one is Ayrfield wants the wall knocked. Cycling lobbyists want it knocked down so they can cut through, and they're arguing that it's about access to a bus stop for the people of Ayrfield. Actually sounds disgusting.



  • #74
    Tenzor07
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,263 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123133876#Comment_123133876

    So do you think that troublemakers can't get over a wall into an estate? It's not the North/South Korean border you know!

    Have you conducted a comprehensive survey that backs up your assertion that no one in the estate would like access to a well serviced bus corridor, thus reducing the high dependency on single motor vehicle usage in that estate?

    "Cycling lobbyists want it knocked down" one transport related journalist doesn't equate to an entire "cycling lobby"…whoever they are..



  • #75
    Thelonious Monk
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,272 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123133876#Comment_123133876

    you're being ridiciculous. i used to live just off the tonlegee road until last year. loads and loads of adults and schoolkids that live in ayrefield take buses from the malahide road to school and work and this would knock a good bit of time off some of their walks to the bus. it's more to benefit pedestrians rather than cyclists anyway, so you can't blame cyclists this time.



  • #76
    ?Cee?view
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123086454#Comment_123086454

    This. 100%



Advertisement